Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 47 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
BL29.1adopted
Introduction of General Bills and Confirming Bills
City Council will introduce General Bills and Confirming Bills.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, passed By-laws 306-2025 to 364-2025, subject to Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
CC29.1amended
Ensuring Toronto’s Local Summer Festivals Benefit from the World Cup
Every summer, Toronto's streets come alive with festivals. In all corners of our City, people celebrate their cultures, communities and our common bonds as Torontonians. As Mayor, I spend a great deal of time each summer participating in these festivals and witnessing first-hand the cultural and economic value they bring. Our wonderful Business Improvement Areas and local community organizations deserve a great deal of credit for delivering these festivals we all enjoy, each year. Since the pandemic, many of these local events have struggled to raise funds to cover their costs. That's why I was proud to announce the Special Event Stabilization Initiative to support 81 festivals in 2024, and will soon share details of funding support for 2025. Our annual festival season is a critical part of the $8.4 billion in tourism spending our City sees each year. With the 2026 FIFA World Cup coming to Toronto next summer, many festival organizers see an opportunity to bring in more people and partake in the spirit of the World Cup festivities. Given the expected scale of the World Cup festivities and our annual festival season, I am asking that staff work with festival organizers and relevant city divisions to coordinate and ensure the festivals we love to attend each year can continue to run while the World Cup is on.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council affirm the expectation that existing special events and festivals across Toronto continue to be permitted during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto. 2. City Council direct the City Manager, Emergency Services, and additional City staff as appropriate to coordinate to ensure the smooth operations of summer events taking place during the FIFA World Cup 2026, including special consideration of traffic operations, transit accessibility, and safety. 3. City Council direct the City Manager to seek the partnership of the federal and provincial governments in supporting Toronto festivals in summer 2026, in view of both Toronto's World Cup hosting obligations and other market conditions, such as costs escalations, labour scarcity and demands upon City of Toronto essential services, to ensure the sustainability of Toronto festivals and special events. 4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the FWC26 Toronto Secretariat, to bring forward to the Executive Committee, through the FIFA World Cup 2026 Subcommittee, by the third quarter of 2025 a plan for support to Toronto festivals and special events impacted by World Cup hosting in 2026 to include a funding program, within existing divisional resources, to enable community celebrations.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Mayor recommends that: 1. City Council affirm the expectation that existing special events across Toronto continue to be permitted during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto. 2. City Council direct the City Manager, Emergency Services, and additional City staff as appropriate to coordinate to ensure the smooth operations of all summer events taking place during the FIFA World Cup 2026, including special consideration of traffic operations, transit accessibility, and safety.
DM29.1adopted
Appointment of a Public Member to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
At its meeting on February 26, 2025, the Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal considered Item ND6.1 and made a recommendation to City Council. Summary from the report (February 10, 2025) from the City Clerk The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council appoint Sophia Davis to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal for a term of office beginning March 28, 2025, and ending on November 14, 2026, and until a successor is appointed. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (February 26, 2025) from the Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (February 26, 2025) from the Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal recommends that: 1. City Council appoint the following candidate to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal for a term of office beginning March 28, 2025, and ending on November 14, 2026, and until a successor is appointed: Sophia Davis The City Clerk further recommends that: 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (February 26, 2025) from the Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. Candidate's biography Sophia Davis Sophia Davis has a degree in Professional Communications. She is an experienced dog daycare business owner and is formally trained by Grassroots K9 in dog behaviour, psychology, and effective training methodologies of police, service and military dogs. She has contributed to her community as a Warrant Officer Second Class and Civilian Instructor with the 180 Mosquito Cadet Squadron. She brings many years of leadership and experience working with dogs and assessing their behaviour.
IA29.1received
Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 4, Parkdale-High Park, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry: I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code Section 27-7.11 for the April 23rd 2025 meeting of City Council. On April 1st all members of Council received a letter from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. It raised a number of questions about how the online survey regarding the "Proposed Demonstrations Bylaw to Protect Vulnerable Institutions" was designed and carried out. The letter draws attention to the language in the survey which states that the potential bylaw is "not intended to prohibit peaceful and lawful demonstrations" - however as they point out, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, any protest is peaceful as long as it does not reach the level of physical violence or threats of physical violence. Protests which do not present these characteristics qualify as peaceful, even if they are disturbing, offensive or conveying intolerant or discriminatory expression. A bubble zone bylaw limiting this type of expression would expressly limit peaceful protests, which makes the survey's statement potentially misleading. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association points out that the survey materials mention that other municipalities have adopted a similar bylaw. But, the survey materials fail to mention that at least one of those municipalities is subject to an ongoing Charter challenge. This omission gives the impression that these bylaws are commonplace and non-contentious, which is not accurate. Finally, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association points out that the survey is an anonymous process that does not even require respondents to attest that they are Toronto residents. This raises questions about what measures, if any, the City has implemented to ensure that results are not skewed by non-residents' input or by multiple survey submissions made by the same individuals. Charter jurisprudence protects the right to peaceful assembly and the right to free expression even in cases where it may cause 'discomfort.' The survey questions, which offer respondents an opportunity to express how they 'feel' when they encounter a peaceful demonstration, may lack the context that would properly allow for residents to provide an informed and balanced answer. With a matter of such sensitivity, it is important to ensure that the consultation process is diligent, fair, and process oriented. I am asking these questions to ensure a transparent, clear and fair discussion on this important topic and that the process is up to the standard of excellence that this tremendously important issue deserves. If a determination is made under section 27-7.11 subsection A(3) of the Municipal Code that staff cannot answer all questions in the normal course of their work then I respectfully request that staff answer the questions they are able to and allow Council to determine under subsection B(1) if staff should answer the unanswered questions. Survey 1. What measures, if any, has the City implemented to ensure that survey results are not skewed by non-residents' input or by multiple survey submissions made by the same individuals? 2. What is the City's standard for collecting data regarding if a person resides in Toronto as part of any public engagement survey and does this survey meet that standard? 3. It is often a City process to collect at least the first 3 letters of a postal code. Who designed the survey, including the decision to not collect any kind of information regarding a respondent's place of residence? If a combination of City Staff and outside consultants, please enumerate all parties. 4. Who drafted or selected the questions for the survey? If a combination of City Staff and outside consultants, please enumerate all parties. Who approved the final survey questions? 5. Who drafted and approved the website 'Background' section? If a combination of City Staff and outside consultants, please enumerate all parties. 6. On such a critical matter, which directly involves freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly -rights enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - what was the role of City Legal in designing and vetting the questions on the survey, including all of the questions that solicit feedback about how individuals 'feel' about fundamental freedoms protected in the Charter? 7. How were email addresses added to the list that would be contacted directly regarding the survey? In-Person Consultation Meetings 1. How many in-person consultation meetings have been scheduled, and are planned as part of the "Public Consultation for a Proposed Demonstrations Bylaw to Protect Vulnerable Institutions"? How was this decision made? 2. Were any of these meeting conducted 'by invitation only'? 3. Who made the decision to conduct the meetings this way? Please list all City staff who approved the consultant's plan. 4. Who determined who would be invited to these meetings? Was anyone added to the list of invitees at any point, if so, who requested that addition? Consultant Selection and Procurement 1. What was the date when the contract was awarded to the consultant and who signed on behalf of the City? 2. How was the consultant selected and what other work has this consultant undertaken for the City dealing with issues of heightened sensitivity, or complex constitutional issues? 3. Please provide a copy of requirements, solicitation document, or similar, for the selection of the consultant for the pubic consultation. 4. What information or direction was given to the consultant regarding constitutional issues and the legal aspects of the potential bylaw?
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, received Administrative Inquiry IA29.1 from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 4, Parkdale-High Park, regarding Requesting a Transparent, Clear and Fair Consultation Process Regarding the "Proposed Demonstrations By-law to Protect Vulnerable Institutions", and Answer IA29.1a from the City Manager, for information.
MM29.1adopted
In alignment with the City's Council-approved Toronto Island Park Master Plan, Parks and Recreation has been working with Toronto Parking Authority Bike Share Toronto program to launch a bike share pilot in Toronto Island Park for the upcoming summer season. The pilot will bring a total of 200 Bike Share Toronto bicycles to two locations in Toronto Island Park: Ward's Island Ferry Landing and Hanlan's Ferry Landing. Bike Share Toronto and Parks and Recreation will collect data and feedback to measure the success of the pilot to inform future expansions. Toronto Parking Authority runs the Bike Share Toronto system, and for this system to operate in Toronto Island Park, Parks and Recreation must amend its existing agreement with Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd. to remove the exclusivity clause, effective immediately. Parks and Recreation staff have approached Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd. to discuss the amendment to their exclusive rights to allow for Bike Share Toronto to operate in Toronto Island Park, in exchange for an additional extension to their term. Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd. is supportive of these changes and has indicated willingness to work with the City on the terms of the extension. Through a Request for Proposals process in 2017, Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd. was awarded a licence agreement to operate as the sole provider of bike rentals in Toronto Island Park. The current licence agreement expires on September 30, 2026, and the licensee currently pays $83,000 in annual fees plus two per cent of gross revenue.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to enter into a Licence Amending Agreement with Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd., to remove the licensee's exclusive rights to operate a bike share rental in Toronto Island Park, and to extend the agreement term for five additional years ending September 30, 2031, along the same fee schedule as the existing licence agreement, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to enter into a Licence Amending Agreement with Toronto Island Bicycle Rental Ltd., to remove the licensee's exclusive rights to operate a bike share rental in Toronto Island Park, and to extend the agreement term for five additional years ending September 30, 2031, along the same fee schedule as the existing licence agreement, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
RM29.1adopted
- O Canada - Moment of Silence
CALL TO ORDER: 9:41 a.m. Speaker Nunziata took the Chair and called the Members to order. The meeting opened with O Canada. Members of Council observed a moment of silence and remembered: His Holiness Pope Francis Howard G. Ashbourne Wendy Bishop Gladys Anne Clune, and Christina Huang Mayor Olivia Chow and Speaker Frances Nunziata spoke in memory of Pope Francis. Speaker Nunziata addressed Council as follows: I would like to take a moment on behalf of Council to acknowledge the Indigenous Peoples of all the lands that we are on today. We do this to reaffirm our commitment and responsibility in improving relationships between nations and to deepening our own understanding of Indigenous peoples and their cultures. It is a moment to reflect on the importance of this land, which we each call home. We acknowledge the land we are meeting on is the traditional territory of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Speaker Nunziata advised Council of the following: For the benefit of those who are connected to the internet, the City Clerk has posted all of the agenda materials for today's meeting at toronto.ca/council .
CC29.2adopted
The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the results of the collective bargaining negotiations between the City of Toronto and The Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and to seek ratification of the negotiated agreement.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council ratify and approve the Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and the Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to labour relations or employee negotiations. 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer remain confidential at this time, as it relates to labour relations or employee negotiations, and City Council authorize the public release of the confidential labour relations information in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer following ratification by City Council, and the creation of a final collective agreement and the completion of all related proceedings, as confirmed by the Chief People Officer. 4. City Council amend Schedule B to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 67, Fair Wage, by including in the current Schedule B, the City's new contractual obligations in the residential sector of the construction industry as a result of the ratification of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and the Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America; this amendment is effective as of the effective date of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and the Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 5. City Council amend Schedule C to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 67, Fair wage, by adding to the current Schedule C, the Residential Work Fair Wage Schedule contained in Attachment 3 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer, effective as of the effective date of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and the Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council's decision, and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or Manager, Fair Wage, in order to give effect to Parts 4 and 5 above. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to labour relations or employee negotiations. Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to labour relations or employee negotiations. Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (April 14, 2025) from the City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer will be made public following the creation of a final collective agreement, and the completion of all related proceedings, as confirmed by the Chief People Officer.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Manager, the Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer recommend that: 1. City Council ratify and approve the Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and The Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report from the City Manager, Chief People Officer and the Chief Procurement Officer. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 remains confidential in its entirety as it relates to labour relations or employee negotiations. 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 2 remain confidential at this time, as it relates to labour relations or employee negotiations and City Council authorize the public release of the confidential labour relations information in Confidential Attachment 2 following ratification by City Council, and the creation of a final collective agreement, and the completion of all related proceedings, as confirmed by the Chief People Officer. 4. City Council amend Schedule B to Municipal Code, Chapter 67, by including in the current Schedule B, the City's new contractual obligations in the residential sector of the construction industry as a result of the ratification of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and The Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. This amendment is effective as of the effective date of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and The Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 5. City Council amend Schedule C to Municipal Code, Chapter 67, by adding to the current Schedule C, the Residential Work Fair Wage Schedule contained in Attachment 3 to this report, effective as of the effective date of Memorandum of Settlement between the City of Toronto and The Carpenters' District Council of Ontario/United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or Manager, Fair Wage, in order to give effect to Parts 4 and 5, above.
DM29.2amended
On February 6, 2025, a heavy construction vehicle operated by a Metrolinx sub-contractor struck a pedestrian while making a right turn from Pape Avenue onto Mortimer Avenue. This route was not a Metrolinx approved haul route. On February 27, 2025, another heavy truck, operated by a different Metrolinx sub-contractor, made an identical turn, which was captured on video. These two incidents have caused the surrounding community and residents all across the Ontario Line to call for increased steps to be taken to keep people safe during Ontario Line construction. At a recent online community meeting nearly 150 residents expressed their concerns about heavy truck safety around the Ontario Line construction sites. With hundreds of additional trucks expected once Metrolinx begins soil removal from tunnelling operations at the Gerrard and Carlaw site, a publicly shared Heavy Truck Safety Plan is critical to ensuring community confidence and safety throughout the project construction.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Manager to request Metrolinx to develop a comprehensive Heavy Truck Safety Plan to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, that is shared publicly by Metrolinx, and includes enforcement measures, monitoring protocols, and a mechanism for residents to report concerns, and to share the finalized plan with the local Councillors and interested community members along the Ontario Line alignment by May 12, 2025. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to include the requirement for a Heavy Truck Safety Plan as a permit condition in Transportation Permits issued to Metrolinx Ontario Line contractors in Ward 14 and Ward 15 and other affected Wards subsequent to May 12, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Manager to request Metrolinx to develop a comprehensive Heavy Truck Safety Plan to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, that is shared publicly by Metrolinx, and includes enforcement measures, monitoring protocols, and a mechanism for residents to report concerns, and to share the finalized plan with the local Councillors and interested community members along the Ontario Line alignment by April 11, 2025. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to include the requirement for a Heavy Truck Safety Plan as a permit condition in Transportation Permits issued to Metrolinx Ontario Line contractors in Ward 14 subsequent to April 11, 2025.
MM29.2adopted
This motion seeks approval to release Section 37 funds in the total amount of $29,000.00 to Transportation Services for the purpose of funding various public realm and streetscape improvements including the supply and installation of decorative paving fronting the historic Wesleyan Cemetery and associated Highland Creek Community Association signage. In partnership with the local Councillor and Transportation Services staff, the resident's association has identified an opportunity to upgrade a section of existing asphalt paving fronting the historic Wesleyan Cemetery to create an appealing public space for the local community. This project is a partnership with the Highland Creek Community Association who are fully funding adjacent historic cemetery fence repairs. Transportation Services work will include the installation of signage to provide area identity and promote further economic vitality for the local retail hub of the community.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services, Neighbourhood Improvements (CTP425-04) by $24,000 gross, $0 debt, on a one-time basis, to implement decorative boulevard paving and banners for the Highland Creek Community Association, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from 1625 Military Trail and 6000 Kingston Road (Source Account: XR3026-3701386), collected for enhanced streetscape and public realm in the Highland Creek Village neighbourhood. 2. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services, Signs and Markings Asset Management (CTP725-02) by $5,000 gross, $0 debt, on a one-time basis, to fabricate and install branded street name signs for the Highland Creek community association fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from 1625 Military Trail and 6000 Kingston Road (Source Account: XR3026-3701386), collected for enhanced streetscape and public realm in the Highland Creek Village neighbourhood.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services, Neighbourhood Improvements (CTP425-04) by $24,000 gross, $0 debt, on a one-time basis, to implement decorative boulevard paving and banners for the Highland Creek Community Association, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from 1625 Military Trail and 6000 Kingston Road (Source Account: XR3026-3701386), collected for enhanced streetscape and public realm in the Highland Creek Village neighbourhood. 2. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services, Signs and Markings Asset Management (CTP725-02) by $5,000 gross, $0 debt, on a one-time basis, to fabricate and install branded street name signs for the Highland Creek community association fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from 1625 Military Trail and 6000 Kingston Road (Source Account: XR3026-3701386), collected for enhanced streetscape and public realm in the Highland Creek Village neighbourhood.
RM29.2adopted
City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on March 26 and 27, 2025.
City Council confirmed the minutes from the regular meeting held on March 26 and 27, 2025.
CC29.3amended
Procurement to Support Activities Funded by the Soccer for All Legacy Fund
The purpose of this report is to advise that the City Manager and Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services will be submitting a report to City Council for its meeting on April 23, 24 and 25. The report will address procurements to support activities through the Soccer for All Legacy Fund, which are being funded by private donations to further the legacy from hosting the FIFA World Cup 2026.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer, to negotiate and enter into any necessary agreements, including non-competitive agreements, with a value exceeding $500,000, and execute any necessary Purchase Order Amendments, with a value exceeding $500,000 or more than 10 per cent of the original commitment, for which Committee or City Council approval would normally be required under City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control By-law, and City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, for the provision of construction and professional services required to deliver up to 12 mini-pitches across Toronto, provided that: a. the procurement or purchase order amendment is necessary to meet the June 2026 timeline of the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto; b. the costs will be fully funded by the funds raised through the Soccer for All Legacy Fund; c. the non-competitive procurement processes are completed in accordance with the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, and associated policies and procedures; d. the terms and conditions of any such agreements and any amending agreements are acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and e. a report summarizing any amendments made under this authority is submitted to the appropriate Committee and/or City Council for information on an annual basis. 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to proceed to complete project planning and design, and establish a stage gate process that ensures the City's construction plan aligns with the funds committed through the Soccer for All Legacy Fund. 3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to enter into an agreement with the Toronto Foundation to accept donations on behalf of the City for the Soccer for All Legacy Fund and later paid to the City as a grantee. 4. City Council authorize, subject to the confirmation and receipt of donations noted in Part 3 above, the addition of donated funds as in-year adjustments to the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Corporate Real Estate Management to support the procurement activities and delivery of up to 12 mini-pitches, fully funded by the Soccer for All Legacy Fund.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services recommend that: 1. City Council receive this report for information.
MM29.3adopted
This Motion seeks approval to release Section 37 funds in the amount of $210,000 to Transportation Services Neighbourhood Projects Unit for the purpose of funding laneway construction on Lane S Eglinton W Glen Cedar - an unnamed section of public laneway bounded by Toronto Parking Authority Car Park 155 (995 Eglinton West) to the north, Glen Cedar Road to the east and Menin Road to the west. In partnership with the local Councillor and Transportation Services staff, the Cedarvale and Upper Village Community Group has identified an opportunity to transform the laneway at the rear of Toronto Parking Authority property into a safe, vibrant and inviting public space for the local community. In addition to enhanced aesthetic appeal through replacement of an aging retaining wall and installation of decorative fencing, the project will also incorporate green infrastructure in the form of planting and permeable surfaces. As this laneway is located within the boundaries of the Upper Village Business Improvement Area, the local Business Improvement Area has been engaged and will assist with ongoing maintenance of laneway elements once constructed.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services by $210,000, on a one-time basis, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured from the developments: a. $116,826.37 from 1996-2000 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701168); and b. $93,173.63 from 859, 861, and 875 Eglinton Avenue West and 2020 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701174). for public realm and laneway improvements to Lane S Eglinton W Glen Cedar in the Humewood-Cedarvale neighbourhood (CTP425-03).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2025-2034 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services by $210,000, on a one-time basis, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured from the developments: a. $116,826.37 from 1996-2000 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701168); and b. $93,173.63 from 859, 861, and 875 Eglinton Avenue West and 2020 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701174). for public realm and laneway improvements to Lane S Eglinton W Glen Cedar in the Humewood-Cedarvale neighbourhood (CTP425-03).
RM29.3adopted
Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from the Mayor and City Officials
Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 22 on April 14, 2025 Submitted by Mayor Olivia Chow, Chair Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 24 on April 11, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Lily Cheng, Chair Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 19 on April 8, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, Chair Report of the General Government Committee from Meeting 20 on April 7, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 20 on April 9, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Mike Colle, Vice-Chair Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 20 on April 10, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 8 on April 7, 2025 Submitted by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, Chair Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 21 on April 2, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holyday, Chair Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 22 on April 2, 2025 Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 21 on April 3, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 21 on April 3, 2025 Submitted by Councillor Chris Moise, Chair New Business from the Mayor and City Officials
Committee Reports and New Business were presented to City Council for consideration.
CC29.4adopted
Pursuant to the Expropriations Act, Metrolinx expropriated City-owned lands with the municipal addresses of 271 Front Street East, 25 Berkeley Street, and the north portion of 44 Parliament Street operating as a Toronto Parking Authority lot (collectively known as the "First Parliament Properties") and the subsurface portion of Parliament Square Park located at the south side of 44 Parliament Street (the "Strata Lands"), for the purpose of the construction of the new underground Corktown Subway Station and underground tunnel on the proposed Ontario Line. Metrolinx took possession of the First Parliament Properties and the Strata Lands on August 31, 2021. Metrolinx served offers of compensation on the City on August 16, 2021 in respect of 271 Front Street East and 25 Berkeley Street and on September 15, 2021 for 44 Parliament Street. The City accepted the offers of compensation without prejudice to its ability to further negotiate the payment of additional compensation or to bring a claim to the Ontario Land Tribunal to seek additional compensation for the expropriations as permitted by the Expropriations Act. This report deals with potential litigation that affects the City and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The purpose of this report is to seek further direction in this regard and information is being provided as confidential material.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as they contain advice and information that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice and information that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this Report. 2. City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 including Confidential Appendices A and B, and the confidential recommendations are to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it contains advice and information which are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.4adopted
I received a request from Spirit of York Distillery Co., located at 12 Trinity Street, advising that in order to obtain a "By The Glass" Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence, a resolution from the local Municipal Council is required.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Spirit of York Distillery Co., 12 Trinity Street, for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Spirit of York Distillery Co., 12 Trinity Street for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass.
RM29.4received
Members of Council will declare interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
Members of Council declared interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
CC29.5adopted
On February 26, 2024, the owner of 1117 Queen Street West appealed Council's refusal of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 1117 Queen Street West (the "Original Development Applications") to the Ontario Land Tribunal. On June 17, 2024, the owner appealed Council's refusal of the applications to alter and demolish heritage attributes of the property at 1117 Queen Street West under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to the Tribunal (the "Original Permit Requests"). The heritage permit applications reflected the proposal in the above noted Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. On October 4, 2024, the Tribunal issued the Procedural Order regarding the appealed Original Development Applications and Original Permit Requests, and set down a 10 day hearing commencing on July 7, 2025. On February 4, 2025, as permitted by the Procedural Order, the owner filed revisions to the Original Development Applications and Original Permit Requests. The Original Development Applications have been revised to propose the construction of a 28 storey, mixed use building, partially retaining the designated heritage Postal Station 'C' building at the base. The development proposes a total gross floor area of 17,353 square metres, consisting of 16,421 square metres of residential floor space and 932 square metres of community space. A total of 272 residential units are proposed and one level of underground parking for 309 bicycles. Loading for the site is accessed from Lisgar Street (the "Revised Development Applications"). This report focuses on the owner's revisions to the Original Permit Requests (described below) under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act which requests City Council's consent to alterations to the designated property at 1117 Queen Street West and subsection 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which requests the demolition of specified heritage attributes on the building of the designated heritage property. Council requires the advice of the Toronto Preservation Board in respect of matters which may impact a designated heritage property.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 19, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 19, 2025) from the City Solicitor, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 19, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it pertains to litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 19, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 19, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.5withdrawn
In recent months, my office along with several of my colleagues have experienced a surge in concerns around public safety, dangerous overcrowding, and noise complaints stemming from certain non-profit organizations hosting large-scale rave parties. Currently, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario issues Special Occasion Permits without requiring these organizations to notify municipal authorities, creating a regulatory gap that allows potentially problematic events to proceed unchecked. While the majority of non-profit events in our city contribute positively to our community, a few have exploited regulatory exemptions, undermining the public trust and safety that these guidelines are intended to protect. This motion seeks to address this oversight by requesting that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario amend its Special Occasion Permit process for non-profit organizations. By including municipalities in the approval process for these permits, as is the current practice for for-profit entities, the motion aims to enhance local oversight in event planning. Additionally, the establishment of a municipal complaint process will provide a structured channel for addressing grievances and ensuring that non-compliant events are swiftly managed. Through these amendments, we aim to preserve the integrity of non-profit events while safeguarding public safety and community welfare.
Member Motion MM26.5 was withdrawn at City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to review and amend its Special Occasion Permit process for non-profit organizations to include a municipal approval process to reduce nuisance actors.
RM29.5received
Members of Council may file petitions.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, received the following petitions for information: 1. Petition headed "Torontonians United Against MM29.5 - Enhance Oversight of Special Occasion Permits for Non-Profit Organizations" submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 24 - Scarborough-Guildwood, containing the signatures of approximately 6,808 persons. 2. Petition headed "Make School Zones Safer in North Scarborough" submitted by Councillor Jamaal Myers, Ward 23 - Scarborough North, containing the signatures of approximately 218 persons.
CC29.6adopted
The purpose of this report is to request instructions in respect of the proceedings before the Ontario Land Tribunal. The applicant appealed the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 1117 Queen Street West to the Ontario Land Tribunal as a result of Council's refusal of the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. The property municipally known as 1117 Queen Street West is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it pertains to litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to oppose the revised Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application filed on February 5, 2025, for the lands municipally known as 1117 Queen Street West. 2. Should the Ontario Land Tribunal approve the revised Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, in whole or in part, City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order on the Official Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment is satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor; b. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment is satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor; c. the Owner has, at its sole cost and expense: i. submitted a revised Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Review, including the Foundation Drainage Report ("Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water; ii. secured the design and the provision of financial securities in respect of any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Reports, all to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Engineering Reports, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water; and iii. ensured that implementation of the accepted Engineering Reports does not require changes to the proposed amending By-law or that any required changes have been made to the proposed amending By-law to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, including the use of a Holding ("H") By-law symbol regarding any new municipal servicing infrastructure or upgrades to existing municipal servicing infrastructure, as may be required; d. the Owner has provided a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1117 Queen Street West prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 26, 2023, and Heritage Impact Assessment Addendum prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated January 31, 2025 and details all future conservation efforts as part of this application, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and e. the Owner has entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1117 Queen Street West in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates, dated January 31, 2025, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 26, 2023, and Heritage Impact Assessment Addendum prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated January 31, 2025, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Part 2.d. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor on the lands municipally known as 1117 Queen Street West. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any additional conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.6amended
The Toronto Transit Commission Board in response to safety concerns and customer complaints approved at its December meeting banned lithium-ion battery powered micromobility devices, including e-bikes and e-scooters until April 15, 2025. The decision came after an incident in December 2024 involving a battery explosion and fire on a Toronto Transit Commission subway train, as well as several other similar incidents in Toronto. While the Toronto Transit Commission remains committed to improving the integration of cycling, micromobility and transit in Toronto, this ban supports the Toronto Transit Commission's priority of putting the safety of employees and customers first. Lithium-ion batteries are known to pose a greater risk in colder months, resulting in a higher likelihood of fires. Paired with the increased risk for fire damage and spread in underground tunnels, the seasonal ban was determined to be the safest option for customers and employees. However, the Toronto Transit Commission recognizes that this ban also has a disproportionate effect on some of the most marginalized workers in our city. In New York City a public e-bike battery charging pilot program was piloted and met with considerable success. It is thus vital that the City of Toronto explore appropriate options and the costs of supplying such options for food delivery workers prior to the re-implementation of the ban for Winter 2025.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, and the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to assess the need for more secure e-bike storage and battery charging and exchange facilities near Toronto Transit Commission transit stations. 2. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to work with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, through the multi-partner table led by Transportation Services, to develop a communications campaign to inform Toronto Transit Commission riders of the Toronto Transit Commission's electronic micromobility policies.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe, recommends that: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with the Toronto Parking Authority to: a. work with the Toronto Transit Commission, food delivery companies (including Uber, Doordash, Skip, etc.) and labour unions (such as Gig Workers United) to study the feasibility of providing more secure e-bike storage and battery charging and exchange facilities near transit stations; and b. develop an e-bikes policy specific to all enclosed Toronto Transit Commission public spaces by July 2025. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with the Toronto Parking Authority to work with food delivery companies to provide e-bike and battery storage, exchange, charging, and transport solutions to support their workers' needs, including requiring verification of e-bike and battery certification for workers to use their delivery platform. 3. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to work with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the General Manager, Transportation Services, labour associations (such as Gig Workers United) and food delivery companies (including Uber, Doordash, Skip, etc.) to develop a communications campaign to inform e-bike users of the Toronto Transit Commission's e-bike policies.
RM29.6received
Presentations, Introductions and Announcements
Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.
Various presentations, introductions and announcements were made to City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025. April 23, 2025 Councillor Colle, during the morning session of the meeting, made remarks about the late Wendy Bishop and offered condolences to Wendy's family and colleagues, who were present in the Council Chamber. Councillor Myers, during the morning session of the meeting, made remarks about the late Christina Huang, and offered condolences to Christina's family, classmates, teachers and everyone grieving her tragic passing. Councillor Saxe, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed grades 4 and 5 students from Huron St. Junior Public School who were present in the Council Chamber. Councillor Colle, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed Joe Xuereb, a vistor from Malta, and former MP and York City Councillor John Nunziata, who were present in the Council Chamber. Mayor Chow, during the afternoon session of the meeting, recognized the anniversary of the Yonge Street tragedy of April 23, 2018, and asked for a moment of silence to honour the memories of the victims of the incident: Renuka Amarasingha, Andrea Bradden, Geraldine Brady, So He Chung, Anne Marie D'Amico, Mary Elizabeth Betty Forsyth, Chul Min Kang, Ji Hun Kim, Munir Abdo Habib al-Najjar, Dorothy Sewell, and Amaresh Tesfamariam. City Council observed a moment of silence. Mayor Chow acknowledged the first responders and personnel involved in the aftermath and investigation, and announced that on Saturday, April 26, 2025, Canterbury Place in North York will be ceremonially renamed as "Heroes' Way." The following Members of Council, during the afternoon session of the meeting, made remarks to commemorate the Yonge Street tragedy: Councillor Cheng, Councillor Moise, and Councillor Bravo April 24, 2025 Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, called upon Mayor Chow to recognize National Poetry Month. Mayor Chow addressed City Council in celebration of National Poetry Month. Mayor Chow welcomed Lillian Allen, Toronto's Poet Laureate and Shahaddah Jack, Toronto's Youth Poet Laureate to the Chamber. Lillian Allen addressed City Council and read her poems "Arrivals" and "The Village Corner - Old Yorkville, Toronto." Shahaddah Jack addressed City Council and read her poem "I am a Poem." Mayor Chow, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed participants in the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's "The Next Surgeon" program, who were present in the Council Chamber. Mayor Chow recognized program staff and volunteers and presented them with a scroll. Mayor Chow, during the morning session of the meeting, acknowledged Abi Bond, Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on her last City Council meeting. Mayor Chow thanked Abi for her contribution to the City of Toronto and wished her all the best on her return to British Columbia. Deputy Mayor Malik, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed grades 3, 4 and 5 students from the Waterfront School who were present in the Council Chamber. Councillor Fletcher, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed former City of Toronto Councillor and budget chief Gary Crawford who was present in the Council Chamber. Councillor Matlow, during the afternoon session of the meeting, welcomed students from the Centennial Infant and Child Centre who were present in the Council Chamber. Councillor Mantas, during the afternoon session of the meeting, advised Members of Council that today marked the day to commemorate the victims of the 1915 Armenian Genocide, and made remarks in remembrance of the event.
CC29.7adopted
On October 12, 2023, the applicant submitted Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to the City to permit the development of a 21-storey mixed-use building containing 263 dwelling units and 213 square metres of ground floor retail at 1304-1318 King Street West and 143-145 Cowan Avenue. At the May 22 to 24, 2024 meeting of City Council, City Council considered a staff report that recommended refusal of the applications. City Council adopted City staff's recommendations without amendment. One June 24, 2024, the applicant appealed City refusal of the applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The City Solicitor requires further directions for upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearings scheduled to commence on May 26, 2025. This matter is urgent and should not be deferred.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated April 4, 2025 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, including any appropriate holding (H) provisions; b. acceptable site and concept landscape plans have been provided to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services for the required streetscape works along King Street West and Cowan Avenue (including the reduction of the curb radius at the northeast corner of the intersection, in accordance with the City's Curb Radii Design Guidelines); c. any other required plans, reports and studies have been revised to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services with revisions, as may be necessary, implemented as part of the amending Zoning By-law, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and d. City Council has approved Rental Housing Demolition Application 23 213845 STE 04 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the existing rental housing. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.7adopted
Toronto rightly prides itself on being a leader in the protection of tenants. From the groundbreaking Section 111 Rental Replacement by-law to the recent Renovictions By-law, one of the strongest in Canada, this City and Council has consistently worked to close the gaps in legislation to protect tenants. One area that needs a careful look at creating additional protections is the Committee of Adjustment. Many applications go to the Committee that, if approved, would likely lead to current residential tenants having to move. While the Committee is constrained to consider only the factors as laid out in the four tests under the Planning Act, there is an opportunity to expand the City's information about residential tenancies and potential future impacts. The addition of a simple question on the application asking whether current residential tenants would be required to move would be invaluable to the City. With a similar question now added to the Building Permit process it should be well within the scope of the City's authority to collect this data. Another area where the Committee could make a simple change to help tenants is to make it standard to notify tenants of an application at the property they live in. Currently only property owners are notified via mail up to 20 days before, while tenants have to wait until a sign goes up 10 days before.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include in future changes to the Committee of Adjustment the creation of a standard entry on Committee of Adjustment Applications that would disclose whether one or more tenants are expected to be displaced by the application and to provide that information as part of the materials posted on the Application Information Centre. 2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include in future changes to the Committee of Adjustment notices to tenants at the impacted property, rather than solely to property owners.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to include in future changes to the Committee of Adjustment the creation of a standard entry on Committee of Adjustment Applications that would disclose whether one or more tenants are expected to be displaced by the application and to provide that information as part of the materials posted on the Application Information Centre. 2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include in future changes to the Committee of Adjustment notices to tenants at the impacted property, rather than solely to property owners.
RM29.7amended
City Council will review the Order Paper.
April 23, 2025: City Council adopted the April 23, 2025, Order Paper as amended and all other items not held on consent. April 24, 2025: City Council adopted April 24, 2025, Order Paper.
CC29.8adopted
On November 23, 2023, the City received Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment applications for 4151 to 4155 Sheppard Avenue East and 5 Lamont Avenue to permit the construction of a 46-storey mixed-used building. At its meeting of March 20 and 21, 2024, City Council refused the Applications. The applicant appealed City Council's refusal of the Applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal on April 22, 2024. The City Solicitor requires further directions for the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing which was scheduled to commence on April 22, 2025. The hearing was adjourned and a Case Management Conference before the Ontario Land Tribunal has been scheduled for April 28, 2025, so the City Solicitor can update the Ontario Land Tribunal following receipt of Council's directions. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle from Goodmans LLP dated April 7, 2025 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribuna in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review; b. the Owner has submitted an acceptable revised Landscape and Planting Plans, including a soil volume plan to meet TGS version 4 requirements, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment and Climate and the Executive Director, Development Review; c. the Owner has submitted an acceptable revised Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including a revised wind tunnel study with the identification of any required mitigation measures to be secured in the Zoning By-law amendment and through the Site Plan Control process, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; d. the Owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services and Transportation Services as they relate to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application as set out in their memorandum dated January 3, 2024, or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the Applicant, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the Owner has submitted a Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, and Hydrogeological Review, including the Foundation Drainage Report or addendums ("Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water; and f. the Owner has secured the design and provision of financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the Engineering Reports, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 9, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, and all information contained in Confidential Appendices A, B and C to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM29.8adopted
Toronto's parks are some of the most used and cherished public spaces residents have to enjoy. They are places that we use to participate in sports, go for a walk, or just sit with friends and family at a picnic table. For the increasing number of Torontonians that live in highrise buildings, the local park is their backyard. Parks are where we come together. That's why the City needs to adapt to the changing way parks are being used by residents. Many of Toronto's park by-laws are archaic, burdensome, unnecessary, and sometimes even absurd. One sign in a Midtown park prohibits ball playing, kite flying, frisbee throwing, large picnics and, ironically, posting signs. There are also by-laws in place against landing hot air balloons and cursing. This motion requests Staff to review the Parks By-law to remove measures that unfairly restrict residents from the full enjoyment of our parks. This motion also requests Staff to enable more food and beverage offerings in parks. Cities around the world establish kiosks and small cafes that provide enjoyable meeting places for residents to congregate. These could be tailored to the size and use of the parks; from small huts serving hot chocolate and coffee adjacent to outdoor rinks to kiosks serving sandwiches surrounded by picnic tables. There is inspiration from around the world that Toronto can draw on to offer a more enjoyable experience in our parks.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks, and report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with recommendations to remove any provisions that are archaic, burdensome, or unnecessary. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with options to provide more food and beverage offerings in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of physical structures and operating models.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks, and report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with recommendations to remove any provisions that are archaic, burdensome, or unnecessary. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to report in the fourth quarter of 2025 with options to provide more food and beverage offerings in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of physical structures and operating models.
