The Public GalleryToronto

Sign Variance Committee · 2019-07-09 · 2019.SB4.6

The filed record

Appeal Concerning Variances for One First Party Wall Sign at 135 Fenelon Drive

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2019-07-09 · Sign Variance Committee · adopted

As filed

The Sign Variance Committee: 1. Refused the requested variances to subsections 694-21B(4)(a), 694-21B(4)(b) and 694-21B(4)(c) with respect to the Proposed Sign at the premises municipally known as 135 Fenelon Drive, as described in greater detail in Attachment 1 of the report (June 24, 2019) from the Manager, Sign By-law Unit, Toronto Building.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

This report addresses an appeal concerning three variances sought respecting one first party wall sign displaying static copy (the Proposed Sign). The Proposed Sign is to be located on portions of the north elevation between the 15th and 18th storeys of an existing 20-storey apartment building at 135 Fenelon Drive (the Subject Premises). The Proposed Sign is to contain one rectangular sign face, directed north towards Highway 401 and towards vehicular traffic travelling south-bound on the Don Valley Parkway.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,550 more characters as filed

The height of the Proposed Sign (the highest point of the sign measured from grade) would be 48.46 metres. The Proposed Sign's sign face would have a bisecting line (horizontal dimension) of 12.19 metres and centre line (vertical dimension) of 9.14 metres, and would function to identify "Beaux Properties", the owner and manager of the apartment building on the premises, as well as advertise apartments available for rent within the building. After conducting a review of the initial sign variance application made by N.K. Girdhar and Associates (the Applicant), a decision was made by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building (the CBO) to refuse to grant the requested variances required for the erection and display of the Proposed Sign. Following this decision, an appeal was filed by the Applicant. The CBO has determined that the Applicant has not provided sufficient information to determine that the Proposed Sign meets all nine of the criteria established in §694-30A of the Sign By-law, which are required for a variance approval to be granted. Specifically, insufficient information was provided to determine that the Proposed Sign is compatible with the development of the premises and surrounding area; supports Official Plan Objectives for the premises and surrounding area; does not alter the character of the premises or surrounding area; and is not contrary to the public interest. As such, the CBO does not support the Sign Variance Committee granting the requested variances for the Proposed Sign.

Staff recommended

The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building recommends that: 1. The Sign Variance Committee refuse the requested variances to subsections 694-21B(4)(a), 694-21B(4)(b) and 694-21B(4)(c) with respect to the Proposed Sign at the premises municipally known as 135 Fenelon Drive, as described in greater detail in Attachment 1 of this report.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting