The filed record
Authorization to Amend Section 37 Agreement for 5800 Yonge Development Application - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2026-06-24 · Toronto City Council · amended
As filed
City Council on June 24 and 25, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward a City-initiated amendment to By-laws 1285-2022 (OLT) and 1286-2022 (OLT) to amend the terms of the Section 37 benefits, specifically to introduce an election by City Council to require the Owner to provide two of the required facilities services and matters secured as Section 37 benefits.
Show the rest of As filed, 266 more characters as filed
2. City Council elect that, in the event that the By-law Amendments are adopted, the Owner provide: a. the Parkland Over dedication; and b. the conveyance and construction of the childcare facility in accordance with the terms in the By-law and Section 37 Agreement.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
In 2022, City Council approved the redevelopment of 5800 Yonge Street through By-laws 1285-2022 (OLT) and 1286-2022 (OLT). As part of the approval, the owner was required to provide a new child care facility and deliver associated community benefits secured through a Section 37 agreement. This agreement includes also and over dedication of parkland for 4,291.6 square meters. Since the approval of the development, the provincial land use planning and development framework has undergone significant reform through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23).
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 2,566 more characters as filed
Bill 23 significantly restructured municipal tools for securing community benefits by limiting the scope of Section 37 density bonusing and introducing a capped Community Benefits Charge system. These changes have materially reduced the City's ability to secure community benefit if the developers choose to bring forward their application again. Within this evolving legislative and financial context, the owner has continued discussions with City staff regarding the implementation and delivery of the required child care facility. The owner has now proposed a revised framework that maintains the obligation to deliver a fully fitted out stand-alone child care facility, along with associated furnishings and equipment contributions, and $500,000 Child Care Facility Capital Contribution. Importantly, the continued requirement for a stand-alone child care facility represents a significant and meaningful community benefit outcome. Given current market and policy conditions, including the limitations introduced by Bill 23 and the City's constrained ability to secure equivalent child care capital contributions through alternative mechanisms, the delivery of a purpose-built facility of this scale would be extremely difficult to achieve through any other planning or funding pathway. In this regard, securing the delivery of this facility represents a clear success in advancing critical community infrastructure. This outcome is particularly significant given that Willowdale is identified as a "red zone" on Toronto Children's Services Priority Levels for CWELCC expansion, indicating high unmet demand for licensed child care spaces and limited existing capacity relative to need. The revised proposal provides for a direct capital investment by the owner in the construction of the child care facility. This approach aligns with the current legislative environment, and ensures the continued delivery of a high-priority community service in an area of demonstrated need along with the over dedication of the parkland. Given the increased construction costs associated with delivering the child care facility, the strong public policy imperative to secure new licensed spaces in high-need areas such as Willowdale, and the legislative changes introduced by Bill 23 that have constrained alternative funding tools, it is appropriate to amend the existing Section 37 requirements to remove the separate cash contribution obligation while maintaining and strengthening the obligation to deliver the stand-alone child care facility and its associated benefits.
Staff recommended
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward a City-initiated amendment to By-laws 1285-2022 (OLT) and 1286-2022 (OLT) to amend the terms of the Section 37 benefits, specifically the removal of the required cash contribution for the increase in density, in an effort to preserve the construction of a fully built-out daycare and recognize the over-dedication of parkland.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Ombudsman Toronto Report - No Refunds for Discontinued TTC Tickets and Tokens: An Investigation Behind How the Decision was MadeFiled record
- Improving Access to Toronto Island Park - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula FletcherFiled record
- (Removed)Filed record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Ontario-Toronto New Deal - Advancing the Upload of the Don Valley Parkway and Frederick G. Gardiner Expressway to the ProvinceFiled record