Fossil Fuel Advocacy Advertising on City Assets

In Toronto, climate change is already causing serious impacts, including increases in average heat, and in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events. In turn, these adversely affect the Toronto Transit Commission and those we serve. The Government of Canada has made international climate commitments to drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption and to reach carbon neutrality by 2050. The City of Toronto, through TransformTO, and an annual carbon budget, has committed to achieve Net Zero climate pollution by 2040. Fossil fuel companies have a well-documented history of using their immense wealth for advocacy advertising to undermine public support for policies that reduce fossil fuel pollution. Such policies are necessary and urgent to preserve a liveable future for today's young people. The Pathways Alliance , a coalition of six billionaire fossil fuel companies who produce 95 percent of tar sands bitumen, has actively advertised for this purpose in Toronto, eliciting a number of public complaints. Another fossil fuel lobby group, Canada Action , has also actively advertised across Canada. Recent changes to 74.01 of the Competition Act expressly prohibit misleading environmental benefits claims made to the public, including: - Any statement, warranty or guarantee of a product's benefits for protecting or restoring the environment or mitigating the environmental, social and ecological causes or effects of climate change that are not based on an adequate and proper testing; and - Any representations with respect to the benefits of a business or business activity for protecting or restoring the environment or mitigating the environmental and ecological causes or effects of climate change that are not based on adequate and proper substantiation in accordance with internationally recognized methodology. The onus is on the advertiser making such claims to prove, if challenged, that the claims are based on adequate and proper testing or substantiation. In July 2024, the Pathways Alliance removed the advocacy messaging from its website and social media feeds, citing uncertainty over whether they comply with these amendments to the Competition Act. A June 2024 study in Energy Research and Social Policy established strong grounds for this "uncertainty". It examined whether Pathways Alliance advertisements are based on adequate and proper substantiation. Instead, they found: "instances of selective disclosure and omission, misalignment of claim and action, displacement of responsibility, non-credible claims, specious comparisons, nonstandard accounting, and inadequate reporting… Their messaging omits important information, uses misleading framing and comparisons, and fails to meet standards expected of a credible net-zero plan". Several European court cases have also ruled that fossil fuel advertising is misleading . In May 2024, Canada's advertising regulator determined that Canada Action ads claiming liquified natural gas will lower emissions are inaccurate, misleading, and distort scientific data. In June, United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres asked all governments to ban advertising from fossil fuel companies , in light of the enormous harm they are causing, including record planetary heat levels . Support for this initiative is growing among physicians and other health professionals in Canada and around the world . Several governments are taking such action. Fossil fuel advocacy advertising limits have been adopted in cities such as Edinburgh , Amsterdam , Yarra and Sheffield . The Montreal bikeshare system has removed fossil fuel advertising. The Société de transport de Montréal is considering doing the same . In March 2024, Council of the City of Ottawa directed its staff to report back in the third quarter on revising its city-wide advertising policy on fossil fuel advocacy advertising. Given the urgency of the climate crisis, the documented greenwashing by fossil fuel companies, and the harmful effect of such greenwashing in discouraging essential climate action, it is contrary to the best interests of the people of Toronto for the City or its agencies and corporations to display fossil fuel advocacy advertising inconsistent with TransformTO on city assets, especially if the claims in such advertising have not been substantiated as required by the Competition Act.