Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 90 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 1 to 50 of 90Show 2550100all
BL16.1adopted
Introduction of General Bills and Confirming Bills
City Council will introduce General Bills and Confirming Bills.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, passed By-laws 196-2024 to 291-2024.
CC16.1received
The Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 3, Accountability Officers, requires that the City's Accountability Officers undergo an annual audit by an external auditor, a practice that began with the Auditor General. As directed by City Council, the City Manager facilitated the request for proposal process and retained Robert Gore and Associates to undertake this work. The external auditors have completed their review. I am transmitting to City Council the external auditor's reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman for the year ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, for information.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, received Item CC16.1 for information.
IA16.1withdrawn
New Linear Park for Scarborough in Review
Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 24, Scarborough-Guildwood, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry: I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code Chapter 27 §27-7.11 to seek information regarding the request for staff to report back to Council on the feasibility of a new linear park for Scarborough. On February 2, 2022, City Council adopted MM39.24 , Potential Adaptive Reuse - Scarborough Rapid Transit Elevated Track. The item was considered urgent as it asked staff to explore the potential for the adaptive reuse of the elevated track currently utilized by the Scarborough Rapid Transit line as a new linear park and active transportation corridor and to report back to a future meeting of City Council on the feasibility, including potential funding options. In 2024, City Council directed the Toronto Transit Commission to design a busway within the at-grade sections of the Scarborough Rapid Transit corridor to function until the Scarborough Subway is operational. As this work will include the removal of the tracks, surface paving, and the installation of a safety wall, the corridor will be open for a natural next step for pedestrian accessibility in the form of a linear park connection, from Kennedy Station to the Scarborough Town Centre. Please provide information on the following points: - What work has been completed to date regarding the feasibility study and funding options for the pedestrian accessibility transformation into a linear park? - Which division or department is leading the feasibility study and project? - When can we expect a detailed report back to the Council with the feasibility and funding options to transform the supported busway for pedestrian accessibility? Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to receiving your response and continuing the dialogue on this important issue. 2022.MM39.24 - Potential Adaptive Reuse - Scarborough Rapid Transit Elevated Track - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2022.MM39.24
Item IA16.1 was ruled redundant by the Speaker at City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024.
MM16.1adopted
This motion is to install two heritage plaques in Ward 11 with $20,000 in Section 37 funds, honouring local residents who have made outstanding contributions to Toronto and to Canada as a whole. The first plaque is to honour Uno Prii, the influential Toronto architect who brought sculptural curves and artful details to apartment buildings. Some of his best-loved and internationally famous works are in the Annex in Ward 11, such as the Vincennes at 35 Walmer Road (1966), Prince Arthur Towers at 20 Prince Arthur Avenue (1968), Brazil Towers at 485 Huron Street, and 44 Walmer Road (1969). The second plaque is to honour Senator David Croll. Senator David Croll was an immigrant and prominent social reformer who shattered racist barriers within Canada's political landscape. For over 60 years of exemplary public service (1931 to 1991) he fought for fairness, for justice, and for those most in need. Despite rampant anti-Jewish prejudice, he became Canada's first Jewish mayor, first Jewish cabinet minister, and first Jewish senator. Senator David Croll lived his principles. He resigned from the Ontario Cabinet over the government's harsh response to the 1937 United Auto Workers strike against General Motors, declaring "I would rather walk with the workers than ride with General Motors." He served overseas during World War II, and then was elected as a federal member of parliament for Spadina. In the Canadian Senate, Senator David Croll authored the influential 1971 "Report of the Special Senate Committee on Poverty," calling powerfully for a universal basic income. This report embarrassed the Trudeau government into tripling family allowances and instituting the Child Tax Credit; the report began with ringing words that are still too true today: "the poor do not choose poverty. It is at once their affliction and our national shame. The children of the poor (and there are many) are the most helpless victims of all, and find even less hope in a society where welfare systems from the very beginning destroys their chances of a better life." Senator David Croll was also responsible for key Senate reports on Aging, on Retirement without Tears, and on Consumer Credit and the Cost of Living. In 1990, in recognition of his lifetime of public service, he was sworn into the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, an honour usually given only to federal cabinet ministers. Senator David Croll's name appears on the Toronto Community Housing Corporation building at 341 Bloor Street West, but with no explanation of who he was or what he contributed to our community.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 666 Spadina Avenue, secured for public realm improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701288), for the production and installation of a heritage plaque honouring Uno Prii at or near 35 Walmer Road (Cost Centre: HG0001). 2. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the following developments: a. $5778.12 from 192A, 194, and 200 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3700396), secured for the heritage plaque program in the Annex community; and b. $4,221.88 from 666 Spadina Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3701288), secured for public realm improvements; for the production and installation of a heritage plaque honouring Senator David Croll at or near Senator David Croll Apartments at 341 Bloor Street West (Cost Centre: HG0001).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 666 Spadina Avenue, secured for public realm improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701288), for the production and installation of a heritage plaque honouring Uno Prii at or near 35 Walmer Road (Cost Centre: HG0001). 2. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the following developments: a. $5778.12 from 192A, 194, and 200 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3700396), secured for the heritage plaque program in the Annex community; and b. $4,221.88 from 666 Spadina Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3701288), secured for public realm improvements; for the production and installation of a heritage plaque honouring Senator David Croll at or near Senator David Croll Apartments at 341 Bloor Street West (Cost Centre: HG0001).
RM16.1adopted
- O Canada - Moment of Silence
CALL TO ORDER: 9:38 a.m. Speaker Nunziata took the Chair and called the Members to order. The meeting opened with O Canada. March 20, 2024 Members of Council observed a moment of silence and remembered: The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney Stephen James Bedford Gladys Elizabeth Danford Herb Pirk Vassili Ioannou Spyropoulos Estella Wheeler Martin Willschick Speaker Nunziata addressed Council as follows: I would like to take a moment on behalf of Council to acknowledge the Indigenous Peoples of all the lands that we are on today. We do this to reaffirm our commitment and responsibility in improving relationships between nations and to deepening our own understanding of Indigenous peoples and their cultures. It is a moment to reflect on the importance of this land, which we each call home. We acknowledge the land we are meeting on is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Speaker Nunziata advised Council of the following: For the benefit of those who are connected to the internet, the City Clerk has posted all of the agenda materials for today's meeting at toronto.ca/council.
CC16.2adopted
Appointment of Interim Controller
The purpose of this report is to recommend to City Council the appointment of an Interim Controller. This is a time sensitive matter as the current Controller, Andrew Flynn, retired from the City of Toronto effective March 12, 2024 and an interim appointment must be in place before the next Council meeting, currently scheduled for April 17, 18 and 19, 2024.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council appoint David McIsaac as the Interim Controller, and in turn to the statutory office of Deputy Treasurer of the City of Toronto, for the purposes of section 138 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, effective the latter of March 22, 2024, or such date when David McIsaac enters into an employment contract for the position of Interim Controller and until such time as a new Controller has been appointed. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary by-laws to give effect to City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Manager recommends that: 1. City Council appoint David McIsaac as the Interim Controller, and in turn to the statutory office of Deputy Treasurer of the City of Toronto, for the purposes of section 138 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 effective the latter of March 22, 2024, or such date when David McIsaac enters into an employment contract for the position of Interim Controller and until such time as a new Controller has been appointed. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary by-laws to give effect to City Council's decision.
IA16.2received
Renaming of Dundas Toronto Transit Commission Stations
Councillor Brad Bradford, Ward 19, Beaches-East York, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry: I am submitting this administrative inquiry (under Municipal Code S27-7.11) to obtain information on plans to rename the Dundas subway stations. On December 14, 2023, a motion approved by City Council provided recommendations for the Toronto Transit Commission Board to undertake steps to rename both Dundas and Dundas West Subway Station. At that time, the Fiscal Impact Statement said that "Renaming the Dundas subway and Dundas West subway stations are estimated to cost approximately $2.2 million in gross expenditures with an estimated net City costs of $0.6 million." The Statement also said that Toronto Metropolitan University would "fully fund costs" associated with Dundas Station renaming, "currently estimated at $1.6 million", and "Costs associated with renaming the Dundas West subway station will be included as part of the staff proposed 2024 - 2033 Capital Budget and Plan for the Toronto Transit Commission." At the Toronto Transit Commission Board Meeting held on February 22, 2024, direction was subsequently provided for Toronto Transit Commission staff to move forward with the development of a framework to consider the renaming of both subway stations and report back to the Toronto Transit Commission Board by the end of the third quarter of 2024. Unfortunately, the video recording of this meeting is not available. As it remains unclear how these renamings will be achieved without significant costs to the City, this Administrative Inquiry seeks to provide an update directly to Council. Questions for the City Manager: 1. Did Toronto Transit Commission staff provide the cost estimates for the renaming of the stations included in the Fiscal Impact Statement? If not, how and by whom were those estimates developed? 2. What is the current estimated cost to rename both Dundas and Dundas West Stations, inclusive of train and streetcar technical systems, signage and system-wide maps? 3. What is the status of discussions between the City, the Toronto Transit Commission and Toronto Metropolitan University regarding the potential renaming of Dundas Station? And whom at the City of Toronto has been engaged in those discussions? 4. What are the draft terms of agreement between the City, the Toronto Transit Commission and Toronto Metropolitan University regarding the potential renaming of Dundas Station, including the proposed term of the agreement? 5. Is the City or the Toronto Transit Commission in active discussions with any additional parties regarding the naming rights for Dundas West Station? 6. To date, what work has been undertaken to determine the potential revenue opportunities for renaming rights to transit lines, stations and other City assets? 7. What is the estimated opportunity cost to the City as a result of choosing not to pursue potential revenue opportunities for naming rights to these transit stations? Should the answers to any of these questions require a confidential attachment, I request that those responses be separated from other responses so that as much information be made publicly available as possible.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, received Administrative Inquiry IA16.2 from Councillor Brad Bradford, Ward 19, Beaches-East York, regarding Renaming of Dundas Toronto Transit Commission Stations and Answer IA16.2a from the City Manager, for information.
MM16.2adopted
As the third vice-president of the Good Roads Association, I ask that the City of Toronto join the Good Roads Association in supporting Bill 152. Bill 152, Chad's Law (Enforcing Safer Passing), 2023 , was introduced by New Democrat Party Member of Provincial Parliament Guy Bourgouin (Mushkegowuk-James Bay) this past November. The intent of the Bill is to enhance road safety by discouraging risky passing maneuvers on highways, particularly those marked with double solid yellow lines. The Bill passed First Reading on November 21 and was ordered for Second Reading. It is unclear at this time when that will occur. Bill 152 is named after Chad Bélanger, who was the victim in a head-on collision near Kapuskasing in January of 2022 after a commercial vehicle crossed solid yellow lines to pass another commercial vehicle on a hill. Although Bélanger was not killed, he was seriously injured. Ontario is currently the only province in Canada to not have passing on double yellow lines officially legislated as illegal. A driver can face charges if an accident occurs after passing a solid double yellow line, but the act of passing is not itself illegal. Rather, it is a very strong recommendation to not pass. Currently, charges can be laid regarding unsafe passing on or near hills, bridges, and viaducts under sections 148 and 149 of the Highway Traffic Act. While having these laws on the books is positive, it is a reactionary approach. Oftentimes, police are laying these charges because of a motor vehicle collision. This Bill aims to take a more proactive approach by prohibiting the dangerous passing in the first place. The primary amendment proposed by Bill 152 is the addition of subsections (9) and (10) to section 148 of the Highway Traffic Act. Individuals found contravening the prohibition outlined in subsection (9) would be guilty of an offence. Upon conviction, they would be subject to a fine of $400 and would incur three or more demerit points. Bill 152, Chad's Law (Enforcing Safer Passing), 2023 - Legislative Assembly of Ontario (ola.org)
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council express its support for Bill 152, Chad's Law, Enforcing Safer Passing 2023. 2. City Council forward this item to Premier Doug Ford, Member of Provincial Parliament Guy Bourgouin, Toronto Members of Provincial Parliament, and the Good Roads Association, advising of City Council's support for Bill 152.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council express its support for Bill 152, Chad's Law, Enforcing Safer Passing 2023. 2. City Council forward this item to Premier Doug Ford, Member of Provincial Parliament Guy Bourgouin, Toronto Members of Provincial Parliament, and the Good Roads Association, advising of City Council's support of Bill 152.
RM16.2adopted
City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on February 6 and 7, 2024 and the special meeting held on February 14, 2024.
City Council confirmed the Minutes of Council from the regular meeting held on February 6 and 7, 2024, and the special meeting held on February 14, 2024.
