The filed record
Application by Pattison Outdoor for One Third Party Electronic Ground Sign at 115 City View Drive
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2019-07-09 · Sign Variance Committee · adopted
As filed
The Sign Variance Committee: 1. Refused the requested variances required to allow the Applicant to obtain a permit for the erection and display of one third party electronic ground sign at 115 City View Drive, as described in Attachment 1 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Manager, Sign By-law Unit, Toronto Building.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This report reviews and makes recommendations to the Sign Variance Committee regarding a proposal by Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of the property owner (the Applicant), to allow for one third party electronic ground sign displaying electronic static copy (the Proposed Sign), as described in further detail in Attachment 1. The Proposed Sign would be located at the south-west corner of the property municipally known as 115 City View Drive (the Subject Premises), which contains a one-storey building intended for light industrial use.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,681 more characters as filed
The Proposed Sign would have a height of 9.14 metres from grade, and contain two sign faces in a back-to-back configuration with a sign face area of 18.6 square metres on each side. The Subject Premises is designated as an E Sign District, which allows third party electronic ground signs, and the proposed height and sign face area are in-line with the Sign By-law requirements for third party electronic ground signs in an E Sign District. Only the south-facing sign face would display electronic static copy; the north sign face would display static copy. The Proposed Sign is intended to capture the attention of traffic travelling along City View Drive and, further west, Highway 27. The Subject Premises is located in two overlapping area-specific restrictions specified by the Sign By-law, where third party signs shall not be erected. It would be located within 400 metres of the northern limit of Highway 409, and within 400 metres of the eastern limit of Highway 27. The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building (the CBO), has determined that the Applicant has not provided sufficient information to establish that the Proposed Sign meets all nine of the criteria set out in §694-30A of the Sign By-law, which are required for a variance approval to be granted. Specifically, the Applicant has not provided sufficient information to allow the CBO to determine that the Proposed Sign is compatible with the development of the premises and surrounding area, supports the Official Plan objectives for the premises and surrounding area, does not alter the character of the premises or surrounding area, and is not contrary to the public interest.
Staff recommended
The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, recommends that: 1. The Sign Variance Committee refuse the requested variances required to allow the Applicant to obtain a permit for the erection and display of one third party electronic ground sign at 115 City View Drive, as described in Attachment 1 to this report.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Sign Variance Committee - Roles and Expectations of Public MembersFiled record
- Integrity Commissioner - Code of Conduct and Municipal Conflict of Interest ActFiled record
- Overview of Sign By-law and City Policy and ProceduresFiled record
- Overview of Sign By-law and Roles and Obligations of Sign Variance CommitteeFiled record
- Appeal Concerning Variances for One First Party Wall Sign at 185 The West MallFiled record
- Appeal Concerning Variances for One First Party Wall Sign at 135 Fenelon DriveFiled record