CC29.9amended
The Applicant submitted Official Plan amendment and Zoning Bylaw amendment applications for the sites located at 1175-1181 Weston Road and 7-17 Locust Street (the "Applications"). City Council refused the Applications at its meeting on July 24 and 25, 2024. The applicant appealed City Council's decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal on August 22, 2024 (the "Appeal"). The City Solicitor requires further directions regarding the Appeal at the Ontario Land Tribunal. The first Case Management Conference for this matter is scheduled on May 20, 2025. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 5. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management following the closing of the transactions contemplated in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. 6. City Council request the Mayor to consider allocating any Community Benefit Charge funds collected from the development to the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area Streetscape Plan, through the annual budget process immediately following the payment of the funds to the City. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information regarding a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto. Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 22, 2025) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management will be made public at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. October 22, 2025 The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make them public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated April 11, 2025, set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment(s) and Zoning By-law Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor; b. the owner meets the Toronto Green Standard Tier 1, version 4, requirements applicable at the zoning bylaw-stage to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with the exception of soil width area as set out on the drawings attached as Appendices D and E in Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor; c. the owner has provided and implemented a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for Eligible Tenants of four (4) existing rental dwelling unit proposed to be demolished, addressing financial compensation and other assistance to lessen hardship, including the provision of rent gap payments; d. the owner has provided a legal undertaking to the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, securing the implementation of the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan required by condition (c) above; e. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues identified within the Engineering and Construction Services correspondence, dated May 8, 2024, or as revised, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; f. the owner has submitted a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and such report shall determine the stormwater run-off, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from the development and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development and/or any upgrades that may be required; g. the owner has provided a revised Servicing Report Groundwater Summary Form, Hydrogeological Review Report, Hydrological Review Summary Form, and Foundation Summary Form to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; h. should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report, a Holding Provision be included in the final form of the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment and the Holding Provision not to be lifted until such a time as the owner has made satisfactory arrangements, including entering into appropriate agreement(s) with the City for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure and the provision of financial securities to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; i. the submitted Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Rail Safety Report, and Compatibility/ Migration Study have been peer reviewed by a third-party consultant retained by the City at the owner's expense, to the satisfaction of the City; j. the submitted Energy Strategy Report has been reviewed to the satisfaction of the Environment and Energy; k. the owner has provided a revised Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including a revised Wind Tunnel Study with the identification of any required mitigation measures to be secured in the Zoning By-law amendment, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and l. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Metrolinx noted in correspondence, dated May 7, 2024, including the need for a technical review and made required revisions, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx. 3. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals, in whole or in part, City Council approve an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum size of 503 square metres with frontage on Weston Road and Hollis Street in satisfaction of the owner's required parkland dedication pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as described in the Settlement Offer; the on-site parkland dedication shall be conveyed to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments with the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; the on-site parkland shall further be conveyed to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for whichever building comes first, in an acceptable environmental condition, and constructed to base park condition at no cost to the City, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor. 4. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part and the owner elects to construct the Above Base Park Improvements, City Council approve a Development Charges credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the Development Charges credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time-to-time. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor is now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make it public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2025) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor are to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
MM29.9adopted
The Weston Lions Arena is a 75-year-old facility that is City-owned, and programmed and managed by the Weston Lions. The current agreement has been in place since 1983, automatically renewing annually. Through preliminary discussions with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, there is potential to explore the feasibility of investing in Weston Lions Arena as a potential MLSE Launchpad location. MLSE Foundation has significant experience delivering free, high quality, accessible recreation programming for children and youth experiencing barriers to participation. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment LaunchPad located at 259 Jarvis Street is a purpose-built, 42,000-square-foot facility located in downtown Toronto that leverages sport to support positive youth development. Since 2017, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment LaunchPad has delivered free, evidence-informed programming that integrates physical activity, life skills, and academic support for children and youth experiencing barriers to participation. The model is informed by comparable City recreation and youth services and emphasizes measurable outcomes and strong community partnerships to improve the long-term well-being of participants. It is recognized in North America as one of the leading sport for development community initiatives. This motion seeks to direct staff to engage directly with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation as well as local stakeholders to explore the feasibility of revitalizing and reimagining the Weston Lions Arena to optimize recreation opportunities and community benefits in the next evolution of the facility.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to engage with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, the Ward Councillor, stakeholders and local residents, to explore the feasibility of reimagining Weston Lions Arena to better deliver high-quality and accessible sport and recreation opportunities.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to engage with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, the Ward Councillor, stakeholders and local residents, to explore the feasibility of reimagining Weston Lions Arena to better deliver high-quality and accessible sport and recreation opportunities.
MM29.10adopted
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision approving the minor variance application for 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Application. The Applicant is the owner of the lands municipally known as 164 Homewood Avenue in the City of Toronto. On February 20, 2025, the Applicant applied to the Committee for variances to City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, seeking increases to the maximum permitted building height and maximum lot coverage to construct a new three-storey fourplex with below-grade parking spaces and an as of right garden suite with residential dwelling. The proposed dwelling proposes a 34.8 percent lot coverage whereas the permitted lot coverage is 30 percent and a 10.65m building height whereas the permitted height is 10m, posing massing and coverage issues disproportionate to the neighbourhood. Community Planning did not submit a Staff Report on this matter. On April 11, 2025, the Committee issued a decision approving the Application, subject to conditions. A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached as Attachment 1. In order to preserve the City's right of appeal, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body on April 17, 2025. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to preserve the City's statutory right and requires instructions to appeal and attend the hearing for this matter.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision pertaining to 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application A0076/25NY respecting 164 Homewood Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision pertaining to 164 Homewood Avenue (Application A0076/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application A0076/25NY respecting 164 Homewood Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
MM29.11adopted
The actions by the provincial government to build a private spa by Therme at Ontario Place have already exacted a severe toll. The province has razed mature trees, destroying a waterfront recreation space beloved by Torontonians and the habitat of many animals including beavers, minks, foxes, coyotes and over 170 species of birds. However, another potential disaster raised in an April 16th New York Times article, can still be averted. The Province has advanced its project through extraordinary legislative powers, including the Rebuilding Ontario Place Act. It exempted the Therme site from an Environmental Assessment, imposed an enhanced Ministerial Zoning Order that removed the City's Planning review authority, and expropriated City owned land within the Ontario Place site. The Ontario Place redevelopment was the subject of an Auditor-General of Ontario report released December 3, 2024. The Auditor-General found that Infrastructure Ontario (IO) did not conduct due diligence to ensure that spas cited by Therme in its submissions were in fact owned and operated by Therme Group. They reviewed the six spas and found five instances where the spa cited in the submission was not owned or operated by Therme Group. The April 16, 2025 New York Times article investigated these inconsistencies and determined Therme group "misrepresented itself, misleading the Ontario government and exaggerating its experience in its bid to secure the Toronto deal." Therme was able to misrepresent its experience by adopting the same name, and similar logo, of a more established spa company. Therme used its deal with the Ontario government to secure funding for another project in Manchester and is closing in on deals in Dubai, Washington, and Dallas, which would require $2.5 billion to construct all 4 sites. Given the company was found to only have $1.1 million (USD) in equity, and losing money, there is now significant doubt that Therme would be able to deliver a spa in a reasonable timeframe, if at all. The new information contained in the Times story has significant implications for the City of Toronto as the only thing worse on a public waterfront site than a private spa, that is anticipated to worsen traffic and congestion, is a derelict wasteland fenced off by construction hoarding. During its review of the Ontario Place planning application, the City raised serious concerns about the appropriateness of this development on the waterfront. The Ontario government's failure to provide proper due diligence on their spa partner requires a status update on all City activities related to the provincial government's Therme development before this dubious project becomes further entrenched. This motion is urgent as Council needs an opportunity to assess the City's options given the significant revelations contained in an April 16th New York Times article titled, "A wellness Company with False Claims, Global Aims and a Toronto Island."
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor and all relevant Divisions, to report to the next meeting of City Council with a status update on all City activities related to the Therme spa project, including: a. whether the Province has taken ownership of the 16 acres of City-owned land at Ontario Place and, if so, what legislative mechanism has been applied, and any options for the return of that land to the City, particularly as a result of inadequate due diligence in the provincial bid award process; b. the status of the City's review of the Province's initial planning application for Ontario Place, the City's findings during that review regarding public benefit and accessibility of the waterfront, and whether the proposal would have been recommended for approval based on the City's planning principles; c. what remaining approvals or permits are required for the Therme project, and what public benefits Therme is obligated to provide, either under provincial legislation or which can be secured through these approvals; or already have been; and d. status update regarding: i. parking for the Ontario Place development; ii. site servicing (water, sewage, electricity, etc) on the Ontario Place site; and iii. construction related road closures/alterations at the Ontario Place site.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor and all relevant Divisions, to report to the next meeting of City Council with a status update on all City activities related to the Therme spa project, including: a. whether the Province has taken ownership of the 16 acres of City-owned land at Ontario Place and, if so, what legislative mechanism has been applied, and any options for the return of that land to the City, particularly as a result of inadequate due diligence in the provincial bid award process; b. the status of the City's review of the Province's initial planning application for Ontario Place, the City's findings during that review regarding public benefit and accessibility of the waterfront, and whether the proposal would have been recommended for approval based on the City's planning principles; c. what remaining approvals or permits are required for the Therme project, and what public benefits Therme is obligated to provide, either under provincial legislation or which can be secured through these approvals; or already have been; and d. status update regarding: i. parking for the Ontario Place development; ii. site servicing (water, sewage, electricity, etc) on the Ontario Place site; and iii. construction related road closures/alterations at the Ontario Place site.
MM29.12adopted
Since the approval for 589-599 Lawrence Avenue West was adopted by Council on October 9, 2025 (Item 2024.NY17.6), City staff have requested that a motion be moved in order to table a supplementary report to introduce an updated bill with revisions that would implement this application. This motion serves as that opportunity for staff to table their supplementary report. The reason for urgency for this motion is because the applicant is required to have the bills passed by Council so that they can complete their application submission for funding from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: Requires a re-opening of Item 2025.NY17.6 (October 9 and 10, 2024, Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Part 1 of the decision.
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.NY17.6 by: a. amending Part 1 by deleting the words "Attachment 5 to the report (September 6, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District" and replacing with the words "Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development" so that Part 1 now reads as follows: 1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review. 2. City Council determine that pursuant to Subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act no further notice is required.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Chernos Lin, recommends that City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2024.NY17.6 by: a. amending Part 1 by deleting the words "Attachment 5 to the report (September 6, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District" and replacing with the words "Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development" so that Part 1 now reads as follows: 1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (April 1, 2025) from the Executive Director, Development Review. 2. City Council determine that pursuant to Subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act no further notice is required.
MM29.13adopted
In 2021, City Council provided City staff with direction to engage with Noventa Energy Partners ("Noventa") on up to nine additional sewer waste recovery projects (MM47.61). Exhibition Place was identified as a potential opportunity given the imminent need to replace existing aging equipment and the City's mandate of net-zero by 2040. At its meeting of April 25, 2024, the Exhibition Place Board by adoption of EP9.19, authorized Exhibition Place staff to work with City Environment, Climate and Forestry staff to negotiate and enter into a Memorandum of Understanding, including a Thermal Energy Services Agreement among Exhibition Place, City of Toronto, and Novena Energy Partners. Pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 63-6F, Exhibition Place requires City Council authority for any agreement with a third party related to the provision of services in excess of four years. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 195 Procurement, Section 195-7.3 (D), Standing Committee and Council approval is required for all procurement valued up to or over $500,000, or where the term of the contract exceeds five (5) years or exceeds the projected capital funding for the project as approved by Council. Chapter 195-7.1K provides an exemption to the requirement to conduct competitive procurements where there is "Another organization is funding, or substantially funding, the procurement and the City has determined that the supplier and the terms and conditions of the proposed contract are beneficial to the City." The term of 30 years is necessary due to the significant upfront capital, long payback periods, long equipment and infrastructure lifespans and the proprietary nature of equipment and maintenance procedures for specialized equipment and operations. Should the engagement proceed, Noventa, at their own risk, will design, finance, construct, own, and operate the energy system with substantial funding from the Canadian Infrastructure Bank constituting a significant benefit to Exhibition Place and the City of Toronto. This motion is urgent as the deadline for the City to complete a Thermal Energy Services Agreement for the project to receive Canadian Infrastructure Bank funding is April 28, 2025.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Exhibition Place to negotiate and execute a non-competitive procurement contract with Noventa Aggregator GP Inc. on behalf of Noventa Exhibition Place LP, for the supply of hot water, chilled water and power generation capacity to Exhibition Place's district energy system over a term of 30 years commencing on date July 1, 2026, with an anticipated spend of eighty two (82) million dollars over the course of the term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize Exhibition Place to negotiate and execute a non-competitive procurement contract with Noventa Aggregator GP Inc on behalf of Noventa Exhibition Place LP for the supply of Hot Water, Chilled Water and power generation capacity to Exhibition Place's district energy system over a term of 30 years commencing on date July 1, 2026, with an anticipated spend of eighty-two (82) million dollars over the course of the term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Exhibition Place Board of Directors, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
MM29.14adopted
At its meeting on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, City Council adopted Item TE34.35, in connection with a site-specific zoning amendment relating to redevelopment of lands at 200 Queens Quay. The application was approved for a mixed-use development and included an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum area of 488 square metres as contemplated by Section 42 of the Planning Act. The proposed development was approved and site- specific By-law 1012-2022 was enacted by Council which secured the parkland conveyance as a matter in support of the development through Section 37 Agreement requirements. The By-law requires the conveyance within 30 months of the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development and includes permission for encumbrance by de-stressed tiebacks deemed acceptable to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation subject to compensation payable at the time of conveyance. Otherwise, the conveyance was to be free and clear of encumbrances to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation. Through detailed review of the related Site Plan Control application, it has come to staff's attention that there are existing concrete caissons located throughout the development site that supported the former parking structure, including 7 caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland to be conveyed to the City. The subject caissons range in diameter from approximately 0.7 metres to 1.4 metres. The owner has advised that it is not feasible to completely remove the caissons located within the future parkland but they will be cut down to a minimum of 2 metres below ground level. It has also come to staff's attention that the development site is burdened by a registered Limiting Distance Agreement. In relation to the adjoining residential condominium located at 218 Queens Quay West, the Limiting Distance Agreement moves the limiting distance from the property line to accommodate certain unprotected openings within the meaning of the Ontario Building Code along the condominium's northern wall. The effect is to restrict construction along the southern boundary of the future parkland. The owner has advised that it is not feasible to fully release the Limiting Distance Agreement from title of the future parkland without a significant retrofit of the condominium to meet Building Code requirements. Consequently, the limiting distance that restricts construction over two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres along the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the height of the lower level of the 9th storey of 218 Queens Quay West will need to be preserved, either through an amendment to the existing Limiting Distance Agreement or by virtue of a new Limiting Distance Agreement. Toronto Municipal Code Section 415-26B requires parkland conveyances to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. This Motion seeks authority from City Council to accept the future parkland with unforeseen encumbrances of below grade concrete caissons and above grade limiting distance requirements as set out above and deemed satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, subject to the property owner providing the City with compensation determined, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in the usual course. This motion is urgent as it relates to a development approval that is delivering 79 units of affordable housing and requires certainty on these agreements to proceed.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. Despite Toronto Municipal Code Section 415-26 (B), City Council authorize that the conveyance of parkland to the City pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as contemplated in Site Specific Zoning By-law 1012-2022 may be encumbered by: a. a maximum of 7 below grade concrete caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland, where such encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrance is subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; and b. limiting distances that restrict construction relating to two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres located at the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the lower level of the 9th storey of the adjacent building to the south, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrances are subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount to be determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and which limiting distances are set out in a limiting distance agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. Despite Toronto Municipal Code Section 415- 26 (B), City Council authorize that the conveyance of parkland to the City pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act as contemplated in Site Specific Zoning By-law 1012-2022 may be encumbered by: a. a maximum of 7 below grade concrete caissons distributed within the southern half of the future parkland, where such encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrance is subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management; and b. limiting distances that restrict construction relating to two triangular sections having a combined area of approximately 8.1 square metres located at the southern boundary of the future parkland and commencing at a height of approximately 103.3 metres above ground corresponding to the lower level of the 9th storey of the adjacent building to the south, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the City Solicitor and such encumbrances are subject to compensation payable to the City at the time of conveyance, in an amount to be determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and which limiting distances are set out in a limiting distance agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
MM29.15withdrawn
During the pandemic, the City of Toronto developed the capacity to hold public meetings and consultations remotely through videoconferencing technology. This technology continues to be used to hold many public meetings exclusively online. While online meetings can have many advantages, being present in the same room as the presenters and interested participants is important in certain circumstances. For example, being present in the same space may help neighbours build trust and understanding between one another and City representatives, digest complex information more effectively, feel more welcome to ask questions and interact with decision-makers, and serve a community's preferences. In 2024, the City of Toronto adopted a policy that allows Members of Council to request any internal meeting with City staff be held in-person. Following that precedent, this motion recommends that Council direct the City Manager to hold any consultation that is proposed to be conducted through a videoconferencing platform in person if requested by a Member of Council. To ensure the City Manager is able to act on clear direction, this motion recommends that Councillors can provide this direction for consultations on matters that relate to their Ward, while the Mayor can provide direction on consultations related to multiple wards or all wards. This change ensures that public consultations and meetings are responsive to the unique needs of the communities participating in each consultation.
Member Motion MM26.15 was withdrawn at City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Manager to hold in-person any public consultation or meeting that is planned to be hosted remotely when requested to do so in writing by: a. the local Councillor, if the matter relates only to the ward represented by that Councillor; or b. the Mayor, if the matter relates to more than one ward.
MM29.16adopted
Freezing Development Charges - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks
Every year, the City of Toronto follows Provincial legislation that requires raising development charges. This year, they are set to rise by 4 percent on May 1. The City has previously requested that the Province of Ontario amend the Development Charges Act and allow the City more flexibility when it comes to this annual indexing. This motion reiterates that request, and brings forward a workaround so we can freeze development charges. Canadian municipalities face challenges delivering the infrastructure people expect. Cities are responsible for an estimated 60 percent of public infrastructure yet receive only 9 percent of total revenue generated from all combined federal, provincial and municipal taxes and charges. Cities like Toronto apply development charges to cover a portion of the cost of infrastructure that enables housing development and creates communities people want to live in. Toronto's $59 billion 10-Year Capital Plan includes $6.5 billion from development charges to support our growing city. This includes: $1.2 billion in funding for water, wastewater and sewer infrastructure; approximately $950 million towards road and intersection upgrades to enable development; $1 billion towards parks and community centres; and $950 million to add capacity to the City's transit system, including purchasing new buses, streetcars and subway cars. Some examples to make this more concrete: Development charges will help build the infrastructure to serve tens of thousands of new homes in new communities at Quayside (4,700 homes), the Downsview airport lands (63,000 homes), Golden Mile (33,000 homes) and East Harbour (4,300 homes). They will also fund Toronto's one-third portion of the Eglinton East light-rail transit and Waterfront East light-rail transit, which are currently being designed. Of course, we recognize the challenges of the housing market and added cost of development charges. That's why we have cut or deferred development charges in two new programs. The Rental Housing Supply Program cuts development charges and property taxes, helping build 7,000 new rental homes. Our Multi-Unit Ownership Program defers development charges for 3,000 condo units. It's also why we are freezing development charges with this motion. Ultimately, the extent to which we can lower or defer development charges will depend on how much funding for infrastructure we can secure from other orders of government. The City of Toronto will continue to take action within our means to ensure more market and affordable homes are built in these uncertain economic times.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to authorize municipalities to adjust or remove annual indexing provisions without an amendment to the development charge by-law in order to incentivize building new housing. 2. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in coordination with appropriate City staff, and in the event that the Province of Ontario does not fulfill City Council's previous request to waive the requirement for the City to index its development charges annually, to use Section 27 agreements, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on all new housing developments effective May 1, 2025, to freeze development charges at current rates until such time that the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer completes the City Council directed comprehensive review of development charges, and a new development charge by-law is adopted. 3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to give municipalities the flexibility to reallocate development charge funds collected for specific service areas toward any development charge eligible project across other development charge service areas without the need to for future repayment or to merge services areas through a new by-law, so the City can meet critical infrastructure needs to support new housing. 4. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to allow federal and provincial infrastructure funding contributions to be directed to the non-growth share of development charge eligible projects and/or to offset revenue loss from Council's discretionary rate reductions, so the City can optimize all available funding sources to get critical infrastructure projects finished more quickly. 5. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to make the City of Toronto whole for lost revenue as a result of Bill 23.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to authorize municipalities to adjust or remove annual indexing provisions without an amendment to the development charge by-law in order to incentivize building new housing. 2. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer, in coordination with appropriate City staff, and in the event that the Province of Ontario does not fulfill City Council's previous request to waive the requirement for the City to index its development charges annually, to use Section 27 agreements, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on all new housing developments effective May 1, 2025 to freeze development charges at current rates until such time that the Chief Financial Officer completes the Council directed comprehensive review of development charges, and a new development charge by-law is adopted. 3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to give municipalities the flexibility to reallocate development charge funds collected for specific service areas toward any development charge eligible project across other development charge service areas without the need to for future repayment or to merge services areas through a new By-law, so the City can meet critical infrastructure needs to support new housing. 4. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Development Charges Act to allow federal and provincial infrastructure funding contributions to be directed to the non-growth share of development charge eligible projects and/or to offset revenue loss from Council's discretionary rate reductions, so the City can optimize all available funding sources to get critical infrastructure projects finished more quickly. 5. City Council reaffirm its request of the Province of Ontario to make the City of Toronto whole for lost revenue as a result of Bill 23.
