Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 111 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 51 to 100 of 111Show 2550100all
MM39.27amended
Grocery Store Pilot Project - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
The rising cost of living continues to place significant pressure on many residents across Toronto. Food costs, in particular, represent one of the largest household expenses. As a result, food bank usage has increased dramatically throughout the city. In several neighbourhoods, residents face limited access to full-service grocery stores offering affordable, high-quality food. These areas are often referred to as "food deserts," where the lack of accessible grocery options forces residents to rely on smaller convenience or boutique stores with significantly higher prices. Access to nutritious and affordable food is a key determinant of health. Too many Torontonians are experiencing food insecurity and related health challenges because healthy food options are simply unaffordable. The City of Toronto must explore innovative ways to improve food access and affordability. Making life more affordable for residents should remain a central goal of municipal government. Establishing City operated grocery stores could help increase access to affordable food while addressing food insecurity in underserved communities.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council establish a pilot project to open four municipally operated grocery stores within the City of Toronto, with the following parametres: a. one grocery store located within each of the City's Community Council districts; b. priority given to neighbourhoods with limited access to full-service grocery stores and where residents have lower average household incomes; c. a not-for-profit model under the City of Toronto with the goal of providing residents with the most affordable food pricing possible; d. financial supports including potential waivers of property taxes, development charges, and other applicable fees, to reduce operating costs and maximize affordability for residents; e. pool purchasing across City food programs, including school food programs, senior residences, and other municipal services to lower costs and build community wealth; and f. prioritizing food purchases from local and regional food producers. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Social Development, and Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report back to Council in the second quarter of 2027 with a vision and strategy for establishing municipally operated grocery stores and broader food security and affordability measures, that considers: a. policy levers available to the City to prevent price gouging by grocery and other retailers, including ensuring retailers licensed by the City are transparent about rates and prices and disclose the use of consumers' personal data and algorithmic pricing; b. engagement with the Provincial and Federal government to strengthen competition and improve choice for residents, including removing the ability of large grocers to restrict competitors from operating on or near their properties; c. the City's Public Markets Action Plan, Black Food Sovereignty Plan, and work to update the City's Food Charter; d. the City's own food procurement, logistics and delivery for libraries, long-term care homes, shelters, daycares and camps as well as School Food Hubs; e. a comprehensive jurisdictional review of municipally-run grocery options, including the potential for diverse operating models led by the City of Toronto or in partnership with non-profit organizations; and f. engaging with the federal and provincial governments for financial or other commitments. 3. City Council request the City Manager to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the second quarter of 2027 on options to support non-profit Toronto community food cooperatives, such as Karma Co-op, which maximize food affordability for residents and build community through mutual aid, trading volunteer labour for reduced food costs, and eliminating commercial profit margins. 4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development to request staff look at alternative models for delivery of groceries locally which takes advice/consultation from industry expertise to lower food costs for the City of Toronto. 5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the second quarter 2027, as part of the ongoing development of the updated Food Charter for Toronto and ongoing work on the Universal School Food Program and Black Food Sovereignty Plan, with recommendations on establishing a program advisory body to guide the City's work to set food policy in Toronto, informed by lessons learned from the Toronto Food Policy Council.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council establish a pilot project to open four municipally operated grocery stores within the City of Toronto, with the following parametres: a. one grocery store located within each of the City's Community Council districts; b. priority given to neighbourhoods with limited access to full-service grocery stores and where residents have lower average household incomes; c. a not-for-profit model under the City of Toronto with the goal of providing residents with the most affordable food pricing possible; and d. financial supports including potential waivers of property taxes, development charges, and other applicable fees, to reduce operating costs and maximize affordability for residents. 2. City Council request the City Manager to report to City Council at the April 22, 2026 meeting on the implementation measures required to give effect to the municipal grocery store pilot.
MM39.28adopted
At the April meeting of City Council, an accessible parking space on Dundas Street West near Coolmine Road was removed because of compliance concerns from the original applicant. Since that time, the original applicant shared that the removal of this space resulted in significant challenges in finding parking around the neighbourhood. The applicant no longer has concerns with the use of this accessible space and has worked with Transportation Services staff on a plan to return the space to this location. City Council approval of this motion is required to re-open and amend this item. Requires Re-opening: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 2025.TE21.33 (April 23 and 24, 2025 Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Table 2 in attachment of the report.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE21.33 by: a. deleting Table 2 in Attachment 1 to the report (March 18, 2025) from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services. Table to be deleted : Table 2: On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces to be Removed Ward Location Ward 9 Dundas Street West, north side, between a point 23.5 metres east of Coolmine Road and a point 5.5 metres further east
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE21.33 by: a. deleting Table 2 in Attachment 1 to the report (March 18, 2025) from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services. Table to be deleted : Table 2: On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces to be Removed Ward Location Ward 9 Dundas Street West, north side, between a point 23.5 metres east of Coolmine Road and a point 5.5 metres further east
MM39.29adopted
In March 2024 City Council adopted Item 2024.IE12.4 , which included details on Transportation Services' plans to install delegated sidewalks in the near term (2024-2026), including a new sidewalk on the north side of Taber Road. Taber Road is classified as a Collector roadway between Racine Road and Kipling Avenue and currently has a sidewalk on the south side. The City's Missing Sidewalk Installation Policy calls for sidewalks to be installed where they are missing on both sides of Arterial and Collector roadways during road reconstruction or as a standalone capital project based on identified needs and budget availability. A new sidewalk on the north side of Taber Road between Brydon Drive and Kipling Avenue is scheduled to be tendered this spring and installed in 2026. Adjacent properties on the north side of Taber Road between Brydon Drive and Kipling Avenue were recently notified of the planned sidewalk and some businesses have shared concerns related to the potential loss of parking. Currently, these properties use space within the City-owned right-of-way for private parking. This motion proposes to amend the west limit of the new sidewalk construction to terminate at the Rexdale Community Health Centre on Taber Road. This revised limit would allow sidewalk construction to proceed while providing an accessible and safe pedestrian connection where there is the greatest need.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to proceed with the new sidewalk construction project on the north side of Taber Road between Kipling Avenue and 140 metres west of Kipling Avenue as part of contract 26ECS-RD-04LR.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to proceed with the new sidewalk construction project on the north side of Taber Road between Kipling Avenue and 140 metres west of Kipling Avenue as part of contract 26ECS-RD-04LR.
MM39.30amended
Jewish community institutions are being forced to absorb unprecedented and unsustainable costs to ensure the safety of students, congregants and other community members at their facilities. While this has been the unfortunate reality for decades now, the need has taken on a new dimension and sense of urgency here in Toronto and across Canada and other countries since the October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel and the resulting war. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centres have required significant additional security measures far beyond what has been historically necessary, driven by a marked and sustained rise of antisemitic incidents both here in Toronto and globally. Many other diaspora communities and ethnic and/or religious minorities are also increasingly facing similar pressures because of conflicts abroad and foreign influence campaigns, underscoring that this is a broader public safety concern. The Toronto Police Service has demonstrated a very strong commitment to protecting the Jewish community in particular at this time as well as other vulnerable communities, often at considerable strain on its own resources. However, it is neither reasonable nor sustainable for vulnerable communities to bear this additional cost for paid duty officers and private security to keep their children safe and to worship in peace and security. Public safety and security is a shared responsibility - one that must be supported through coordinated action and appropriate resources from all levels of government.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the federal Minister of Finance and National Revenue, and the Ontario Minister of Finance to establish a Tax Credit Program to support parents of children in school and childcare, religious congregants, and community centre members whose identifiably ethnocultural, faith-based, or diasporic institutions bear extraordinary security costs to keep their communities safe, with eligibility criteria based on the existing Canada Community Security Program and the Ontario Anti-Hate Security and Prevention Grant Program.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council request the federal Minister of Finance and National Revenue, and the Ontario Minister of Finance to establish a Tax Credit Program to support identifiable religious, ethnocultural and diasporic community institutions including schools, places of worship, and community centres who bear extraordinary security costs to keep their communities safe with eligibility criteria based on the existing Canada Community Security Program and the Ontario Anti-Hate Security and Prevention Grant Program.
MM39.31adopted
This motion will give the City Solicitor the authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision approving the minor variance application at 96 Patricia Avenue (Application No. A0046/26NY) (the "Application"); to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development in the Application; to retain outside consultants as necessary; and to negotiate a resolution of the appeal. On January 29, 2026, the applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for variances to the City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013. The Application sought approval to construct a new three-storey detached fourplex dwelling with a rear exterior stairwell, and also to construct a new two-storey garden suite. The applicant initially sought twelve variances but seven were withdrawn. In a report dated March 3, 2026, Community Planning staff recommended that two variances regarding the height of the detached houseplex and the height of the main walls be refused, or alternatively in the event that the Committee approve the application the report recommended modifications (the Staff Report is attached as Attachment 1). On March 5, 2026, the North York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application including the two variances that staff recommended refusal of. A copy of the Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached as Attachment 2. The deadline for submitting an appeal is March 25, 2026. The intention is for the appeal to be filed by the City Solicitor pending adoption of this motion by City Council to preserve the City's statutory rights. The City Solicitor requires instruction to maintain the appeal and attend a hearing for this matter.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 99 Patricia Avenue (Application A0046/26NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the development proposed in application A0046/26NY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal regarding (Application A0046/26NY), and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor's discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 99 Patricia Avenue (Application A0046/26NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the development proposed in application A0046/26NY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal regarding (Application A0046/26NY), and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor's discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
MM39.32adopted
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision approving the minor variance application at 210 Cosburn Avenue (A0102/25TEY); to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in application A0102/25TEY; to retain outside consultants as necessary; and to negotiate a settlement of the appeal. On January 27, 2026, the Committee of Adjustment approved an application brought by the agent of the owner of 210 Cosburn Avenue for a proposal to alter the existing four-storey apartment building by converting the existing integral garage, laundry, and storage areas into four additional residential dwelling units (located within the basement level). There will be a total of 37 residential dwelling units and 16 lawful parking spaces on this lot. To facilitate this application, three minor variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 were sought. A copy of the Committee of Adjustment's decision on this application is attached as Attachment 1. The City's primary issue with the Application relates to the absence of both indoor and outdoor amenity space for the additional dwelling units. The second issue with the Applicant is that it results in a significant reduction of lawful on-site parking spaces from 26 to 16. In order for the City to continue to effectively assess and call its case, the City Solicitor requires the expertise of an external consultant to advise on the applicant's proposed plan, and to potentially make recommendations respecting a solution. To preserve the City's right of appeal, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body on February 10, 2026. This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to preserve the City's statutory right of appeal. Thus, the City Solicitor requires instructions to appeal and to attend the hearing for this matter.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 210 Cosburn Avenue (Application A0102/25TEY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in application A0102/25TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in her discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 210 Cosburn Avenue (Application A0102/25TEY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in application A0102/25TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in her discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
MM39.33adopted
St. Gabriel Catholic School is located at 396 Spring Garden Avenue in Willowdale and serves students and families in the surrounding neighbourhood. The school is part of the Toronto Catholic District School Board and plays an important role as a community hub for local families. Schoolyards in dense urban neighbourhoods like Willowdale provide valuable outdoor space for recreation, physical activity, and informal gathering. Outside of school hours, these spaces are frequently used by residents and families who have limited access to nearby open space. This motion proposes allocating $50,000.00 in Section 37 funds from the development at 2, 4 and 6 Teagarden Court to support capital improvements to the St. Gabriel Catholic School schoolyard, subject to the Toronto Catholic District School Board entering into a Community Access Agreement with the City of Toronto. Through this agreement, the improved schoolyard would be accessible for community use outside of school hours for a period of 20 years, ensuring that the investment benefits both students and the broader neighbourhood. We are grateful to St. Gabriel Catholic School Principal, Antonella De Roma, as well as the school's highly engaged Parent Council, led by Chair Rebeca Lewy, for their strong advocacy in advancing this important improvement for their school. Enhancing schoolyards through partnerships between the City and local school boards is a cost-effective way to expand recreational opportunities, improve outdoor play spaces for children, and increase access to safe community gathering areas in neighbourhoods where park space may be limited.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $50,000.00 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 2, 4 and 6 Teagarden Court (Source Account: XR3026-3701172), secured for capital improvements to area parks, for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for capital improvements to the schoolyard at St. Gabriel Catholic School, subject to the Toronto Catholic District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at St. Gabriel Catholic School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $50,000.00 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 2, 4 and 6 Teagarden Court (Source Account: XR3026-3701172), secured for capital improvements to area parks, for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for capital improvements to the schoolyard at St. Gabriel Catholic School, subject to the Toronto Catholic District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at St. Gabriel Catholic School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
MM39.34adopted
Toronto Police Service 33 Division approached Parks and Recreation through my office to identify opportunities to improve the outdoor basketball court at McNicoll Park to provide stronger opportunities for youth engagement. Parks and Recreation determined that improvements are needed to renew the existing court surface and related amenities. Staff subsequently identified $125,000.00 in City funding through the Back on Track program to support near-term improvements to the existing court, including new asphalt, nets, line painting, and accessible walkways. An external donation is also being explored through a community partner, to further support the project. While these investments are welcome and should be retained, they represent only a first step toward realizing the full potential of this site. The McNicoll Park basketball court has become an important and growing hub, where students and residents from across the neighbourhood gather to play, connect, and build community. To support the long-term renewal and enhancement of the basketball court and surrounding park area, I am requesting that City Council approve the allocation of up to $500,000.00 in Section 45 funding for capital improvements to the basketball court at McNicoll Park. This additional investment would allow the City to deliver a more complete community-focused project, with potential enhancements such as lighting, fencing, public art, and other supporting amenities that reflect the importance of this space. This funding will ensure that the project can proceed in a coordinated manner through the Parks and Recreation capital program and in accordance with applicable City policies and construction requirements.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation by $500,000.00, with cash flows of $250,000.00 in 2026 and $250,000.00 in 2027, fully funded by Section 45 community benefits obtained from the development at 47 Sheppard Square (Source Account: XR3028-4500038), secured for parks improvements in the ward, for the purpose of capital improvements to the basketball court at McNicoll Park. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to take all necessary actions to deliver McNicoll Park Basketball Court improvement project by spring 2027. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to negotiate and execute agreements with community partners to support enhancements to the basketball court at McNicoll Park, including appropriate recognition opportunities, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and subject to satisfactory agreement terms.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation by $500,000.00, with cash flows of $250,000.00 in 2026 and $250,000.00 in 2027, fully funded by Section 45 community benefits obtained from the development at 47 Sheppard Square (Source Account: XR3028-4500038), secured for parks improvements in the ward, for the purpose of capital improvements to the basketball court at McNicoll Park. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to take all necessary actions to deliver McNicoll Park Basketball Court improvement project by spring 2027. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to negotiate and execute agreements with community partners to support enhancements to the basketball court at McNicoll Park, including appropriate recognition opportunities, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and subject to satisfactory agreement terms.
MM39.35amended
City Council adopted its current flag policy in 1999. The policy allows for the following flags on its courtesy flag poles at Toronto City Hall and civic centres with courtesy flag poles: a. the flags of nations recognized by Global Affairs Canada, on a national day or on the anniversary of a special occasion, upon written request; and b. the flag of a non-profit or charitable organization upon the written request of the group or organization. City Council delegated authority to the Chief of Protocol to approve all flag raisings in accordance with Council's policy. This motion proposes changes to Council's flag raising policy that would eliminate the flying of flags of foreign nations, and those of non-profit or charitable organization effective immediately. This motion also recommends the continuation of City of Toronto hosted flag raisings and accompanying ceremonies of the following: the flags of Indigenous and Treaty partners, the Intersex Pride flag, the Black Liberation flag, and flags of professional sport organizations, and flags of cities that are part of the City's International Alliance program. This motion does not recommend any changes to the following: flying of the City of Toronto flag, Canada's provincial/territorial flags and the Canadian flag as well as the City of Toronto's half-masting policy.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its flag raising policy to eliminate flying flags of foreign nations, or any flags which include the depiction of a foreign nation's flag, on the courtesy flag poles at Toronto City Hall and civic centres, effective December 1, 2026. 2. City Council direct the City Clerk to review the City's current flag raising policy and report to City Council in the first quarter of 2027 with a community recognition program proposal that considers the flag raising policy, the commemorative lighting program for the TORONTO sign and other recognition initiatives.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its flag raising policy to eliminate the flying flags of foreign nations on the courtesy flag poles at Toronto City Hall and civic centres effective immediately. 2. City Council amend its flag raising policy to eliminate the flying of flags requested by non-profit or charitable organizations on the courtesy flag poles at Toronto City Hall and civic centres effective immediately. 3. City Council authorize the continuation of the following City of Toronto hosted flag raisings and accompanying ceremonies: the flags of Indigenous and Treaty partners, the Intersex Pride flag, the Black Liberation flag, the flags of professional sport organizations, and the flags of cities that are part of the City's International Alliance program. 4. City Council direct the City Clerk to review the City's current flag raising policy, and report to City Council in the first quarter of 2027 with a community recognition program proposal that considers the flag raising policy, the commemorative lighting program for the TORONTO sign and other recognition initiatives.
MM39.36amended
Once the supportive housing development at 185 Cummer Avenue is complete, 175, 185, and 205 Cummer Avenue will function as a full-fledged senior's campus. On this campus, parking is not a convenience. It is essential infrastructure that supports both the delivery of care and the mental well-being of residents who depend on consistent access to family, caregivers, and services. Reliable parking enables physicians to provide timely care, allows staff to begin their shifts without added stress, and ensures that loved ones can visit regularly. When parking is unavailable, care is delayed, staff are strained, and residents face increased isolation. Significant and growing parking pressures have been identified at 175 and 205 Cummer Avenue, which serve Willowdale Manor and Cummer Lodge Long Term Care Home, as well as at the soon-to-open Seniors Supportive Housing development at 185 Cummer Avenue. Both 175 and 205 Cummer Avenue depend heavily on on-site parking. Transit access in the area is limited, and there is no nearby street parking or public parking. The current parking supply is not sufficient to meet the daily operational needs of Cummer Lodge, Willowdale Manor, and their service providers. This shortage is already creating serious impacts. Physicians and caregivers are sometimes unable to find parking, which directly affects service delivery. When 185 Cummer Avenue becomes fully occupied, demand will increase further. The non-profit operator for 185 Cummer Avenue estimates that an additional 12 to 14 parking spaces, beyond the 2 already designated, will be required to support staffing. Preliminary data highlights the scale of the issue. Cummer Lodge employs about 600 staff, with 323 on site each day, supporting 391 residents. Willowdale Manor houses 246 residents, with 40 who have permitted parking spots and 13 on a waitlist for parking. The site also receives frequent visits from families, caregivers, volunteers, medical practitioners, service technicians, and other essential support personnel. The lack of adequate parking is affecting both operations and quality of life. Staff recruitment and retention are being impacted because employees regularly struggle to find parking for their shifts. Evening staff are often forced to park off-site and move their vehicles during their shift, causing stress, delays, and disruptions to care. Limited parking also creates barriers for seniors and visitors. Families and caregivers often struggle to find parking, which reduces visits and contributes to social isolation among residents, with real consequences for mental health and wellbeing. Daily operations are also affected. Waste collection and scheduled maintenance are sometimes delayed due to blocked access or the lack of designated service parking. In addition, the absence of a gate or monitoring system has allowed unregulated use of the lot by individuals and staff from nearby facilities, further reducing availability for long term care operations. With these existing constraints and the expected occupancy of the new residential building at 185 Cummer Avenue in summer 2026, a comprehensive parking assessment is urgently needed. This study should examine current usage, identify capacity gaps, forecast future demand, and assess site limitations. It should also identify practical solutions, including opportunities to expand capacity, improve on site management, and coordinate parking use with nearby facilities to ensure this campus can continue to deliver safe, reliable, and compassionate care.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Development Office to consult with the President and Chief Executive Office of Toronto Community Housing Corporation, the Chief Executive Officer of Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation, the President of the Toronto Parking Authority and the Executive Director of Corporate Real Estate Management and report back to the appropriate committee by the first quarter of 2027 on: a. the results of a comprehensive parking study for 175, 185 and 205 Cummer Avenue which identifies current and future cumulative parking demands for Cummer Lodge, Willowdale Manor and Supportive Housing, including public transit options, demand during shift change times, existing waitlists for resident parking at Willowdale Manor and visitor parking; b. identifying effective parking enforcement options to ensure only users of the site park there, including consideration of parking permits, visitor parking tags and a parking operator who provides enforcement; and  c. exploring opportunities to provide additional parking capacity for 175, 185 and 205 Cummer Avenue on- or off-site.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Development Office to consult with the President and Chief Executive Office of Toronto Community Housing Corporation, the Chief Executive Officer of Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation, the President of the Toronto Parking Authority and the Executive Director of Corporate Real Estate Management and report back to the appropriate committee in quarter 2 of 2026 on: a. the results of a comprehensive parking study for 175, 185 and 205 Cummer Avenue which identifies current and future cumulative parking demands for Cummer Lodge, Willowdale Manor and Supportive Housing including demand during shift change times, existing waitlists for resident parking at Willowdale Manor and visitor parking; b. identifying effective parking enforcement options to ensure only users of the site park there, including consideration of parking permits, visitor parking tags and a parking operator who provides enforcement; and  c. exploring opportunities to provide additional parking capacity for 175, 185 and 205 Cummer Avenue on- or off-site, with an interim solution to be implemented in quarter 3 of 2026 and a long-term solution to be implemented in 2027.
