development
Buried by deferral
City seeks council direction on Employment Areas Official Plan Amendment as minister review stalls and tribunal appeals mount
City Council is being asked to direct staff on how to proceed with Official Plan Amendment 804, which realigned Toronto's employment area designations to match new provincial definitions under Bill 97. The amendment was sent to the Province for approval in June 2025 and remains under review; meanwhile, 47 site-specific amendment applications and 10 active Ontario Land Tribunal appeals seeking employment land conversions are queued, with hearings beginning as early as November 2026. The City Solicitor says the matter is urgent and cannot be deferred, but the report details are in a confidential attachment.
The City Solicitor states the matter is urgent and cannot be deferred, but Council is receiving only a status report and being asked for directions, not making a substantive decision. The confidential attachment—which contains the urgency justification—is not public. If the deferral of the substantive decision pending provincial approval is itself a de facto position (accepting the status quo rather than changing course), and if provincial approval may never come or come too late for tribunal hearings, then the lack of a direction now is functionally equivalent to maintaining the current amendment without modification. The November 2026 tribunal hearings fall after the October 2026 election.
Also in this item
• 47 site-specific Official Plan Amendment applications to redesignate lands within Employment Areas are currently pending, and 10 active Ontario Land Tribunal appeals seek employment land conversion, with hearings scheduled starting November 2026
• The matter is flagged as urgent and cannot be deferred, but the reasons are set out in a confidential attachment not available to the public
The journey
Time to act
You can weigh in
This is before Council with no vote scheduled yet; deputation opportunity depends on whether Council permits delegations. The report is partially confidential, limiting public information on the urgency claim.
Why is this story here?
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.