The filed record
Fighting for Ontario Place and Ontario’s Democracy - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2026-03-25 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring a motion seeking leave to intervene in the appeal of Ontario Place Protectors v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario and Attorney General of Ontario, case number 41805, before the Supreme Court of Canada, and to intervene in the appeal if granted leave by the Court.
The vote
Adopt Item · Carried, 21-5
The whole record, all 26 members
- Alejandra BravoFor
- Amber MorleyFor
- Anthony PerruzzaFor
- Ausma MalikFor
- Brad BradfordAgainst
- Chris MoiseFor
- Dianne SaxeFor
- Frances NunziataFor
- Gord PerksFor
- Jamaal MyersFor
- James PasternakAgainst
- Jon BurnsideFor
- Josh MatlowFor
- Lily ChengFor
- Michael ThompsonAgainst
- Mike ColleFor
- Neethan ShanFor
- Nick MantasFor
- Olivia ChowFor
- Parthi KandavelFor
- Paul AinslieFor
- Paula FletcherFor
- Rachel Chernos LinFor
- Shelley CarrollFor
- Stephen HolydayAgainst
- Vincent CrisantiAgainst
Every name opens that member’s record.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Rebuilding Ontario Place Act (ROPA) will have significant implications for Toronto, and we have one last opportunity to fight it at the Supreme Court. This is not just about saving our waterfront. It's about protecting the rule of law in our city and province. This legislation is a direct threat to our democracy - stripping away the public's rights, eliminating transparency, and shielding government decisions from legal accountability.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,167 more characters as filed
The Rebuilding Ontario Place Act immunizes the government from any "remedy in contract, restitution, tort, misfeasance, bad faith, trust or fiduciary obligation, any equitable remedy or any remedy under any statute". This is part of a larger pattern of the Ford government protecting itself from accountability for the decisions that they make which benefit themselves and their friends contrary to the public interest. The Rebuilding Ontario Place Ac also exempts the government from any responsibilities under the Environmental Assessment Act, which many suspect would reveal catastrophic impacts not only on the natural environment but also on infrastructure and traffic. For years, Doug Ford has been testing the boundaries of our democracy, including most recently announcing that he plans to exempt himself from Freedom of Information laws. This bill, if allowed to stand, will set a dangerous precedent - permitting the Premier to put his own interests ahead of the public good. Torontonians deserve to be represented in this case. And when residents are willing to show leadership for our city's interests, they deserve to know that City Hall has their backs.
Staff recommended
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring a motion seeking leave to intervene in the appeal of Ontario Place Protectors v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario and Attorney General of Ontario, case number 41805, before the Supreme Court of Canada, and to intervene in the appeal if granted leave by the Court.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Report on Councillor Chris Moise’s Comments to a ConstituentFiled record
- Public Salary Disclosure for City Agencies and CorporationsFiled record
- 233 Carlton StreetFiled record
- Authorization to Release Section 45 Funds to Little Italy Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber MorleyFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record