MM29.17adopted
On March 26, 2025, City Council instructed the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of Revised Plans filed by the applicant on January 2, 2025. City Council also instructed the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that ten conditions have been fulfilled. The final condition that staff had recommended, and that City Council adopted, is that "the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site […]." This condition was added inadvertently and should be removed. The condition was appropriate in the context of negotiations with the applicant for a possible community space, which might have involved the release of the easement as a part of the deal for the community space. However, negotiations with the applicant on this point never materialized into a settlement offer, and so the condition is now unnecessary.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.DM28.1 by deleting Part 2.j. of the instructions to staff: 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: Part to be deleted: j. the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site, more specifically described as Parts 13 and 14 on Plan 66R-29819.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.DM28.1 by deleting Part 2. j. of the instructions to staff: 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: Part to be deleted: j. the owner and the City have made satisfactory arrangements to release the easement over the western portion of the site, more specifically described as Parts 13 and 14 on Plan 66R-29819.
MM29.18deferred
In December 2021, City Council allocated $2.912 million from the Toronto Water Capital Reserve (Resolution EX28.6) to the Scarborough Bluffs West (SBW) Project. The SBW study (the Project) will explore the enhancement and protection of sensitive shoreline and natural areas and opportunities for improved waterfront experience and access between the Eastern Beaches (Silver Birch Avenue) and Bluffer's Park along Lake Ontario. City Council also requested Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to include the Project as part of the 2022 Budget process and directed the City Manager to enter into an agreement with TRCA to complete the Project. The Project commenced on November 2, 2023 and following completion of several rounds of consultation through 2024, the Draft Terms of Reference (ToR) was released for public comment and agency review in July 2024. In fall 2024, after reviewing the Draft ToR, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) contacted the Project team to confirm whether all future design options would meet the recently updated 2024 Environmental Assessment regulations. These new rules require at least 1 km of altered shoreline and 4 hectares of lakefill for a Comprehensive Environmental Assessment (CEA) to be mandatory. The Project team explained that not all future design alternatives would meet these thresholds, given that the intent of the Project is to explore a wide range of reasonable options, including tableland solutions and/or shoreline solutions that could be less than 1 km in total length or 4 hectares of lakefill. Subsequently, the Project team requested to voluntarily continue with the CEA process to undertake the same high level of technical analysis and thorough public consultation that have been applied to other waterfront projects, and to conform to the requirements of the City's Official Plan. The Project team has received MECP approval to proceed with a Voluntary Agreement to continue through the CEA process, which requires execution from both TRCA and the City as co-proponents on the Project.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, deferred Item MM29.18 to the May 21, 22 and 23, 2025, meeting of City Council.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Manager on behalf of the City to enter into an Agreement with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks as a co-proponent with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to apply the Environmental Assessment Act to the Scarborough Bluffs West Project.
MM29.19adopted
Over the past few years, the importance of ensuring all Torontonians have equitable access to parks and public spaces has been driven home starkly. It is vital, especially for equity-seeking communities of colour, to have quality parks which support mental health, community resilience and a sense of belonging. As highlighted through the PanAm Games in 2015, and the upcoming FIFA World Cup next year, investment in sports can help to build communities. However, this is only true if we use these opportunities strategically to address the uneven distribution of sports resources across the City. While physical activity and healthier lifestyles begin with access to high-quality, accessible sports facilities, that is just the start of helping ensure every child and community member have an opportunity to thrive through sport. Partnerships providing underserved youth with access to safe, inclusive, and free sports programs in collaboration with organizations that use sports for social good is a key part of the picture. Furthermore, building a diverse and educated network of coaches and referees is vital to surmounting financial and cultural barriers that limit participation in sport. Working together with community and educational stakeholders who have expressed interest, we will be able to build happier, healthier, and more equitable communities. The language in this motion has been drafted and approved by staff in Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Community Planning and CreateTO.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward at the earliest opportunity City-initiated amendments to the Zoning By-laws identified in Attachment 1 to Member Motion MM29.19 in order to: a. re-allocate the unspent Section 37 funds towards other capital facility improvements within Ward 23 - Scarborough North; and b. to allow for the re-allocation of Section 37 funds to be directed towards another purpose if said funds have not been used for its intended purpose within three years. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to identify and explore partnership opportunities for Scarborough North that support Council-adopted park or recreation needs and priorities.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward at the earliest opportunity city-initiated amendments to the Zoning By-laws identified in Attachment 1 in order to: a. re-allocate the unspent Section 37 funds towards other capital facility improvements within Ward 23 - Scarborough North; and; b. to allow for the re-allocation of Section 37 funds to be directed towards another purpose if said funds have not been used for its intended purpose within three years. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to identify and explore partnership opportunities for Scarborough North that support Council-adopted park or recreation needs and priorities.
MM29.20adopted
Oxford Properties Group and CP REIT (collectively, the "Tenants") is seeking to align the current terms of all the ground leases at the southwest corner of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue (known as "Canada Square") with the Toronto Transit Commission, which will allow the Tenants sufficient term to secure the anchor tenant and to obtain the necessary capital investment to retrofit and modernize the existing buildings at 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street, shown on Appendix A. In 2018, City Council authorized the Toronto Transit Commission to enter the consolidated ground lease, which once in full force and effect upon waiver or satisfaction of conditions set out in a commencement agreement, will extend the terms of the existing ground lease for a 99-year period, while allowing for a phased redevelopment of the property. Under the consolidated ground lease, the Tenants original redevelopment plans for the property included partial demolition of the existing buildings at 2180 to 2200 Yonge Street, improvements to the subway station entrances, and the construction of a new bus terminal for the Toronto Transit Commission, with the Toronto Transit Commission contributing $25 million to the cost for the new bus terminal. On February 24, 2025, the Toronto Transit Commission Board approved the Tenants' request to align the terms of the existing ground leases to allow the Tenants sufficient term to execute the anchor tenant office lease for the existing buildings at 2180 Yonge Street and 2200 Yonge Street, and to commit the necessary capital investment to retrofit and modernize those buildings for the anchor tenant. By securing the anchor tenant office lease, the Tenants will secure the presence of a major employer in the Midtown community and revenue to support the ground rent from these properties for the Toronto Transit Commission. for many years to come. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 213, real estate agreements are generally entered into by the City. However, authority for Toronto Transit Commission to enter into the lease amending agreement is being sought in this instance in order to be consistent with the existing Council authority. Reason for Urgency: The matter is urgent because the Tenants fear that their anchor tenant may give notice to vacate Canada Square if the amendment to the lease is not heard at April City Council meeting and without the anchor tenant, the Tenants will not be able to secure financing for the new development.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Toronto Transit Commission, as landlord, to enter the lease amending agreements identified in the recommendations of the Toronto Transit Commission board approved on February 24, 2025, attached as required under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 279, as the Toronto Transit Commission holds the Lands as agent on behalf of the City. 2. City Council request the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to consult with the local Councillor and the Executive Director, Development Review, City of Toronto, on the redevelopment plan for the podium space connecting 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the Toronto Transit Commission, as landlord, to enter the lease amending agreements identified in the recommendations of the Toronto Transit Commission Board approved on February 24, 2025, attached as required under Municipal Code Chapter 279 as the Toronto Transit Commission holds the Lands as agent on behalf of the City. 2. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Chief Executive Officer to consult with the local Councillor and Executive Director, Development Review, City of Toronto, on the redevelopment plan for the podium space connecting 2180 and 2200 Yonge Street.
MM29.21adopted
On April 23, 2018, a devastating tragedy occurred on Yonge Street in Toronto's Willowdale neighborhood. The attack took place on a beautiful spring Monday afternoon in the heart of downtown North York resulting in the deaths of 11 people and injuries to 15 others. It was the deadliest mass murder in Toronto's history and sent shockwaves throughout the country. In the years since, the community has come together in grief, strength, and remembrance as the city has worked to keep the victims' memories alive through ongoing commemoration. The community is hopeful for a peaceful, permanent space where reflection and healing can continue to take place. Reason for urgency: A permanent memorial is urgently needed to honour the victims and provide a dedicated space for reflection and healing. Given the years that have passed since the tragedy, it is crucial to act swiftly and establish the memorial in a timely manner for a respectful tribute. Regrettably, challenges arose due to the scheduled reconstruction of Yonge Street and future refresh of Mel Lastman Square which made it difficult to select an appropriate location.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to bring forward a plan for a Yonge Street Tragedy memorial in Olive Square Park, and report back to the July 9, 2025, meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with: a. a consultative plan to engage victims' families, the Yonge Street Tragedy Memorial Steering Committee and the Willowdale community; b. proposed scope, including current site conditions and elements discussed with the steering committee, including consideration of a water feature, perennial garden and lighting; c. design contest timeline; d. work plan; e. funding sources; and f. a plan that brings forward the earliest possible date of implementation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to bring forward a plan for a Yonge Street Tragedy memorial in Olive Square Park, and report back to the July 9, 2025 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with: a. a consultative plan to engage victims' families, the Yonge Street Tragedy Memorial Steering Committee and the Willowdale community; b. proposed scope, including current site conditions and elements discussed with the steering committee, including consideration of a water feature, perennial garden and lighting; c. design contest timeline; d. work plan; e. funding sources; and f. a plan that brings forward the earliest possible date of implementation.