MM39.37adopted
On November 27, 2025, a fire broke out in two connected buildings at 11 Thorncliffe Park Drive and 21 Overlea Boulevard. As a result, residents of nearly 400 units were displaced for more than a month as firefighters and first responders worked around-the-clock to extinguish the fire - a task complicated by the fact that the fire was located in a 25 to 50 millimetre gap between the tower walls, resulting in a prolonged smouldering of the compressed wood material that filled the space between buildings. On the day of the fire, City divisions and agencies - particularly Toronto Fire Services - acted quickly to ensure the safety of residents. In the weeks to follow, we received regular updates on the status of the fire, and residents were provided with access to contacts to answer their questions and provide support for the duration of their displacement. As crews worked to extinguish the slow-burning fire, community members and organizations came together to provide immediate and ongoing support to the residents of these buildings in their time of need. My office received many kind offers of support from individuals and groups from across the Ward, and across the City more broadly - the Don Valley West community is truly grateful for the outpouring of support in the wake of this incident. In the aftermath of a fire incident of this scale and duration, it is essential that we take stock at the City and within the community to evaluate lessons learned, and best practices that can be implemented should similar situations occur in the future.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Executive Director, Toronto Emergency Management, in consultation with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, as well as relevant City divisions and community organizations involved in the response to the 2025 fire at 11 Thorncliffe Park Drive and 21 Overlea Boulevard, to report back to City Council by the end of the first quarter of 2027 on best practices for the communication and coordination of supports across City divisions, agencies and community groups as part of the upcoming revision of the Emergency Human Services Policy.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Executive Director, Toronto Emergency Management, in consultation with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, as well as relevant City divisions and community organizations involved in the response to the 2025 fire at 11 Thorncliffe Park Drive and 21 Overlea Boulevard, to report back to City Council by the end of the first quarter of 2027 on best practices for the communication and coordination of supports across City divisions, agencies and community groups as part of the upcoming revision of the Emergency Human Services Policy.
MM39.38adopted
Every year, in cities from coast to coast to coast and online, thousands of Canadians get off their bums and run (or walk) to support research, patient care, and early screening for colon cancer. The Bum Run has directly raised more than $1.8 million for colon cancer charities and done incredible work promoting one of the most important parts of effective treatment: regular screening. I am glad to say that the Bum Run will march through my ward (and parts of Ward 13) again this year, coming to our city on April 26th, 2026. Bum Run is a registered 100 percent non-profit, and any free-will donations made to the charity are directed towards their cause, cure, and awareness campaign. There are no mandatory fees or purchases associated with attending the Bum Run, although participants may make donations or pay a fundraising registration fee for a timing chip. The Run is staffed by volunteers. To support this event, I am asking that City Council waive both the application fee and event permission fee associated with partially closing or occupying the necessary arterial and collector roads for the Run. Combined, the fees would amount to $5,209.14.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to waive the application and permit fees charged for the Bum Run's 2026 event (Fee Ref. 61.06, 61.07, Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C - Schedule 2, Transportation Services).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to waive the application and permit fees charged for the Bum Run's 2026 event (Fee Ref. 61.06, 61.07, Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C - Schedule 2, Transportation Services).
MM39.39adopted
The David Crombie Park Revitalization project is a multi-year capital project delivering comprehensive improvements across the entire David Crombie Park. Construction is being implemented in a phased approach to minimize disruption, maintain access where possible, and coordinate infrastructure upgrades across individual park blocks (see Appendix 1). Construction of Block 2 (between Lower Jarvis and George Street), which includes the existing City playground is currently used by St. Michael Catholic School, a Toronto Catholic District School Board school, and Downtown Alternative School, a Toronto District School Board school, for recess. Construction was scheduled to begin on March 10, 2026, and will continue through approximately December 20, 2026. During this period, Block 2 will function as an active construction zone and will not be available for public programming or school use. Block 3, as shown in Appendix 1, has been identified as the temporary location for the schools to use during construction. The access will be formalized through a Parks and Recreation permit to accommodate both schools during the Block 2 construction period. As Block 3 does not contain permanent washroom facilities, portable toilets may be required to support safe and practical recess operations during school hours. Given the distance to the nearest indoor facilities and supervision requirements for elementary students, the school boards have requested on-site portable toilets to ensure timely access, minimize disruption to instructional time, and reduce the need for additional staffing to escort students back to school buildings. The school boards shall be responsible for all costs and liability associated with the portable toilets. The Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board have requested that the Parks and Recreation Permit fees be waived for their short-term use of Block 3 (between George Street and Frederick Street) to support temporary recess space while Block 2 (between Lower Jarvis Street and George Street) is under construction and to supply, install and maintain portable toilets for the duration of the permit. Re-opening of Block 2 is scheduled to be January 2027. Both St. Michael Catholic School and Downtime Alternative School use Block 2 for recess and lunch breaks. The City will be negotiating and seeking Council authority for licence agreements with Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board, which is anticipated to be completed by Spring 2027. The waiver of permit fees for the schools use of Block 2 is recommended to ensure access for schools upon the completion of construction of Block 2.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $31,994.79 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto District School Board from March 10, 2026 to June 26, 2026, and from September 8, 2026, until construction of Block 2 is complete (approximately December 20, 2026) for the use of Block 3 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 1, during recess and lunch hours, and to permit the Toronto District School Board to supply, install, secure and maintain a standard portable toilet in Block 3 for school use, should they choose to provide one. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $4,299.78 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto Catholic District School Board from March 10, 2026 to June 26, 2026, and from September 8, 2026, until construction of Block 2 is complete (approximately December 20, 2026) for the use of Block 3 of David Crombie Park, as shown in the Appendix 1, during recess and lunch hours and to permit the Toronto Catholic District School Board to supply, install, secure and maintain a standard portable toilet in Block 3 for school use, should they choose to provide one. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $21,354.69 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto District School Board from approximately January 1, 2027, or upon completion of construction in Block 2, whichever is earlier, to approximately the end of May 2027 when a licence agreement is negotiated and executed for the use of Block 2 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 2, during recess and lunch hours. 4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $2,729.58 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto Catholic District School Board from approximately January 1, 2027, or upon completion of construction in Block 2, whichever is earlier, to approximately the end of May 2027 when a licence agreement is negotiated and executed for the use of Block 2 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 2, during recess and lunch hours.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $31,994.79 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto District School Board from March 10, 2026 to June 26, 2026, and from September 8, 2026, until construction of Block 2 is complete (approximately December 20, 2026) for the use of Block 3 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 1, during recess and lunch hours, and to permit the Toronto District School Board to supply, install, secure and maintain a standard portable toilet in Block 3 for school use, should they choose to provide one. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $4,299.78 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto Catholic District School Board from March 10, 2026 to June 26, 2026, and from September 8, 2026, until construction of Block 2 is complete (approximately December 20, 2026) for the use of Block 3 of David Crombie Park, as shown in the Appendix 1, during recess and lunch hours and to permit the Toronto Catholic District School Board to supply, install, secure and maintain a standard portable toilet in Block 3 for school use, should they choose to provide one. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $21,354.69 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto District School Board from approximately January 1, 2027, or upon completion of construction in Block 2, whichever is earlier, to approximately the end of May 2027 when a licence agreement is negotiated and executed for the use of Block 2 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 2, during recess and lunch hours. 4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to waive permit fees estimated at $2,729.58 (including Harmonized Sales Tax), on a one-time basis, for permits taken out by Toronto Catholic District School Board from approximately January 1, 2027, or upon completion of construction in Block 2, whichever is earlier, to approximately the end of May 2027 when a licence agreement is negotiated and executed for the use of Block 2 of David Crombie Park, as shown in Appendix 2, during recess and lunch hours.
MM39.40adopted
Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society is an Indigenous-led housing provider that provides community-based, culturally appropriate services and housing for First Nation (Status and Non-Status), Inuit, and Métis 2SLGBTQIA+ women exiting correctional institutions, and survivors of intergenerational trauma. At its Council meeting on November 12 and 13, 2025, the affordable housing property owned by Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society at 28 Algoma Street (located within Etobicoke-Lakeshore) was approved for a property tax exemption through Item 2025.PH25.4. A recommendation to enact a site-specific by-law for 28 Algoma Street was required to be adopted by Council for the property tax exemption recommended in Part 4 of Item 2025.PH25.4 - 2024-2025 Annual Progress Report - HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan and Housing Action Plan (2022-2026) to come into effect. Tenants will begin to occupy the affordable housing property at 28 Algoma Road on March 30, 2026. Council approval of this technical amendment to Item 2025.PH25.4 is required in order for the property tax exemption for this property to come into effect upon tenant occupancy, which will support the financial viability of this project for Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council enact a site-specific by-law to authorize 4 rental housing units at 28 Algoma Street as "Affordable Housing" for the purposes of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 513, Housing Programs.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councilor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that: 1. City Council enact a site-specific by-law to authorize 4 rental housing units at 28 Algoma Street as "Affordable Housing" for the purposes of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 513, Housing Programs.
MM39.41adopted
The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever the property municipally known as 35 Elder Avenue into two residential lots (Application B0010/25EYK), and to request variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 (Applications A0103/25EYK and A0104/25EYK) to construct a new dwelling and garden suite on each of the newly created lots. The Applications required variances to By-law 569-2013, including lot frontage, lot area, and number of dwelling units. On November 20, 2025, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused the Applications. Copies of the Committee's decisions are attached as Attachment 1. The Applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. On February 18, 2026, the Applicant filed revised plans with the Toronto Local Appeal Body. These plans removed the proposed garden suites on each of the lots and made no changes to the proposed dwellings. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Appeal and to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in their discretion. This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as a hearing has been scheduled and the City has filed for Party status to preserve its rights.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear before the Toronto Local Appeal Body in opposition to the owner's appeal from the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Applications A0103/25EYK, A0104/25EYK and B0010/25EYK in respect of the property municipally known as 35 Elder Avenue. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the Appeal and settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Development Review.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear before the Toronto Local Appeal Body in opposition to the owner's appeal from the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Applications A0103/25EYK, A0104/25EYK and B0010/25EYK in respect of the property municipally known as 35 Elder Avenue. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the Appeal and settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Development Review.
MM39.42adopted
The City of Toronto contracts the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to operate a Mute Swan Management Program, which is a non-mandatory program under the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. This population control program involves coating mute swan eggs with oil in the nest, which cuts off oxygen to the cygnets inside preventing them from developing so the eggs do not hatch. Female swans will remain on the nest for longer than the typical incubation period, subjecting them to increased physical stress before they give up on a clutch of eggs. The rationale for managing the mute swan population in Ontario is based on concerns that mute swans displace other water birds and overgraze aquatic vegetation. However, there is a growing body of scientific research which challenges those concerns and provides evidence that mute swans do not outcompete other waterbirds and do not damage wetland ecosystems by overgrazing. The most recent Midsummer Mute Swan Survey found that the mute swan population from Humber Bay to Hamilton Harbour has decreased by 81 percent since 2011 (413 total birds in 2011 to 80 total birds in 2024). Many residents of Etobicoke-Lakeshore get a great deal of joy from the mute swans along our waterfront and waterways. They would like to see mating pairs experience a more natural life cycle where they lay eggs, hatch cygnets, and raise their young; activities which account for approximately 80 percent of the life of an adult swan. The recommendations below direct staff to review the non-mandatory Mute Swan Management Program and determine if a scoped adjustment, leaving some number of viable eggs in each nest located within the geographic area of Ward 3, is appropriate. It also requests that Environment Canada and Canadian Wildlife Service consider newer scientific research on the behaviours and environmental impacts of mute swans and re-evaluate the need for population control.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and relevant conservation groups and stakeholders, to assess the feasibility and effects of amending the Mute Swan Population Management Program in Ward 3, such that where Toronto and Region Conservation Authority undertakes egg management in Ward 3 parks and natural areas, some number of viable eggs are left in each impacted Mute Swan nest, and report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2027. 2. City Council request Environment Canada and Canadian Wildlife Service to further study the environmental impact of mute swans, including review of scientific research which challenges the basis for population management, and re-evaluate the need for the population control program.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and relevant conservation groups and stakeholders, to assess the feasibility and effects of amending the Mute Swan Population Management Program in Ward 3, such that where Toronto and Region Conservation Authority undertakes egg management in Ward 3 parks and natural areas, some number of viable eggs are left in each impacted Mute Swan nest, and report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2027. 2. City Council request that Environment Canada and Canadian Wildlife Service further study the environmental impact of mute swans, including review of scientific research which challenges the basis for population management, and re-evaluate the need for the population control program.
MM39.43
In recent months, many Toronto residents have gathered in peaceful demonstrations in solidarity with the people of Iran and in support of freedom, human dignity, and fundamental rights. These events reflect a deep and personal connection within Toronto's Iranian-Canadian community, many of whom have family, friends, and loved ones directly affected by the ongoing situation in Iran. The City has received requests from residents to recognize the Iranian-Canadian community by raising the historic Lion and Sun flag (Attachment 1). Neighbouring municipalities, including Aurora, Barrie, Richmond Hill, and Vaughan, have taken similar steps by raising Iran's historic flag with the Lion and Sun emblem. For many, this symbol represents Iran's cultural heritage and, increasingly, a shared expression of hope for a future grounded in freedom, human rights, and dignity. In recent years, this flag has been widely used by Iranians in Canada and around the world as a symbol of resistance to repression and a vision of Iran that reflects the will of its people. This request is about acknowledging Iranian-Canadians in Toronto, their identity, their lived experiences, and their aspirations. It reflects the voices of residents who do not feel represented by the current government in Iran and who wish to see their heritage and their hopes for freedom recognized in a meaningful and respectful way. This all takes place during a particularly tumultuous time for the Iranian community, and this symbolic gesture would offer comfort, recognition, and support to members of the Iranian diaspora in our city. For clarity, this recognition does not represent support for any foreign government, political movement, or position on international conflicts. The City of Toronto does not take positions on geopolitical matters. The City of Toronto also affirms our respect for International Law. This is a local gesture intended to recognize a community within our city. At the same time, this recognition affirms a principle that is deeply shared across our city: support for the universal values of freedom, human dignity, and human rights. For many Iranian-Canadians, the Lion and Sun flag has come to embody these aspirations, a peaceful expression of solidarity with those seeking a better future. Toronto is strengthened by its diversity. Iranian-Canadians are a valued part of our social, cultural, and economic fabric. Recognizing their community in this way affirms both who they are and the values that unite us as a city.
Member Motion MM39.43 was ruled out of order at City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas, recommends that: 1. City Council, despite the City of Toronto Flag Raising Policy, approve raising of the Lion and Sun flag (Attachment 1) at a courtesy flagpole at City Hall or North York Civic Centre on Saturday, March 28, or another date, in celebration of Nowruz and in solidarity with Iranian-Canadians and the humanitarian concerns expressed by the community.
MM39.44adopted
The owner of the lands municipally known as 2-20 Glazebrook Avenue and 391 Broadway Avenue (the "Subject Site"), applied to the Committee of Adjustment requesting variances from Site Specific By-law 109-2025(OLT), (Application Number A0447/25NY), including variances related to maximum height, maximum permitted gross floor area, minimum gross floor area for non-residential uses, maximum permitted lot coverage, and minimum required building setbacks (the "Application"). Site Specific By-law 109-2025(OLT) zones the subject property to permit a mixed-use building of 33 storeys (including 2 storeys of wrapped residential around the mechanical penthouse). The Application proposes to add an additional 4 storeys to the building, for a total height of 37 storeys, as well as proposing other built form changes and a reduction in the proposed retail space. Specifically, the Application proposes changes to the building height, podium massing, stepbacks, lot coverage, additional height projections for wind mitigation elements and technical revisions to balcony projections. The variances would result in an increased tower plate from 769 square metres to 825 square metres, as well as an increase gross floor area from 29,500 square metres to 31,967 square metres. Compared to the permissions in Site Specific By-law 109-2025, this would result in an increase from 428 units to 489 units. On February 5, 2026, the North York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved the requested variances, with conditions (Decision in Attachment 1). In its report dated January 30, 2026, Community Planning Staff acknowledged that heights have been approved within the Subject Site's Secondary Plan Character Area greater than 35 storeys, including the 46 storey approval at 1802 Bayview Avenue. It was Community Planning Staff's opinion that the additional storeys proposed would allow for intensification for a site near transit, while still maintaining the intent of the Secondary Plan policies by decreasing in height from the Station Area Core. Further, that the massing of the building including the floorplate, setbacks, stepbacks, ground floor configuration conforms to the Official Plan and the Yonge Eglinton Secondary Plan. (Staff Report in Attachment 2). This Motion will authorize and direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Decision, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, and to retain outside consultants, as necessary, in order to oppose the Decision. This Motion will also authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor's discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has appealed the Decision in order to preserve the City's statutory rights and requires instruction to appeal and attend the hearing for this matter.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to both appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 2 to 20 Glazebrook Avenue and 391 Broadway Avenue (Application A0447/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing with appropriate City Staff, to oppose the development proposed in Application A0447/25NY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a resolution regarding 2 to 20 Glazebrook Avenue and 391 Broadway Avenue (Application A0447/25NY) and authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to both appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding 2 to 20 Glazebrook Avenue and 391 Broadway Avenue (Application A0447/25NY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing with appropriate City Staff, to oppose the development proposed in Application A0447/25NY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a resolution regarding 2 to 20 Glazebrook Avenue and 391 Broadway Avenue (Application A0447/25NY) and authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
MM39.45adopted
Approximately 15,000 recycling receptacles (Blue Bins) are located in public spaces across the City of Toronto. Under the terms of the provincial takeover of Ontario's Blue Bin (paper and packaging recycling system), the materials deposited in these bins are no longer collected or processed as part of the Blue Bin recycling program. Instead, the contents are collected as solid waste and combined with garbage for disposal in landfill sites. Toronto also has high contamination rates in these receptacles, which means recycling rates in public bins have long been reduced in our city. This disconnects between public perception and operational reality undermines trust and transparency. Many residents reasonably believe that putting their recyclables into Blue Bins and receptacles labelled as recycling in public spaces contributes to waste diversion and environmental protection. If those materials are instead disposed of as garbage, the continued presence of recycling infrastructure in these spaces may mislead the public and may undermine support for recycling and the circular economy more generally. In addition, substantial quantities of valuable and genuinely recyclable materials (such as aluminum cans and PET bottles) will go to landfill instead of being reused. Accordingly, this Motion requests that Council direct the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services to explore cost-effective options for restoring targeted recycling in public places, or whether to remove all recycling infrastructure from public spaces in the interest of transparent and truthful waste collection practices. It further requests that the City advocate to the Province of Ontario for practical ways to better manage Blue Box materials when people are away from home, to boost recycling and reduce litter.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in coordination with the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services in their analysis for bin procurement to replace Astral bins, to consider procurement of litter-only bins with no recycling infrastructure, instead transitioning to a 'carry-in, carry-out' model that encourages users to take their recyclables home with a report back to the appropriate committee when the plan for bin procurement is reported back. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in 2027 with an updated strategy for public space recycling and food packaging litter reduction in Toronto, including the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of one or more of: a. targeted receptacles in high-traffic locations that accept only valuable and genuinely recyclable materials (e.g., aluminum cans and PET bottles), such as reverse vending machines or smart-bin technology; b. incentive Programs successfully utilized in other jurisdictions; and c. other options that will reduce litter and landfilling of food packaging, including those identified in the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks 2019 Discussion Paper on Reducing Litter and Waste in our Communities . 3. City Council request the Provincial Government to: a. re-introduce public space recycling obligations within O. Reg 391/21: Blue Box; and b. require retail establishments to: i. allow consumers to de-package products onsite upon purchase, and ii. deliver any Blue Bin materials from that packaging into the provincially-mandated Blue Bin recycling system.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council request the City Manager, in coordination with the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services in their analysis for bin procurement to replace Astral bins, to consider procurement of litter-only bins with no recycling infrastructure, instead transitioning to a 'carry-in, carry-out' model that encourages users to take their recyclables home with a report back to the appropriate committee when the plan for bin procurement is reported back. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in 2027 with an updated strategy for public space recycling and food packaging litter reduction in Toronto, including the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of one or more of: a. targeted receptacles in high-traffic locations that accept only valuable and genuinely recyclable materials (e.g., aluminum cans and PET bottles), such as reverse vending machines or smart-bin technology; b. incentive Programs successfully utilized in other jurisdictions; and c. other options that will reduce litter and landfilling of food packaging, including those identified in the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks 2019 Discussion Paper on Reducing Litter and Waste in our Communities . 3. City Council request the Provincial Government to: a. re-introducing public space recycling obligations within O. Reg 391/21: Blue Box; and b. requiring retail establishments to: i. allow consumers to de-package products onsite upon purchase, and ii. deliver the any Blue Bin materials from that packaging into the provincially-mandated Blue Bin recycling system.
