The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2026-05-20 · 2026.MM41.31

The filed record

Addressing Toronto’s Female Ginkgo Trees - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2026-05-20 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on May 20 and 21, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry to provide recommendations on the impacts of City-owned female ginkgo trees with a focus on community health and safety, as part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review and report back in 2027.

The vote

On the agenda

As the city filed it

Concerns from residents about the health and nuisance impacts of City-owned female ginkgo trees have increased in recent years. The noxious smell produced by the fruit creates undue hardship for nearby residents and surrounding communities. In addition, the hazardous residue left by the rotting fruit prevents residents from conducting proper maintenance and increases potential safety hazards. The City of Toronto does not intentionally plant female ginkgo trees but has no policy to address erroneously planting female ginkgo trees which begin producing fruit later in life.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 234 more characters as filed

This motion requests that the City's female ginkgo tree population be explicitly addressed in Environment, Climate and Forestry's Tree By-Law Review. Reason for Urgency: Ongoing nuisance impacts of female ginkgo trees across the City.

Staff recommended

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry to provide recommendations on the impacts of City-owned female ginkgo trees with a focus on community health and safety, as part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review and report back in 2027.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting