112 Walmer Road - Development Charges Complaint and Parkland Levy Appeal - Request for Directions

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2026-05-20 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on May 20 and 21, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 6, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (May 6, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Show the rest of As filed, 459 more characters as filed

Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (May 6, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (May 6, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 22-1

Against (1)Stephen Holyday

Absent (3)James Pasternak, Paul Ainslie, Vincent Crisanti

The whole record, all 26 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

On August 29, 2024, the City received a complaint from 1000229415 Ontario Inc., pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27, for 112 Walmer Road regarding the payment of development charges as well as an appeal of the cash-in-lieu of parkland payment made to the City pursuant to section 42 of the Planning Act. The complaint and appeals derive from a development of a fourplex plus a garden suite, totalling five units on the subject property.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 143 more characters as filed

The City Solicitor requires further directions. For reasons set out in Confidential Attachment 1, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.

Staff recommended

The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the confidential recommendations and all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

On the record

The item as the City filed it

More from this meeting

The whole meeting