MM39.46adopted
There was a drafting error in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Request for Directions Report dated December 8, 2025. Recommendation 3 mistakenly referenced the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, rather than the General Manager, Children's Services. Requires Re-opening: City Council Item 2025.CC35.19 (December 16 and 17, 2025 Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Part 3 of the instructions to staff.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.CC35.19 by deleting the words "the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration" in Part 3 of the instructions to staff and replacing them with the words "the General Manager, Children's Services", so that Part 3 now reads as follows: 3. City Council allow the owner to design, construct, finish, furnish, equip and convey to the City, at the Owner's expense, a minimum 929 square metres child care facility, with a minimum 279 square metres outdoor area, ("Child Care Facility") to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the General Manager, Children's Services, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the City Solicitor, as part of the development, as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act, in accordance with the terms set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (December 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.CC35.19 by deleting the words "the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration" in Part 3 of the instructions to staff and replacing them with the words "the General Manager, Children's Services", so that Part 3 now reads as follows: 3. City Council allow the owner to design, construct, finish, furnish, equip and convey to the City, at the Owner's expense, a minimum 929 square metres child care facility, with a minimum 279 square metres outdoor area, ("Child Care Facility") to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the General Manager, Children's Services, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the City Solicitor, as part of the development, as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act, in accordance with the terms set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (December 8, 2025) from the City Solicitor.
MM39.47adopted
As Artificial Intelligence becomes an increasingly prevalent force in global industry and our day-to-day lives, we must navigate the technical and infrastructure requirements that makes the use of this technology possible. The location and servicing of Artificial Intelligence data centres is one such consideration - and it is one that is a growing concern in our communities. There are good data sovereignty reasons to want Canadian data managed in Canada, and the many data-reliant Canadian businesses headquartered in Toronto have good reasons to want their data managed here. At the same time, Artificial Intelligence data centres may put a significant strain on power grids, driving up the cost of electricity for all users, displacing other valued uses of electricity, and increasing climate pollution from electricity generation. They may also use large quantities of potable water and climate-warming chemicals for cooling purposes, and trigger costly fires. These extensive resource requirements could adversely affect municipal infrastructure, increase costs for Torontonians, and worsen climate damage. Residents have questions about how Toronto plans to manage proposed Artificial Intelligence data centres while maintaining energy, water and infrastructure capacity for the essential functions of our city and their day-to-day lives, as well as balance these proposals with our broader affordability, environmental and climate goals. These questions are particularly challenging in relation to Artificial Intelligence data centres that can be established as-of-right - that is, without a public process by which residents can raise questions or concerns.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, along with other relevant divisions and in consultation with Toronto Hydro, to report to the Planning and Housing Committee in the first half of 2027, on the subject of new Artificial Intelligence data centres in the City of Toronto, addressing the following: a. a general overview of the land-use compatibility considerations and zoning by-law requirements that apply to such projects; b. processes in place to address impacts relating to grid capacity and water usage, among other environmental, energy and affordability impacts, resulting from their existence within the City of Toronto; c. information on the current regulatory environment for Artificial Intelligence data centres at the federal, provincial and municipal orders of government, as well as any updates following recent legislative changes; and d. recommendations for improvements, if any, to municipal review processes and regulatory frameworks around Artificial Intelligence data centres to ensure Toronto's environmental, climate, infrastructural, energy and affordability priorities are protected.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, along with other relevant divisions and in consultation with Toronto Hydro, to report to the Planning and Housing Committee in the first half of 2027, on the subject of new Artificial Intelligence data centres in the City of Toronto, addressing the following: a. a general overview of the land-use compatibility considerations and zoning by-law requirements that apply to such projects; b. processes in place to address impacts relating to grid capacity and water usage, among other environmental, energy and affordability impacts, resulting from their existence within the City of Toronto; c. information on the current regulatory environment for Artificial Intelligence data centres at the federal, provincial and municipal orders of government, as well as any updates following recent legislative changes; and d. recommendations for improvements, if any, to municipal review processes and regulatory frameworks around Artificial Intelligence data centres to ensure Toronto's environmental, climate, infrastructural, energy and affordability priorities are protected.
MM39.48adopted
At the time of the original settlement, the Section 37 agreement for 1141 Bloor Street West, 980 Dufferin Street, and 90 Croatia Street included the construction of a below-grade pedestrian tunnel connecting the development to Dufferin Station. Since that agreement was finalized, construction costs associated with the tunnel have escalated significantly. Given these cost increases, it is prudent to reassess whether the tunnel continues to represent the best value for the City. This motion directs staff to report back with an option that would allow the City to accept a cash contribution in lieu of the applicant constructing the tunnel, enabling the City to allocate those funds to other important community priorities.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Housing Development Office to, upon conveyance of Block F to the City, bring forward a City-initiated Zoning By-law Amendment to amend Schedule A of Site-Specific By-law 700-2021 (Ontario Land Tribunal) to require either: a. the provision of the Toronto Transit Commission Below-Grade Connection identified in Paragraphs 18 to 21 in Schedule A; or b. an additional financial contribution, with a minimum amount to be specified in the Zoning By-law Amendment, with indexing provisions, satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review, the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, and the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management, that will be directed towards: 1. the provision of Affordable Housing in the local ward satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Development Office and Executive Director, Development Review; and/or 2. capital improvements to the Dufferin Subway Station, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management and the Toronto Transit Commission, with the selection to be at the City's sole discretion.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Housing Development Office to, upon conveyance of Block F to the City, bring forward a City-initiated Zoning By-law Amendment to amend Schedule A of Site-Specific By-law 700-2021 (Ontario Land Tribunal) to require either: a. the provision of the Toronto Transit Commission Below-Grade Connection identified in Paragraphs 18 to 21 in Schedule A; or b. an additional financial contribution, with a minimum amount to be specified in the Zoning By-law Amendment, with indexing provisions, satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review, the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, and the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management, that will be directed towards: 1. the provision of Affordable Housing in the local ward satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Development Office and Executive Director, Development Review; and/or 2. capital improvements to the Dufferin Subway Station, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management and the Toronto Transit Commission, with the selection to be at the City's sole discretion.
MM39.49adopted
On February 24, 2026, a contractor operating under a Cut Permit that was submitted by Toronto Water (Permit Number 1032408001) closed a section of Dupont Street, a major arterial road in Ward 9 - Davenport, from all vehicle traffic for water and sewer connection work. This closure continued until the afternoon of Friday, February 27, with no cars, trucks, or Toronto Transit Commission buses able to traverse Dupont Street from Edwin Avenue to Franklin Avenue. Toronto Water and Transportation Services provided no notice to the Ward 9 Councillor's office of this significant road closure. The Divisions also did not properly notify the Toronto Transit Commission, which had to implement alternate routing for the 26 Dupont bus that operates on this road. Local businesses on this section of Dupont reached out to the Councillor's office to confirm that they, along with nearby residents, received no notice of this work. A four-day road closure in the middle of the week with no advance notice had a significant impact, particularly on local businesses who lost revenue as a result, and would have closed operations for the affected days if they had received proper notice. Under the Standard Conditions outlined in the Cut Permit, section A, the "Applicant/Contractor must notify affected residents and businesses/Business Improvement Area (BIA) about the construction work minimum of 48 hrs prior to construction." Additionally, under section E, "a sign identifying the name of the company owning the work, the contractor undertaking the work and 24-hour contact phone number(s) shall be prominently displayed at the work site for any work which has a duration of 48 hours or longer." Toronto Water has confirmed that neither of the above conditions were met. There continues to be ambiguity about who is responsible for overseeing that permit conditions are satisfied, including required notice periods, and whether this responsibility falls directly to the permit applicant (Toronto Water) or to the Transportation Services Division, through the Work Zone Coordinator roles.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1.City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to work with the Chief Congestion Officer and the Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, the General Manager, Toronto Water, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to develop and implement a clear accountability framework to ensure that going forward all Standard Conditions of any permits issued are fully complied with by any contracted parties; and that for any major road or intersection closures, this framework should establish a single point of contact for coordinating communications with the local Councillors' offices and the public regarding these works; and to report back through the Annual Strategic Capital Coordination Report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee at the appropriate meeting, outlining the details of the accountability framework and its implementation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher recommends that: 1.City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to work with the Chief Congestion Officer and the Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, the General Manager, Toronto Water, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to develop and implement a clear accountability framework to ensure that going forward all Standard Conditions of any permits issued are fully complied with by any contracted parties; and that for any major road or intersection closures, this framework should establish a single point of contact for coordinating communications with the local Councillors' offices and the public regarding these works; and to report back through the Annual Strategic Capital Coordination Report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee at the appropriate meeting, outlining the details of the accountability framework and its implementation.
MM39.50amended
The Toronto Transit Commission continues to experience one of the slowest transit recoveries in Canada, with ridership hovering around 80 percent of 2019 levels. Four in 10 Torontonians say they do not feel safe on transit, and many residents are choosing to ride less frequently or avoid the system altogether. These public safety concerns are particularly acute on the subway, as stations are too often experienced as neglected public spaces with a lack of visible enforcement. Toronto's subway system should be a place where residents and visitors can travel without fear, day or night. It should also be a place where Toronto Transit Commission workers feel safe from harassment and violence, not just in principle, but in practice as well. City Hall must demonstrate a true commitment to improving public safety and restoring public confidence across the subway system. This motion proposes comprehensive and immediate action to address serious gaps in existing services, including developing a plan with Toronto Police Services to deploy police officers in all subway stations; a firm commitment to beginning the installation of platform edge doors at priority stations, which would improve reliability and safety; improved station cleanliness and lighting standards and public compliance reporting to ensure accountability; safety design audits for all subway stations across the network; and zero tolerance for the harassment of Toronto Transit Commission drivers and other staff members.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Toronto Police Service board, in consultation with the City Manager and the Toronto Transit Commission board, and having regard for the Memorandum of Understanding with the Toronto Transit Commission, including how responsibilities are shared with Special Constables and crisis services, to develop a plan to deploy uniformed police officers across all subway stations, including cost estimates and staffing considerations, as part of the 2027 budget process. 2. City Council request the Toronto Police Service board to include the report on the creation of a Safe Toronto Transit Commission Strategy requested in Item 2025.CC33.1 in the report requested above. 3. City Council declare its commitment to beginning construction of platform edge doors across the Toronto Transit Commission subway system, with a mandate to commence construction on a multi-station pilot project no later than the fourth quarter in 2027. 4. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in partnership with the City Manager, to develop a funded plan covering the first 10 years of implementation of platform edge doors (including a multi-station pilot, Line 1 high-priority stations and the Bloor-Yonge Capacity Improvements project), and report back to City Council as part of the 2027 budget process. 5. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to publish updated cleanliness standards for all subway stations and publicly report on station-level performance, no later than the first quarter in 2027. 6. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report on a single network-wide lighting standard for vehicles, entrances, stairways, concourses, and platforms, including clear maintenance response standards. 7. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in consultation with the local City Councillors, Toronto Police Service, local Business Improvement Areas and residents associations, to undertake safety design audits of all subway stations that evaluate the physical environment, including lighting conditions, from the perspective of both crime prevention and public perceptions of safety, and report back to City Council no later than the third quarter in 2027. 8. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in consultation with the City Manager and the City Solicitor, to review the implications of implementing a one-year ban on any riders that harass or assault Toronto Transit Commission drivers and other staff members, and report back no later than the first quarter in 2027.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Toronto Police Service board, in consultation with the City Manager and the Toronto Transit Commission board, to develop a plan to deploy uniformed police officers across all subway stations, including cost estimates and staffing considerations, as part of the 2027 budget process. 2. City Council request the Toronto Police Service board to include the report on the creation of a Safe Toronto Transit Commission Strategy requested in Item 2025.CC33.1 in the report requested above. 3. City Council declare its commitment to beginning construction of platform edge doors across the Toronto Transit Commission subway system, with a mandate to commence construction on a multi-station pilot project no later than the fourth quarter in 2027. 4. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in partnership with the City Manager, to develop a funded plan covering the first 10 years of implementation of platform edge doors (including a multi-station pilot, Line 1 high-priority stations and the Bloor-Yonge Capacity Improvements project), and report back to City Council as part of the 2027 budget process. 5. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to publish updated cleanliness standards for all subway stations and publicly report on station-level performance, no later than the first quarter in 2027. 6. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report on a single network-wide lighting standard for vehicles, entrances, stairways, concourses, and platforms, including clear maintenance response standards. 7. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in consultation with the local City Councillors, Toronto Police Service, local Business Improvement Areas and residents associations, to undertake safety design audits of all subway stations that evaluate the physical environment, including lighting conditions, from the perspective of both crime prevention and public perceptions of safety, and report back to City Council no later than the third quarter in 2027. 8. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, in consultation with the City Manager and the City Solicitor, to review the implications of implementing a one-year ban on any riders that harass or assault Toronto Transit Commission drivers and other staff members, and report back no later than the first quarter in 2027.
MM39.51adopted
The Rebuilding Ontario Place Act (ROPA) will have significant implications for Toronto, and we have one last opportunity to fight it at the Supreme Court. This is not just about saving our waterfront. It's about protecting the rule of law in our city and province. This legislation is a direct threat to our democracy - stripping away the public's rights, eliminating transparency, and shielding government decisions from legal accountability. The Rebuilding Ontario Place Act immunizes the government from any "remedy in contract, restitution, tort, misfeasance, bad faith, trust or fiduciary obligation, any equitable remedy or any remedy under any statute". This is part of a larger pattern of the Ford government protecting itself from accountability for the decisions that they make which benefit themselves and their friends contrary to the public interest. The Rebuilding Ontario Place Ac also exempts the government from any responsibilities under the Environmental Assessment Act, which many suspect would reveal catastrophic impacts not only on the natural environment but also on infrastructure and traffic. For years, Doug Ford has been testing the boundaries of our democracy, including most recently announcing that he plans to exempt himself from Freedom of Information laws. This bill, if allowed to stand, will set a dangerous precedent - permitting the Premier to put his own interests ahead of the public good. Torontonians deserve to be represented in this case. And when residents are willing to show leadership for our city's interests, they deserve to know that City Hall has their backs.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring a motion seeking leave to intervene in the appeal of Ontario Place Protectors v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario and Attorney General of Ontario, case number 41805, before the Supreme Court of Canada, and to intervene in the appeal if granted leave by the Court.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring a motion seeking leave to intervene in the appeal of Ontario Place Protectors v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario and Attorney General of Ontario, case number 41805, before the Supreme Court of Canada, and to intervene in the appeal if granted leave by the Court.
MM39.52adopted
At its meeting on March 26 and 27, 2025, City Council, via Member Motion 2025.MM28.1 , authorized the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, among others, to enter into and execute on behalf of the City a Construction Management Agreement with the owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue for securing, designing and constructing a new Indigenous-themed park at 819 Yonge Street. City staff have become aware that a portion of the lands previously assumed to be part of the 819 Yonge Street lands are City-owned lands at 876 Church Street under the jurisdiction of Corporate Real Estate Management. Parks and Recreation staff have begun the process to have these lands jurisdictionally transferred from Corporate Real Estate Management to Parks and Recreation. This Motion seeks authority from City Council to include the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street in the Construction Management Agreement to be entered with the Owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue ('Greybrook') for the design and construction of a future park at 819 Yonge Street. This future park will expand the public open space network in the Bloor-Yorkville neighbourhood, and celebrate the intersection of Yonge Street and the historic portage trail. This matter is urgent because the agreement must be finalized with Greybrook before detailed design work can commence on the future park. Requires Re-opening: City Council Item 2025.MM28.1 (March 26 and 27, 2025 Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Parts 2, 3 and 8 of the decision.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1.City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM28.1 by: a. amending Part 2 by adding to the end the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street", so that it reads as follows: 2. Notwithstanding Municipal Code 415-25, City Council authorize all required parkland dedication cash-in-lieu funds collected for 717 Church Street, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, be allocated to the new park at 819 Yonge Street and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street. b. amending Part 3 by deleting the words "Section 42 and cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication monies" and replacing them with "cash-in-lieu monies"; adding the words "of the lands at 819 Yonge Street" after the word "acquisition"; and adding the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street" after words "Member Motion MM28.1", so that it now reads as follows: 3. City Council direct that the cash-in-lieu monies collected from the development at 717 Church Street to reimburse the owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue for the acquisition of the lands at 819 Yonge Street, and for the design, and construction of a new park at 819 Yonge Street as listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to Member Motion MM28.1, and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street; c. amending Part 8 by adding the words "the lands at 819 Yonge Street" after the word "securing"; adding the words "a new park" after the words "designing and constructing"; and adding the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street" after the words "at 819 Yonge Street", so that it now reads as follows: 8. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to enter into and execute on behalf of the City a Construction Management Agreement with the owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue for securing the lands at 819 Yonge Street, and for designing and constructing a new park at 819 Yonge Street and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street, on terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, the Executive Director, Development and Review Division, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and in accordance with City policies applicable to capital projects.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1.City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM28.1 by: a. amending Part 2 by adding to the end the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street", so that it reads as follows: 2. Notwithstanding Municipal Code 415-25, City Council authorize all required parkland dedication cash-in-lieu funds collected for 717 Church Street, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, be allocated to the new park at 819 Yonge Street and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street. b. amending Part 3 by deleting the words "Section 42 and cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication monies" and replacing them with "cash-in-lieu monies"; adding the words "of the lands at 819 Yonge Street" after the word "acquisition"; and adding the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street" after words "Member Motion MM28.1", so that it now reads as follows: 3. City Council direct that the cash-in-lieu monies collected from the development at 717 Church Street to reimburse the owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue for the acquisition of the lands at 819 Yonge Street, and for the design, and construction of a new park at 819 Yonge Street as listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to Member Motion MM28.1, and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street; c. amending Part 8 by adding the words "the lands at 819 Yonge Street" after the word "securing"; adding the words "a new park" after the words "designing and constructing"; and adding the words "and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street" after the words "at 819 Yonge Street", so that it now reads as follows: 8. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to enter into and execute on behalf of the City a Construction Management Agreement with the owner of 148 Yorkville Avenue for securing the lands at 819 Yonge Street, and for designing and constructing a new park at 819 Yonge Street and the City-owned lands at 876 Church Street, on terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, the Executive Director, Development and Review Division, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and in accordance with City policies applicable to capital projects.
MM39.53adopted
Chinatown is an important part of Toronto's cultural landscape, serving people across Toronto and attracting large numbers of visitors, both tourists and local residents. Toronto's first Chinatown was largely displaced through expropriation for today's City Hall. Many displaced residents and businesses moved to what is now Toronto's West Chinatown, centred on Dundas Street between McCaul and Spadina and on Spadina Avenue between College and Queen. This area is home to the highest concentration of Chinatown societies and legacy businesses that originate from the Canadian Chinese Exclusion Act and head tax era. Chinatown later evolved with major waves of immigration from Southeast Asia, including Indochinese Designated Class refugees. Today, many diasporic East and Southeast Asian Toronto subcultures make their home in Chinatown - creating a distinct Chinatown identity and Asian-Canadian cultural experience found nowhere else. Many local Chinese and Indochinese-owned and -operated businesses in Chinatown are fighting a battle against the potential loss of the character, identity and roots of their neighbourhood. As owners age, commercial and residential rents rise, and developers buy up land, a growing number of much-loved community institutions, Chinatown societies, and small businesses have shuttered their doors. In addition, many Chinatown elders, carriers of community traditions and practices, have quietly moved away seeking lower rents. Community groups and projects such as the Toronto Chinatown Land Trust have therefore formed to stand with local businesses and residents to preserve what they love in Chinatown. Without a City of Toronto sustainability plan, our Chinatown could wither away. This motion is based on Council's precedent for the protection of minority cultural districts in 2020.MM24.36, Supporting Black-Owned and Operated Businesses and Preserving the Cultural Heritage of Eglinton Avenue West's "Little Jamaica".