CC16.3adopted
Appointment of Public Members to the CreateTO Board
At its meeting on February 26, 2024, the Corporations Nominating Panel considered Item NC7.1 and made recommendations to City Council. Summary from the report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk: The Corporations Nominating Panel will conduct interviews and recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the CreateTO Board.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council appoint the following public member to the CreateTO Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 22, 2028, and until a successor is appointed: Mark Guslits 2. City Council appoint the following public member to the Boards of Directors of Build Toronto and the Toronto Port Lands Company, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 22, 2026, and until a successor is appointed: Mark Guslits 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the CreateTO Board. Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the CreateTO Board.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel: The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that: 1. City Council appoint the following public member to the CreateTO Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 22, 2028, and until a successor is appointed: Mark Guslits 2. City Council appoint the following public member to the Boards of Directors of Build Toronto and the Toronto Port Lands Company, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 22, 2026, and until a successor is appointed: Mark Guslits 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the CreateTO Board.
IA16.3received
Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry: I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry (under Municipal Code §27-7.11.) to obtain information about emergency preparedness, public safety, by law enforcement and police response to the upcoming Al Quds day protest and further details on how by law enforcement responded to protests and rallies that have taken place between October 7, 2023, and March 3, 2024. Since October 7, 2023, Toronto has seen over 400 protests, many of which targeted the Jewish community in Toronto. Because of the temperament of these events Toronto Police Service allocated hundreds of officers at a cost of over $8 million to protect persons and property. The mobs behind these events have targeted synagogues, a hospital with a Jewish history, Jewish-owned stores, individuals who support Israel and Christmas shoppers. They have blocked streets, ambulance routes, the entrance and exits of social and fundraising events, blocked the entrance to the offices of elected officials and sabotaged a state visit by the Prime Minister of Italy and the Prime Minister of Canada in Toronto. Chants have called for the genocide of Jews, and the destruction of Jewish owned businesses. The events are in violation of the City of Toronto Anti-discrimination policy, the City of Toronto Hate-sponsored Rallies policy, and numerous by laws and various provisions of the criminal code. While dozens have been arrested and charged, these hate rallies are growing more threatening and menacing. On or about April 5-6, 2024, an event called Al Quds Day, will take place. This event calls for the genocide of Jews in Jerusalem. The event has opened with a song called "Declare it a Popular Revolution." Keynote speakers include Holocaust deniers, those encouraging attacks on Jews, calling for the destruction of Israel and other hateful rhetoric. In light of months of incitement across Toronto it is expected that this year's gathering could be hateful and violent in the extreme. Questions for the City Manager, City of Toronto. Although there have been dozens, perhaps hundreds of by law violations during these protests since October 7, 2023, there is no indication that any by law charges have been laid. Have any by law infraction charges been laid against individuals participating in protests and rallies since October 7, 2023? If no charges have been laid, what are the reasons by law enforcement is not supporting police services and enforcing City of Toronto by laws? It has been over 4 years since the Hate Sponsored Rallies policy was adopted by Toronto City Council. Despite the city being overwhelmed with hateful protests, there is no indication that the policy has been enforced. What response and enforcement actions have city staff taken under the Hate Sponsored Rallies policy between October 7, 2023, and March 11, 2024. It is expected that this year's Al Quds day gathering could be violent and hateful. What options are available to seek an injunction to prevent the event from taking place or what other measures are available to stop this gathering? What plans are in place to keep the public safe from gatherings of this nature?
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, received Administrative Inquiry IA16.3 from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre, regarding Al-Quds Day and Answer IA16.3a from the City Manager, for information.
MM16.3adopted
I am writing to request City Council request the Province of Ontario to undertake a comprehensive review of the Cannabis Control Act, 2017. This review, in consultation with municipalities, is imperative to ensure effective regulation and enforcement of cannabis-related matters across our province. While the Cannabis Control Act, 2017 established a framework for the legal sale and distribution of cannabis, there remain significant challenges, particularly regarding the proliferation of unlicensed cannabis establishments. It is evident that the current measures are not sufficient to deter these establishments from breaking the law and reopening despite enforcement efforts. One of the major limitations lies in the fines imposed under the Cannabis Control Act, 2017. While fines can be issued, their effectiveness is constrained by the discretion of a Judge or Justice of the Peace. This inconsistency in penalties undermines deterrence and enforcement efforts. Moreover, the enforcement measures available under the Cannabis Control Act of Ontario, including those carried out by the Municipal Licensing and Standards Cannabis Enforcement Unit, are constrained by the existing framework. Although property owners can be held accountable for illegal cannabis activities on their premises, there are challenges when property owners are directly involved in the operation of unlicensed cannabis dispensaries. In such cases, it becomes difficult to compel property owners to take action to evict or stop the sale of cannabis from unlicensed establishments. Furthermore, the licensing of cannabis dispensaries through the Alcohol Gaming Commission of Ontario adds another layer of complexity to enforcement efforts. Without a streamlined regulatory process and clear enforcement mechanisms, municipalities struggle to effectively address the ongoing operation of unlicensed cannabis establishments. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the Cannabis Control Act, 2017, must address these shortcomings and provide municipalities with enhanced tools and resources to combat illegal cannabis activities. This includes exploring options to strengthen enforcement measures, increase penalties for non-compliance, and improve collaboration between municipalities and provincial authorities. In conclusion, I urge City Council to advocate for a thorough review of the Cannabis Control Act, 2017, to address the challenges associated with the proliferation of unlicensed cannabis establishments. By doing so, we can better protect public health and safety while upholding the integrity of the legal cannabis market in our province. I kindly ask for your support in formalizing this request to the Province of Ontario. Together, we can ensure that our concerns are heard and addressed through meaningful legislative action.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to undertake a comprehensive review of the Cannabis Control Act, 2017, in consultation with municipalities, including roles and responsibilities, funding, and enforcement, and addressing unlicensed cannabis establishments.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to undertake a comprehensive review of the Cannabis Control Act, 2017 in consultation with municipalities, including roles and responsibilities, funding, and enforcement, and addressing unlicensed cannabis establishments.
RM16.3adopted
Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from the Mayor and City Officials
Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 12 on February 29, 2024 Submitted by Mayor Olivia Chow Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 4 on February 23, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holday, Chair Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 13 on February 2, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Lily Cheng, Chair Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 14 on March 4, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Lily Cheng, Chair Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 10 on February 20, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, Chair Report of the General Government Committee from Meeting 10 on February 13, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 11 on February 27, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Chair Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 10 on February 28, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 5 on March 8, 2024 Submitted by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, Chair Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 11 on February 26, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holyday, Chair Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 11 on February 22, 2024 Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 11 on February 16, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 11 on February 21, 2024 Submitted by Councillor Chris Moise, Chair New Business submitted by the Mayor and City Officials.
Committee Reports and New Business were presented to City Council for consideration.
CC16.4adopted
Appointment of Public Members to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal
At its meeting on March 1, 2024, the Nominating Panel - Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal considered Item NH4.1 and made recommendations to City Council. Summary from the report (February 15, 2024) from the City Clerk: The Nominating Panel - Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend two candidates to City Council for appointment to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal for a term of office ending on February 8, 2028, and until successors are appointed: Owen Chambers; and Emily McKernan. 2. City Council direct that Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (March 12, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal. Confidential Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (March 12, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal: The Nominating Panel - Multi-Tenant Licensing Tribunal recommends that: 1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal for a term of office ending on February 8, 2028, and until successors are appointed: Owen Chambers Emily McKernan 2. City Council direct that Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (March 12, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Multi-Tenant House Licensing Tribunal.
MM16.4referred
Night Economy Manifesto - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie
As the Night Economy Champion, I am working with Economic Development and Culture to ensure the City of Toronto fulfills its mandate to modernize and clarify the rules to provide flexibility and support for businesses at night, while ensuring an appropriate level of regulatory oversight to mitigate any potential community nuisance and public safety issues. As we move the directive forward, it is important that the City of Toronto join other cities worldwide in signing the Nighttime Manifesto, symbolizing a global commitment to raising the awareness around the importance of nightlife. The Nighttime Manifesto is an expression of intent to support a nighttime that is safe, resilient, sustainable, responsible, inclusive, and creative. It is aligned with existing Council direction for the City's support of the Night Economy, including: EC8.14 headed "Supporting the Growth of the Night Economy" ; EC8.13 headed "Recommended Amendments to Chapter 545, Licensing for Bars, Restaurants, and Entertainment Venues as part of the Night Economy Review" ; and PH8.2 headed "Recommended Amendments to Zoning By-laws for Bars, Restaurants and Entertainment Venues as part of the Night Economy Review - Final Report" . There are no financial implications, and the Nighttime Manifesto is not legally binding. Some of the supporting cities include, Antwerp, Bangkok, Belfast, Berlin, Durban, Johannesburg, Mälmo, Montreal, New York, São Paulo, and Singapore. The Manifesto outlines objectives to "Involve different partners and stakeholders to bridge gaps, raise awareness, and build stronger representation for nighttime communities." I look forward to your support.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, referred Motion MM16.4 to the Economic and Community Development Committee for consideration.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council express its support for the Nighttime Manifesto and request the Mayor to sign the Manifesto on behalf of the City of Toronto.
RM16.4received
Members of Council will declare interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
Members of Council declared interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
CC16.5amended
415 Broadview Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Direction Report
On January 20, 2022 an Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application was submitted seeking to permit the adaptive re-use of an existing historic church to include a 10-storey addition with 60 residential units. On August 15, 2022 the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act. Subsequently the applicant made applications under Sections 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter the property and demolish heritage attributes in order to allow for the construction of a modified development application comprised of a seven-storey mixed-use building with commercial units at grade and residential units above. Staff recommended refusal of those permits as the submitted heritage memo was incomplete and therefore did not demonstrate satisfactory conservation of the heritage resources on site. On January 17, 2024 the applicant submitted a revised development concept generally in line with the previous heritage alteration application, although the height has been further reduced to six-storeys. An Ontario Land Tribunal hearing is scheduled for June 10, 2024, with procedural filing dates occurring in spring 2024. The City Solicitor requires further directions for upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal proceedings relating to the Official Plan and rezoning appeal.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by Motion 1 by Councillor Paula Fletcher. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by Motion 1 by Councillor Paula Fletcher. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by Motion 1 by Councillor Paula Fletcher, were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the application as depicted in Public Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, provided that the applicant has made arrangements satisfactory to the City Solicitor, such as entering into minutes of settlement or entering other agreements with the City or other parties to the Ontario Land Tribunal appeal, to secure the following: a. the applicant, in coordination with the City, will undertake best efforts through the site plan approval process to relocate the transformer currently located at the north east corner of the site to a location acceptable to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and b. the applicant will conserve all trees on neighbouring properties, undertake best efforts to retain as many on-site trees as feasible, and plant additional trees to enhance privacy for adjacent properties. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its final Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the draft Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendments implementing the Settlement Offer are finalized in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the applicant has provided updated reports confirming adequate water, sanitary and stormwater capacity to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, or the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services has determined that holding provisions are required in the Zoning By-law Amendment; c. the owner has resolved transportation-related matters including streetscape and curb extension provisions, site loading and access, as well as matters related to functional servicing and stormwater management, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. in the event that the updated reports referred to above identify required upgrades to servicing or functional items above, the owner shall enter into agreement(s) for the construction of any such improvements to such services, as required, at no cost to the City and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the owner has submitted a Revised Heritage Impact Assessment that includes a conservation strategy for the on-site significant heritage resource, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; f. the owner has entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 415 Broadview Avenue, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by RAW Design Inc. and dated January 17, 2024, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects dated January 17, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the approved Plan required in Part 2.g. below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; g. the owner has provided a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 415 Broadview Avenue, prepared by ERA Architects dated January 17, 2024, and details all future conservation efforts as part of this application, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; h. the owner has submitted an application and gained approval in writing under Section 33 and Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the proposed alterations and partial demolition of the heritage property at 415 Broadview Avenue; i. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review, as they relate to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review; and j. the owner has resolved all outstanding matters identified in the Memorandum prepared by Engineering and Construction Services, dated June 30, 2022. 3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor to continue discussions with the applicant to explore the delivery of affordable units within the development, including as an in-kind community benefit pursuant to section 37(6) of the Planning Act, and to report back to City Council for further instruction if the applicant offers such an in-kind community benefit. 4. City Council direct that the parkland dedication requirement shall be satisfied through a cash-in-lieu payment pursuant to section 42 of the Planning Act and will be appraised through Corporate Real Estate Management. 5. City Council recommend the applicant, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, commit to the following measures in addition to the implementation of the standard City of Toronto Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, including but not limited to the following: a. establish a Construction Liaison Committee made up of local residents and businesses including a representative of the local Residents Associations, to the satisfaction of the local Councillor; the Committee is to meet bi-weekly at the beginning of construction; and notes from the meetings are to be shared with the members and the Councillor's office in a timely way following each meeting; b. sweep the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe; c. pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks, laneways and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe; d. ensure that the existing sidewalks and all pedestrian walkways have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night; e. consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local businesses and residents in advance of any physical road modifications; f. install appropriate signage and converging mirrors where necessary to ensure that pedestrians', cyclists' and motorists' safety is considered at all times; g. post a 24/7 contact number for the site superintendent on the construction hoarding; h. create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the subject site; and i. include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork at their sole cost, in collaboration with the Steps Initiative and to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor. 6. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to Toronto and East York Community Council to reconfigure the portion of Simpson Avenue adjacent to the subject site to allow two-way traffic. 7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.5adopted
The Canadian Independent Music Association , during the month of February visited the Minister of Canadian Heritage to raise awareness of the government's pledge to provide annual funding to the Canadian Music Sector. This initiative is one of the many held by organizations to advocate on behalf of the music sector, which have included the Canadian Live Music Association and others. As the Night Economy Champion I am writing to urge Toronto City Council to extend its support to the music community by advocating for increased funding to the Canada Music Fund. As an integral part of our cultural landscape, the music sector plays a crucial role in enriching our community and contributing to our economy. However, recent challenges, compounded by the impacts of the pandemic, have highlighted the need for additional support to ensure the continued vibrancy and sustainability of this vital industry. The Liberal government demonstrated its commitment to the music sector by promising to increase the annual contribution to the Canada Music Fund to $50 million by 2024-2025. This commitment reflects an understanding of the importance of supporting Canadian artists and music companies, particularly during these challenging times. Organizations like Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings (FACTOR) rely on funding from the Canada Music Fund to provide essential support to artists and music companies across the country. The Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings' investments have not only nurtured talent but have also contributed significantly to the growth and sustainability of the Canadian music scene. However, declining contributions from private radio broadcasters pose a significant threat to the Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings' funding model, jeopardizing its ability to support the industry effectively. By advocating for an increase in funding to the Canada Music Fund, Toronto City Council can demonstrate its commitment to supporting local artists, businesses, and organizations within the music sector. A stronger investment in the Canada Music Fund will not only help sustain existing programming but will also enable the creation of new initiatives, particularly in the live sector, which has been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. I ask City Council to join in calling for increased funding to the Canada Music Fund.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council express its support for the Canadian Independent Music Association and the Canadian Live Music Association in their efforts in requesting the Government of Canada to increase its annual contribution to the Canada Music Fund to $50 million by 2024-2025 as pledged during the 2021 federal election. 2. City Council forward this item to the Minister of Canadian Heritage, the Canadian Independent Music Association, and the Canadian Live Music Association advising of Toronto City Council's support.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that: 1. City Council express its support to the Canadian Independent Music Association and the Canadian Live Music Association in their efforts in requesting the Government of Canada to increase its annual contribution to the Canada Music Fund to $50 million by 2024-2025 as pledged during the 2021 federal election. 2. City Council forward this item to the Minister of Canadian Heritage, the Canadian Independent Music Association, and the Canadian Live Music Association advising of Toronto City Council's support.
RM16.5received
Members of Council may file petitions.
No petitions were filed during the Routine Matters portion of the meeting.
CC16.6adopted
On November 10, 2021, Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications were submitted to permit a 24-storey (76 metres high) mixed-use building and a 9-storey residential building (30 metres high) at 2402-2418 Dufferin Street and 4-10 Ramsden Road. Also proposed were a northerly extension to the existing municipal laneway within the site, and an on-site parkland dedication at the southwest corner of the site. On August 2, 2022, the Applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision within the prescribed time frames in the Planning Act. Case Management Conferences before the Ontario Land Tribunal took place on November 15, 2022 and April 3, 2023. Duffli Limited and Li III Ltd, an adjacent landowner, was made a party to the proceedings and a 10 day hearing has been scheduled to commence on April 15, 2024. The City Solicitor urgently requires further directions for the upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing. This item cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment applications dated March 5, 2024 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor, and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council approve that in accordance with section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 503.2 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor. 3. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management. 4. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time. 5. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has submitted revised architectural and landscape plans, and sun/shadow and wind studies to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; c. the owner has revised the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report, Hydrological Review Summary, and Groundwater Summary to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the owner has provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the acceptable Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development; in requiring any off site municipal infrastructure upgrades, the owner is to make satisfactory arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services for Work on the City's Right-of-Way; e. the owner has submitted an updated Transportation Impact Study to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; f. the owner has submitted a revised Transportation Demand Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and that such matters be secured if required; g. the owner has provided space within the development for installation of maintenance access holes and sampling ports on the private side, as close to the property line as possible, for both the storm and sanitary service connections, in accordance with the Sewers By-law Chapter 681.10 to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and h. the owner has provided a revised draft Plan of Subdivision, as necessary, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor if the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.6adopted
Bloor Bedford Safe Rear Access - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
The City owns a driveway (unopened lane) just west of Avenue Road and north of Bloor Street West (the "City Driveway"). The City Driveway runs south from Prince Arthur Avenue and then east toward Bedford Road just north of 200 to 220 Bloor Street West. The City Driveway terminates at the rear of 220 Bloor Street West, which is City property leased to HPT IHG Canada Corporation (known familiarly as the "Royal Sonesta Hotel"). Owners of several buildings fronting onto Avenue Road or Bloor Street have non-exclusive easements to use the north-south portion of the City Driveway for ingress and egress to Prince Arthur Avenue. This includes the Royal Sonesta Hotel. As part of its long-term lease of the City property at 220 Bloor Street West, the Royal Sonesta Hotel also has an exclusive easement for $1 per year over the east to west portions of the City Driveway that are identified as Parts 2 and 3 on the draft Plan attached hereto as Appendix "C". The Royal Sonesta Hotel also has a right of egress west to Bedford Road across the southern edge of the Toronto Parking Authority Green P Lot 58, and is very close to the Bedford entrance of the St. George Subway Station. In 2022, the Ontario Land Tribunal ignored the City's objections and authorized construction of a large condominium tower at 210 Bloor Street West This is a very small site with no room for a driveway. The Ontario Land Tribunal ruled that acceptable access was provided, for both construction and long-term operations, by an easement over a narrow private driveway behind 208 Bloor (4.7 m wide) and then south (5.5 metres wide) between the Museum (206 Bloor) and Exhibit (200 Bloor) condominiums to Bloor Street (the "Private Driveway"). Since that time, a fourth condominiums tower has been approved for 208 Bloor Street West, to use the same narrow access over the Private Driveway. If nothing is done to protect the public interest, construction vehicles, heavy trucks and all other vehicles that serve the four condominiums towers will be competing to access Bloor Street through this dangerously narrow Private Driveway, plus there might have to be construction staging on Bloor. The Private Driveway empties directly across the Bloor Street westbound sidewalk and newly constructed cycle track, shortly before the Royal Sonesta Hotel's entry. Visibility is poor and the risk of collisions is high. There is already conflict between existing users of this Private Driveway, and vehicles sometimes queue on Bloor. In addition, the Royal Ontario Museum has also just announced major construction on its site across the street. The City Driveway could be converted into a public lane that would provide much safer access to the four condominiums, if not for the exclusive easement granted to the Royal Sonesta Hotel. Release of the exclusive easement held by the Royal Sonesta Hotel in Part 3 of the attached survey is necessary to provide the public with a safe rear access route to the four condos, in exchange for which the southern portion of the Private Driveway will be converted to a mid-block pedestrian connection to Bloor Street. This will significantly reduce the risk of serious collisions causing injury or death, of interference with pedestrians and cycle access along Bloor Street, and of congestion and queueing on Bloor Street. The operations of the Royal Sonesta Hotel will not be interfered with, as they will continue to be able to use the City Driveway / lane to access Prince Arthur Avenue, and will be able to access Bedford Road through Green P Lot 58. Release of the exclusive easement would also facilitate an eventual public lane that could connect Prince Arthur Avenue and Bedford Road, likely as part of converting all or part of the Toronto Parking Authority Green P Lot 58 to much-needed housing and green space. This could be a valuable site for the City's plan for Leveraging City-Wide Real Estate Opportunities for Affordable Housing, Complete Communities and Financial Sustainability , https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.EX12.4 . Negotiations are ongoing with the Royal Sonesta Hotel to release its exclusive easement in Part 3 in exchange for non-exclusive access over the same lands, and for reduction or elimination of its maintenance costs. If an amicable agreement cannot be secured, it will be necessary to expropriate the exclusive easement from the Royal Sonesta Hotel on appropriate terms.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation, to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2024 with a detailed plan and timetable for converting the City Driveway, between the rear of 210 Bloor Street West and Prince Arthur Avenue, to a public lane, and for any necessary ancillary changes to Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58, 208R Bloor Street West and/or to Prince Arthur Avenue, while maximizing the potential for future housing development at Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58. 2. For the purpose of this public lane, City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to negotiate: a. with the Royal Sonesta Hotel for the release of the exclusive easement on that part of the property more particularly described in Appendix B and shown as Part 3 on Draft Plan Job 2023-06713, attached as Appendix C; b. with the owners of 9 Prince Arthur Avenue to purchase the southeast corner of that property to the minimum extent necessary to relieve the current pinch point; and c. with the owners of 200 and 206 Bloor Street West to ensure that the Private Driveway between 200 and 206 Bloor Street West will be permanently closed to vehicular traffic once rear access is provided. 3. If such negotiations are unsuccessful, City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to report back to City Council in the second quarter of 2024 with recommendations for initiation of any necessary expropriations. 4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority, to evaluate conversion of all or part of Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58 to housing with associated green space, and City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation, to evaluate whether, when and how it would be in the public interest to extend the public lane from the rear of 210 Bloor Street West to Bedford Road, as part of implementing City Council's decision on Item 2024.EX12.4, headed "Long-Term Financial Plan Update: Leveraging City-Wide Real Estate Opportunities for Affordable Housing, Complete Communities and Financial Sustainability".
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation, to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2024 with a detailed plan and timetable for converting the City Driveway, between the rear of 210 Bloor Street West and Prince Arthur Avenue, to a public lane, and for any necessary ancillary changes to Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58, 208R Bloor Street West and/or to Prince Arthur Avenue, while maximizing the potential for future housing development at Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58. 2. For the purpose of this public lane, City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to negotiate: a. with the Royal Sonesta Hotel for the release of the exclusive easement on that part of the property more particularly described in Appendix B and shown as Part 3 on Draft Plan Job 2023-06713, attached as Appendix C; b. with the owners of 9 Prince Arthur Avenue to purchase the southeast corner of that property to the minimum extent necessary to relieve the current pinch point; and c. with the owners of 200 and 206 Bloor Street West to ensure that the Private Driveway between 200 and 206 Bloor Street West will be permanently closed to vehicular traffic once rear access is provided. 3. If such negotiations are unsuccessful, City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to report back to City Council in the second quarter of 2024 with recommendations for initiation of any necessary expropriations. 4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority, to evaluate conversion of all or part of Toronto Parking Authority Lot 58 to housing with associated green space, and City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation, to evaluate whether, when and how it would be in the public interest to extend the public lane from the rear of 210 Bloor Street West to Bedford Road, as part of implementing City Council's decision on Item 2024.EX12.4, headed "Long-Term Financial Plan Update: Leveraging City-Wide Real Estate Opportunities for Affordable Housing, Complete Communities and Financial Sustainability".
RM16.6received
Presentations, Introductions and Announcements
Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.
Various presentations, introductions and announcements were made to City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024. March 20, 2024 Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed Paul Bedford, former Chief Planner for the City of Toronto, to the Council Chamber and expressed condolences to him and his family, on behalf of Members of Council, on the passing of his son, Stephen. Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, called upon Mayor Chow to address City Council for a presentation on Recognizing World Water Day and 150 Years of Toronto Water. Mayor Chow addressed Members of Council and gave remarks in celebration of World Water Day with the theme of Water for Peace, and recognized Toronto Water celebrating 150 years as a public utility. Mayor Chow introduced a short video presentation on the history of Toronto Water and presented Lou Di Gironimo, General Manager, Toronto Water with a commemorative scroll. Lou Di Gironimo addressed City Council and thanked Mayor Chow for her remarks. Mr. Gironimo remarked that as a division Toronto Water is not just providing water, sewer and storm water services, but also acts as stewards protecting the system for future generations. Mr. Gironimo thanked Members of Council and Toronto Water staff for their work and dedication to Toronto Water and the City of Toronto. Councillor Cheng, during the morning session of the meeting, acknowledged Nowruz, the annual Persian Festival and the first day of spring celebrating the Persian New Year. Speaker Nunziata, during the afternoon session of the meeting, called upon John D. Elvidge, City Clerk, to address City Council on the occasion of Fiona Murray's retirement as Deputy City Clerk of Toronto Elections, City Clerk's Office. John D. Elvidge, City Clerk, addressed City Council and acknowledged the outstanding career of Fiona Murray on her retirement from the City of Toronto after 31 years. Mr. Elvidge recognized Ms. Murray's career milestones and the impacts of her governance expertise and leadership on the City. Mr. Elvidge thanked Ms. Murray for her service and contributions to the City. Mayor Chow addressed City Council and recognized Fiona Murray's 31-year career and remarked on Ms. Murray's accomplishments during her time in Shelter, Support and Housing, the City Manager's Office and finally as Deputy City Clerk of Toronto Elections, City Clerk's Office. Mayor Chow welcomed Ms. Murray's family present in the Council Chamber. Mayor Chow congratulated Ms. Murray and presented her with a commemorative scroll as a token of the City's appreciation for her accomplishments and contributions. Fiona Murray addressed City Council and thanked Mayor Chow and John D. Elvidge, City Clerk for their remarks. Ms. Murray acknowledged and thanked colleagues, mentors, and the elected officials she had the pleasure of working with over her 31-year career. Ms. Murray extended thanks to the Toronto Elections team, for their hard work and dedication. Councillor Crisanti, during the afternoon session of the meeting, acknowledged March as National Engineering Month. Councillor Moise, during the afternoon session of the meeting, welcomed Cathy Crowe, and her students from Toronto Metropolitan University, to the Council Chamber. March 21, 2024 Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, called upon Mayor Chow to address City Council on the occasion of Casey Brendon's retirement as Director of Revenue Services, Finance and Treasury Services. Mayor Chow addressed City Council by recognizing Casey Brendon's career milestones and accomplishments as Director, Revenue Services, Finance and Treasury Services. Mayor Chow acknowledged and welcomed Mr. Brendon's wife, Francis, and his children, Kyle, Anthony, Leah and Malcom, to the Council Chamber. Mayor Chow congratulated Mr. Brendon, thanked him for his contributions to the City of Toronto, and presented him with a commemorative scroll. Casey Brendon addressed City Council and thanked Mayor Chow for her remarks. Mr. Brendon reflected on his career and what he has learned throughout his time as Director of Revenue Services, Finance and Treasury Services. Mr. Brendon thanked staff, his management team, the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and the City Solicitor. Speaker Nunziata, during the afternoon session of the meeting, called upon Mayor Chow to address City Council in recognition of Toronto Fire Services having earned Accredited Agency Status from the Commission on Fire Accreditation International. Mayor Chow addressed City Council to celebrate and recognize Toronto Fire Services for achieving their second consecutive accredited agency status from the Commission of Fire Accreditation International. Mayor Chow extended congratulations to Matthew Pegg, Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services for his leadership. Mayor Chow welcomed and thanked Toronto Fire Services staff and James Reed, Toronto Professional Fire Fighters' Association Local 3888, President, present in the Chamber. Mayor Chow presented Chief Pegg with a commemorative scroll. Chief Pegg addressed City Council and thanked Mayor Chow for her remarks. Chief Pegg remarked on why the Commission of Fire Accreditation International matters, stating that the Accreditation is third party international validation of the world class fire protection that City Council provides in Toronto. Chief Pegg thanked City Council, the City's Senior Leadership Team, colleagues, and Toronto residents for allowing him to serve as their Fire Chief.
CC16.7amended
This report and the report that went to the Toronto Preservation Board on March 18, 2024 are intended to be considered together by City Council at its meeting on March 20 to 22, 2024. The owner appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment Applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal on April 20, 2023. The applicant has also appealed the Site Plan application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to a lack of decision within the time frame prescribed in the Planning Act. During its meeting of October 11 and 12, 2023, City Council directed the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current applications regarding the Official Plan, and Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control appeals for the lands at 1779-1787 Bayview Avenue and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 4. City Council request the Mayor to allocate a portion of the Community Benefits Charges collected from the development at 1779 - 1787 Bayview Avenue, as part of the 2025 Budget, to improvements to Howard Talbot Park, including baseball field netting and lighting systems, in consultation with the local Councillor. 5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to engage in continued consultation with the Leaside Baseball Association regarding construction management through the Site Plan process. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the settlement offer attached as Confidential Appendix A (the "Settlement Offer") to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor, and substantially in accordance with Confidential Appendices B and C (the "Revised Plans") to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor (together, the "Revised Proposal") for the lands municipally known as 1779-1787 Bayview Avenue (the "Lands"), and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to support the Revised Proposal, subject to Parts 2 to 5 below. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order on the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment until having been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the Owner has satisfactorily addressed the Engineering and Construction Services matters in the Engineering and Construction Services Memorandum dated December 13, 2023, or as may be updated, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer, Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the Owner has satisfactorily addressed Transportation Services matters in the Transportation Services memo dated July 31, 2023 (as updated), or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the Owner, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the Owner has submitted a revised Transportation Demand Management Plan acceptable to, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services and that matters arising from such Plan be secured to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, if required; e. the Owner has satisfactorily addressed matters from the Parks, Forestry and Recreation memorandum dated November 28, 2023, or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the Owner, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; f. the Owner has submitted a Subsurface Investigation for the possible presence of methane gas on the property and any required mitigation measures are to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; g. the Owner has satisfactorily addressed matters from the Urban Forestry memorandum dated December 16, 2022, or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the Owner, all to the satisfaction of General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; h. the Owner has submitted an updated complete Toronto Green Standards Checklist and Statistics Template, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; i. the Owner provides the City with confirmation that the Metrolinx Technical Reviews have been completed, as determined in consultation with Metrolinx; j. the Owner has secured replacement of the existing rental housing, including the same number of units, bedroom type and size and with similar rents, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; k. the Owner has secured an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan addressing the right for existing and former tenants to return to a replacement rental unit on the Lands at similar rents, the provision of alternative accommodation at similar rents, and other assistance to mitigate hardship, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and l. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 22 224403 NNY 15 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 which allows for the demolition of the ten (10) existing rental dwelling units at 1779-1787 Bayview Avenue, and the Owner has entered into, and registered on title to the Lands, one or more agreements with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision. 3. City Council consent to the demolition of the designated heritage building at 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue, in accordance with section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act, subject to the incorporation of the front (westerly) façade of such building into the new residential building at its southwest corner, as reflected in the Revised Plans and as described in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 16, 2024, all subject to and in accordance with a Commemoration Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following further conditions: a. prior to issuance of a final Ontario Land Tribunal Order in connection with the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the Lands, the Owner shall: i. inter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Arcadis, dated February 16, 2024, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 16, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 3.a.ii. below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and ii. provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue, prepared by GBCA, dated February 16, 2024, and details all future conservation efforts as part of this application, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; b. prior to final Site Plan Approval in connection with the proposed development on the Lands, the Owner shall: i. provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 3.a.ii above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; ii. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; iii. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; iv. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and v. submit a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; c. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Owner shall: i. btain final approval for the necessary zoning by-law amendments required to permit the proposed development on the Lands substantially in accordance with the Revised Plans; ii. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; iii. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and iv. provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two printed sets of archival quality 8 by 10 inch colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; d. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 3.c.iii. above, the Owner shall: i. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, required heritage lighting work, and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan, and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and ii. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 4. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the Owner of 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 1783-1785 Bayview Avenue. 6. City Council direct that the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, prioritize the research and evaluation of the heritage potential of the properties south of 1779-1787 Bayview Avenue on the east side of Bayview Avenue, to and including 1747 - 1749 Bayview Avenue, for inclusion on the City's Heritage Register and report back to City Council no later than the November 2024 meeting of City Council on this matter. 7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A, B, and C to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.7amended
In 2013 (CC39.5) and in 2022 (MM39.24), Toronto City Council proactively decided to explore the feasibility for adaptive reuse of the 6.4 kilometre right-of-way and six station assets which comprised the Scarborough Rapid Transit (Line 3), which served Scarborough neighbourhoods from 1985 until its decommissioning in 2023. The possibility of converting the elevated right-of-way portions of Line 3 into an iconic linear public park and mobility space remains an important act of city-building. Scarborough residents have the longest Toronto Transit Commission commutes, the least amount of biking infrastructure and the highest rates of pedestrian deaths in the City. This linear park will help residents to safely and conveniently gain expanded year-round access to jobs, affordable housing options, culture and entertainment, shopping, green space and other neighbourhoods along the existing corridor, and would significantly improve the quality of life in Scarborough while supporting Council's ambitious housing, employment, quality of life and fiscal sustainability goals. During hybrid public consultations conducted in late November and early December 2023 by the Toronto Transit Commission at the request of Council to support work on the Line 3 Busway, respondents noted the potential for local markets, sustainable access to neighbourhoods, direct connections to the Scarborough Town Centre, employers, government buildings and civic assets, and the opportunity to transform McCowan Station into a space which better serves its community. Given that Line 3 has now closed, there is an urgent need to act on previous Council decisions in order to quickly establish an innovative strategic plan which explores options for low-cost financing and supports Council's strategic decisions.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council affirm the goals of 2013.CC39.5 and 2022.MM39.24 to consider the technical and fiscal feasibility of adaptively reusing Line 3 assets that are no longer required to provide bus or train service as part of a new linear park and active transportation corridor. 2. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designates, to urgently complete a preliminary assessment of the potential for the adaptive reuse of the right-of-way and station assets which comprised the Scarborough Rapid Transit (Line 3) between Ellesmere Station and McCowan Station, and Kennedy Station to McCowan Station, and report back to City Council by the end of the fourth quarter of 2024; such report shall include information of how the following can be achieved, including resource considerations and identification of feasibility studies that may be needed to explore: a. opportunities for the development of a new linear park and active transportation corridor leveraging the existing Scarborough Rapid Transit infrastructure, informed by similar projects including the High Line in New York, the Beltline in Atlanta, Cuernavaca's Railway Linear Park in Mexico City, and the Potrero Yard Modernization Project in San Francisco; b. high-capacity mobility solutions along the corridor to meet ongoing resident and business needs in partnership with Metrolinx; and c. commercial and housing development potential along, adjacent, and integrated into the existing Scarborough Rapid Transit corridor, including opportunities to support city-building objectives facilitated by the provision of people and goods movement solutions along the existing corridor; such report shall also include: d. an approach for broader engagement and consultation to promote innovation and human centred design excellence, specifically with academia (University of Toronto Scarborough), architecture and design experts via a charette or competitions, and local public engagement; and e. exploration of funding opportunities, including the Canada Infrastructure Bank.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that: 1. City Council affirm the goals of 2013.CC39.5 and 2022.MM39.24 to consider the technical and fiscal feasibility of adaptively reusing Line 3 assets that are no longer required to provide bus or train service as part of a new linear park and active transportation corridor. 2. City Council request the Board of Directors of CreateTO to direct the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designates to urgently complete a preliminary assessment of the potential for the adaptive reuse of the right-of-way and station assets which comprised the Scarborough Rapid Transit (Line 3) between Ellesmere Station and McCowan Station, and Kennedy Station to McCowan Station, and report back to Council by the end of the third quarter of 2024 outlining: a. initial findings and the additional detailed feasibility studies needed to evaluate: 1. opportunities for the development of a new linear park and active transportation corridor leveraging the existing Scarborough Rapid Transit infrastructure, informed by similar projects including the High Line in New York, the Beltline in Atlanta, Cuernavaca's Railway Linear Park in Mexico City, and the Potrero Yard Modernization Project in San Francisco; 2. high-capacity mobility solutions along the corridor to meet ongoing resident and business needs in partnership with Metrolinx; and 3. commercial and housing development potential along, adjacent, and integrated into the existing Scarborough Rapid Transit corridor, including opportunities to support city-building objectives facilitated by the provision of people and goods movement solutions along the existing corridor. b. anticipated costs to complete detailed due diligence work referenced in recommendation 2. a., and consideration of funding opportunities, including the Canada Infrastructure Bank. c. an approach for broader engagement and consultation to promote innovation and human centred design excellence, specifically with academia (University of Toronto Scarborough), architecture and design experts via a charette or competitions, and local public engagement.
RM16.7amended
City Council will review the Order Paper.
March 20, 2024: City Council adopted the March 20, 2024, Order Paper, as amended and all other Items not held on consent. March 21, 2024: City Council adopted the March 21, 2024, Order Paper.
CC16.8adopted
The City of Toronto received complaints from 109 Erskine Inc., Montclair Developments #1 Inc., and 1161 Kingston Road GP Inc. (collectively the "Owners") respecting the development charges paid by each Owner for developments at 109 Erskine Avenue, 63 - 91 Montclair Avenue, and 1161 Kingston Road respectively. Given City Council's failure to make a decision on the complaints within the statutory timelines, the Owners appealed the complaints respecting 109 Erskine Avenue and 63 - 91 Montclair Avenue to the Ontario Land Tribunal and an appeal respecting 1161 Kingston Road is expected imminently. A hearing has been scheduled for March 20, 2024, which the City Solicitor expects would address all the Owners' appeals given that the issues in each are identical and all are represented by the same legal counsel. The City Solicitor requires further directions. These matters are urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B, and C to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the confidential recommendations and all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A, B and C to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
MM16.8adopted
This motion requests authority from City Council to amend the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to create two service improvement capital sub-projects in the Park Development project, in order to advance design and engagement work in 2024, with construction to proceed in 2025. The first project is for Bartley Park Improvements with a project cost of $925,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $875,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 104-110 Bartley Drive (Source Account: XR3026-3701263). The second project is for Flemingdon Park Improvements with a project cost of $1,000,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $80,000 in 2024 and $920,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Source Account: XR3026-3700863). The funds for both projects have been received and are eligible for these purposes. Staff resources to advance both projects are in place as a result of realignment of project priorities within the ward. Any incremental operating impacts associated with the improvements to Bartley Park and Flemingdon Park, if required, will be submitted for consideration through future budget submissions.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as Bartley Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $925,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $875,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 104-110 Bartley Drive (Source Account: XR3026-3701263) to proceed with design and construction of park improvements; and b. create a new capital sub-project known as Flemingdon Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $1,000,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $80,000 in 2024 and $920,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Source Account: XR3026-3700863) to proceed with design and construction of park improvements.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng, recommends that: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as Bartley Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $925,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $875,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 104-110 Bartley Drive (Source Account: XR3026-3701263) to proceed with design and construction of park improvements. b. create a new capital sub-project known as Flemingdon Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $1,000,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $80,000 in 2024 and $920,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Source Account: XR3026-3700863) to proceed with design and construction of park improvements.
CC16.9adopted
On July 29, 2022, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit the redevelopment of the lands at 123 Wynford Drive (the "Property") with two residential towers having proposed heights of 55 storeys and 48 storeys. The proposed overall gross floor area was 78,660 square metres, with a floor space index of 10.5 times the lot area. The application (the "Application") was deemed complete on August 4, 2022. A resubmission (the "Resubmission") was made by the applicant on April 6, 2023. On April 20, 2023, the Applicant appealed City Council's failure to make a decision on the Application within the applicable statutory timeframe to the Ontario Land Tribunal. On July 19, 2023, City Council stated its intention to designate the Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Heritage Designation By-law 810-2023 ("By-law 810-2023") in respect of the Property was enacted on September 14, 2023. On November 1, 2023, the Applicant appealed By-law 810-2023, after the Ontario Land Tribunal had already scheduled a hearing on the Applicant's Planning Act appeals. On February 5, 2024, the Applicant withdrew its appeal of By-law 810-2023. On February 8, 2024, the Applicant applied for a Heritage Permit (the "Heritage Permit Application"). The Heritage Permit Application was deemed incomplete on February 14, 2024 and remains incomplete. Heritage Planning staff intend to submit a report in respect of the Heritage Permit Application to the meeting of the Toronto Preservation Board scheduled for May 7, 2024; to be considered by North York Community Council at its meeting scheduled for May 8, 2024; and then to be considered by City Council at its meeting scheduled for May 22, 23, and 24, 2024. For reasons set out in Confidential Attachment 1 this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council rescind its decision on Item 2023.NY7.7 headed "123 Wynford Drive - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report". 2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application in its revised form for the property at 123 Wynford Drive. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report and the Request for Direction Report dated August 15, 2023, and to report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary. 3. Should the Ontario Land Tribunal allow the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold its Order approving the application until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and City Solicitor; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services regarding this proposal in its memorandum dated May 23, 2023, or as that memorandum may be updated, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has at its sole expense provided a revised Traffic Impact Study, including: i. acceptable Transportation Demand Measures which plans shall satisfy the Toronto Green Standard AQ 1.1; ii. a sight line study to support the proposed driveway location; and iii. the adequacy of the pick-up and drop-off supply, traffic impacts to the road network and recommended mitigation measures to address any impacts; all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; d. the owner has at its sole expense provided a Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, including the Foundation Drainage Report (the "Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Toronto Water; e. the owner has at its sole expense designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Reports, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports; f. the owner has made satisfactory arrangements with the City and has entered into the appropriate agreement(s) for the design and construction of any improvements to municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and/or road improvements are required to the infrastructure to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports and Traffic Impact Study accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and g. the owner has provided, to the City and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, landscape and stewardship plans, to the satisfaction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review. 4. Should the Ontario Tribunal allow the appeal in whole or in part, City Council accept cash-in-lieu of a parkland contribution pursuant to section 42 of the Planning Act and Chapter 415, Article III of the Toronto Municipal Code. 5. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to take the necessary action to give effect to City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council rescind its decision on item 2023.NY7.7 headed "123 Wynford Drive - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report". 2. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, if adopted by City Council. 4. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
MM16.9adopted
This motion is to assist the Toronto District School Board and ABC Residents Association to upgrade the outdoor running track at Jesse Ketchum School, which is available for community use outside school hours, with $300,000 in Section 37 funds. In 2020, $2,190,000 of Section 37 funds from 1-11 Bloor Street West, 768-784 Yonge Street, and 760-762 Yonge Street were earmarked, by By-Law 685-2020, for new or existing cultural and community facilities. The Jesse Ketchum School outdoor running track and schoolyard provide important green space for community and recreational activities. There is no comparable track in any public park in the area. The current track is inadequate and does not meet the needs of either the school or the local community. The ABC Residents Association has committed $300,000 to the renovation and upgrade of the track, and is seeking matching funds from the city. The Toronto District School Board supports the request. The request letter from ABCRA is Attachment 1. The Toronto District School Board support letter is Attachment 2.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $300,000.00 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 1-11 Bloor Street West, 768-784 Yonge Street, and 760-762 Yonge Street, secured for local park improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701060), for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for improvements to the schoolyard and running track at Jesse Ketchum Junior and Senior Public School, subject to the Toronto District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City. 2. City Council request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard and running track at Jesse Ketchum Junior and Senior Public School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $300,000.00 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 1-11 Bloor Street West, 768-784 Yonge Street, and 760-762 Yonge Street, secured for local park improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701060), for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for improvements to the schoolyard and running track at Jesse Ketchum Junior and Senior Public School, subject to the Toronto District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City. 2. City Council request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard and running track at Jesse Ketchum Junior and Senior Public School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
CC16.10amended
On March 7, 2023, the City received Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 15-19 Bloor Street West (the "Site") to permit the construction of a 94-storey mixed-use tower containing 1,262 dwelling units and 272 square metres of retail space. City Council refused the applications on June 14, 2023. The applicant appealed City Council's refusal to the Ontario Land Tribunal on June 21, 2023. A Case Management Conference took place in September 2023 and Mizrahi Development Group (The One) Inc. ("Mizrahi") and Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation 2208, were granted party status. The ABC Residents Association was granted party status on consent of all the parties on January 25, 2024. A 10-day hearing has been scheduled to commence on June 10, 2024. Given upcoming procedural filing dates set out in the Procedural Order, and other deadlines addressed in Confidential Attachment 1, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by Motion 1a by Councillor Dianne Saxe. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1, as amended by Motion 1a by Councillor Dianne Saxe, and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Executive Director, Environment and Climate and the Toronto Hydro Corporation, to report back to City Council by the fourth quarter of 2024, with recommendations to align the Toronto Green Standards with TransformTO and the planned Emission Performance Standards for Existing Buildings, so that newly approved buildings will be capable of net zero carbon operating emissions by 2040. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by Motion 1a by Councillor Dianne Saxe, were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated March 5, 2024 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor, and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has revised the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report, Hydrological Review Summary, and Groundwater Summary to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. all comments from Engineering and Construction Services contained in their April 21, 2023 memorandum are addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the owner has made satisfactory arrangements for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, to be resubmitted for review and acceptance by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development; and e. the owner has submitted a revised shadow study and Pedestrian Wind Study, including the identification of any required wind mitigation measures to be secured in the zoning by-law amendment and through the site plan control process, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to continue to work with the applicant to explore the feasibility of providing an in-kind community benefit pursuant to section 37(6) of the Planning Act with respect to the provision of a community space in the development or improvements to Balmuto Street, and to report back to City Council for further instruction if the applicant offers such an in-kind community benefit. 4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure, as a Site Plan Application Pre-Approval Condition, that the applicant demonstrate (through an Energy Modelling Report and Upfront Embodied Emissions Assessment accepted by the City of Toronto Environment and Climate) that the building design complies with the applicant's written commitment to meet Toronto Green Standard Version 4 Tier 2 (or the minimum applicable version of the Toronto Green Standard, if more stringent) including but not limited to Energy Emissions and Resilience performance requirements GHG 1.1 (Greenhouse Gas Emissions Limits), GHG 1.2 (Building Energy Performance) and GHG 2.1 Low Embodied Emissions Materials). 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this Report from the City Solicitor if the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.10amended
Upgrades to Paul Martel Park - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
This motion is to evaluate requested upgrades to Paul Martel Park, and to permit continuing Indigenous uses of it. Paul Martel Park is a small park just behind the Spadina Subway Station. Originally named Ecology Park, it was designed and built by Paul Martel, an architect who volunteered and helped to design many community green spaces in the Annex and across Toronto. Ecology Park was designed to celebrate the ecosystems of Southern Ontario, and he helped maintain it for ten years. It was re-named in his honour in 2014. After Paul Martel became ill, the space became neglected. Since his death in 2020, a group of Indigenous tradespeople and Elders known as the Earth Helpers have made it their mission to restore and maintain this park. They have removed invasive species, improved the soil, planted and tended native species, and installed an Indigenous Storytelling mural. They also conduct environmental and cultural activities in the park, under a licence from the city. The current licence expires April 30, 2024. Some of the park is being excavated by the Toronto Transit Commission to expand the streetcar loop. Other parts have been repeatedly damaged by patrons of the adjoining pub, despite the recent installation of a fence. With the support of the Annex Residents Association, Earth Helpers have requested several upgrades to Paul Martel Park, including raised beds, improved lighting, a yurt or similar meeting structure and a public toilet. They also wish the park to be officially recognized as an Indigenous Botanical Garden, the first of its kind in Toronto. Earth Helpers has recently incorporated as Earth Helpers Gardens Inc., a non-profit corporation.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with others as appropriate, to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee, in the second quarter of 2024, on the feasibility, timing and potential funding for: a. renaming Paul Martel Park as an Indigenous Botanical Garden; b. installing a yurt or similar meeting structure in the locked, fenced rear area for Indigenous cultural and environmental activities; c. improving soil quality and reducing trampling of plant material by installing raised beds in the park and adjacent boulevard; d. improving the lighting; and e. installing and maintaining a public toilet once the Toronto Transit Commission has completed its construction work. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and sign on behalf of the City a nominal fee Licence Agreement with Earth Helpers Gardens Inc., to facilitate Indigenous participant horticultural training, gardening and cultural programming at Paul Martel Park, for a three-year term, renewable at the General Manager's discretion for one additional three-year term (six years total) to April 30, 2030, on terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with others as appropriate, to report to Toronto and East York Community Council, in the second quarter of 2024, on the feasibility, timing and potential funding for: a. renaming Paul Martel Park as an Indigenous Botanical Garden; b. installing a yurt or similar meeting structure in the locked, fenced rear area for Indigenous cultural and environmental activities; c. improving soil quality and reducing trampling of plant material by installing raised beds in the park and adjacent boulevard; d. improving the lighting; and e. installing and maintaining a public toilet once the Toronto Transit Commission has completed its construction work. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and sign on behalf of the City a nominal fee Licence Agreement with Earth Helpers Gardens Inc., to facilitate Indigenous participant horticultural training, gardening and cultural programming at Paul Martel Park, for a three-year term, renewable at the General Manager's discretion for one additional three-year term (six years total) to April 30, 2030, on terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
CC16.11adopted
This application proposes a 35-storey mixed-use building with 26,074 square metres of residential gross floor area for a total of 442 units, and 621 square metres of ground floor retail fronting onto Eglinton Avenue. The development will have a total gross floor area of 26,695 square metres with a Floor Space Index of 13.47. A second submission was made by the applicant on July 17, 2023. On April 14, 2023, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision within the time frame prescribed in the Planning Act. The City Solicitor requires further direction for the upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing which was scheduled to commence February 28, 2024, however, this matter was adjourned to March 12, 2024, at which time a date will be set for a hearing. Given this timing, this item is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated February 20, 2024 ("Settlement Offer"), set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor, and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement, subject to the conditions set out below: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the Owner has submitted an acceptable Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report and associated plans, for review and acceptance to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and c. in the event the Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, and/or Hydrogeological Report identify any required upgrades to existing municipal infrastructure to support the development, the Owner has entered into a financially secured agreement(s) with the City requiring the Owner to design, financially secure, construct and make operational, any upgrade or required improvements, prior to the issuance of final site plan approval for any development on the lands, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.11adopted
Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a system of direct democracy where residents imagine how their neighbourhood could be improved, suggest potential ideas and then vote on how funds are spent to improve their community through capital projects. 2023 was the first year Participatory Budgeting was implemented in Toronto Centre to determine how community benefits funding should be allocated. Between May 25 to November 1, 2023, my office hosted online and in-person engagements with local residents and business improvement areas to crowdsource ideas. These ideas were then vetted for costing and feasibility with City staff and presented to the local community to vote on which projects they would like to see funded. In the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood, nine projects were supported by the local community that fit within the allocated budget of $750,000: new street planters at four intersections; heritage street banners for the original 10 blocks of Town of York; a new public plaza at 109 Front Street East custom vinyl-wrapped garbage receptacles; new street furniture; new bicycle parking; cafe tables and chairs for St. James Park; new St. Lawrence Heritage Conversation District street signs; and, replacement of dead or dying trees in the neighbourhood. The release of funds for these projects would allow for locally supported capital projects to move forward in a timely manner. Funding for custom vinyl-wrapped garbage receptacles, new street furniture and new cafe tables and chairs for St. James Park require additional review. Funding for replacing dead or dying trees in the neighbourhood has been removed following a conversation with Parks, Forestry and Recreation as it is not eligible for Section 37 funding and is not included in this motion.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan of Transportation Services to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $2400.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 65-77 King Street East and 46 Colborne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701018) for the purpose of installing bike corrals near 2 Berkeley Street; 120 King Street East; and 34-36 King Street East (Cost Centre: CPT824-03); b. $800.00 gross, $0 debt, funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 40 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700065) for the purpose of installing a bike corral near 26 Wellington Street East (Cost Centre: CTP824-04); and c. $1800.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 6-18 Church Street and 51-63 Front Street East (70 The Esplanade) (Source Account: XR3026-3700344) for the purpose of installing six additional heritage street signs to promote the visual identity of the neighbourhood (Cost Centre: CTP724-01). 2. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program for the purpose of forwarding funds to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $50,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 53, 61 and 65 Ontario Street, and 102 Berkeley Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700872) for the purpose of installing hard planters for more growing spaces (Cost Centre: NP2161); b. $5,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701237) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street banners within the original ten blocks of the Town of York (Cost Centre: NP2161); c. $150,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701237) for the purpose of installing street furniture in the public realm location of 109 Front Street East in the plaza between Jarvis Street and George Street (Cost Centre: NP2161). 3. City Council direct that $205,000.00 be forwarded to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, subject to the Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. 4. Prior to the release of the funds identified in recommendation 3.c. to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, City Council direct the City Solicitor to ensure the plaza at 109 Front Street East is fully accessible to the public, not gated from the street, available throughout the year (save and except for repairs or emergencies) and appropriately lit for safety after dark through an easement in favour of the City to the satisfaction to the City Solicitor. 5. City Council direct that the use of Section 37 community benefits be prominently recognized in documents and promotional materials, including on any construction hoarding, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan of Transportation Services Division to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $2400.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 65-77 King Street East and 46 Colborne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701018) for the purpose of installing bike corrals near 2 Berkeley Street; 120 King Street East; and 34-36 King Street East (Cost Centre: CPT824-03); b. $800.00 gross, $0 debt, funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 40 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700065) for the purpose of installing a bike corral near 26 Wellington Street East (Cost Centre: CTP824-04). c. $1800.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 6-18 Church Street and 51-63 Front Street East (70 The Esplanade) (Source Account: XR3026-3700344) for the purpose of installing six additional heritage street signs to promote the visual identity of the neighbourhood (Cost Centre: CTP724-01). 2. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program for the purpose of forwarding funds to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $50,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 53, 61 and 65 Ontario Street, and 102 Berkeley Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700872) for the purpose of installing hard planters for more growing spaces (Cost Centre: NP2161); b. $5,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701237) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street banners within the original ten blocks of the Town of York (Cost Centre: NP2161); c. $150,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701237) for the purpose of installing street furniture in the public realm location of 109 Front Street East in the plaza between Jarvis Street and George Street (Cost Centre: NP2161). 3. City Council direct that $205,000.00 be forwarded to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, subject to the Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. 4. Prior to the release of the funds identified in recommendation 3.c. to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, City Council direct the City Solicitor to ensure the plaza at 109 Front Street East is fully accessible to the public, not gated from the street, available throughout the year (save and except for repairs or emergencies) and appropriately lit for safety after dark through an easement in favour of the City to the satisfaction to the City Solicitor. 5. City Council direct that the use of Section 37 community benefits be prominently recognized in documents and promotional materials, including on any construction hoarding, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
CC16.12adopted
City Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 536 on March 9, 2022. Official Plan Amendment 536 sought to establish a consistent city-wide approach to public safety for development when an application is submitted to introduce, develop or intensify land uses in proximity to rail facilities. Official Plan Amendment 536 sought to introduce a new section, Section 3.6 titled Rail Facilities and Public Safety, which contains policies related to the requirements for a Rail Safety and Risk Mitigation Report for developments that propose to introduce a new or intensified land use within the area of influence of rail facilities. It also included an amendment to Schedule 3 of the Official Plan (Application Requirements) adding the requirement for a Rail Safety and Mitigation Report for applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan Approval for lands abutting rail facilities. Official Plan Amendment 536 also included non-policy explanatory text. Official Plan Amendment 536 was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal by 44 appellants. A first Case Management Conference was held on July 21, 2022. A second Case Management Conference is scheduled to be held on April 22, 2024. The City Solicitor requires further instructions on this matter. This matter is urgent as it pertains to an upcoming hearing event at the Ontario Land Tribunal and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B, and C to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of Official Plan Amendment 536 as modified, substantially in accordance with the Modified Official Plan Amendment attached as Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to sign the Minutes of Settlement attached as Confidential Appendix B to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor with willing parties, and City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 3. City Council accept the Settlement Offer dated February 26, 2024 from KSDWP LLP contained in Confidential Appendix C to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor, to settle Appeal 13 as referenced in Public Appendix A to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. April 3, 2024 Confidential Appendices A, B and C to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor are now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make them public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, and relevant Confidential Appendices at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.12adopted
Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a system of direct democracy where residents imagine how their neighbourhood could be improved, suggest potential ideas and then vote on how funds are spent to improve their community through capital projects. 2023 was the first year Participatory Budgeting was implemented in Toronto Centre to determine how community benefits funding should be allocated. Between May 25 to November 1, 2023, my office hosted online and in-person engagements with local residents and business improvement areas to crowdsource ideas. These ideas were then vetted for costing and feasibility with City staff and presented to the local community to vote on which projects they would like to see funded. In the Canary District, Corktown and Distillery District neighbourhoods, four projects were supported by the local community that fit within the allocated budget of $750,000: 10 new iron tree guards; new planters along the Bayview Avenue cycle tracks; new interactive lighting above Underpass Park; and King-Queen Triangle Parkette improvements. The release of funds for these projects will allow for locally supported capital projects to move forward in a timely manner. As Waterfront Toronto has a current project to improve the King-Queen Triangle Parkette, a review of additional improvements and release of additional funding may follow that project. New interactive lighting above Underpass Park is still under review by City staff.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan of Transportation Services to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $80,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 18-32 Eastern Avenue, 1 Gilead Place and 2 Sackville Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701230) for the purpose of installing 10 Corktown-themed tree guards within the Corktown neighbourhood (Cost Centre: CPT424-02); and b. $150,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 1-25 Defries Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3701146) for the purpose of enhancing disused parking laybys on Bayview Avenue by installing permanent planters (Cost Centre CPT424-03). 2. City Council direct that the use of Section 37 community benefits be prominently recognized in documents and promotional materials, including on any construction hoarding, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan of Transportation Services Division to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $80,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 18-32 Eastern Avenue, 1 Gilead Place and 2 Sackville Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701230) for the purpose of installing 10 Corktown-themed tree guards within the Corktown neighbourhood (Cost Centre: CPT424-02); and b. $150,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits obtained from the development at 1-25 Defries Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3701146) for the purpose of enhancing disused parking laybys on Bayview Avenue by installing permanent planters (Cost Centre CPT424-03). 2. City Council direct that the use of Section 37 community benefits be prominently recognized in documents and promotional materials, including on any construction hoarding, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
CC16.13adopted
181-191 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report
The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing into this matter currently scheduled to commence on April 16, 2024, for two weeks. The applicant appealed the proposed amendments to the Zoning By-Law to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. The applicant has presented a with prejudice settlement offer to the City Solicitor dated March 6, 2024 (the "Settlement Proposal") as contained within Public Appendix A to this report. Direction from Council is required for an upcoming hearing of the proposal at the Ontario Land Tribunal in April 2024. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20, and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the with prejudice settlement offer dated March 6, 2024 in Public Appendix A to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor and the revised plans substantially in accordance with Schedule A to the settlement offer as may be acceptable and satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (the "Settlement Proposal"), attached to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor for the lands municipally known as 181-191 Eglinton Avenue East (the "Site"), subject to Parts 2 to 3 below. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing on this matter in support of the revised development proposal generally described in the settlement offer and the revised plans substantially in accordance with Public Appendix A to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request, in the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part, that the issuance of any final orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft zoning by-law is to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the Applicant has entered into a Limiting Distance Agreement to secure the separation distance for the proposed towers located at 181 Eglinton Avenue East and 191 Eglinton Avenue East, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; c. the Applicant has provided confirmation of water, sanitary and stormwater capacity to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water; d. the Applicant has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review; e. the Applicant has explored the potential to secure 5,000 to 10,000 square feet (465 square metres to 929 square metres) of visible and accessible community space on the ground floor of the subject site for human service and/or community agencies to the satisfaction of the Director, Strategic Initiatives, Policy and Analysis; and f. the Applicant has provided revised statistics for the Settlement Plans showing a minimum percentage of 2- and 3-bedroom units in accordance with Official Plan Amendment 405, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the decision of City Council. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 8, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report. 2. If the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1, with the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.13adopted
In 2019, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, and a Draft Plan of Subdivision, were approved by the Ontario Land Tribunal, to permit the redevelopment of the subject property, which is located on the west side of Dufferin Street, south of the intersection of Dufferin Street and the Highway 401 southbound off-ramp. The approved development consisted of three tall buildings (Buildings "A," "B," and "C" from west to east) including a Child Care Facility located within a podium shared by Buildings A, B, and C, and associated with Building C. The timing of the construction and completion of the Child Care Facility, to a level of substantial performance, was secured in the site specific Zoning By-law Amendment, and in the Section 37 Agreement for the redevelopment and was to be prior to the first residential occupancy of Building C. As a result of refinements to the design, as generally identified in drawings dated September 15, 2023, a shared podium is now proposed for only Buildings A and B; with Building C proposed to stand alone. The Child Care Facility is proposed to be located in the easterly portion of Building B, rather than Building C. Further the Owner has advised that Building C will be occupied prior to Buildings A and B. On this basis, the Owner submitted an application to the Committee of Adjustment for a Minor Variance to the site specific Zoning By-law to modify the timing of construction and completion of the Child Care Facility. More particularly, the application sought to postpone the construction and completion of the Child Care facility to "prior to the first residential occupancy of the second most easterly building," which would align the construction of the Child Care Facility with the first residential occupancy of the building in which the Child Care Facility is located (Building "B"). In a report to the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee"), attached as Attachment "1," Community Planning staff advised the Committee that Children's Services was satisfied with the proposed change in timing, and that Community Planning staff was of the opinion that the proposal to align the construction of the Child Care Facility with Building "B" met the four tests set out in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Community Planning staff also recommended that the Committee impose the following condition of authorization, which was agreed to by the Owner: "The Owner shall obtain approval from City Council for any changes required to the existing Section 37 Agreement registered on title to the lands as Instrument AT5385339 as an amending Section 37 Agreement to be entered into and registered on title to the lands to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor." The Committee authorized the requested variance, subject to the condition requested by Community Planning staff, following a hearing on February 29, 2024. The Notice of Decision (the "Decision") is attached as Attachment "2." The Decision may be appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body (the "TLAB") until March 20, 2024. City Council approval is required to amend the Section 37 Agreement, should the Decision not be appealed or, if it is appealed, the Minor Variance is authorized by the Toronto Local Appeal Body. This motion will provide staff with the necessary authority to amend the existing Section 37 Agreement, to reflect the revised timing for the construction and completion of the Child Care Facility, and to ensure that the agreement is consistent with the Minor Variance. Nothing in this motion will fetter the consideration of the Minor Variance application by the Toronto Local Appeal Body, should the Committee's decision be appealed.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. If the Committee of Adjustment decision on Application A0002/24NY, for the property municipally known 3450 Dufferin Street, is not appealed or is upheld by the Toronto Local Appeal Body on appeal, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Amending Section 37 Agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (as it read the day before the date Section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020, came into force), to make amendments to the existing Section 37 Agreement registered on title to the lands as Instrument AT5385339 to implement the Committee's decision in a manner, content and form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. If the Committee of Adjustment decision on Application A0002/24NY, for the property municipally known 3450 Dufferin Street, is not appealed or is upheld by the Toronto Local Appeal Body on appeal, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Amending Section 37 Agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (as it read the day before the date Section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020 came into force), to make amendments to the existing Section 37 Agreement registered on title to the lands as Instrument AT5385339 to implement the Committee's decision in a manner, content and form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
CC16.14amended
1840 Bayview Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
On December 6, 2022, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 1840 Bayview Avenue (the "Site") to permit the construction of a 34-storey mixed-use building. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Zoning By-law Amendment (the "Appeal"), to the Ontario Land Tribunal on March 16, 2023. The City Solicitor requires further directions for an upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled for May 27, 2024 to June 7, 2024. Given imminent procedural filing dates set out in the Procedural Order, and other deadlines addressed in Confidential Attachment 1, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 4. City Council request that prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall work with the City's Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and local residents to explore opportunities along the Broadway Avenue frontage for a double row of trees (one row of street trees and one row of trees on site) and a row of street trees along the Bayview Avenue frontage as well as the possibility of pulling back the first two levels of the building to expand the public realm along Broadway Avenue, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated March 1, 2024 set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor (the "Settlement Offer") and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has satisfactorily addressed the matters in the Engineering and Construction Services Memorandum dated April 20, 2023, or as may be updated, in response to further submissions filed by the owner, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has satisfactorily addressed the matters in the Transportation Services memo dated May 23, 2023, or as may be updated, in response to further submissions filed by the owner, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the owner has submitted a revised Transportation Demand Management Plan acceptable to, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services and that such matters arising from the study be secured if required; e. the owner has satisfactorily addressed matters from the Urban Forestry memorandum dated January 24, 2023, or as may be updated, in response to further submissions filed by the owner, all to the satisfaction of Urban Forestry; f. the owner has submitted an updated complete Toronto Green Standards Checklist and Statistics Template, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and g. City Council has considered a City-initiated official plan amendment to amend Map 21-8 of the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan in respect of the properties known municipally as 389 Broadway Avenue, 391 Broadway Avenue and 393 Broadway Avenue to redesignate these properties as Public Park and/or Park Expansion Areas, with such official plan amendment to be presented on or by the October 2024 meeting of City Council. 3. Should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report and/or the Transportation Impact Study or that mitigation is required per the Subsurface Investigation, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to request that a Holding provision (H) be included in the final form of the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment, not to be lifted until such time as the owner has made satisfactory arrangements, including entering into appropriate agreement(s) with the City for required mitigation, as well as the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure and the provision of financial securities to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.14
In 2023 City Council approved a number of changes to the Traffic Calming Policy under item 2023.IE7.4 headed Updates on Vision Zero Road Safety Initiatives - New Traffic Calming Policy, Community Safety Zone Criteria, Zebra Marking Policy, Approach to Area-Based Speed Limit Reductions and Related Council Requests. This policy is the basis of determining where speed humps will be installed on a city street following a request. Among the changes were a reduction to the warranted speed threshold which would now qualify more streets, using the posted speed as a basis, the deletion of the requirement of a petition to gauge support at the outset of the process, and the deletion of the mandatory requirement of a formal Clerk's Poll of households to formalize support at the final stage of approval. Members of the public who contact 311 to request a traffic calming investigation are no longer able to do so, and are now directed to their local Councillor to place their request. The new policy places a significant onus with the local Councillor to select and advance traffic calming projects. It now requires that Transportation Services staff liaise with a Councillor to understand community support, based on the Councillor's discretion, before staff prepare a report to Community Council to authorize a road alteration by-law for locations where the Councillor has indicated support. This new process which gives the Councillor discretionary authority for the initiation process leaves very little transparency for the public. It is essential to maintain accountability to the public and support confidence in the integrity government, since some traffic calming projects can be controversial and they affect the rights, safety and wellbeing of residents. The Clerk does not directly notify the local residents when a Traffic Calming report is placed on the agenda, and a Clerk's Poll could be the only form of notice in some instances. Community Councils always had ad-hoc discretion to modify the process or approve a traffic calming installation for any reason at any time. In the recent changes to the Traffic Calming Policy, members of Council were advised that the mandatory Clerk's Polling requirement of the policy would be removed. I have recently learned that the availability of a Clerk's Poll is now expressly prohibited, even in instances where the local Councillor or Community Council desires one to be held. The purpose of this motion is to seek City Council approval to modify the 2023 Traffic Calming Policy to allow the flexibility of the option of directing that a Clerk's Poll be conducted upon approval from the Community Council on a case by case basis. This motion does not propose any other amendments to the Traffic Calming Policy. Requires Re-opening Item 2023.IE7.4 (November 8 and 9, 2023 City Council Meeting)
Motion MM1.14 was not introduced at City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2023.IE7.4 headed "Updates on Vision Zero Road Safety Initiatives - New Traffic Calming Policy, Community Safety Zone Criteria, Zebra Marking Policy, Approach to Area-Based Speed Limit Reductions and Related Council Requests" by adopting the following: 1. City Council amend the 2023 Traffic Calming Policy to delegate to Community Council the authority to request a poll for traffic calming measures in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 190, Polling and Notifications, with the specific requirements as set out in Chapter 190 or as otherwise set by Community Council.
CC16.15adopted
35-47 Camden Street - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
On December 16, 2021, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application (the "Application") for 39-47 Camden Street to permit the construction of a 16-storey mixed use building with commercial uses on the ground floor and 154 dwelling units above. On April 4, 2022, the applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal. On February 27, 2024, the City Solicitor received a "with prejudice" settlement offer, which incorporates the adjacent land at 35 Camden Street into the proposal (the "Site"), consisting of the correspondence attached to this report as Public Appendix A and the architectural plans and drawings attached to this report as Public Appendix B (the "Settlement Offer"), which propose to modify the Application. The City Solicitor requires further directions for the upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled from April 15 to 19, 2024. Given that the City Council meeting commencing on March 20, 2024 is the last City Council meeting to consider the Settlement Offer before the hearing commences, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2025) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the with prejudice offer to settle dated February 27, 2024 set out in Public Appendices A and B (the architectural plans and drawings) (together the "Settlement Offer") to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment application until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, in consultation with other appropriate divisions, and that it provides for, among other matters: i. a Type "G" loading space or the Owner shall make any other acceptable arrangements to the satisfaction of the Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; b. the Owner has, at its sole cost and expense: i. resubmitted the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Report, which includes confirmation of water, sanitary, and stormwater capacity, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, or the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services has determined that holding provisions are required in the Zoning By-law Amendment; ii. entered into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and road improvements are required to support the development, according to the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and iii. submitted a revised Transportation Impact Study or addendum to demonstrate the necessary easements for access from the private laneway to the south and any streetscape and curb extension provisions, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and such matters arising from the Transportation Impact Study, if required, be secured through the Site Plan Control process; and iv. submitted a revised Landscape Plan (with a public utility plan underlay in an updated soil volume plan) to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.15referred
Article IV Posters on Public Property in Chapter 693 of Toronto Municipal Code defines the regulations that are required for placing community posters on public property. Sections 693-29 to 693-33 describes various restrictions and guidelines that are outlined in this policy. Posters from persons, charities, religious organizations, community organizations and schools may attach community posters on utility poles. However, even if a community poster complies with all these criteria, Section 693-34 implies that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards is permitted to remove community posters at any time and without notice. There is a lack of clarity for how long a poster can remain on one site, who can remove it, and the policy reach on which matters of concern (such as missing persons, property, pets, or community event) are eligible content. It seems that if the flyers posted on utility poles are not community flyers, residents are encouraged to contact 311. Municipal Licensing and Standards will investigate and take appropriate enforcement action and undertake to have illegally placed poster(s) removed. Municipal Licensing and Standards will initiate removal of unauthorized posters by contacting the appropriate division/external agency. Other than the original sponsor of the poster, can any citizen remove a poster as a form of enforcement? What is the process for review of those posters that are seen by some as hate inspired?
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, referred Motion MM16.15 to the Economic and Community Development Committee for consideration.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Manager and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to review and clarify the policy for affixing and removing community posters, placed on utility poles, kiosks and other structures and report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by July 2024.
CC16.16adopted
309 Cherry Street - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
On March 5, 2012 and December 30, 2016, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for the north block and south block respectively of the lands known as 309 Cherry Street (the "Site"). The applications proposed mixed use development, with a 26-storey residential tower atop an 8-storey podium and the partial retention of existing heritage buildings on the north block, and an 11-storey building and 52-storey building atop a 4-12 storey 'u-shaped' podium. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Zoning By-law Amendment to the predecessor to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "Tribunal") on October 31, 2014 for the north block and June 1, 2017 for the south block (the "Appeals"). In March 2023, the applicant submitted revised plans for the Site, proposing a tower on each of the north and south block with heights of 47 and 39 storeys respectively. The City Solicitor requires further directions in this matter.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor, in its entirety remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and City Council direct that Confidential Appendices A and B remain confidential in their entirety, as they contain confidential and privileged information. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in their entirety at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as they contain advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege, and that Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B remain confidential as they contain confidential and privileged information.
MM16.16amended
Canada Day is an important opportunity for community members to gather. Many have memories of BBQs and fireworks. In Willowdale, community members used to have the chance to gather on Yonge Street and watch fireworks launched off of the North York Civic Centre. In a community where the visible minority population is 83,000, including newcomers and immigrants, and 74,000 residents have a mother tongue that is neither English nor French, it is important to bring people together to share meaningful experiences. After COVID, the City stopped Canada Day fireworks in Willowdale which had previously happened for 20 years and focused its investment at the waterfront. It's been said that Toronto is a city that is one-hour away from itself. Willowdale is very far from the waterfront. I know many of my constituents are not able to benefit from these investments, especially families with younger children for whom the added travel time at a late hour would make it difficult. As a high growth centre, Willowdale has done a lot of heavy lifting adding thousands of units of housing to Toronto and welcoming many tax paying newcomers into our city. While fireworks are offered in other neighbourhoods from various sources of funding including different City divisions, Willowdale has been left out. We would like to understand the distribution of Canada Day events, regardless of funding sources, across the city to better understand the equity of this distribution based on population and geography. We would also like to understand the feasibility of restoring Canada Day celebrations to Mel Lastman Square to serve the present and future hundreds of thousands of people who will be moving to the North York area. As our city grows, we need to have a plan to foster stronger connectivity outside of the downtown core that already has a lot of events and programming.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to review all City-run and funded Canada Day events across the City, including a review of the equitable distribution in terms of population and geography, and report to the April 30, 2024 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee, on a plan to celebrate Canada Day in the inner suburbs on an annual basis, starting with Canada Day 2024, subject to receiving full funding from the Federal government.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to review all City-run and funded Canada Day events across the City, including a review of the equitable distribution in terms of population and geography, and report to the April 30, 2023 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee, on a plan to celebrate Canada Day in the inner suburbs on an annual basis, starting with Canada Day 2024.
