housing
148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue, 53-storey residential tower with 640 units; rental demolition and heritage alterations; referred to council without recommendation
A large residential development at Soudan Avenue (53 storeys, 640 units, replacing 17 rental units) was referred to City Council without committee recommendation. Staff recommended approval with a holding bylaw pending infrastructure studies. Councillor Saxe deferred the item citing ongoing negotiations with the applicant and concerns about podium massing, setbacks, and infrastructure capacity in an already-intensely-redeveloped area.
Who did what
- Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11, University-Rosedale) movedMoved referral to council without recommendation, citing ongoing negotiations with applicant and need for further conversations.
From the floor
“This structure will not only fully block our view, but it will also block the natural right reaching our units. Our windows will end up facing a large wall just a few meters away. I'm concerned about what life will be like once these buildings are completed.”Resident owner at 825 Church Street
“The proposal before community council today is the result of collaboration not only with city staff but with the greater Yorkville residents association and the ABC. Through several meetings with them, we now have a proposal before you that we think has provided significant public realm improvements on Young Street, securing new large setbacks, new tree plantings, a new pop space in place of an existing gas station.”Bowfields, on behalf of Canadian Tire, the applicant
“The podium is currently 5 m away from the property line of the adjacent building, which is consistent with the mid-rise design guidelines. The high-rise has 20 m of separation, which is significantly more than we typically get, which we usually ask for 12.5.”City staff
“Why are you bringing it to council before those studies are reviewed, submitted and reviewed?”Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11, University-Rosedale)
“We're actually putting a hold on this approval. There's a holding bylaw which is a requirement on the applicant to provide those studies that will determine whether or not there's capacity. A development is not able to proceed without them. There will be a hold on the bylaw, which will mean this the zoning permissions will not actually they will not be able to build a building until they satisfy those.”City staff
1 more person spoke
“I'm going to send this one without recommendations as well. I have begun negotiations with the applicant, but there's more work to do.”Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11, University-Rosedale)
Also in this item
• Infrastructure hold: applicant must satisfy engineering and infrastructure capacity studies before the zoning by-law can take effect. Staff found issues in submitted studies requiring further work with the applicant.
• Adjacent building shadow and light: podium only 5 metres from 825 Church Street property line; resident deputation raised concerns about view obstruction and loss of natural light. Staff noted this meets mid-rise guidelines but is adjacent to a high-rise (20 m separation from towers).
• Rental housing: 17 existing rent-controlled rental units will be demolished and replaced by 17 rental replacement units as part of the 640-unit development, subject to a Tenant Assistance Plan providing return rights at similar rents and financial compensation.
The journey
Time to act
You can weigh in
Residents can depute at City Council when this item is called. The holding bylaw ensures further technical work; residents with infrastructure or shadow/light concerns should contact their councillor before the council vote.
Decision
Referred to City Council without recommendation. A holding bylaw will require the applicant to complete infrastructure and engineering studies before construction can proceed. The item does not advance with staff's recommendation; instead it goes to council for a fresh debate.
On video
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.