The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2023-06-14 · 2023.MM7.3

The filed record

29 De Marco Boulevard - Request for City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2023-06-14 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on June 14 and 15, 2023, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Applications for 29 De Marco Boulevard, as well as any other variances and/or relief that may be requested. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution regarding the Applications for 29 De Marco Boulevard,

Show the rest of As filed, 231 more characters as filed

and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in the City Solicitor's discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

On April 27, 2023, the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") refused three applications brought by the owner of 29 De Marco Boulevard for, collectively, a consent to sever the property into two undersized residential lots and for minor variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 for each of the two proposed dwellings, one on each proposed lot (the "Applications"). Copies of the Committee's decisions on the Applications are attached as Attachments 1A, 1B and 1C.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 939 more characters as filed

On May 17, 2023, the owner, through its agent, appealed the Committee's decisions to refuse the Applications to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. In a report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated April 19, 2023, Community Planning Staff recommended refusal of the Applications. More specifically, Community Planning Staff opined that the Applications would result in the creation of lots and dwellings that are out of character with the established neighbourhood, and that the proposed severance and variances are not in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan, nor in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By-law, and that the variances are not minor in nature. A copy of the Planning report is attached as Attachment 2. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body and oppose the appeal. A hearing date has yet to be scheduled.

Staff recommended

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Applications for 29 De Marco Boulevard, as well as any other variances and/or relief that may be requested. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution regarding the Applications

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 260 more characters as filed

for 29 De Marco Boulevard, and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in the City Solicitor's discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting