Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 47 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 26 to 47 of 47Show 2550100all
CC29.8adopted
On November 23, 2023, the City received Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment applications for 4151 to 4155 Sheppard Avenue East and 5 Lamont Avenue to permit the construction of a 46-storey mixed-used building. At its meeting of March 20 and 21, 2024, City Council refused the Applications. The applicant appealed City Council's refusal of the Applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal on April 22, 2024. The City Solicitor requires further directions for the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing which was scheduled to commence on April 22, 2025. The hearing was adjourned and a Case Management Conference before the Ontario Land Tribunal has been scheduled for April 28, 2025, so the City Solicitor can update the Ontario Land Tribunal following receipt of Council's directions. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle from Goodmans LLP dated April 7, 2025 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribuna in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review; b. the Owner has submitted an acceptable revised Landscape and Planting Plans, including a soil volume plan to meet TGS version 4 requirements, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment and Climate and the Executive Director, Development Review; c. the Owner has submitted an acceptable revised Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including a revised wind tunnel study with the identification of any required mitigation measures to be secured in the Zoning By-law amendment and through the Site Plan Control process, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; d. the Owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services and Transportation Services as they relate to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application as set out in their memorandum dated January 3, 2024, or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the Applicant, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the Owner has submitted a Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, and Hydrogeological Review, including the Foundation Drainage Report or addendums ("Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water; and f. the Owner has secured the design and provision of financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the Engineering Reports, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, and all information contained in Confidential Appendices A, B and C to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.8adopted
Toronto's parks are some of the most used and cherished public spaces residents have to enjoy. They are places that we use to participate in sports, go for a walk, or just sit with friends and family at a picnic table. For the increasing number of Torontonians that live in highrise buildings, the local park is their backyard. Parks are where we come together. That's why the City needs to adapt to the changing way parks are being used by residents. Many of Toronto's park by-laws are archaic, burdensome, unnecessary, and sometimes even absurd. One sign in a Midtown park prohibits ball playing, kite flying, frisbee throwing, large picnics and, ironically, posting signs. There are also by-laws in place against landing hot air balloons and cursing. This motion requests Staff to review the Parks By-law to remove measures that unfairly restrict residents from the full enjoyment of our parks. This motion also requests Staff to enable more food and beverage offerings in parks. Cities around the world establish kiosks and small cafes that provide enjoyable meeting places for residents to congregate. These could be tailored to the size and use of the parks; from small huts serving hot chocolate and coffee adjacent to outdoor rinks to kiosks serving sandwiches surrounded by picnic tables. There is inspiration from around the world that Toronto can draw on to offer a more enjoyable experience in our parks.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks, and report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with recommendations to remove any provisions that are archaic, burdensome, or unnecessary. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with options to provide more food and beverage offerings in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of physical structures and operating models.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks, and report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with recommendations to remove any provisions that are archaic, burdensome, or unnecessary. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with options to provide more food and beverage offerings in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of physical structures and operating models.
CC29.9amended
The Applicant submitted Official Plan amendment and Zoning Bylaw amendment applications for the sites located at 1175-1181 Weston Road and 7-17 Locust Street (the "Applications"). City Council refused the Applications at its meeting on July 24 and 25, 2024. The applicant appealed City Council's decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal on August 22, 2024 (the "Appeal"). The City Solicitor requires further directions regarding the Appeal at the Ontario Land Tribunal. The first Case Management Conference for this matter is scheduled on May 20, 2025. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 5. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management following the closing of the transactions contemplated in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. 6. City Council request the Mayor to consider allocating any Community Benefit Charge funds collected from the development to the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area Streetscape Plan, through the annual budget process immediately following the payment of the funds to the City. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information regarding a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto. Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management will be made public at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. October 22, 2025 The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make them public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated April 11, 2025, set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment(s) and Zoning By-law Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor; b. the owner meets the Toronto Green Standard Tier 1, version 4, requirements applicable at the zoning bylaw-stage to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with the exception of soil width area as set out on the drawings attached as Appendices D and E in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor; c. the owner has provided and implemented a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for Eligible Tenants of four (4) existing rental dwelling unit proposed to be demolished, addressing financial compensation and other assistance to lessen hardship, including the provision of rent gap payments; d. the owner has provided a legal undertaking to the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, securing the implementation of the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan required by condition (c) above; e. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues identified within the Engineering and Construction Services correspondence, dated May 8, 2024, or as revised, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; f. the owner has submitted a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and such report shall determine the stormwater run-off, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from the development and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development and/or any upgrades that may be required; g. the owner has provided a revised Servicing Report Groundwater Summary Form, Hydrogeological Review Report, Hydrological Review Summary Form, and Foundation Summary Form to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; h. should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report, a Holding Provision be included in the final form of the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment and the Holding Provision not to be lifted until such a time as the owner has made satisfactory arrangements, including entering into appropriate agreement(s) with the City for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure and the provision of financial securities to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; i. the submitted Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Rail Safety Report, and Compatibility/ Migration Study have been peer reviewed by a third-party consultant retained by the City at the owner's expense, to the satisfaction of the City; j. the submitted Energy Strategy Report has been reviewed to the satisfaction of the Environment and Energy; k. the owner has provided a revised Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including a revised Wind Tunnel Study with the identification of any required mitigation measures to be secured in the Zoning By-law amendment, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and l. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Metrolinx noted in correspondence, dated May 7, 2024, including the need for a technical review and made required revisions, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx. 3. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals, in whole or in part, City Council approve an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum size of 503 square metres with frontage on Weston Road and Hollis Street in satisfaction of the owner's required parkland dedication pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as described in the Settlement Offer; the on-site parkland dedication shall be conveyed to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments with the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; the on-site parkland shall further be conveyed to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for whichever building comes first, in an acceptable environmental condition, and constructed to base park condition at no cost to the City, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor. 4. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part and the owner elects to construct the Above Base Park Improvements, City Council approve a Development Charges credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the Development Charges credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time-to-time. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor is now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make it public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor are to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
MM29.9adopted
The Weston Lions Arena is a 75-year-old facility that is City-owned, and programmed and managed by the Weston Lions. The current agreement has been in place since 1983, automatically renewing annually. Through preliminary discussions with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, there is potential to explore the feasibility of investing in Weston Lions Arena as a potential MLSE Launchpad location. MLSE Foundation has significant experience delivering free, high quality, accessible recreation programming for children and youth experiencing barriers to participation. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment LaunchPad located at 259 Jarvis Street is a purpose-built, 42,000-square-foot facility located in downtown Toronto that leverages sport to support positive youth development. Since 2017, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment LaunchPad has delivered free, evidence-informed programming that integrates physical activity, life skills, and academic support for children and youth experiencing barriers to participation. The model is informed by comparable City recreation and youth services and emphasizes measurable outcomes and strong community partnerships to improve the long-term well-being of participants. It is recognized in North America as one of the leading sport for development community initiatives. This motion seeks to direct staff to engage directly with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation as well as local stakeholders to explore the feasibility of revitalizing and reimagining the Weston Lions Arena to optimize recreation opportunities and community benefits in the next evolution of the facility.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to engage with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, the Ward Councillor, stakeholders and local residents, to explore the feasibility of reimagining Weston Lions Arena to better deliver high-quality and accessible sport and recreation opportunities.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to engage with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, the Ward Councillor, stakeholders and local residents, to explore the feasibility of reimagining Weston Lions Arena to better deliver high-quality and accessible sport and recreation opportunities.
MM29.10adopted
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision approving the minor variance application for 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Application. The Applicant is the owner of the lands municipally known as 164 Homewood Avenue in the City of Toronto. On February 20, 2025, the Applicant applied to the Committee for variances to City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, seeking increases to the maximum permitted building height and maximum lot coverage to construct a new three-storey fourplex with below-grade parking spaces and an as of right garden suite with residential dwelling. The proposed dwelling proposes a 34.8 percent lot coverage whereas the permitted lot coverage is 30 percent and a 10.65m building height whereas the permitted height is 10m, posing massing and coverage issues disproportionate to the neighbourhood. Community Planning did not submit a Staff Report on this matter. On April 11, 2025, the Committee issued a decision approving the Application, subject to conditions. A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached as Attachment 1. In order to preserve the City's right of appeal, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body on April 17, 2025. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to preserve the City's statutory right and requires instructions to appeal and attend the hearing for this matter.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision pertaining to 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application A0076/25NY respecting 164 Homewood Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision pertaining to 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application A0076/25NY respecting 164 Homewood Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
MM29.11adopted
The actions by the provincial government to build a private spa by Therme at Ontario Place have already exacted a severe toll. The province has razed mature trees, destroying a waterfront recreation space beloved by Torontonians and the habitat of many animals including beavers, minks, foxes, coyotes and over 170 species of birds. However, another potential disaster raised in an April 16th New York Times article, can still be averted. The Province has advanced its project through extraordinary legislative powers, including the Rebuilding Ontario Place Act. It exempted the Therme site from an Environmental Assessment, imposed an enhanced Ministerial Zoning Order that removed the City's Planning review authority, and expropriated City owned land within the Ontario Place site. The Ontario Place redevelopment was the subject of an Auditor-General of Ontario report released December 3, 2024. The Auditor-General found that Infrastructure Ontario (IO) did not conduct due diligence to ensure that spas cited by Therme in its submissions were in fact owned and operated by Therme Group. They reviewed the six spas and found five instances where the spa cited in the submission was not owned or operated by Therme Group. The April 16, 2025 New York Times article investigated these inconsistencies and determined Therme group "misrepresented itself, misleading the Ontario government and exaggerating its experience in its bid to secure the Toronto deal." Therme was able to misrepresent its experience by adopting the same name, and similar logo, of a more established spa company. Therme used its deal with the Ontario government to secure funding for another project in Manchester and is closing in on deals in Dubai, Washington, and Dallas, which would require $2.5 billion to construct all 4 sites. Given the company was found to only have $1.1 million (USD) in equity, and losing money, there is now significant doubt that Therme would be able to deliver a spa in a reasonable timeframe, if at all. The new information contained in the Times story has significant implications for the City of Toronto as the only thing worse on a public waterfront site than a private spa, that is anticipated to worsen traffic and congestion, is a derelict wasteland fenced off by construction hoarding. During its review of the Ontario Place planning application, the City raised serious concerns about the appropriateness of this development on the waterfront. The Ontario government's failure to provide proper due diligence on their spa partner requires a status update on all City activities related to the provincial government's Therme development before this dubious project becomes further entrenched. This motion is urgent as Council needs an opportunity to assess the City's options given the significant revelations contained in an April 16th New York Times article titled, "A wellness Company with False Claims, Global Aims and a Toronto Island."
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor and all relevant Divisions, to report to the next meeting of City Council with a status update on all City activities related to the Therme spa project, including: a. whether the Province has taken ownership of the 16 acres of City-owned land at Ontario Place and, if so, what legislative mechanism has been applied, and any options for the return of that land to the City, particularly as a result of inadequate due diligence in the provincial bid award process; b. the status of the City's review of the Province's initial planning application for Ontario Place, the City's findings during that review regarding public benefit and accessibility of the waterfront, and whether the proposal would have been recommended for approval based on the City's planning principles; c. what remaining approvals or permits are required for the Therme project, and what public benefits Therme is obligated to provide, either under provincial legislation or which can be secured through these approvals; or already have been; and d. status update regarding: i. parking for the Ontario Place development; ii. site servicing (water, sewage, electricity, etc) on the Ontario Place site; and iii. construction related road closures/alterations at the Ontario Place site.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor and all relevant Divisions, to report to the next meeting of City Council with a status update on all City activities related to the Therme spa project, including: a. whether the Province has taken ownership of the 16 acres of City-owned land at Ontario Place and, if so, what legislative mechanism has been applied, and any options for the return of that land to the City, particularly as a result of inadequate due diligence in the provincial bid award process; b. the status of the City's review of the Province's initial planning application for Ontario Place, the City's findings during that review regarding public benefit and accessibility of the waterfront, and whether the proposal would have been recommended for approval based on the City's planning principles; c. what remaining approvals or permits are required for the Therme project, and what public benefits Therme is obligated to provide, either under provincial legislation or which can be secured through these approvals; or already have been; and d. status update regarding: i. parking for the Ontario Place development; ii. site servicing (water, sewage, electricity, etc) on the Ontario Place site; and iii. construction related road closures/alterations at the Ontario Place site.
MM29.12adopted
Since the approval for 589-599 Lawrence Avenue West was adopted by Council on October 9, 2025 (Item 2024.NY17.6), City staff have requested that a motion be moved in order to table a supplementary report to introduce an updated bill with revisions that would implement this application. This motion serves as that opportunity for staff to table their supplementary report. The reason for urgency for this motion is because the applicant is required to have the bills passed by Council so that they can complete their application submission for funding from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: Requires a re-opening of Item 2025.NY17.6 (October 9 and 10, 2024, Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Part 1 of the decision.
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.NY17.6 by: a. amending Part 1 by deleting the words "Attachment 5 to the report (September 6, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District" and replacing with the words "Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development" so that Part 1 now reads as follows: 1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review. 2. City Council determine that pursuant to Subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act no further notice is required.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Chernos Lin, recommends that City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2024.NY17.6 by: a. amending Part 1 by deleting the words "Attachment 5 to the report (September 6, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District" and replacing with the words "Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development" so that Part 1 now reads as follows: 1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review. 2. City Council determine that pursuant to Subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act no further notice is required.
MM29.13adopted
In 2021, City Council provided City staff with direction to engage with Noventa Energy Partners ("Noventa") on up to nine additional sewer waste recovery projects (MM47.61). Exhibition Place was identified as a potential opportunity given the imminent need to replace existing aging equipment and the City's mandate of net-zero by 2040. At its meeting of April 25, 2024, the Exhibition Place Board by adoption of EP9.19, authorized Exhibition Place staff to work with City Environment, Climate and Forestry staff to negotiate and enter into a Memorandum of Understanding, including a Thermal Energy Services Agreement among Exhibition Place, City of Toronto, and Novena Energy Partners. Pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 63-6F, Exhibition Place requires City Council authority for any agreement with a third party related to the provision of services in excess of four years. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 195 Procurement, Section 195-7.3 (D), Standing Committee and Council approval is required for all procurement valued up to or over $500,000, or where the term of the contract exceeds five (5) years or exceeds the projected capital funding for the project as approved by Council. Chapter 195-7.1K provides an exemption to the requirement to conduct competitive procurements where there is "Another organization is funding, or substantially funding, the procurement and the City has determined that the supplier and the terms and conditions of the proposed contract are beneficial to the City." The term of 30 years is necessary due to the significant upfront capital, long payback periods, long equipment and infrastructure lifespans and the proprietary nature of equipment and maintenance procedures for specialized equipment and operations. Should the engagement proceed, Noventa, at their own risk, will design, finance, construct, own, and operate the energy system with substantial funding from the Canadian Infrastructure Bank constituting a significant benefit to Exhibition Place and the City of Toronto. This motion is urgent as the deadline for the City to complete a Thermal Energy Services Agreement for the project to receive Canadian Infrastructure Bank funding is April 28, 2025.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Exhibition Place to negotiate and execute a non-competitive procurement contract with Noventa Aggregator GP Inc. on behalf of Noventa Exhibition Place LP, for the supply of hot water, chilled water and power generation capacity to Exhibition Place's district energy system over a term of 30 years commencing on date July 1, 2026, with an anticipated spend of eighty two (82) million dollars over the course of the term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize Exhibition Place to negotiate and execute a non-competitive procurement contract with Noventa Aggregator GP Inc on behalf of Noventa Exhibition Place LP for the supply of Hot Water, Chilled Water and power generation capacity to Exhibition Place's district energy system over a term of 30 years commencing on date July 1, 2026, with an anticipated spend of eighty-two (82) million dollars over the course of the term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Exhibition Place Board of Directors, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
MM29.14adopted