MM29.22adopted
In March of 2025, a Vehicle-For-Hire driver drove away from the location of a drop-off with a five year old child still remaining in a back row passenger seat. The mother was unable to contact the driver and when she contacted the Vehicle-For-Hire company directly, she was told they would not give out the driver's contact information to her or the police, and they offered no further assistance. This terrifying experience makes clear how critical it is for the City of Toronto to take additional measures to help safeguard its residents and visitors by continuously improving the policies and procedures that regulate Vehicle-For-Hire companies to ensure they meet a greater standard of customer safety and coordination with local law enforcement to prevent any number of dangerous situations such as this incident. The City of Toronto's current regulatory framework for the Vehicle-For-Hire industry does not provide any remedy to passengers in such an emergency situation, nor any penalty to negligent operators. The City of Toronto must review its current rules and recommend additional licencing requirements for the protection of passengers in even the rarest of circumstances. The reason for urgency of this motion without notice is due to the already demonstrated and possibly imminent danger to Vehicle-For-Hire customers if this risk remains unaddressed in the City of Toronto's regulatory framework governing Vehicle-For-Hire companies and drivers.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Toronto Police Service, to consult with Vehicle-For-Hire Industry and recommend any changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-For-Hire, that could require licensees to take greater accountability to directly assist customers and law enforcement in emergency situations in an urgent manner; and whether such requirements could become a condition of licenses to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Toronto Police Service to consult with Vehicle-For-Hire Industry and recommend any changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546 that could require licensees to take greater accountability to directly assist customers and law enforcement in emergency situations in an urgent manner; and whether such requirements could become a condition of licenses to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licencing and Standards.
MM29.23adopted
The Armenian Community Centre of Toronto has long stood as a vital hub for the Armenian-Canadian community across the Greater Toronto Area - supporting cultural, religious, educational, and advocacy organizations that serve thousands. Since 2021, the Centre has been working diligently on a much-needed expansion of its Armenian Youth Centre, with the support of both federal and provincial partners. Today, the project is at a pivotal moment. The City is prepared to issue the building permits, with only a few outstanding items remaining: development charges, education levies, and cash-in-lieu of parkland - totaling $626,507.00. As a registered charity, the Centre is exempt from municipal property taxes under provincial legislation, but these charges remain a barrier. The financial viability of the Armenian Youth Centre's expansion project is under significant strain due to escalating development charges, ongoing inflation in the construction industry, and the recent introduction of U.S. tariffs on building materials. Through the execution of a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement, the City of Toronto can grant relief in support of the Centre's expansion and expand the delivery of public local cultural activities and programming. This motion is urgent to avoid further cost escalation and to ensure this long-planned, community-driven project can proceed this summer without additional delays.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to: a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement and any other agreement that may be required, with Armenian Community Centre of Toronto (doing business as "Armenian Youth Centre"; the "Operator") for part of the property municipally known as 50 Hallcrown Place (the "Premises") with the City, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture including that the premises are primarily used for local cultural activities and that the City has the right to recover the benefits provided to the Operator should the use of the Premises change; b. exempt the Premises from development charges otherwise owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article I of the Toronto Municipal Code; and c. giving money to the Operator in the form of a credit towards the amount of the parkland levies owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article III of the Toronto Municipal Code; with the exemptions being effective for the purpose of obtaining a building permit from the latest of the by-law is enacted or the date of execution of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement. 2. City Council pass a resolution that the above Municipal Capital Facility is for the purposes of the City and is for public use. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir. 4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to: a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement and any other agreement that may be required, with Armenian Community Centre of Toronto (doing business as "Armenian Youth Centre"; the "Operator") for part of the property municipally known as 50 Hallcrown Place (the "Premises") with the City, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture including that the premises are primarily used for local cultural activities and that the City has the right to recover the benefits provided to the Operator should the use of the Premises change; b. exempt the Premises from development charges otherwise owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article I of the Municipal Code; and c. giving money to the Operator in the form of a credit towards the amount of the parkland levies owing pursuant to Chapter 415 Article III of the Municipal Code; with the exemptions being effective for the purpose of obtaining a building permit from the latest of the by-law is enacted or the date of execution of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement. 2. City Council pass a resolution that the above Municipal Capital Facility is for the purposes of the City and is for public use. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir. 4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
MM29.24adopted
This motion is being requested by the City Solicitor to provide additional instructions for a limiting distance agreement in relation to the application for 295 Jarvis Street. In 2024, City Council accepted a settlement for 295 Jarvis Street that included limiting distances, as seen in Confidential Appendix A, Schedule C . As staff were executing the settlement, they realized they didn't have the requisite authority for entering into some of the agreements that were contemplated. This motion would provide staff with that authority, and allow the issuance of a final order for both the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments, and to negotiate the terms of the Limiting Distance Agreement with the applicant. This motion is urgent because this matter cannot proceed without that authority. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: City Council Item 2024.CC18.10 (May 22 and 23, 2024, City Council meeting)
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.CC18.10 by adding the following Part to the instructions to staff: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement, or similar legal instrument, with the City and the owners of the properties at 311 Jarvis Street and 319 Jarvis Street, to be registered on title to the properties, to achieve appropriate tower separation by preventing the erection of tall buildings on the portions of the sites along the north/south shared property line (as set out in Schedule C to Confidential Appendix A) and to facilitate appropriate block planning for the area, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2024.CC18.10 by adding the following Part to the instructions to staff: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement, or similar legal instrument, with the City and the owners of the properties at 311 Jarvis Street and 319 Jarvis Street, to be registered on title to the properties, to achieve appropriate tower separation by preventing the erection of tall buildings on the portions of the sites along the north/south shared property line (as set out in Schedule C to Confidential Appendix "A") and to facilitate appropriate block planning for the area, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
MM29.25withdrawn
The urban forests of Scarborough Village and Cliffcrest serve as vital natural infrastructure, protecting the Bluffs from erosion, reducing flood risk, and supporting city air quality. However, rapid and often unpermitted development in Ward 20 is removing trees and covering permeable land, altering water flow in an area with a high-water table and increasing the risk of basement flooding. These activities are endangering the natural environment of these distinctive communities and popular tourist areas. Characters of the Neighbourhood Guidelines would provide clear direction to City Planning, Engineering and the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment to determine growth parameters that will protect the fragile environment and character of our neighbourhoods. The Scarborough Bluffs, trails and ravines are destinations not only for residents, but for visitors. Reason for Urgency: This motion is urgent as the Character Study for the Guildwood Community needs to be included in the City planning work for 2025. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: City Council Item 2024.MM24.13 (December 17 and 18, 2024 City Council meeting)
Member Motion MM26.25 was withdrawn at City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Parthi Kandavel, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to extend the scope of the architectural character study for the Guildwood Community that was directed by Council in December 2024 to include a parallel study and community process within the adjacent Cliffcrest and Scarborough Village Community.
MM29.26adopted
Dog Off-Leash Area at Glendora Park - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow
As the city grows in population, we are not growing more land. This necessitates creative considerations for opportunities for the diverse uses to meet the needs of our city. It is estimated that Toronto is home to 600,000 or more dogs. The City's current off-leash area network includes 81 off-leash areas distributed across 21 wards. An additional 13 off-leash areas are under development. Only one of these off-leash areas is located in Willowdale at Bayview Arena Park and it is not located anywhere close to our concentration of density. We want to ensure that Willowdale's unique needs and preferences are taken into account and would like to retain the opportunity to create a dual-use Off-Leash Area, one that leverages a beloved toboggan hill to potentially become a 3-season dog park. It is already a place where many illegally off-leash their dogs. This motion allows us to continue a consultative process to reflect this option that attempts to model what happens successfully in Mississauga at Jack Darling Park, where they also have a toboggan hill that is used as a 3-season dog park. Reason for Urgency: The Off-Leash Policy is being moved today, and Willowdale is in the process of launching off-leash area consultations. We need to move this motion to create the conditions for this option to be considered.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to consult with the community on several options for a Glendora Park Off-Leash Area and include a seasonal Off-Leash Area that would encompass the Glendora Park toboggan hill to be used as an off-leash area from spring to fall while maintaining the toboggan hill for winter use only, as one of the options presented in the consultation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to consult with the community on several options for a Glendora Park Off-Leash Area and include a seasonal Off-Leash Area that would encompass the Glendora Park toboggan hill to be used as an off-leash area from spring to fall while maintaining the toboggan hill for winter use only, as one of the options presented in the consultation.
MM29.27adopted
The urban forests of Scarborough Village and Cliffcrest serve as vital natural infrastructure, protecting the Bluffs from erosion, reducing flood risk, and supporting city air quality. However, rapid and often unpermitted development in Ward 20 is removing trees and covering permeable land, altering water flow in an area with a high-water table and increasing the risk of basement flooding. These activities are endangering the natural environment of these distinctive communities and popular tourist areas. Characters of the Neighbourhood Guidelines would provide clear direction to City Planning, Engineering and the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment to determine growth parameters that will protect the fragile environment and character of our neighbourhoods. The Scarborough Bluffs, trails and ravines are destinations not only for residents, but for visitors. Reason for Urgency: This motion is urgent as the Character Study for the Cliffcrest community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road) needs to be included in the City planning work for 2025.
City Council on April 23 and 24, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a thorough review of existing development guidelines and zoning regulations within the Cliffcrest Community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road). 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop specific design guidelines that clearly articulate the desired architectural character and principles of the community; these guidelines should: a. emphasize the preservation and enhancement of the existing architectural styles and materials; b. consider the scale, massing, and setbacks of new developments to ensure compatibility with the surrounding built environment; c. incorporate measures to protect views and sightlines within the community; d. amend existing zoning by-laws and development agreements as necessary to ensure compliance with the newly developed design guidelines; and e. implement a robust review process for all new development proposals within Cliffcrest, ensuring that they are rigorously assessed for compliance with the established design guidelines. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to engage with the Cliffcrest community through public consultations to gather input and feedback on the development of these design guidelines.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Parthi Kandavel, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a thorough review of existing development guidelines and zoning regulations within the Cliffcrest Community (Scarborough Village up to Markham Road). 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop specific design guidelines that clearly articulate the desired architectural character and principles of the community; these guidelines should: a. emphasize the preservation and enhancement of the existing architectural styles and materials; b. consider the scale, massing, and setbacks of new developments to ensure compatibility with the surrounding built environment; c. incorporate measures to protect views and sightlines within the community; d. amend existing zoning by-laws and development agreements as necessary to ensure compliance with the newly developed design guidelines; and e. implement a robust review process for all new development proposals within Cliffcrest, ensuring that they are rigorously assessed for compliance with the established design guidelines. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to engage with the Cliffcrest community through public consultations to gather input and feedback on the development of these design guidelines.