Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 45 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 26 to 45 of 45Show 2550100all
MM11.13amended
On October 3, 2019, South Cabbagetown residents became aware that a women's resource centre was to be relocated from another part of Ward 13 to a location in their neighbourhood. While the resource centre has not historically been a cause for concern with regards to community health and safety, plans for its relocation came as a surprise to residents currently grappling with complex issues around mental health, addictions, homelessness, and vulnerability in the immediate area and along the Sherbourne corridor. The local Councillor first spoke about the relocation plan with staff on July 18, 2019. At that time a lease deal was still pending for the new location. The local Councillor and her staff were informed that the decision was final, under delegated authority and that the process would take until late 2020. At that meeting concerns were raised about the plan, citing area health, safety, and service coordination challenges that were all identified as part of the Enhanced 12-month Action Plan for the Downtown East (Item 2018.CD29.5) endorsed during the June 26-29, 2018 meeting of City Council. They also noted that the plan came as a surprise, as staff had indicated in the Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Locating Municipal Shelters in the Downtown East Area (Item 2019.PH3.2a) in March, 2019, that a "collaborative forum" would be created under the Downtown East Action Plan to facilitate consultation on issues like locating new services. The same supplementary report indicated that "a systematic community-based research project [would] be undertaken to understand how marginalized populations live out their daily lives in the area" and that this would "be used to inform programmatic responses and identify where there are opportunities to shift services for greater impact." Finally, the Councillor and her staff asked that the community be engaged as fully as possible, early on, to allow for their feedback to inform the plans as much as possible to address concerns proactively. Unfortunately, on October 3, 2019, the community became aware of the plans for the relocation of the Adelaide Resource Centre for Women by way of a Delegated Approval Form detailing the terms of the lease, rather than through direct engagement and consultation. This was not the appropriate way for a community to find out about plans for their neighbourhood. This series of events has highlighted two areas that need attention - how communities are engaged with regards to services moving into, and within, the Downtown East and how the specific challenges of the area are being considered in the context of City-wide service planning. Both need to be reviewed in order to be improved upon. Residents of the Downtown East need to have a clear understanding of work and planning underway that involves their neighbourhoods and the City needs to ensure that new services and resources are deployed in a sustainable and effective way.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to report to the January 14, 2020 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee to: a. provide an update on all projects taking place in the Downtown East area involving the expansion, renovation, reduction, or relocation of any City-funded services and facilities, including, but not limited to: shelters, respites, and drop-ins; and b. identify whether the Downtown East Action Plan coordinator is being provided with the appropriate controls and authorities necessary to inform decision-making, with regards to facility and program planning in the Downtown East, and what additional controls or enhanced authorities are necessary to ensure the local context and area needs are prioritized. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report to the January 14, 2020 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with recommendations to improve upon public engagement and consultation around locating new shelters, respites, and drop-in programs in the Downtown East, such that: a. area resident groups and major stakeholders are informed of plans proactively, irrespective of delegated authority; and b. the maximum amount of time is provided between initial consultation and implementation for local context, health and safety considerations to be appropriately addressed, balancing the time needed for staff to complete preliminary and necessary prerequisite work. 3. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to expedite the community engagement on the establishment of a drop-in at 233 Carlton Street to ensure that local residents are informed of the decision making process and that the relocation does not contribute to an increase in vulnerability of service users.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to report to the January 14, 2020 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee to: a. provide an update on all projects taking place in the Downtown East area involving the expansion, renovation, reduction, or relocation of any City-funded services and facilities, including, but not limited to: shelters, respites, and drop-ins; and b. identify whether the Downtown East Action Plan coordinator is being provided with the appropriate controls and authorities necessary to inform decision-making, with regards to facility and program planning in the Downtown East, and what additional controls or enhanced authorities are necessary to ensure the local context and area needs are prioritized. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report to the January 14, 2020 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with recommendations to improve upon public engagement and consultation around locating new shelters, respites, and drop-in programs in the Downtown East, such that: a. area resident groups and major stakeholders are informed of plans proactively, irrespective of delegated authority; and b the maximum amount of time is provided between initial consultation and implementation for local context, health and safety considerations to be appropriately addressed, balancing the time needed for staff to complete preliminary and necessary prerequisite work. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to pause any relocation processes underway for shelters, respites, and drop-ins in the Downtown East so that a community consultation plan can be established immediately with local residents to inform the decision-making process and ensure that any relocation does not contribute to an increase in vulnerability for service users.
MM11.14amended
On October 10, 2019, Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff cancelled the permit for the regular use of meeting space at the Pam McConnell Aquatics Centre to a group running church services. Registered as "Christ's Forgiveness Ministries", the City's Aquatics Centre was listed on the group's website as the official location of their church. The cancelling of their permit took place after the group held a rally in downtown Toronto on September 28, 2019. The group's coordinator was arrested on charges of disturbing the peace in the Church-Wellesley Village earlier this year. In response, Christ's Forgiveness Ministries planned to march, en masse, up the street and through The Village on September 28, 2019. While advertised as having no relationship to the LGBTQ2S neighbourhood on Church Street, many community members recognized this provocation as an act of intimidation targeting the best known neighbourhood in Canada for LGBTQ2S rights and inclusion. Subsequent organizing resulted in the closure of streets in the St. Lawrence Market area, counter-protests, and a significant mobilization of resources by the Toronto Police Service to prevent altercations and maintain the peace. Concerned residents realized this group was advertising that it was running their church services out of a City-owned facility and complained to City staff. After reviewing and investigating the complaint, City staff canceled the group's permit. Though it required a complaint and investigation after the space had been used for some time by this group, staff were able to determine that the group was in contravention of City policies and acted. In other cases, action has been lacking. City libraries, for example, have provided space for groups and events that are blatantly engaged in, and promote, intolerant and discriminatory activities. On July 12, 2017, leading neo-Nazi figures in Canada held a memorial event at the Richview Public Library in Etobicoke. Though Jewish organizations, human rights advocates, and residents complained about the event, it was allowed to proceed. The policies in place were insufficient to restrict the rental, even to individuals and groups involved in Holocaust denial and other racist, discriminatory actions. In response, Mayor Tory asked the Toronto Public Library board and staff to review its rental policies. Again, this very month, the City of Toronto is once again being criticized for the use of its libraries. On October 29, 2019, a third-party group is planning to hold a "gender identity talk and Q&A" with a controversial speaker at the Toronto Public Library's Palmerston branch. The featured speaker has publicly stated that trans rights are a danger to cis-gendered women, which appears to violate the Library's community and event space policy. Permitting an individual or group to promote harmful transphopic views in publically funded facilities, such as public libraries, is egregious and unacceptable considering the disproportionate violence and prejudice faced by Toronto's trans community. Trans individuals face significant prejudice and are regularly the target of violence and harassment in Canada. A 2011 report by Egale Canada found that 37 percent of trans students reported physical harassment or assault because of their gender expression. A 2017 report by Statistics Canada found that among hate crimes targeting transgender or asexual people 74 percent involved violence. A 2013 Trans Pulse survey of 433 trans people in Ontario found that 98 percent reported at least one experience of transphobia. These are disturbing numbers that must be considered when developing inclusive policies to protect the human rights of all Toronto residents. In sharp contrast to the ongoing rental and use of its libraries and facilities by groups like these, the City of Toronto has a long-standing commitment to preventing discrimination and the promotion of equity. In April, 2003, City Council passed a Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity that includes the following principles: The City recognizes the barriers of discrimination and disadvantage faced by human rights protected groups. To address this, the City will create an environment of equality in the government and in the community for all people regardless of their race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, disability, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, same sex partnership, age, marital status, family status, immigrant status, receipt of public assistance, political affiliation, religious affiliation, level of literacy, language and/or socio-economic status. The City of Toronto will implement positive changes in its workforce and communities to achieve access and equality of outcomes for all residents and to create a harmonious environment free from discrimination, harassment and hate. Given the ongoing use of City facilities and library spaces by groups promoting division, racism, and prejudice and their ability to gain notoriety through the ensuing conflict and media coverage, it is incumbent upon the City of Toronto to review its policies to deliver upon its Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity. Equity-seeking groups should not feel unsafe or unwelcome in these spaces and the City should be proactive in upholding its commitments to access, equity, and diversity.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to consult LGBTQ2S+ stakeholders and review the City's policies governing the use of community spaces in City facilities by third parties in order to ensure that those policies uphold the City of Toronto's Commitment to the Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity and proactively ensure that groups contravening the City's Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy are identified sooner and that permits are denied or revoked, where appropriate, and to report directly to City Council in the first quarter of 2020 with the results of the consultations and policy review. 2. City Council request the City Manager to consult with the Toronto Public Library Board on whether the Library's policies governing the use of community spaces in Toronto Public Library align with the City of Toronto's commitment to the Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity and its Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy. 3. City Council reaffirm its commitment to the City's Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy and the protection of its residents from discrimination, harassment and intolerance, including transphobia and transphobic activity.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Manager, the City Solicitor, the Chief People Officer and appropriate staff to report to the January 23, 2020 meeting of the Executive Committee with recommendations to strengthen the policies governing the use of community spaces in Toronto Public Library and other City facilities by third parties in order to proactively ensure that groups contravening the City of Toronto's commitment to the Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity and its Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination policy are identified sooner and that permits are denied or revoked in a timely manner. 2. City Council request the City Manager, the City Solicitor, the Chief People Officer and appropriate staff to consult with Toronto Public Library staff and report to the January 23, 2020 meeting of the Executive Committee with actions the Toronto Public Library can take in order to: a. strengthen its policies governing the use of Toronto Public Library community spaces to better reflect the City of Toronto's commitment to the Vision Statement on Access, Equity and Diversity and its Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination policy; and b. ensure that activities enabling discrimination and intolerance, including transphobia and transphobic activity, are given all due consideration as a human rights violation under the Human Rights Code.
