The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2026-07-29 · 2026.TE34.21

transit

Buried by deferral

191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street; 240 McCormick Street; and 420-444 Young Street and 1223 College Street; three major mixed-use and housing redevelopments approved, with mixed support and significant tenant concerns

Toronto and East York Community Council approved three major zoning and Official Plan amendments on 2026-07-08: a 45-storey, 684-unit mixed-use tower at College and Henry (545 affordable units); a 19-storey Ronald McDonald House expansion; and a three-tower College Park redevelopment at Young and College (2,342 units, requiring demolition of 210 rental homes). The College Park item drew the most opposition, with residents citing infrastructure strain, tenant displacement over 5+ years, and cumulative density concerns in downtown core.

College Park (TE34.24) was held mid-debate and has not yet received a vote. Councillor Saxe explicitly stated the motion 'isn't ready yet' and asked to hold the item to draft language addressing George Trainey's setback concern. The three related items (TE34.25, TE34.26) were added to the same agenda. No timeline given for when the motion will return or when council will vote. This deferral could function as a decision if the report-back is delayed past the end of the term (October 2026 election) or if the hold is used to exhaust the opposition without going to a recorded vote.

not yet heardToronto City Council · Wed, Jul 29You can weigh in

Who did what

From the floor

The tall building setback being reduced from 12 m to 7.5. And I should just be noted that 203 College Street was required when they applied to get the tall buildings setback reduced by the land tribunal to 12.12 meters.A resident
The transportation impact study falls well short of the reality of today's urban use of rear lanes and Henry Street. There is not one word of Uber type pickups or as the 210 people are noted for the daily hourly entering and leaving the building, the number of Uber pickups, the use of Amazon delivery trucks, the food delivery bicycles.A resident
We're very proud to be here to advance a development in partnership with the city that we'll will deliver what we believe will be Canada's largest single building affordable housing project. The initial iteration of the project already included 408 affordable units. We're adding 137 new affordable units with this application, bringing the total to 545 units. That's 80% of the total number of units in the entire building being affordable.The Planning Partnership, on behalf of the owner and applicant
The proposal before you today is to redevelop the existing Ronald McDonald House facility to provide an expansion that will accommodate 200 beds on the same site, allowing families to stay close to their children while they receive medical treatment in Toronto.Bosefields, Inc., planning consultant for Ronald McDonald House Charities
The College Park redevelopment builds on the site's iconic legacy while proposing new uses, amenities, and housing to create a livable contemporary urban experience. Overall, the proposal conserves and thought thoughtfully respects the heritage base building while introducing three towers on the site, 65, 96, and 75 stories.Urban Strategies, on behalf of GWL Realty Advisors, the applicant
8 more people spoke
Right now the number of people living there is putting serious strain on all of the infrastructure and I mean all of it. the subway station at peak times 10 12 people deep it can be five or six trains go by and that you can't get on 20 25 minute wait and very crowded.A resident
This area is full right now with given the infrastructure. We've had water shut offs because the water manes can't support the number of people. This is a question of prioritizing people or profits.A resident
This proposal would permit three towers of 65,75 and 96 stories with 2342 residential units. It will demolish 210 existing rental homes and replace them with 216 replacement rental units. It will alter the designated College Park Heritage building, including one of Toronto's major art deco landmarks.Resident of Ward 11 and candidate for city council in Ward 11 University-Rosedale
Move this forward only with stronger conditions before final council approval. Require clear clearer tenant accountability, clear construction and public realm communication, stronger heritage transparency, and a concrete community benefits package.Resident of Ward 11 and candidate for city council in Ward 11 University-Rosedale
I like the idea, but building three high-rise buildings with them expecting us to live for 5 years and probably a lot longer somewhere else when a lot of us have memory problems, dementia, Alzheimer's, heart problems, and multiple other problems.A resident
When I moved in, I did not plan on moving into an old age home. I don't want to. And that's what I'm going to have and that's bothering me now.A resident
This is an older building and it's rent controlled and so when they build new buildings, we're going to lose rent control buildings for future generations. And I think it's very important that we think about our future generations.A resident
The area like has too much density already. I think we really need to to put this thing to to an end.A resident

Also in this item

College Park redevelopment (TE34.24) held mid-debate by Councillor Saxe specifically to incorporate resident concern about setback reduction; suggests councillor responsiveness to environmental/urban design objection, but also indicates lack of consensus on motion language before deputation.