At its meeting on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, City Council adopted Item TE34.35, in connection with a site-specific zoning amendment relating to redevelopment of lands at 200 Queens Quay. The application was approved for a mixed-use development and included an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum area of 488 square metres as contemplated by Section 42 of the Planning Act. The proposed development was approved and site- specific By-law 1012-2022 was enacted by Council which secured the parkland conveyance as a matter in support of the development through Section 37 Agreement requirements. The By-law requires the conveyance within 30 months of the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development and includes permission for encumbrance by de-stressed tiebacks deemed acceptable to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation subject to compensation payable at the time of conveyance. Otherwise, the conveyance was to be free and clear of encumbrances to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation. Through detailed review of the related Site Plan Control application, it has come to staff's attention that there are existing concrete caissons located throughout the development site that supported the former parking structure, including 7 caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland to be conveyed to the City. The subject caissons range in diameter from approximately 0.7 metres to 1.4 metres. The owner has advised that it is not feasible to completely remove the caissons located within the future parkland but they will be cut down to a minimum of 2 metres below ground level. It has also come to staff's attention that the development site is burdened by a registered Limiting Distance Agreement. In relation to the adjoining residential condominium located at 218 Queens Quay West, the Limiting Distance Agreement moves the limiting distance from the property line to accommodate certain unprotected openings within the meaning of the Ontario Building Code along the condominium's northern wall. The effect is to restrict construction along the southern boundary of the future parkland. The owner has advised that it is not feasible to fully release the Limiting Distance Agreement from title of the future parkland without a significant retrofit of the condominium to meet Building Code requirements. Consequently, the limiting distance that restricts construction over two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres along the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the height of the lower level of the 9th storey of 218 Queens Quay West will need to be preserved, either through an amendment to the existing Limiting Distance Agreement or by virtue of a new Limiting Distance Agreement. Toronto Municipal Code Section 415-26B requires parkland conveyances to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. This Motion seeks authority from City Council to accept the future parkland with unforeseen encumbrances of below grade concrete caissons and above grade limiting distance requirements as set out above and deemed satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, subject to the property owner providing the City with compensation determined, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in the usual course. This motion is urgent as it relates to a development approval that is delivering 79 units of affordable housing and requires certainty on these agreements to proceed.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. Despite Toronto Municipal Code Section 415-26 (B), City Council authorize that the conveyance of parkland to the City pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as contemplated in Site Specific Zoning By-law 1012-2022 may be encumbered by: a. a maximum of 7 below grade concrete caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland, where such encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrance is subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; and b. limiting distances that restrict construction relating to two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres located at the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the lower level of the 9th storey of the adjacent building to the south, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrances are subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount to be determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and which limiting distances are set out in a limiting distance agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. Despite Toronto Municipal Code Section 415- 26 (B), City Council authorize that the conveyance of parkland to the City pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as contemplated in Site Specific Zoning By-law 1012-2022 may be encumbered by: a. a maximum of 7 below grade concrete caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland, where such encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrance is subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; and b. limiting distances that restrict construction relating to two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres located at the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the lower level of the 9th storey of the adjacent building to the south, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrances are subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount to be determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and which limiting distances are set out in a limiting distance agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
MM29.15withdrawn
During the pandemic, the City of Toronto developed the capacity to hold public meetings and consultations remotely through videoconferencing technology. This technology continues to be used to hold many public meetings exclusively online. While online meetings can have many advantages, being present in the same room as the presenters and interested participants is important in certain circumstances. For example, being present in the same space may help neighbours build trust and understanding between one another and City representatives, digest complex information more effectively, feel more welcome to ask questions and interact with decision-makers, and serve a community's preferences. In 2024, the City of Toronto adopted a policy that allows Members of Council to request any internal meeting with City staff be held in-person. Following that precedent, this motion recommends that Council direct the City Manager to hold any consultation that is proposed to be conducted through a videoconferencing platform in person if requested by a Member of Council. To ensure the City Manager is able to act on clear direction, this motion recommends that Councillors can provide this direction for consultations on matters that relate to their Ward, while the Mayor can provide direction on consultations related to multiple wards or all wards. This change ensures that public consultations and meetings are responsive to the unique needs of the communities participating in each consultation.
Member Motion MM26.15 was withdrawn at City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Manager to hold in-person any public consultation or meeting that is planned to be hosted remotely when requested to do so in writing by: a. the local Councillor, if the matter relates only to the ward represented by that Councillor; or b. the Mayor, if the matter relates to more than one ward.
MM29.16adopted
Freezing Development Charges - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks
Every year, the City of Toronto follows Provincial legislation that requires raising development charges. This year, they are set to rise by 4 percent on May 1. The City has previously requested that the Province of Ontario amend the Development Charges Act and allow the City more flexibility when it comes to this annual indexing. This motion reiterates that request, and brings forward a workaround so we can freeze development charges. Canadian municipalities face challenges delivering the infrastructure people expect. Cities are responsible for an estimated 60 percent of public infrastructure yet receive only 9 percent of total revenue generated from all combined federal, provincial and municipal taxes and charges. Cities like Toronto apply development charges to cover a portion of the cost of infrastructure that enables housing development and creates communities people want to live in. Toronto's $59 billion 10-Year Capital Plan includes $6.5 billion from development charges to support our growing city. This includes: $1.2 billion in funding for water, wastewater and sewer infrastructure; approximately $950 million towards road and intersection upgrades to enable development; $1 billion towards parks and community centres; and $950 million to add capacity to the City's transit system, including purchasing new buses, streetcars and subway cars. Some examples to make this more concrete: Development charges will help build the infrastructure to serve tens of thousands of new homes in new communities at Quayside (4,700 homes), the Downsview airport lands (63,000 homes), Golden Mile (33,000 homes) and East Harbour (4,300 homes). They will also fund Toronto's one-third portion of the Eglinton East light-rail transit and Waterfront East light-rail transit, which are currently being designed. Of course, we recognize the challenges of the housing market and added cost of development charges. That's why we have cut or deferred development charges in two new programs. The Rental Housing Supply Program cuts development charges and property taxes, helping build 7,000 new rental homes. Our Multi-Unit Ownership Program defers development charges for 3,000 condo units. It's also why we are freezing development charges with this motion. Ultimately, the extent to which we can lower or defer development charges will depend on how much funding for infrastructure we can secure from other orders of government. The City of Toronto will continue to take action within our means to ensure more market and affordable homes are built in these uncertain economic times.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to authorize municipalities to adjust or remove annual indexing provisions without an amendment to the development charge by-law in order to incentivize building new housing. 2. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in coordination with appropriate City staff, and in the event that the Province of Ontario does not fulfill City Council's previous request to waive the requirement for the City to index its development charges annually, to use Section 27 agreements, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on all new housing developments effective May 1, 2025, to freeze development charges at current rates until such time that the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer completes the City Council directed comprehensive review of development charges, and a new development charge by-law is adopted. 3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to give municipalities the flexibility to reallocate development charge funds collected for specific service areas toward any development charge eligible project across other development charge service areas without the need to for future repayment or to merge services areas through a new by-law, so the City can meet critical infrastructure needs to support new housing. 4. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to allow federal and provincial infrastructure funding contributions to be directed to the non-growth share of development charge eligible projects and/or to offset revenue loss from Council's discretionary rate reductions, so the City can optimize all available funding sources to get critical infrastructure projects finished more quickly. 5. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to make the City of Toronto whole for lost revenue as a result of Bill 23.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to authorize municipalities to adjust or remove annual indexing provisions without an amendment to the development charge by-law in order to incentivize building new housing. 2. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer, in coordination with appropriate City staff, and in the event that the Province of Ontario does not fulfill City Council's previous request to waive the requirement for the City to index its development charges annually, to use Section 27 agreements, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on all new housing developments effective May 1, 2025 to freeze development charges at current rates until such time that the Chief Financial Officer completes the Council directed comprehensive review of development charges, and a new development charge by-law is adopted. 3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to give municipalities the flexibility to reallocate development charge funds collected for specific service areas toward any development charge eligible project across other development charge service areas without the need to for future repayment or to merge services areas through a new By-law, so the City can meet critical infrastructure needs to support new housing. 4. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to allow federal and provincial infrastructure funding contributions to be directed to the non-growth share of development charge eligible projects and/or to offset revenue loss from Council's discretionary rate reductions, so the City can optimize all available funding sources to get critical infrastructure projects finished more quickly. 5. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to make the City of Toronto whole for lost revenue as a result of Bill 23.
MM29.17adopted
On March 26, 2025, City Council instructed the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of Revised Plans filed by the applicant on January 2, 2025. City Council also instructed the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that ten conditions have been fulfilled. The final condition that staff had recommended, and that City Council adopted, is that "the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site […]." This condition was added inadvertently and should be removed. The condition was appropriate in the context of negotiations with the applicant for a possible community space, which might have involved the release of the easement as a part of the deal for the community space. However, negotiations with the applicant on this point never materialized into a settlement offer, and so the condition is now unnecessary.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.DM28.1 by deleting Part 2.j. of the instructions to staff: 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: Part to be deleted: j. the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site, more specifically described as Parts 13 and 14 on Plan 66R-29819.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.DM28.1 by deleting Part 2. j. of the instructions to staff: 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: Part to be deleted: j. the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site, more specifically described as Parts 13 and 14 on Plan 66R-29819.
MM29.18deferred
In December 2021, City Council allocated $2.912 million from the Toronto Water Capital Reserve (Resolution EX28.6) to the Scarborough Bluffs West (SBW) Project. The SBW study (the Project) will explore the enhancement and protection of sensitive shoreline and natural areas and opportunities for improved waterfront experience and access between the Eastern Beaches (Silver Birch Avenue) and Bluffer's Park along Lake Ontario. City Council also requested Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to include the Project as part of the 2022 Budget process and directed the City Manager to enter into an agreement with TRCA to complete the Project. The Project commenced on November 2, 2023 and following completion of several rounds of consultation through 2024, the Draft Terms of Reference (ToR) was released for public comment and agency review in July 2024. In fall 2024, after reviewing the Draft ToR, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) contacted the Project team to confirm whether all future design options would meet the recently updated 2024 Environmental Assessment regulations. These new rules require at least 1 km of altered shoreline and 4 hectares of lakefill for a Comprehensive Environmental Assessment (CEA) to be mandatory. The Project team explained that not all future design alternatives would meet these thresholds, given that the intent of the Project is to explore a wide range of reasonable options, including tableland solutions and/or shoreline solutions that could be less than 1 km in total length or 4 hectares of lakefill. Subsequently, the Project team requested to voluntarily continue with the CEA process to undertake the same high level of technical analysis and thorough public consultation that have been applied to other waterfront projects, and to conform to the requirements of the City's Official Plan. The Project team has received MECP approval to proceed with a Voluntary Agreement to continue through the CEA process, which requires execution from both TRCA and the City as co-proponents on the Project.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, deferred Item MM29.18 to the May 21, 22 and 23, 2025, meeting of City Council.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Manager on behalf of the City to enter into an Agreement with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks as a co-proponent with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to apply the Environmental Assessment Act to the Scarborough Bluffs West Project.
MM29.19adopted
Over the past few years, the importance of ensuring all Torontonians have equitable access to parks and public spaces has been driven home starkly. It is vital, especially for equity-seeking communities of colour, to have quality parks which support mental health, community resilience and a sense of belonging. As highlighted through the PanAm Games in 2015, and the upcoming FIFA World Cup next year, investment in sports can help to build communities. However, this is only true if we use these opportunities strategically to address the uneven distribution of sports resources across the City. While physical activity and healthier lifestyles begin with access to high-quality, accessible sports facilities, that is just the start of helping ensure every child and community member have an opportunity to thrive through sport. Partnerships providing underserved youth with access to safe, inclusive, and free sports programs in collaboration with organizations that use sports for social good is a key part of the picture. Furthermore, building a diverse and educated network of coaches and referees is vital to surmounting financial and cultural barriers that limit participation in sport. Working together with community and educational stakeholders who have expressed interest, we will be able to build happier, healthier, and more equitable communities. The language in this motion has been drafted and approved by staff in Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Community Planning and CreateTO.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward at the earliest opportunity City-initiated amendments to the Zoning By-laws identified in Attachment 1 to Member Motion MM29.19 in order to: a. re-allocate the unspent Section 37 funds towards other capital facility improvements within Ward 23 - Scarborough North; and b. to allow for the re-allocation of Section 37 funds to be directed towards another purpose if said funds have not been used for its intended purpose within three years. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to identify and explore partnership opportunities for Scarborough North that support Council-adopted park or recreation needs and priorities.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward at the earliest opportunity city-initiated amendments to the Zoning By-laws identified in Attachment 1 in order to: a. re-allocate the unspent Section 37 funds towards other capital facility improvements within Ward 23 - Scarborough North; and; b. to allow for the re-allocation of Section 37 funds to be directed towards another purpose if said funds have not been used for its intended purpose within three years. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to identify and explore partnership opportunities for Scarborough North that support Council-adopted park or recreation needs and priorities.
MM29.20adopted
Oxford Properties Group and CP REIT (collectively, the "Tenants") is seeking to align the current terms of all the ground leases at the southwest corner of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue (known as "Canada Square") with the Toronto Transit Commission, which will allow the Tenants sufficient term to secure the anchor tenant and to obtain the necessary capital investment to retrofit and modernize the existing buildings at 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street, shown on Appendix A. In 2018, City Council authorized the Toronto Transit Commission to enter the consolidated ground lease, which once in full force and effect upon waiver or satisfaction of conditions set out in a commencement agreement, will extend the terms of the existing ground lease for a 99-year period, while allowing for a phased redevelopment of the property. Under the consolidated ground lease, the Tenants original redevelopment plans for the property included partial demolition of the existing buildings at 2180 to 2200 Yonge Street, improvements to the subway station entrances, and the construction of a new bus terminal for the Toronto Transit Commission, with the Toronto Transit Commission contributing $25 million to the cost for the new bus terminal. On February 24, 2025, the Toronto Transit Commission Board approved the Tenants' request to align the terms of the existing ground leases to allow the Tenants sufficient term to execute the anchor tenant office lease for the existing buildings at 2180 Yonge Street and 2200 Yonge Street, and to commit the necessary capital investment to retrofit and modernize those buildings for the anchor tenant. By securing the anchor tenant office lease, the Tenants will secure the presence of a major employer in the Midtown community and revenue to support the ground rent from these properties for the Toronto Transit Commission. for many years to come. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 213, real estate agreements are generally entered into by the City. However, authority for Toronto Transit Commission to enter into the lease amending agreement is being sought in this instance in order to be consistent with the existing Council authority. Reason for Urgency: The matter is urgent because the Tenants fear that their anchor tenant may give notice to vacate Canada Square if the amendment to the lease is not heard at April City Council meeting and without the anchor tenant, the Tenants will not be able to secure financing for the new development.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Toronto Transit Commission, as landlord, to enter the lease amending agreements identified in the recommendations of the Toronto Transit Commission board approved on February 24, 2025, attached as required under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 279, as the Toronto Transit Commission holds the Lands as agent on behalf of the City. 2. City Council request the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to consult with the local Councillor and the Executive Director, Development Review, City of Toronto, on the redevelopment plan for the podium space connecting 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the Toronto Transit Commission, as landlord, to enter the lease amending agreements identified in the recommendations of the Toronto Transit Commission Board approved on February 24, 2025, attached as required under Municipal Code Chapter 279 as the Toronto Transit Commission holds the Lands as agent on behalf of the City. 2. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Chief Executive Officer to consult with the local Councillor and Executive Director, Development Review, City of Toronto, on the redevelopment plan for the podium space connecting 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street.
MM29.21adopted
On April 23, 2018, a devastating tragedy occurred on Yonge Street in Toronto's Willowdale neighborhood. The attack took place on a beautiful spring Monday afternoon in the heart of downtown North York resulting in the deaths of 11 people and injuries to 15 others. It was the deadliest mass murder in Toronto's history and sent shockwaves throughout the country. In the years since, the community has come together in grief, strength, and remembrance as the city has worked to keep the victims' memories alive through ongoing commemoration. The community is hopeful for a peaceful, permanent space where reflection and healing can continue to take place. Reason for urgency: A permanent memorial is urgently needed to honour the victims and provide a dedicated space for reflection and healing. Given the years that have passed since the tragedy, it is crucial to act swiftly and establish the memorial in a timely manner for a respectful tribute. Regrettably, challenges arose due to the scheduled reconstruction of Yonge Street and future refresh of Mel Lastman Square which made it difficult to select an appropriate location.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to bring forward a plan for a Yonge Street Tragedy memorial in Olive Square Park, and report back to the July 9, 2025, meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with: a. a consultative plan to engage victims' families, the Yonge Street Tragedy Memorial Steering Committee and the Willowdale community; b. proposed scope, including current site conditions and elements discussed with the steering committee, including consideration of a water feature, perennial garden and lighting; c. design contest timeline; d. work plan; e. funding sources; and f. a plan that brings forward the earliest possible date of implementation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to bring forward a plan for a Yonge Street Tragedy memorial in Olive Square Park, and report back to the July 9, 2025 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with: a. a consultative plan to engage victims' families, the Yonge Street Tragedy Memorial Steering Committee and the Willowdale community; b. proposed scope, including current site conditions and elements discussed with the steering committee, including consideration of a water feature, perennial garden and lighting; c. design contest timeline; d. work plan; e. funding sources; and f. a plan that brings forward the earliest possible date of implementation.
MM29.22adopted
In March of 2025, a Vehicle-For-Hire driver drove away from the location of a drop-off with a five year old child still remaining in a back row passenger seat. The mother was unable to contact the driver and when she contacted the Vehicle-For-Hire company directly, she was told they would not give out the driver's contact information to her or the police, and they offered no further assistance. This terrifying experience makes clear how critical it is for the City of Toronto to take additional measures to help safeguard its residents and visitors by continuously improving the policies and procedures that regulate Vehicle-For-Hire companies to ensure they meet a greater standard of customer safety and coordination with local law enforcement to prevent any number of dangerous situations such as this incident. The City of Toronto's current regulatory framework for the Vehicle-For-Hire industry does not provide any remedy to passengers in such an emergency situation, nor any penalty to negligent operators. The City of Toronto must review its current rules and recommend additional licencing requirements for the protection of passengers in even the rarest of circumstances. The reason for urgency of this motion without notice is due to the already demonstrated and possibly imminent danger to Vehicle-For-Hire customers if this risk remains unaddressed in the City of Toronto's regulatory framework governing Vehicle-For-Hire companies and drivers.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Toronto Police Service, to consult with Vehicle-For-Hire Industry and recommend any changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-For-Hire, that could require licensees to take greater accountability to directly assist customers and law enforcement in emergency situations in an urgent manner; and whether such requirements could become a condition of licenses to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Toronto Police Service to consult with Vehicle-For-Hire Industry and recommend any changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546 that could require licensees to take greater accountability to directly assist customers and law enforcement in emergency situations in an urgent manner; and whether such requirements could become a condition of licenses to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licencing and Standards.
MM29.23adopted
The Armenian Community Centre of Toronto has long stood as a vital hub for the Armenian-Canadian community across the Greater Toronto Area - supporting cultural, religious, educational, and advocacy organizations that serve thousands. Since 2021, the Centre has been working diligently on a much-needed expansion of its Armenian Youth Centre, with the support of both federal and provincial partners. Today, the project is at a pivotal moment. The City is prepared to issue the building permits, with only a few outstanding items remaining: development charges, education levies, and cash-in-lieu of parkland - totaling $626,507.00. As a registered charity, the Centre is exempt from municipal property taxes under provincial legislation, but these charges remain a barrier. The financial viability of the Armenian Youth Centre's expansion project is under significant strain due to escalating development charges, ongoing inflation in the construction industry, and the recent introduction of U.S. tariffs on building materials. Through the execution of a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement, the City of Toronto can grant relief in support of the Centre's expansion and expand the delivery of public local cultural activities and programming. This motion is urgent to avoid further cost escalation and to ensure this long-planned, community-driven project can proceed this summer without additional delays.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to: a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement and any other agreement that may be required, with Armenian Community Centre of Toronto (doing business as "Armenian Youth Centre"; the "Operator") for part of the property municipally known as 50 Hallcrown Place (the "Premises") with the City, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture including that the premises are primarily used for local cultural activities and that the City has the right to recover the benefits provided to the Operator should the use of the Premises change; b. exempt the Premises from development charges otherwise owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article I of the Toronto Municipal Code; and c. giving money to the Operator in the form of a credit towards the amount of the parkland levies owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article III of the Toronto Municipal Code; with the exemptions being effective for the purpose of obtaining a building permit from the latest of the by-law is enacted or the date of execution of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement. 2. City Council pass a resolution that the above Municipal Capital Facility is for the purposes of the City and is for public use. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir. 4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to: a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement and any other agreement that may be required, with Armenian Community Centre of Toronto (doing business as "Armenian Youth Centre"; the "Operator") for part of the property municipally known as 50 Hallcrown Place (the "Premises") with the City, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture including that the premises are primarily used for local cultural activities and that the City has the right to recover the benefits provided to the Operator should the use of the Premises change; b. exempt the Premises from development charges otherwise owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article I of the Municipal Code; and c. giving money to the Operator in the form of a credit towards the amount of the parkland levies owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article III of the Municipal Code; with the exemptions being effective for the purpose of obtaining a building permit from the latest of the by-law is enacted or the date of execution of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement. 2. City Council pass a resolution that the above Municipal Capital Facility is for the purposes of the City and is for public use. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir. 4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
MM29.24adopted
This motion is being requested by the City Solicitor to provide additional instructions for a limiting distance agreement in relation to the application for 295 Jarvis Street. In 2024, City Council accepted a settlement for 295 Jarvis Street that included limiting distances, as seen in Confidential Appendix A, Schedule C . As staff were executing the settlement, they realized they didn't have the requisite authority for entering into some of the agreements that were contemplated. This motion would provide staff with that authority, and allow the issuance of a final order for both the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments, and to negotiate the terms of the Limiting Distance Agreement with the applicant. This motion is urgent because this matter cannot proceed without that authority. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: City Council Item 2024.CC18.10 (May 22 and 23, 2024, City Council meeting)
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.CC18.10 by adding the following Part to the instructions to staff: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement, or similar legal instrument, with the City and the owners of the properties at 311 Jarvis Street and 319 Jarvis Street, to be registered on title to the properties, to achieve appropriate tower separation by preventing the erection of tall buildings on the portions of the sites along the north/south shared property line (as set out in Schedule C to Confidential Appendix A) and to facilitate appropriate block planning for the area, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.CC18.10 by adding the following Part to the instructions to staff: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement, or similar legal instrument, with the City and the owners of the properties at 311 Jarvis Street and 319 Jarvis Street, to be registered on title to the properties, to achieve appropriate tower separation by preventing the erection of tall buildings on the portions of the sites along the north/south shared property line (as set out in Schedule C to Confidential Appendix "A") and to facilitate appropriate block planning for the area, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
MM29.25withdrawn
The urban forests of Scarborough Village and Cliffcrest serve as vital natural infrastructure, protecting the Bluffs from erosion, reducing flood risk, and supporting city air quality. However, rapid and often unpermitted development in Ward 20 is removing trees and covering permeable land, altering water flow in an area with a high-water table and increasing the risk of basement flooding. These activities are endangering the natural environment of these distinctive communities and popular tourist areas. Characters of the Neighbourhood Guidelines would provide clear direction to City Planning, Engineering and the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment to determine growth parameters that will protect the fragile environment and character of our neighbourhoods. The Scarborough Bluffs, trails and ravines are destinations not only for residents, but for visitors. Reason for Urgency: This motion is urgent as the Character Study for the Guildwood Community needs to be included in the City planning work for 2025. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: City Council Item 2024.MM24.13 (December 17 and 18, 2024 City Council meeting)
Member Motion MM26.25 was withdrawn at City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Parthi Kandavel, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to extend the scope of the architectural character study for the Guildwood Community that was directed by Council in December 2024 to include a parallel study and community process within the adjacent Cliffcrest and Scarborough Village Community.
MM29.26adopted
Dog Off-Leash Area at Glendora Park - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow
As the city grows in population, we are not growing more land. This necessitates creative considerations for opportunities for the diverse uses to meet the needs of our city. It is estimated that Toronto is home to 600,000 or more dogs. The City's current off-leash area network includes 81 off-leash areas distributed across 21 wards. An additional 13 off-leash areas are under development. Only one of these off-leash areas is located in Willowdale at Bayview Arena Park and it is not located anywhere close to our concentration of density. We want to ensure that Willowdale's unique needs and preferences are taken into account and would like to retain the opportunity to create a dual-use Off-Leash Area, one that leverages a beloved toboggan hill to potentially become a 3-season dog park. It is already a place where many illegally off-leash their dogs. This motion allows us to continue a consultative process to reflect this option that attempts to model what happens successfully in Mississauga at Jack Darling Park, where they also have a toboggan hill that is used as a 3-season dog park. Reason for Urgency: The Off-Leash Policy is being moved today, and Willowdale is in the process of launching off-leash area consultations. We need to move this motion to create the conditions for this option to be considered.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to consult with the community on several options for a Glendora Park Off-Leash Area and include a seasonal Off-Leash Area that would encompass the Glendora Park toboggan hill to be used as an off-leash area from spring to fall while maintaining the toboggan hill for winter use only, as one of the options presented in the consultation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to consult with the community on several options for a Glendora Park Off-Leash Area and include a seasonal Off-Leash Area that would encompass the Glendora Park toboggan hill to be used as an off-leash area from spring to fall while maintaining the toboggan hill for winter use only, as one of the options presented in the consultation.
MM29.27adopted
The urban forests of Scarborough Village and Cliffcrest serve as vital natural infrastructure, protecting the Bluffs from erosion, reducing flood risk, and supporting city air quality. However, rapid and often unpermitted development in Ward 20 is removing trees and covering permeable land, altering water flow in an area with a high-water table and increasing the risk of basement flooding. These activities are endangering the natural environment of these distinctive communities and popular tourist areas. Characters of the Neighbourhood Guidelines would provide clear direction to City Planning, Engineering and the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment to determine growth parameters that will protect the fragile environment and character of our neighbourhoods. The Scarborough Bluffs, trails and ravines are destinations not only for residents, but for visitors. Reason for Urgency: This motion is urgent as the Character Study for the Cliffcrest community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road) needs to be included in the City planning work for 2025.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a thorough review of existing development guidelines and zoning regulations within the Cliffcrest Community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road). 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop specific design guidelines that clearly articulate the desired architectural character and principles of the community; these guidelines should: a. emphasize the preservation and enhancement of the existing architectural styles and materials; b. consider the scale, massing, and setbacks of new developments to ensure compatibility with the surrounding built environment; c. incorporate measures to protect views and sightlines within the community; d. amend existing zoning by-laws and development agreements as necessary to ensure compliance with the newly developed design guidelines; and e. implement a robust review process for all new development proposals within Cliffcrest, ensuring that they are rigorously assessed for compliance with the established design guidelines. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to engage with the Cliffcrest community through public consultations to gather input and feedback on the development of these design guidelines.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Parthi Kandavel, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a thorough review of existing development guidelines and zoning regulations within the Cliffcrest Community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road). 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop specific design guidelines that clearly articulate the desired architectural character and principles of the community; these guidelines should: a. emphasize the preservation and enhancement of the existing architectural styles and materials; b. consider the scale, massing, and setbacks of new developments to ensure compatibility with the surrounding built environment; c. incorporate measures to protect views and sightlines within the community; d. amend existing zoning by-laws and development agreements as necessary to ensure compliance with the newly developed design guidelines; and e. implement a robust review process for all new development proposals within Cliffcrest, ensuring that they are rigorously assessed for compliance with the established design guidelines. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to engage with the Cliffcrest community through public consultations to gather input and feedback on the development of these design guidelines.