MM11.15adopted
At its July meeting, City Council adopted the Vision Zero 2.0 plan. Through that discussion, Members of Council gave their unanimous support to continue making every effort to reduce the number of road deaths in Toronto to zero. Road safety is one of the most pressing needs in our City. My community is challenged by a particularly dangerous roadway which has seen four serious accidents over the last 10 months. This Motion asks for Council's support to direct staff to bring forward road safety options for the meeting point of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Woodbine Avenue within the next quarter. The four accidents at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Woodbine Avenue have been caused by vehicles travelling too fast eastbound along Lake Shore Boulevard East, and being caught by the sharp turn northbound to Woodbine Avenue. The accidents have resulted in serious injuries to motorists but also serious damage to private property. They also created a very real risk of serious pedestrian injury or death. The attached images show some of the damage that has been caused this year. Sidewalks on both sides of Woodbine Avenue and Lake Shore Boulevard East are quite narrow, and are heavily used by residents and visitors accessing Woodbine Beach. Residents from across Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area frequently visit this intersection to access Woodbine Beach for events such as the Canada Day fireworks, the Beaches Jazz Festival and to enjoy the beach as an amenity. The narrow right of way also means that residents on this stretch of roadway are exposed to increased danger of meeting with an accident and or facing property damage, including to vehicles parked within the on-street permit parking areas on Woodbine. Our streets need to be safe for everyone. Multiple accidents happening within months of each other on the same portion of roadway is completely unacceptable. Issues here have been reported for years before 2019 and little has been done. We need a full suite of measures to address safety in this problem area. Enforcement is one component - the Toronto Police Service have offered their support with this. However, we need to adapt our road design to address the unfortunate realities of unsafe driver behavior and make streets safer by design. This Motion is intended to accelerate tangible action to deliver short, medium, and long term measures that will increase safety at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Woodbine Avenue. With this issue being raised in previous terms of Council, residents should not be kept waiting any longer. The time to act is now.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report in the first quarter of 2020 to the Toronto and East York Community Council with recommended options for measures to improve road safety at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Woodbine Avenue such as: a. automated speed enforcement equipment; b. installation of speed humps or rumble strips; c. additional signage identifying the curve in the road; d. narrowing traffic lanes to reduce speed; e. reducing speed limits; f. roadway reconfiguration; g. barriers or other measures to protect pedestrians and homes in the event of an accident; and h. any other options to calm traffic and reduce accidents. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct any necessary community consultation to prepare the report requested in Part 1 above. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include an implementation timeline and any necessary budget required to install the measures identified in the report requested in Part 1 above.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report in the first quarter of 2020 to the Toronto and East York Community Council with recommended options for measures to improve road safety at Lake Shore Boulevard East and Woodbine Avenue such as: a. automated speed enforcement equipment; b. installation of speed humps or rumble strips; c. additional signage identifying the curve in the road; d. narrowing traffic lanes to reduce speed; e. reducing speed limits; f. roadway reconfiguration; g. barriers or other measures to protect pedestrians and homes in the event of an accident; and h. any other options to calm traffic and reduce accidents. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct any necessary community consultation to prepare the report requested in Part 1 above. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include an implementation timeline and any necessary budget required to install the measures identified in the report requested in Part 1 above.
MM11.16adopted
Jane Falstaff is a Toronto Community Housing community located in the Jane Street and Falstaff Avenue area within the boundaries of the Rustic Neighbourhood Improvement Area with 34 percent of the population composed of children and youth and a median household income 32 percent lower than the rest of the City. Jane Falstaff is made up of three older high-rise apartment buildings at 20, 30 and 40 Falstaff Avenue with 660 rent-geared-to-income units. In 2019 alone, the Jane Falstaff community experienced five shooting incidents, the most recent on August 1, 2019 when 16 year old Hanad Abdullahi Ali was fatally shot in the stairwell of his building. Residents are worried about their safety and the safety of their children, and youth continue to experience trauma as a result of exposure to community violence. On October 2, 2019, through the adoption of MM10.2- Addressing the Root Causes of Violence - TO Wards, City Council approved an increase to the 2019 Operating Budget for Social Development, Finance and Administration to implement year one of the TO Wards Peace program which leverages the lived experience of affected communities to develop and implement effective community engagement approaches, innovative communication tools, social media strategies and targeted investment geared at violence prevention and interruption. In July 2018, the Board of Health recognized exposure to community violence as a social determinant of health. Violence prevention initiatives need to focus on the root causes of violence and youth already involved in community violence must be engaged in identifying the programs and services they need to help them succeed. I have been actively engaging youth of the Jane Falstaff community and they are asking that the City invest in their future and provide alternatives to violence. The issues in the Jane Falstaff community have perpetuated for far too long. As a City we can and must do better for our young people.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to allocate funding from the TO Wards Peace program to support youth in the Jane Falstaff community who have lived experience of gun violence with capacity building supports related to employment and leadership development. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consult with youth from the Jane Falstaff community to develop a local plan for the provision of recreation programs and services to respond to local need, and report through the Economic and Community Development Committee on the resources required for the implementation of the plan.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to allocate funding from the TO Wards Peace program to support youth in the Jane Falstaff community who have lived experience of gun violence with capacity building supports related to employment and leadership development. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consult with youth from the Jane Falstaff community to develop a local plan for the provision of recreation programs and services to respond to local need, and report through the Economic and Community Development Committee on the resources required for the implementation of the plan.