Three-tower College Park project will demolish 210 existing rent-controlled units and replace with 216 at market rent, eliminating long-term affordability for ~90% of replacement units; this supply-side loss was raised by two tenants and not directly addressed by staff or applicant.

College Park phasing delayed: original timeline promised completion by 2030, current plan extends displacement to 2032 with 5-year relocation period; elder and vulnerable tenant expressed distress and cited health impacts from uncertainty.

Infrastructure strain testimony from multiple sources: transit crowding (20-25 min waits at College station), schools at capacity with portables, water main failures, cell phone dead zones from tower density. City staff did not respond to cumulative-effect concerns.

The journey

Wed, Jul 29 · Toronto City Council · not yet heard

Time to act

You can weigh in

College Park (TE34.24) explicitly held; motion pending when Councillor Saxe returns. No vote yet recorded. For residents: deputation window remains open on amendments being drafted. Ronald McDonald House and College-Henry both passed without amendment; no further action possible on those two.

Decision

Item TE34.21 (College and Henry): approved as presented with 45-storey height, 684 units including 545 affordable at 80% of total. Item TE34.22 (Ronald McDonald House): approved as presented, 19-storey main component with 4-storey Henry Street element, 200-bed capacity. Item TE34.24 (College Park): held on request of Councillor Saxe to incorporate George Trainey's concern about setback reduction (from 12m to 7.5m) into motion language; three related items (TE34.25, TE34.26) added to agenda.

On video

Jump to this item in the meeting video

Why is this story here?
Big deal at city hallThe three items together represent multi-year commitments to major institutional change in downtown core. College Park alone: 2,342 units across three towers (96 storeys max), demolition of 210 existing rental homes, alteration of designated heritage building (Eaton's College Park art deco landmark), and an Official Plan Amendment to override City Hall view corridor protection. Ronald McDonald House and College-Henry are each single-site or single-org-scale (Stakes 1-2 individually), but College Park crosses the threshold to Stakes 2 for its permanence, reversibility cost, and institutional precedent: once three towers are built and heritage altered, a future council cannot readily undo the massing, density, or heritage impact. The items meet the Stakes 2 test: 'hard to reverse OR wide reach, not both' – here it is both. Passes the Standards test: undoing this (demolishing the towers, restoring the heritage fabric) would cost massive capital and political cost.Felt nowCollege Park salience is 2 (direct and real, bounded to recognizable group). The 210 existing tenants face displacement over 5+ years, which is a present-day effect: relocation notices and planning are happening now, uncertainty is real now, and elderly/vulnerable tenants report health impacts now. The ~2,300 new residents from towers are not yet in the building, so their salience is 0. Infrastructure strain testimony (transit crowding, school portables) describes effects felt in an ordinary week by residents of Ward 11, a recognizable group touching that subway station and those schools. However, the effect is attributed to cumulative prior development, not solely to this one decision; this project adds to existing strain but is not the sole cause. College-Henry and Ronald McDonald House are lower salience: College-Henry is a single site, 684 units, but it is not yet built so no resident feels the height/shadow change yet (future salience, not present); Ronald McDonald House is a narrow group (families needing short-term housing near hospitals) and the 19-storey component is bounded to the site. Neither reaches Salience 2 on present effect. Weighted average across three items leans toward 2 because College Park's tenant displacement is live and ongoing.

Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.

Share this

Official title: 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval · meeting video