CC16.17adopted
32, 36 and 38 Olive Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
On May 30, 2023, the City received a complaint from 31F Development Limited Partnership (the "Complainant"), pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27 (the "Section 20 Complaint"), for 32, 36 and 38 Olive Avenue (the "Site") regarding the payment of development charges. On August 16, 2023, pursuant to Section 22(2) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, the Complainant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its complaint (the "Section 22 Appeal"), to the Ontario Land Tribunal. On January 23, 2024, this matter was litigated at the Ontario Land Tribunal and the decision from the Ontario Land Tribunal is being held pending further discussion amongst the parties. The City Solicitor requires further directions as this matter has been adjudicated; as a result, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 7, 2023) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in their entirety, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the confidential recommendations and all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
MM16.17adopted
This motion requests authority from City Council to advance two service improvement capital projects in Ward 11. The 2024-2033 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation includes a planned project for improvements to Huron Washington Parkette. To advance the construction phase of the preferred design of the community, additional funds in the amount of $400,000 are required which requires an amendment to the project cost, from $556,273 to $956,273, with cash flow commitments in 2024. The improvements will be fully funded from the following sources: $90,000 from the Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 316 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3701257) and $310,000 from various Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu generated from developments in proximity to Huron Washington Parkette. In addition, in order to improve accessibility and gathering spaces in Ramsden Park, Council authority is required to advance a new capital project in the Park Development project called Ramsden Park Improvements with a project cost and cash flow in 2024 of $103,000 with funding from various Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu generated from developments in proximity to Ramsden Park. The funds for both projects have been received and are eligible for these purposes. Staff resources to advance both projects are in place. Any incremental operating impacts associated with the improvements to Huron Washington Parkette and Ramsden Park, if required, will be submitted for consideration through future budget submissions.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan to: a. amend the Huron Washington Parkette Improvements sub-project in the Park Development project in the amount of $400,000 gross and $0 debt, increasing the total project cost from $556,273 to $956,273, with cash flow commitments in 2024, fully funded by the following sources that have been received and eligible for use for the construction phase of parkette improvements: 1. $90,000 from Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 316 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026- 3701257); and 2. $310,000 from the Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu from the sources included in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 84 Harbord Street 4200128 $11.73 96 Harbord Street 4200871 $21,609.34 233 College Street 4201021 $99,794.54 172 Harbord Street 4201314 $37,161.47 328 Brunswick Avenue 4201450 $41,179.99 150 Harbord Street 4201585 $29,592.93 117 Robert Street 4201643 $80,650.00 Total $310,000.00 b. create a new capital sub-project known as Ramsden Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $103,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, fully funded by Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu from the sources included in the chart below, to install accessible benches and picnic tables with concrete pads in Ramsden Park. Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 837 Yonge Street 4200074 $1,129.85 836-850 Yonge Street and 1-9A Yorkville Avenue 4200726 $47,531.00 1027 Yonge Street 4200960 $5,023.65 690 College Street 4201514 $1,288.38 5 Scrivener Square 4201752 $48,027.12 Total $103,000.00
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel, recommends that: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Council Approved Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan to: a. amend the Huron Washington Parkette Improvements sub-project in the Park Development project in the amount of $400,000 gross and $0 debt, increasing the total project cost from $556,273 to $956,273, with cash flow commitments in 2024, fully funded by the following sources that have been received and eligible for use for the construction phase of parkette improvements: 1. $90,000 from Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 316 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026- 3701257); and 2. $310,000 from the Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu from the sources included in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 84 Harbord Street 4200128 $11.73 96 Harbord Street 4200871 $21,609.34 233 College Street 4201021 $99,794.54 172 Harbord Street 4201314 $37,161.47 328 Brunswick Avenue 4201450 $41,179.99 150 Harbord Street 4201585 $29,592.93 117 Robert Street 4201643 $80,650.00 Total $310,000.00 b. create a new capital sub-project known as Ramsden Park Improvements in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $103,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, fully funded by Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu from the sources included in the chart below, to install accessible benches and picnic tables with concrete pads in Ramsden Park. Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 837 Yonge Street 4200074 $1,129.85 836-850 Yonge Street and 1-9A Yorkville Avenue 4200726 $47,531.00 1027 Yonge Street 4200960 $5,023.65 690 College Street 4201514 $1,288.38 5 Scrivener Square 4201752 $48,027.12 Total $103,000.00
CC16.18amended
8 Yorkleigh Avenue - Committee of Adjustment Decision
On February 8, 2024, the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") considered applications made by the owner of 8 Yorkleigh Avenue for a consent to sever the lot and construct a new dwelling on each of the two new lots, and for three minor variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 in respect of one of the new lots. Two of the minor variances were for relief from Zoning by-law provisions regulating lot frontage and lot area. The Committee of Adjustment gave its provisional consent and authorized the requested variances. Copies of the Committee's decisions are attached as Public Attachment 1. In accordance with the motion adopted by Etobicoke York Community Council on February 28, 2024 (Item EY11.14), the City Solicitor appealed the Committee's decision in order to preserve the City's rights, in the event that City Council directs the City to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in opposition to the Committee's decision.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to withdraw the appeal before the Toronto Local Appeal Body, as it pertains to 8 Yorkleigh Avenue. 2. City Council request the City Solicitor to include the concepts of abuse of process and res judicata in the training offered by Legal Services staff to Committee of Adjustment staff, and as part of the ongoing training provided to Committee of Adjustment panel members. 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council receive this report for information. 2. City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.18adopted
This motion requests authority from City Council to amend the 2024-2033 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR) to create two service improvement capital sub-projects in the Park Development project, in order to advance design work and a park study to inform future capital project phases. The first project is for Glendora Park Off Leash Area Design with a project cost of $100,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $50,000 in 2025, fully funded by various Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu generated in proximity to the site. The funds are required to retain professional services to advance design work for a new off leash area in Glendora Park with additional funds to be identified for a construction phase in future budget submissions. The second project is for the Ward 18 Parks Study with a project cost of $50,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $45,000 in 2024 and $5,000 in 2025, fully funded by various Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu generated in proximity to the parks sites to be included in the study. The funds are required to retain professional services to advance a study of three parks in Ward 18, including: Doris-Norton Park, 35 Churchill Avenue and Northtown Park. Pending completion of the study, funds would be required for design and construction phases of work, to be submitted in future budget submissions. The funds for both projects have been received and are eligible for these purposes. Staff resources to advance both projects are in place. There are no incremental operating impacts associated with the design and study phases. Future impacts associated with construction phases of work will be submitted for consideration through future budget submissions.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan for the following: a. create a new capital sub-project known as Glendora Park Off Leash Area Design in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $100,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $50,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu obtained from developments in proximity to Glendora Park to proceed with design for a new off leash area, from sources in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 28 Avondale 4200687 $73,323.72 90 Sheppard Avenue 4201070 $6,431.75 14C Hycrest Avenue 4201493 $9,605.93 14B Hycrest Avenue 4201502 $10,638.60 Total $100,000.00 b. create a new capital sub-project known as Ward 18 Parks Study in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $50,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $45,000 in 2024 and $5,000 in 2025, fully funded by various Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu obtained from developments to advance a study of three parks in Ward 18, including Doris-Norton Park, 35 Churchill Avenue and Northtown Park, from sources in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 75 Canterbury Place 4201100 $28,956.92 5250-5254 Yonge Street 4201555 $21,043.08 Total $50,000.00
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that: 1. City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2024 Capital Budget and 2025-2033 Capital Plan for the following: a. create a new capital sub-project known as Glendora Park Off Leash Area Design in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $100,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $50,000 in 2024 and $50,000 in 2025, fully funded by Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu obtained from developments in proximity to Glendora Park to proceed with design for a new off leash area, from sources in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 28 Avondale 4200687 $73,323.72 90 Sheppard Avenue 4201070 $6,431.75 14C Hycrest Avenue 4201493 $9,605.93 14B Hycrest Avenue 4201502 $10,638.60 Total $100,000.00 b. create a new capital sub-project known as Ward 18 Parks Study in the Park Development project, with a project cost of $50,000 gross and $0 debt in 2024, with cash flow commitments of $45,000 in 2024 and $5,000 in 2025, fully funded by various Section 42 Above 5% Cash-in-lieu obtained from developments to advance a study of three parks in Ward 18, including Doris-Norton Park, 35 Churchill Avenue and Northtown Park, from sources in the chart below: Development Location Internal Order Account (XR2213) Amount 75 Canterbury Place 4201100 $28,956.92 5250-5254 Yonge Street 4201555 $21,043.08 Total $50,000.00
CC16.19amended
175-185 King Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
On August 18, 2022, a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 179-185 King Street East was submitted to permit a 33-storey mixed-use building with 7,600 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 190 dwelling units above. Portions of the facades of the existing designated heritage buildings were proposed to be integrated into the development. On March 24, 2023, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council's failure to make a decision within the timeframe identified in the Planning Act. On August 14, 2023, following the appeal, the applicant acquired 175 King Street East and submitted a revised Zoning By-law Amendment application. The revised application for the enlarged site was for a 35-storey mixed-use building with 500 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 394 dwelling units above. On January 20, 2024, and following several days of Tribunal-led mediation, the applicant provided a with prejudice settlement offer. The details of this offer are set out in this report, Public Attachment 1, and Public Attachment 2. The City Solicitor requires further directions for upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal proceedings relating to the zoning by-law amendment appeal. This report should be considered along with Item PB14.3 of the Toronto Preservation Board and the associated confidential report from the City Solicitor dated January 31, 2024, which discusses the heritage conservation strategy of the Settlement Offer and has been forwarded to City Council for consideration at its meeting of March 20 to 22, 2024. See: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.PB14.3
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1a by Councillor Chris Moise. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1a by Councillor Chris Moise. 5. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. 6. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the Settlement Offer as set out in Public Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, and City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its final Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the draft Zoning By-law Amendments implementing the Settlement Offer are finalized in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the applicant has provided confirmation of water, sanitary and stormwater capacity to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, or the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services has determined that holding provisions are required in the Zoning By-law Amendment; c. should it be determined that upgrades to municipal infrastructure are required through the review of updated Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, the owner has made satisfactory arrangements with the City and has entered into the appropriate agreement(s) for the design and construction of such works, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the applicant has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review as they relate to the Zoning by-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review; e. the applicant has provided a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 175-185 King Street East, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August 10, 2022, revised August 10, 2023, with an addendum dated January 16, 2024, and details all future conservation efforts as part of this application, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; f. the applicant has entered into and registered on title to the property a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 175-185 King Street East substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated January 10, 2024; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August 10, 2022, revised August 10, 2023, with an addendum dated January 16, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Part 2.e above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and g. the owner has submitted an application and gained approval in writing under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the proposed alterations to the heritage properties at 175-185 King Street East. 3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to continue to work with the applicant to explore the feasibility of providing an in-kind community benefit pursuant to section 37(6) of the Planning Act, and to report back to City Council for further instruction if the applicant offers such an in-kind community benefit. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1a by Councillor Chris Moise, were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council approve alteration of contributing properties and the erection of a new building on the designated heritage property at 175, 179, 181, 183 and 185 King Street East (including the entrance addresses at 58, 60, 62, 62A, 64, 66 and 68 George Street) located in the St. Lawrence Heritage Conservation District in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a new mixed use building in conjunction with an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal, comprised of the plans and drawings prepared by IBI Group Architects (Canada) Inc./Arcadis, dated January 10, 2024, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August 10, 2022, revised August 10, 2023, with an addendum dated January 16, 2024, all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to conditions as set out below. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its final Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. prior to issuance of an Ontario Land Tribunal order in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan appeals for the property at 175-185 King Street East, the owner shall: 1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 175-185 King Street East, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August 10, 2022, revised August 10, 2023, with an addendum dated January 16, 2024, and details all future conservation efforts as part of this application, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and 2. enter into and register on title to the property a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 175-185 King Street East substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated January 10, 2024; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August 10, 2022, revised August 10, 2023, with an addendum dated January 16, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Part 2.a.1. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. b. prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the property at 175-185 King Street East, the owner has: i. provided final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 2.a.i to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; ii. provided an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; iii. provided a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and iv. submitted a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; c. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 175-185 King Street East, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall: i. obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 175-185 King Street East, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council in connection with an Ontario Land Tribunal Order and to have come into effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, City Planning in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; ii. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 2.a.i above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; iii. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and iv. provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8 by 10 inch colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. d. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 2.c.iii above the owner shall: i. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor, remain confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 31, 2024) from the City Solicitor and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM16.19adopted
As we mark the second anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the City of Toronto can provide additional support to the Ukrainian government and our Friendship City, Kyiv, for humanitarian purposes. During a recent meeting with Mr. Oleksandr Shevchenko, Consul General of Ukraine in Toronto, a request for assistance from the City of Toronto was made to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Kyiv. Since 1991, Toronto and Kyiv have been friendship cities, remaining in close contact, and celebrating our 30th anniversary of friendship in 2021. This motion provides authority for Fleet Services and Paramedic Services to donate up to five vehicles at end-of-life to Ukraine in 2024. These vehicles would add to the seven vehicles already provided to the Ukrainian government over the course of 2022 and 2023. The vehicles would be used to respond to emergency humanitarian situations in Ukraine.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council, as with the total of seven vehicles previously donated by the City of Toronto to Ukraine in 2022 and 2023, authorize the donation of up to five vehicles at no cost to the Ukrainian government for humanitarian purposes as follows: a. General Manager, Fleet Services to donate up to two vehicles in April 2024; and b. Chief of Paramedic Services to donate one vehicle in April 2024 and up to two vehicles by Summer 2024. 2. City Council request City of Toronto agencies and corporations, such as the Toronto Transit Commission, and Toronto Police Services Board, to consider the donation of surplus or end-of-life vehicles to the Government of Ukraine for humanitarian purposes. 3. City Council request the City Manager work with the relevant divisions regarding the provision of three generators for humanitarian purposes.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie that: 1. City Council, as with the total of seven vehicles previously donated by the City of Toronto to Ukraine in 2022 and 2023, authorize the donation of up to five vehicles at no cost to the Ukrainian government for humanitarian purposes as follows: a. General Manager, Fleet Services to donate up to two vehicles in April 2024; and b. Chief of Paramedic Services to donate one vehicle in April 2024 and up to two vehicles by Summer 2024. 2. City Council request City of Toronto agencies and corporations, such as the Toronto Transit Commission, and Toronto Police Services Board, to consider the donation of surplus or end-of-life vehicles to the Government of Ukraine for humanitarian purposes. 3. City Council request the City Manager work with the relevant divisions regarding the provision of three generators for humanitarian purposes.
CC16.20adopted
Minto (Mimico) Inc. v Toronto (City) - Appeal of Ontario Land Tribunal Decision
On December 12, 2023, the Ontario Land Tribunal issued a decision in respect of a motion brought by the applicant, Minto (Mimico) Inc., relating to its attempted 2023 site plan control application under Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act relating to various properties under the municipal address of 1 Audley Street and 8 Newcastle Street ("Block D Lands") and for the property municipally known as 2 and 10 Audley Street and 29, 31, and 59 Portland Street ("Block E" Lands). The Ontario Land Tribunal Act allows the parties to a hearing to seek leave to appeal a decision of the Ontario Land Tribunal to the Divisional Court. The City Solicitor requires further directions.
City Council on March 20 and 21, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, with retroactive authority, to: a. bring a motion for leave to appeal, and if granted, to appeal to Divisional Court; and/or b. commence an application for judicial review; from the Ontario Land Tribunal decision released on December 12, 2023 in Ontario Land Tribunal File OLT-23-000545. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring or participate in any necessary proceeding before the Court, including intervening in related court proceedings brought by other municipalities, to ensure integrity of the City's Mandatory Pre-Application Consultation By-law is maintained as the City Solicitor may determine to be appropriate in consultation with the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle, abandon or resolve the leave/appeal/court proceedings as the City Solicitor may determine to be appropriate in consultation with the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to litigation and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.