MM11.17adopted
The lands originally known as 167 Armour Boulevard in Ward 6, have become a landmark of the Armour Heights Community. Commonly referred as the "white picket fenced house", the aforementioned property was home to the Appleby family since 1972. A welcoming, friendly and community oriented family, the Applebys were widely known across the Armour Heights neighbourhood. In 2016, after the passing of Jerry Sheldon Appleby, a charismatic and hardworking Torontonian, his wife Gwen Appleby made the tough decision to sell the property where she and Jerry built a family together. Shortly after it was sold, the lot was proposed for severance. The Armour Heights residents quickly came together to propose a better use, other than densification, for the iconic triangular shaped parcel. Through numerous discussions between the engaged residents, the new property owner and City Staff, 167 Armour Boulevard was unanimously identified as a significant piece of land that could be secured for public enjoyment. Spearheaded by Councillor James Pasternak, a deal was closed in late 2018, where the City of Toronto would build a new parkette at the corner of Westgate Boulevard and Armour Boulevard. The new public space will eventually unlock the pedestrian-busy corner to residents, visitors and students at the neighbouring school. Demolition of the previously existing house has recently been completed and park design focus discussions, between the Councillor's office, Parks staff and residents, will begin shortly. As a result, the new parkette will need a name to the satisfaction of the Armour Heights Community.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consult the nearby community and report to the North York Community Council on name options for a new parkette to be built at the corner of Armour Boulevard and Westgate Boulevard.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consult the nearby community and report to the North York Community Council on name options for a new parkette to be built at the corner of Armour Boulevard and Westgate Boulevard.
MM11.18adopted
The report proposes technical amendments to Site-Specific Zoning By-laws 902-2019 and 903-2019. These amendments are required to ensure the orderly processing of the Site Plan application and the issuance of building permits for a development that has been approved by City Council.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council enact the By-laws in Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (October 22, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, amending Zoning By-laws 902-2019 and 903-2019, being site-specific amendments to City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the Etobicoke Zoning Code, for the lands located at 1629, 1631 and 1633 The Queensway. 2. City Council determine that the changes contained within the amending Zoning By-laws are minor, technical in nature, and reflective of the original proposal and plans considered by City Council and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, that no further notice is required in respect of the proposed amendments to the Zoning By-laws. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft amending Zoning By-laws as may be required.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (October 22, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning: 1. City Council enact the attached By-laws in Attachments 1 and 2 amending Zoning By-laws 902-2019 and 903-2019, being site-specific amendments to City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the Etobicoke Zoning Code, for the lands located at 1629, 1631 and 1633 The Queensway. 2. City Council determine that the changes contained within the amending Zoning By-laws are minor, technical in nature, and reflective of the original proposal and plans considered by City Council and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, that no further notice is required in respect of the proposed amendments to the Zoning By-laws. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft amending Zoning By-laws as may be required.
MM11.19adopted
On September 18, 2019, the Scarborough Panel of the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") refused a minor variance application for two variances: north side yard setback and front yard parking, in respect of the property municipally known as 38 Munson Crescent (the "Application"). A copy of the Committee's decision is attached. The Applicant is proposing to enclose a portion of the existing carport for living space and to construct an open porch at the rear of the house. On October 7, 2019, the Applicant appealed the Committee's decision to refuse the Application to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. In a report (September 6, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning Scarborough District, Community staff recommended refusal of one of the two proposed variances (variance two: front yard parking). A copy of the Planning report is attached. Community Planning staff opined that the Applicant's request for front yard parking does not respect and reinforce the physical character of the neighbourhood as the predominant built form in the neighbourhood includes parking within a garage or carport. Therefore, Communing Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed front yard parking variance does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the deadline for submitting the Notice of Intention to be a Party is November 12, 2019.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City staff, to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose Application A0214/19SC respecting 38 Munson Crescent. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal of the decision in Application A0214/19SC respecting 38 Munson Crescent and authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City staff, to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose Application A0214/19SC respecting 38 Munson Crescent. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal of the decision in Application A0214/19SC respecting 38 Munson Crescent and authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
MM11.20adopted
On June 16, 2019 Quebec's provincial government passed, Bill 21, An Act respecting the laicity of the State. Bill 21 is a legislated ban on public servants in Quebec who wish to publicly display religious symbols. Bill 21 will ban police offers, teachers, bureaucrats from wearing religious symbols such as Hijabs, Sikh turbans, and Jewish Kippah. Bill 21 is a strategic attempt to stifle and limit the civic participation of individuals who choose to wear religious symbols under the guise of secularism. This Bill disproportionately impacts Muslims, Sikhs, and Jews who all participate in different forms of religious symbols. On June 17, 2019, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, National Council of Canadian Muslims, and Ischrak Nourel Hak filed a constitutional challenge of law. This misguided Bill is a significant step toward the growing polarization and marginalization of religious minorities. As the largest municipality in Canada and one of the most diverse cities in the world, the City of Toronto should join a growing group of Canadian municipalities that have publicly condemned Quebec's Bill 21. This Motion is urgent as Bill 21 is currently before the courts. There is an upcoming hearing in November to determine if Quebec's religious symbols law should be suspended.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council oppose Quebec's Bill 21, An Act respecting the laicity of the State and reaffirm the City's commitment to upholding religious freedoms as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 2. City Council endorse the initiative proposed by Calgary City Council and supported by the Regional Municipality of Peel that asks the Canadian Coalition of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination, of which the City of Toronto is a member, to create a nationwide campaign that highlights the harmful widespread impacts of Bill 21 on social cohesion and inclusion in Canada. 3. City Council encourage the Federal Government to unequivocally condemn and challenge Quebec's Bill 21.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council oppose Quebec's Bill 21, An Act respecting the laicity of the State and reaffirm the City's commitment to upholding religious freedoms as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 2. City Council endorse the initiative proposed by Calgary City Council and supported by the Regional Municipality of Peel that asks the Canadian Coalition of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination, of which the City of Toronto is a member, to create a nationwide campaign that highlights the harmful widespread impacts of Bill 21 on social cohesion and inclusion in Canada. 3. City Council encourage the Federal government to unequivocally condemn and challenge Quebec's Bill 21.
MM11.21adopted
City Council accepted the recommendations set out in the 470-530 Wilson Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal - Request for Further Direction regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Report on July 23, 2018. As part of that settlement, the Owner will be dedicating a 973 square metre on-site parkland dedication at the corner of Wilson Avenue and Faywood Boulevard, to satisfy their parkland dedication requirements. The Owner has indicated a willingness to complete the buildout of the park, including completing above base park improvements. In order to do so, the Parks, Forestry and Recreation's component of the development charges, paid upon issuance of building permit, would be required to be directed to the above base park improvements. There is currently no Council Authority to direct the Parks and Recreation component of the development charges to the above base park improvements. This authority is recommended by way of this Motion. Parks, Forestry and Recreation is agreeable to have the property owner design and build out the park, in consultation with Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The new park will be designed in consultation with the local community and the Ward Councillor. This matter is deemed urgent as the Section 37 Agreement must be executed prior to the issuance of the final Order by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
MM11.22adopted
At its meeting on March 26, 2018, City Council accepted the recommendations set out in the Further Request for Direction report (March 16, 2018) from the City Solicitor, opposing the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal at the former Ontario Municipal Board for the property at 250 Lawrence Avenue West. Even though the City opposed the development, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (former Ontario Municipal Board) approved the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal. As part of this development, the Owner will be dedicating a 397.80 square metre on-site park on the north-east corner of their site, municipally known as 219 Glengarry Avenue, to satisfy their parkland dedication requirements. The development charge credit will be secured in the Section 37 Agreement. The Owner has requested City Council's approval to design and build the above base park improvements for the new park. In order to do so, the Parks, Forestry and Recreation's component of the development charges, paid upon issuance of building permit, would be required to be directed to the above base park improvements. Parks, Forestry and Recreation is agreeable to have the Owner design and build out the park, in consultation with Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The new park will be designed in consultation with the local community and the Ward Councillor. This Matter is deemed urgent as the Section 37 Agreement must be executed prior to the issuance of the final Order by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the development at 250 Lawrence Avenue West for the design and construction by the Owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that: 1. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the development at 250 Lawrence Avenue West for the design and construction by the Owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
MM11.23adopted
The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever the subject property into two undersized residential lots, for relief from the provisions of the applicable Zoning By-law to maintain the existing three-storey semi-detached dwelling with two dwelling units and construct a new rear detached garage on the retained lot and to construct a new three-storey detached dwelling and maintain the existing rear detached garage on the conveyed lot. Variances were sought with respect to lot frontage, side yard setback, floor space index and soft landscaping. City Planning submitted a report (November 22, 2018) to the Committee of Adjustment recommending refusal of the applications based on their failure to conform to the Official Plan, as required for a consent by Sections 53(12) and 51(24) of the Planning Act, and their failure to maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan, as required for a minor variance by Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. A copy of the Planning report is attached. Community Planning staff were of the opinion that the Applicant's request to sever the subject property to create a new residential lot was not in keeping with the Official Plan designation of Core Employment Areas, which does not permit residential uses. The lands are also subject to SASP 190, which recognizes existing residential uses in the Employment Area and permits those residential uses that existed on November 26, 2002. New residential dwellings are not permitted in the Employment Area. The subject lands are also within the Lower Don Special Policy Area and are therefore subject to the Protocol Regarding the Lower Don Special Policy Area, which requires joint Ministerial approval for any new or intensified development beyond the existing permissions. At the initial Committee of Adjustment hearing on November 28, 2018, the applications were deferred to provide the applicant with an opportunity to resolve the issues with City Planning staff and to discuss the proposal in more detail with area residents. No revisions were made to the applications. City Planning advised the Committee of Adjustment on September 17, 2019 that the recommendations in its original report dated November 22, 2018 continue to apply. At the rescheduled hearing on September 26, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment refused the applications. The Notice of Decisions are attached. The applicant appealed the decisions to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the proposed consent and minor variances requested in the applications. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants, as necessary. This matter is time-sensitive and urgent, as the decision of the Committee of Adjustment has been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing in opposition of the proposal.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 67 Morse Street to oppose the consent to sever and minor variances requested through Applications B0045/18TEY, A0421/18TEY and A0422/18TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 67 Morse Street to oppose the consent to sever and minor variances requested through Applications B0045/18TEY, A0421/18TEY and A0422/18TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
MM11.24adopted
On August 15, 2019, the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused an application brought by the owner of 149 Highland Crescent for consent to sever the lot into two lots and construct two single detached dwellings, and for associated minor variances including those pertaining to lot frontage and height. A copy of the Committee's decisions in respect of the requested consent and requested minor variances for each lot are attached. On September 4, 2019, the owner appealed the Committee's refusal of the Applications to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the appeal. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants, as necessary. In the report (August 6, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, Community Planning staff recommended that, should the Committee approve the application, it be made subject to a number of conditions. A copy of the Community Planning report is attached. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the Committee's decision has been appealed and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing scheduled for January 14, 2020.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the consent and minor variances requested through Applications B0017/19NY, A0305/19NY, and A0306/19NY respecting 149 Highland Crescent. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Applications B0017/19NY, A0305/19NY, and A0306/19NY respecting 149 Highland Crescent and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the consent and minor variances requested through Applications B0017/19NY, A0305/19NY, and A0306/19NY respecting 149 Highland Crescent. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Applications B0017/19NY, A0305/19NY, and A0306/19NY respecting 149 Highland Crescent and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
MM11.25adopted
On August 29, 2019, the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") approved, on condition, the application for minor variances for the property municipally known as 158 McRae Drive. The original Zoning Notice included variances for building height, length, setbacks, parking and a utility equipment encroachment. At its meeting held on October 2 and 3, 2019, City Council adopted Item MM10.24. Part 1 of the decision authorizes the City Solicitor to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body. The purpose of this Motion is to replace Part 1 to clarify the intent behind Item MM10.24. This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as the Committee's decision has been appealed and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing scheduled for January 13, 2020. Requires Re-Opening: This Motion requires a reopening of Item MM10.24 (October 2 and 3, 2019) only as it relates to Part 1 of City Council's decision.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council delete Part 1 of its decision on Item MM10.24, adopted by City Council on October 2 and 3, 2019, and adopt instead the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the application for minor variances for 158 McRae Drive.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council delete Part 1 of its decision on Item MM10.24, adopted by City Council on October 2 and 3, 2019, and adopt instead the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the application for minor variances for 158 McRae Drive.
MM11.26adopted
City Council at its November 7, 8 and 9, 2017 meeting adopted Item 2017.PW24.7, and in so doing also approved a 'Residential On-street Electric Vehicle Charge Station' pilot enabling Toronto Hydro to utilize electrical and street light poles to install charging stations. Under this previous approval, Council authorization for the City to enter into an agreement with Toronto Hydro was not requested and was an oversight. As such, a technical amendment is being sought to obtain that authorization by way of this Motion. This Motion comes at a time when Transportation Services and Toronto Hydro are making final preparations for the implementation of the residential charging stations and require an executed agreement before rolling out the charging stations. Transportation Services is about to finalize the agreements with Toronto Hydro, but require additional authorization from City Council. If the authorization is not given, Transportation Services will not be able to proceed with the on-street electric vehicle charging pilot this year.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into and execute an agreement with Toronto Hydro for the installation, operation, and implementation of residential on-street Electric Vehicle Charging stations on select residential streets as previously approved by City Council and as generally set out in Item 2017.PW24.7, headed "Preparing Toronto for Electric Vehicles", and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, including any provision that the City provide an indemnification.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into and execute an agreement with Toronto Hydro for the installation, operation, and implementation of residential on-street Electric Vehicle Charging stations on select residential streets as previously approved by City Council and as generally set out in Item 2017.PW24.7, headed "Preparing Toronto for Electric Vehicles", and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, including any provision that the City provide an indemnification.
MM11.27adopted
It is understood that increasing the supply of housing units to meet a wide area of need is a priority for Toronto and an important way to help address housing affordability issues. One area within the City's control is the treatment of building permit applications involving houses with supplemental units that were not originally established through the building permit process. These are sometimes referred to as 'illegal' units. When permit applications are received to renovate these houses, significant development charges and parkland dedication fees can be incurred. These costs can be a barrier to bringing 'illegal' units into conformity with City by-laws, and to the creation of additional units. Examples are coming to the attention of Council with increasing frequency. Current City policies regarding charges for additional units are meant to allow incremental increases in units without incurring substantial fees that are otherwise associated with growth related development in new buildings. However, these policies are not sensitive to the situation where tenancies may have been long established, but in 'illegal' units. This Motion would direct staff to review the situation and make appropriate recommendations to address this challenge. The Province introduced changes to the application of development charges and parkland fees through the More Homes, More Choices Act. These changes are expected to come into effect in the coming months as Provincial regulations are developed and enacted and may influence the City's policy options regarding the treatment of illegal units. It is expected that the staff review would take these pending changes into account.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Infrastructure and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, to conduct a review of the City's development related fees and taxes particularly as they pertain to renovations for grade related housing, and to report back to Executive Committee with recommendations on how to address the impact of City imposed financial barriers on increasing the number of units by second quarter of 2020.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Infrastructure and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, to conduct a review of the City's development related fees and taxes particularly as they pertain to renovations for grade related housing, and to report back to Executive Committee with recommendations on how to address the impact of City imposed financial barriers on increasing the number of units by second quarter of 2020.
MM11.28adopted
So far this year there have been 33 fatalities (which includes 18 seniors) in the City of Toronto. At its July 2019 meeting, City Council adopted Vision Zero 2.0. Members of Council unanimously supported making every effort to reduce to zero road fatalities in the City of Toronto. There are new technologies available to assist pedestrians to safely cross at busy intersections. By conducting Pilot Projects at various high traffic intersections throughout the City, staff can better determine by the data collected whether these technologies are appropriate applications for use on our busy streets.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a Pilot Project using pedestrian detection technologies and to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee where additional authorities are required in order to undertake the Pilot, as necessary.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a Pilot Project using pedestrian detection technologies and to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee where additional authorities are required in order to undertake the Pilot, as necessary.
MM11.29adopted
On January 2, 2019, Richmond Residential Limited Partnership (the "Owner") applied to the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever the lands at 245-283 Queen Street East, 348-354 Richmond Street East and 106-110 Ontario Street into two lots (the "Application"). The Application is filed as Committee Application B0002/19TEY. On February 19, 2019, the Manager, Development Engineering, Toronto and East York District, submitted a memorandum to the Committee recommending that the Application was premature and requested that the Committee not schedule a hearing date. On June 27, 2019, the Owner appealed the Application to the Toronto Local Appeal Body for the failure of the Committee to make a decision on the Application within 90 days, pursuant to Section 53(14) of the Planning Act. The Appeal was forwarded to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, as an Official Plan Amendment appeal and Zoning By-law Amendment appeal related to the Application had previously been made to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and has not yet been finally disposed of . The decision of City Council relating to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Appeal can be found here: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.CC44.36 The Manager, Development Engineering, Toronto and East York District has since issued an updated memorandum respecting the Application. Development Engineering no longer has any objection to the Application, so long as the conditions outlined in the October 29, 2019 Memorandum are satisfied by the Owner. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the hearing of the Appeal at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal is scheduled for Thursday, October 31, 2019, and the City Solicitor requires instructions.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to request that the conditions contained in the October 29, 2019 Memorandum from the Manager, Development Engineering, Toronto and East York District regarding 245 to 285 Queen Street East, 348-412 Richmond Street East, 78 to 106 Ontario Street and 8-12 Brigden Place, be imposed and that the conditions are appended to the Tribunal's Order. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all steps necessary to bring resolution to the appeal, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to request that the conditions contained in the October 29, 2019 Memorandum from the Manager, Development Engineering, Toronto and East York District regarding 245 to 285 Queen Street East, 348-412 Richmond Street East, 78 to 106 Ontario Street and 8-12 Brigden Place, be imposed and that the conditions are appended to the Tribunal's Order. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all steps necessary to bring resolution to the appeal, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
MM11.30adopted
At its meeting held on July 16, 17 and 18, 2019, City Council adopted without amendment Item IE6.12 entitled "Cycling Network Plan: 2019 Cycling Infrastructure Installation" and, in so doing, enacted a number of amendments to bicycle lane and traffic and parking regulations on Vaughan Road. However, there have been concerns raised by the community about sightline concerns due to angled driveways at a portion of the street where the bike lanes are supposed to be installed in. Furthermore, there were concerns over loss of parking space and the inconsistency of the design with previously installed bike lanes, further south on Vaughan Road. After extensive consultation with the community, Transportation Services, and the Public Consultations Unit, we have come to an agreement that would eliminate the sightline concerns and minimize parking impacts, while ensuring we provide the extension of safe biking facilities to our constituents. This matter is urgent as the contract has already been awarded and the contractors have been given the designs previously approved by Council. The contractors need all the new designs and permits necessary to undertake the work, which is scheduled for Fall 2019 through Spring 2020. Transportation Services staff have been consulted regarding the above and have no concerns with the requested amendments below. REQUIRES RE-OPENING: Infrastructure and Environment Committee Item IE6.12 entitled "Cycling Network Plan: 2019 Cycling Infrastructure Installation" as adopted by City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2019 only as it pertains to bicycle lanes on Vaughan Road and related traffic and parking regulations.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its decision on Item IE6.12 by: a. deleting the entry for Vaughan Road under "Designated Bicycle Lanes, To Be Enacted", in Attachment 2 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and adopting the following instead: Highway Between Lanes Times or Days Vaughan Road Oakwood Avenue and Bude Street Easterly Northbound Anytime Vaughan Road Bude Street and Northcliffe Boulevard Northbound lane adjacent to the curb lane used for parking Anytime b. amending Attachment 4 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services by deleting and replacing the entries related to Vaughan Road under "Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations" as set out in Attachment 1 to this Motion.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its decision on Item IE6.12 by: a. deleting the entry for Vaughan Road under "Designated Bicycle Lanes, To Be Enacted", in Attachment 2 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and adopting the following instead: Highway Between Lanes Times or Days Vaughan Road Oakwood Avenue and Bude Street Easterly Northbound Anytime Vaughan Road Bude Street and Northcliffe Boulevard Northbound lane adjacent to the curb lane used for parking Anytime b. amending Attachment 4 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services by deleting and replacing the entries related to Vaughan Road under "Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations" as set out in Attachment 1 to this Motion.
MM11.31adopted
This Motion asks City Council to authorize a five business-day deferral agreement as provided for under the City's Development Charges By-law, for development charges at 650 Kingston Road (Application No. 19 123234 SHO 00 PP) related to the issuance of a building permit on October 30 or 31, 2019. The agreement will stipulate that interest be applicable over the deferral period, and as security, the permit may be revoked if the deferred fees and charges are not paid within the deferral period. The deferral is to assist the applicant with delays in receiving Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation funding through the Rental Construction Financing Initiative, a program created under the National Housing Strategy to support the delivery of rental housing where there is high need. 650 Kingston Road is a 68-unit Open Door funded affordable housing development, providing 19 affordable rental units, 32 mid-range rental units and 11 market rental units. 11 of the units are rental replacement units. The development is a single, modest 7-storey building which received zoning approvals two years ago at the November 7, 8, 9, 2019 City Council meeting (see TE27.11). The building permits for this development are ready for issuance. Due to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation rules and the Rental Construction Financing Initiative's reliance on financial markets the initial loan advance can only be made at intermittent times. The earliest first advance available to the applicant is November 1, 2019. The delay in receiving Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation funding presents a significant financial risk to the project and a deferral creates an opportunity to enable the City to most effectively layer on funding supports for affordable housing with other levels of government. The applicant has attempted to request Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation to advance funds in advance (on October 31) so that all charges and fees could be paid without a deferral. However, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has not been able to accommodate this request. Due to the other financial conditions imposed under the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation program, the applicant has been unable to obtain funds on a temporary basis from other sources. This matter is deemed urgent because a deferral is required to ensure sufficient funding is secured from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation to advance this affordable housing project.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to enter into a development charge deferral agreement as set out in Chapter 415-8C, for building permit application 19 123234 SHO 00 PP at 650 Kingston Road, to defer payment of the applicable development charge calculated as of the date of building permit issuance, to a date on or before November 6, 2019, with interest payable on the deferred amount at an appropriate short term rate to be determined by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, for a building permit issued on October 30 or 31, 2019, subject to full payment of all other applicable fees and charges at permit issuance, and the payment of the deferred development charge by the end of the deferral period, after which time the permit may be revoked if full payment of the deferred development charges is not received.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to enter into a development charge deferral agreement as set out in Chapter 415-8C, for building permit application 19 123234 SHO 00 PP at 650 Kingston Road, to defer payment of the applicable development charge calculated as of the date of building permit issuance, to a date on or before November 6, 2019, with interest payable on the deferred amount at an appropriate short term rate to be determined by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, for a building permit issued on October 30 or 31, 2019, subject to full payment of all other applicable fees and charges at permit issuance, and the payment of the deferred development charge by the end of the deferral period, after which time the permit may be revoked if full payment of the deferred development charges is not received.
MM11.32adopted
Among changes under the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 (Bill 73) that came into final effect on July 1, 2016, Sub-sections 45(1.3) and 45(1.4) of the Planning Act as now amended prevent submission of minor variance applications on properties subject to a privately-initiated zoning by-law amendment within two years of by-law enactment, unless the municipal council has otherwise "declared by resolution that such an application is permitted". With regards to the proposed development at 248 and 260 High Park Avenue, City Council at its meeting on July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 approved Zoning By-law amendments to former City of Toronto By-law 438-86 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, to permit the redevelopment of the properties at 248 and 260 High Park Avenue with a 4-storey (19.8 m total, including a 5.2 m mechanical penthouse) residential apartment building, including the adaptive re-use of a vacant place of worship. A portion of the existing place of worship and a single-detached dwelling (248 High Park Avenue) would be demolished. Site Specific Zoning By-laws 1397-2017 and 1398-2017 were also adopted by City Council at its July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 meeting. On February 26, 2019, City Council authorized the submission of a Minor Variance application, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.14) of the Planning Act, for relief from the By-law requirements of Site Specific Zoning By-laws 1397-2017 and 1398-2017 (Item MM3.22) related to minor modifications made to the design of the site and corrections to a few oversights regarding the landscape width beside the driveway, the setback of the southwest stairwell to the below grade parking and vehicle access design. Since this time, the owner has been continuing to work with staff on the Site Plan Control application. Through the ongoing review of the application, additional variances to permit the proposed redevelopment of the site have been identified by Toronto Building staff in relation to the proposed vestibule and the separation distance between the building wings, as well as in relation to gross floor area. A variance is required for gross floor area as elements of the building, including areas of the stairwell corridors and the 'open to below' spaces, were excluded from the gross floor area calculation previously identified through the Zoning By-law Amendment application. Accordingly, the proposed change in density is technical due to a change in interpretation regarding the areas of an apartment building that are included in the gross floor area calculations. The variances requested will continue to not affect the overall built form or general layout of the site. Under the Planning Act as amended, the owner will not be able to file for a Minor Variance application for zoning relief on these matters until December 8, 2019, thus delaying the site development further and causing the owner undue project delay and financial hardship. As the proposed variances do not modify the remaining development standards established through the rezoning of this property and would result in an improvement of the functioning of the proposed development, City Council's authorization for submission of a Minor Variance application at this time is warranted.
City Council on October 29 and 30, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, submission of a Minor Variance application in regard to 248 and 260 High Park Avenue for relief from the By-law requirements of Site Specific Zoning By-laws 1397-2017 and 1398-2017.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, submission of a Minor Variance application in regard to 248 and 260 High Park Avenue for relief from the By-law requirements of Site Specific Zoning By-laws 1397-2017 and 1398-2017.