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Government of Ontario to introduce rent control legislation for commercial units in Chinatown to protect small local businesses from unfair increases to their rent. 2. City Council request the Government of Ontario to require property owners in Chinatown to provide local and independently owned and operated businesses with a first right to rent retail spaces upon transfer of land. 3. City Council request the Government of Ontario to require property owners in Chinatown to provide current tenants a 15-day first right to offer to purchase residential and/or retail spaces which are offered for sale. 4.City Council recognize West Chinatown and the remaining strip of First Chinatown as the Chinatown Cultural District, an area of cultural significance and importance to the City of Toronto. 5. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Development Review, to consider additional resources necessary as part of the 2027 Budget to prepare a draft Cultural District Plan for Chinatown. 6. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Planner, City Planning and Executive Director, Development Review and community partners, to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee in 2027 on the progress of the comprehensive Cultural District Plan for Chinatown, along with consideration of any additional resources required to complete and implement a plan that: a. integrates Planning and Cultural Heritage planning elements including, alignment with existing planning studies, identifies heritage assets (e.g., community institutions, legacy businesses) and commemorates the contribution of Chinatown societies and associations; b. advances economic vitality and supports the sustainability of culturally significant businesses; c. enhances public realm and community use by expanding culturally relevant programming and partnerships as appropriate; d. identifies short-, medium- and long-term implementation actions and explores public and private partnerships and funding opportunities; e. reviews opportunities to make space for street vending as part of Chinatown's cultural heritage practices; f. identifies and commemorates the rich history and contributions of Toronto's Chinatown Societies, often referred to as Clan or Family Associations; g. identifies opportunities to work with community members and organizations such as Cecil Community Centre, University Settlement, Scadding Court Community Centre, the Toronto Chinatown Land Trust, and the Chinatown Business Improvement Area to expand culturally focused events and initiatives that celebrate Chinatown's cultural heritage; h. clarifies culturally accessible practices for city-led consultations in the Chinatown Cultural District, including multilingual signage, interpretation, and criteria for honorariums; and i. requires city staff working in the Chinatown Cultural District to be informed of the historical discrimination and subsequent redress policies that created Canada's Chinatowns, including Chinatown's migrant workers' history and past displacements. 7. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to accept this motion as a nomination for a Neighbourhood Streets Plan, in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, the Toronto Parking Authority, and the local community that: a. enhances pedestrian, cycling and transit access with a focus on reducing automobile dependency, and the unique needs of senior cyclists in Chinatown; b. considers how to accommodate delivery e-bikes in Chinatown, recognizing that they provide critical revenue for small food businesses, and seeking urban design solutions that protect delivery gig workers as well as other pedestrians and cyclists; c. addresses existing and future commercial loading and parking needs, and d. aligns with the new Cultural District Plan and Retail Strategy. 8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to develop culturally appropriate education and awareness resources to support multi-tenant housing operators in Chinatown to come into compliance with multi-tenant housing standards. 9. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors to give a high priority to completing planned safety and other upgrades to the Chinatown (Larch Street) parking garage in 2026.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik recommends that: 1. City Council request the Government of Ontario to introduce rent control legislation for commercial units in Chinatown to protect small local businesses from unfair increases to their rent. 2. City Council request the Government of Ontario to require property owners in Chinatown to provide local and independently owned and operated businesses with a first right to rent retail spaces upon transfer of land. 3. City Council request the Government of Ontario to require property owners in Chinatown to provide current tenants a 15-day first right to offer to purchase residential and/or retail spaces which are offered for sale. 4.City Council recognize West Chinatown and the remaining strip of First Chinatown as the Chinatown Cultural District, an area of cultural significance and importance to the City of Toronto. 5. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Development Review, to consider additional resources necessary as part of the 2027 Budget to prepare a draft Cultural District Plan for Chinatown. 6. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Planner, City Planning and Executive Director, Development Review and community partners, to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee in 2027 on the progress of the comprehensive Cultural District Plan for Chinatown, along with consideration of any additional resources required to complete and implement a plan that: a. integrates Planning and Cultural Heritage planning elements including, alignment with existing planning studies, identifies heritage assets (e.g., community institutions, legacy businesses) and commemorates the contribution of Chinatown societies and associations; b. advances economic vitality and supports the sustainability of culturally significant businesses; c. enhances public realm and community use by expanding culturally relevant programming and partnerships as appropriate; d. identifies short-, medium- and long-term implementation actions and explores public and private partnerships and funding opportunities; e. reviews opportunities to make space for street vending as part of Chinatown's cultural heritage practices; f. identifies and commemorates the rich history and contributions of Toronto's Chinatown Societies, often referred to as Clan or Family Associations; g. identifies opportunities to work with community members and organizations such as Cecil Community Centre, University Settlement, Scadding Court Community Centre, the Toronto Chinatown Land Trust, and the Chinatown Business Improvement Area to expand culturally focused events and initiatives that celebrate Chinatown's cultural heritage; h. clarifies culturally accessible practices for city-led consultations in the Chinatown Cultural District, including multilingual signage, interpretation, and criteria for honorariums; and i. requires city staff working in the Chinatown Cultural District to be informed of the historical discrimination and subsequent redress policies that created Canada's Chinatowns, including Chinatown's migrant workers' history and past displacements. 7. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to accept this motion as a nomination for a Neighbourhood Streets Plan, in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, the Toronto Parking Authority, and the local community that: a. enhances pedestrian, cycling and transit access with a focus on reducing automobile dependency, and the unique needs of senior cyclists in Chinatown; b. considers how to accommodate delivery e-bikes in Chinatown, recognizing that they provide critical revenue for small food businesses, and seeking urban design solutions that protect delivery gig workers as well as other pedestrians and cyclists; c. addresses existing and future commercial loading and parking needs, and d. aligns with the new Cultural District Plan and Retail Strategy. 8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to develop culturally appropriate education and awareness resources to support multi-tenant housing operators in Chinatown to come into compliance with multi-tenant housing standards. 9. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors to give a high priority to completing planned safety and other upgrades to the Chinatown (Larch Street) parking garage in 2026.
MM39.54adopted
Toronto is getting new, faster, higher capacity, electric ferries to make the trip to Toronto Island Park even better. A naming process for the two new ferries entering service in 2027 is underway. A shortlist of names is being put to a public vote, with a decision coming in May 2026. This process is considering non-commemorative names. This motion requests staff to report back on a commemorative naming process for future ferries purchased by the City of Toronto.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Fleet Services to report back to the Executive Committee by the fourth quarter in 2027 on a commemorative naming process for future ferries purchased by the City of Toronto, in consultation with the local Councillor, consistent with the City of Toronto Property Naming Policy.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Fleet Services to report back to the Executive Committee by the fourth quarter in 2027 on a commemorative naming process for future ferries purchased by the City of Toronto, in consultation with the local Councillor, consistent with the City of Toronto Property Naming Policy.
MM39.55adopted
The City-owned building at 641 Eglinton Avenue West is a former Fire Hall most recently used by Metrolinx in the construction of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit. Toronto Fire Fighters Charities Incorporated, the charitable arm of the Toronto Fire Fighters Union, has expressed interest in utilizing the space at 641 Eglinton Avenue West to provide a 'Home Away Program' for burn victims receiving treatment at Sunnybrook or The Hospital for Sick Children. Though 2024.MM24.16, Council approved direction to the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Toronto Fire Fighters Charities Inc. to lease 641 Eglinton Avenue West at a nominal cost for the "Home away Program" for rehabilitation and heritage conservation work at City-owned 641 Eglinton Avenue (former Fire Station 135, 1932) so it may be used to provide accommodations for burn and trauma survivors and their families. This motion authorizes the release of funds to Corporate Real Estate Management for rehabilitation and heritage conservation work at City-owned 641 Eglinton Avenue to create a Burn Victim Care Centre.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director of Corporate Real Estate Management to include a funding requirement of $2 million gross and $0 debt in the 2027 Capital Budget submission, fully funded from Section 37 funds obtained from the following developments in the following amounts: a. $1,651,027.12 from 859, 861, and 875 Eglinton Avenue West and 2020 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701174) b. $348,972.88 from 39, 41 Roehampton Avenue and 50 Eglinton Ave East (Source Account: XR3026-3701067) for rehabilitation and heritage conservation work at City-owned 641 Eglinton Avenue to create a Burn Victim Care Centre.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos-Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director of Corporate Real Estate Management to include a funding requirement of $2 million gross and $0 debt in the 2027 Capital Budget submission, fully funded from Section 37 funds obtained from the following developments in the following amounts: a. $1,651,027.12 from 859, 861, and 875 Eglinton Avenue West and 2020 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701174) b. $348,972.88 from 39, 41 Roehampton Avenue and 50 Eglinton Ave East (Source Account: XR3026-3701067) for rehabilitation and heritage conservation work at City-owned 641 Eglinton Avenue to create a Burn Victim Care Centre.
MM39.56adopted
Over the past 15 years, the construction of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit has had devastating impacts on communities and businesses along the Eglinton West corridor, including small businesses in the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Oakwood Village Business Improvement Area, Little Jamaica Business Improvement Area, Upper Village Business Improvement Area, The Eglinton Way Business Improvement Area, and Mt. Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area. Despite promises of consultation and community engagement, Metrolinx has failed to meaningfully involve communities and Business Improvement Areas in decisions about station design and cultural representation along the corridor, particularly failing to represent the cultural heritage of the Little Jamaica community in any Light Rail Transit stations. This motion calls on Metrolinx to establish a Cultural Placemaking and Public Art Plan specifically focused on protecting and promoting the cultural heritage of Little Jamaica and other neighborhoods of historical significance in Light Rail Transit stations along the corridor. It requests the creation of a Little Jamaica advisory committee to ensure the community has a direct role in co-designing the themes and heritage elements. In addition, this motion asks Metrolinx to explore free digital ad space for local businesses in the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Oakwood Village Business Improvement Area, Little Jamaica Business Improvement Area, Upper Village Business Improvement Area, The Eglinton Way Business Improvement Area, and Mt. Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area within all Light Rail Transit stations as a concrete way to support their economic recovery. This motion also requests an update on 2018.MM44.80, 1603 Eglinton Avenue West - Release of Section 37 Funds from the Development for Community Benefit and Public Art Projects , which allocated $200,000 for the purpose of forwarding funds to Metrolinx to fund the production and installation of a Reggae Lane Mural reproduction in the Oakwood Light Rail Transit station in collaboration with artist Adrian Hayes. For years, Metrolinx has failed to share updates on the status of this initiative. This motion seeks to center the community's voice in decisions made about how their neighborhood is represented and how they can benefit from the new transit infrastructure, while also being better represented in any placemaking and public art initiatives.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request Metrolinx to establish a Cultural Placemaking and Public Art Plan to protect and promote the cultural heritage of Little Jamaica and other neighborhoods of historical significance along the Eglinton West corridor in specific Eglinton Light Rail Transit stations. 2. City Council request Metrolinx to establish a Little Jamaica advisory committee comprising local business owners, Business Improvement Areas, residents across the corridor, and representatives from the African, Black and Caribbean communities to co-design the themes and heritage elements. 3. City Council request Metrolinx to explore including free digital ads in specific Eglinton Light Rail Transit stations for local businesses in the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Oakwood Village Business Improvement Area, Little Jamaica Business Improvement Area, Upper Village Business Improvement Area, The Eglinton Way Business Improvement Area, and Mt. Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area. 4. City Council request Metrolinx to provide an update on the status of the Reggae Lane Mural reproduction in the Oakwood Light Rail Transit station in collaboration with artist Adrian Hayes.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council request Metrolinx to establish a Cultural Placemaking and Public Art Plan to protect and promote the cultural heritage of Little Jamaica and other neighborhoods of historical significance along the Eglinton West corridor in specific Eglinton Light Rail Transit stations. 2. City Council request Metrolinx to establish a Little Jamaica advisory committee comprising local business owners, Business Improvement Areas, residents across the corridor, and representatives from the African, Black and Caribbean communities to co-design the themes and heritage elements. 3. City Council request Metrolinx to explore including free digital ads in specific Eglinton Light Rail Transit stations for local businesses in the Mount Dennis Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Oakwood Village Business Improvement Area, Little Jamaica Business Improvement Area, Upper Village Business Improvement Area, The Eglinton Way Business Improvement Area, and Mt. Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area. 4. City Council request Metrolinx to provide an update on the status of the Reggae Lane Mural reproduction in the Oakwood Light Rail Transit station in collaboration with artist Adrian Hayes.
MM39.57adopted
On February 5, 1981, 309 people were arrested in the Bathhouse Raids, a landmark moment in Canada's 2SLGBTQ+ civil rights movement. 200 police officers - some with crowbars and sledgehammers - raided the Barracks, the Club, Richmond Street Health Emporium, and Romans II Health and Recreation Spa, arresting owners, staff, and guests. Officers used violence and homophobic insults during the raids, which were the largest mass arrest in the city's history at the time. The men who were arrested were criminally charged with operating or visiting a "bawdy house", a place defined by law as housing "acts of indecency." At the time, gay people faced prejudice and discrimination in Canada. Being publicly outed could mean loss of employment, damage to personal relationships, or other serious consequences. In response, the gay community - with allies including feminist and Black activists, labour organizations, and civil liberties groups - rallied protests. On February 6, 1981, 3,000 people marched on Toronto Police 52 Division and Queen's Park. Former Toronto mayor John Sewell and community leaders like George Hislop (who was also a defendant) gave their support. The Right to Privacy Committee, created after an earlier raid, advised and gave financial support to those arrested. Most successfully defended their charges in court, but some were convicted. The raids damaged the relationship with the queer community, friction that continues over four decades later.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 333 Bloor Street East, 1 Mount Pleasant Road, 575 and 577 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026 - 3700137), secured for the production and installation of a heritage plaque at 231 Mutual Street to recognize the Bathhouse raids (Cost Centre: HG0001).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 333 Bloor Street East, 1 Mount Pleasant Road, 575 and 577 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026 - 3700137), secured for the production and installation of a heritage plaque at 231 Mutual Street to recognize the Bathhouse raids (Cost Centre: HG0001).
MM39.58amended
On May 10, 11 and 12, 2023, City Council adopted an amendment to zoning by-law 569-2013, to permit three buildings of 11, 39 and 44 storeys containing 1,099 square metres of retail, 15,206 square metres of office and 1,094 dwelling units, retention of existing heritage rowhouses, an east-west mid-block connection and a 581 square metre public park at 49 Ontario Street and 72-94 Berkeley Street (the "Site"). ( Agenda Item History - 2023.TE4.12 ) At the time of the application, the proposed tenure for the residential units was not specified. The Owner of the Site has committed to provide the residential units as rental units through the City's Rental Housing Supply Program and Purpose-Built Rental Incentives Stream and include approximately 246 affordable units. The change to secured rental housing required 74 square metres of the previously secured 581 square metre public park along Berkeley Street to be secured as an in-kind community benefit pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act while still retaining 507 square metres of statutory parkland dedication requirement pursuant of Section 42 of the Planning Act ( Agenda Item History - 2025.MM31.29 ). The Owner has proposed converting the approved low-rise building into additional parkland, which would result in a 689.4 square metre expansion of the parkland secured on the Site. Provided that the entire parkland expansion proceeds, the Owner has offered to convey to the City 154 square metres of additional parkland as an in-kind community benefit pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. The remaining 535.4 square metres of land would need to be acquired by the City via an Agreement of Purchase and Sale prior to the conveyance of the Section 42 parkland dedication. In the event the Agreement of Purchase and Sale is not finalized within nine months after the execution of the Agreement, the Owner will not provide the 154 square metres as an in-kind benefit and will pay the Community Benefits Charge in cash. The City and the Owner are currently in discussions regarding this acquisition, but as it is not finalized the City will take a section 118 restriction on the land and letter of credit for the value of the remaining Community Benefits Charge benefit prior to the first building permit until such agreement is entered into or terms cannot be reached at which time the Owner will provide full payment of the remaining Community Benefits Charge benefit and the letter of credit will be released. The City's Real Estate Management team has appraised the proposed in-kind parkland contribution and has determined that its value is equivalent to the remaining 67 percent of the 4 percent that would otherwise have to be paid as a community benefit charge pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. City Planning and Development Review staff support accepting the conveyance of the land under Section 37 of the Planning Act as an in-kind contribution of parkland. The Owner has also requested a delay in the conveyance timing for the parkland dedication due to complications in the environmental process and will be required to complete a full Risk Assessment prior to submitting for a Record of Site Condition. As the Site is part of the City's Rental Housing Supply Program and Purpose-Built Rental Incentives Stream, the timing for pulling permits is quite stringent to remain in the program. Because of this, Development Review staff are support delaying the conveyance timing to prior to two years after first above grade building permit to allow enough time to complete the full Risk Assessment required. This motion is being filed with notice to support the timely provision of purpose-built rental housing through incentives under the Rental Housing Supply Program.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2023.TE4.12 by deleting Part 3 and replacing it as follows: 3. City Council approve that, in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to two years after issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development, the Owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 507 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor. 2. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2023.TE4.12 by adding new instructions to staff as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, City Council require the owner to register in priority a Section 118 Restriction, pursuant to the Land Titles Act against title to the future parkland to be conveyed to the City, that prohibits the transfer or charge of the parkland without the prior written consent of the Executive Director, Development Review, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council allow the owner of the proposed development of the Site to convey 154 square metres of land to the City as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act to be dedicated as parkland in the event that the City enters into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale to purchase from the Owner the adjacent 535.4 square metres of land for parkland purposes prior to nine months after the first above grade building permit, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor. 4. If the Agreement of Purchase and Sale is entered into, the proposed parkland will be conveyed in accordance with the following terms: a. the proposed conveyance shall be one hundred and fifty-four square metres (154 m 2 ) in size; b. the configuration and location of the proposed conveyance shall be to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; c. the proposed conveyance shall be in an acceptable environmental condition to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and d. the proposed conveyance shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 5. City Council attribute a value to the in-kind contribution set out in Part 3 equal to 67 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the development and direct staff to advise the owner of such valuation. 6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to enter into an agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the in-kind contribution identified in Part 3 to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, with such agreement to be registered on title to the lands, which agreement shall be evidence of arrangements for the provision of the in-kind contribution that are satisfactory to City Council. 7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2023.TE4.12 by deleting Part 3 and replacing it as follows: 3. City Council approve that, in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to two years after issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development, the Owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 507 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor. 2. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2023.TE4.12 by adding new instructions to staff as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, City Council require the owner to register in priority a Section 118 Restriction, pursuant to the Land Titles Act against title to the future parkland to be conveyed to the City, that prohibits the transfer or charge of the parkland without the prior written consent of the Executive Director, Development Review, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council allow the owner of the proposed development of the Site to convey 154 square metres of land to the City as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act to be dedicated as parkland in the event that the City enters into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale to purchase from the Owner the adjacent 535.4 square metres of land for parkland purposes prior to nine months after the first above grade building permit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor. 4. If the Agreement of Purchase and Sale is entered into, the proposed parkland will be conveyed in accordance with the following terms: a. the proposed conveyance shall be one hundred and fifty-four square metres (154 m 2 ) in size; b. the configuration and location of the proposed conveyance shall be to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; c. the proposed conveyance shall be in an acceptable environmental condition to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and d. the proposed conveyance shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 5. City Council attribute a value to the in-kind contribution set out in Part 3 equal to 67 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the development and direct staff to advise the owner of such valuation. 6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to enter into an agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the in-kind contribution identified in Part 3 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, with such agreement to be registered on title to the lands, which agreement shall be evidence of arrangements for the provision of the in-kind contribution that are satisfactory to City Council. 7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
MM39.59amended
Over the past few weeks, officials of other orders of government have commented on the future of Toronto's waterfront. While these comments set expectations that the other orders of government may seek to change the character and uses of the waterfront, the City has not received a proposal or any details. The plan, if there is one, remains a mystery. This motion seeks to make it the position of City Council that other orders of government must include the residents of our city and their democratically elected municipal representatives in all decisions about the future of our city, including our waterfront. This includes opposing the unilateral expropriation of any land within the City of Toronto. Any significant decisions on the future of Toronto's waterfront must include Torontonians. It's our waterfront and we've worked hard to make it an extraordinary place to live, work and visit.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Government of Canada and Government of Ontario to include Toronto residents and their democratically elected municipal government in all significant decisions impacting Toronto, including decisions about the uses and future of the Toronto waterfront. 2. City Council oppose any unilateral expropriation of City land by the Government of Canada or Government of Ontario. 3. City Council request the City Solicitor to report to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026, meeting of City Council on potential legal options to defend the City of Toronto's interests, including property ownership, in the Billy Bishop Airport lands and other important City-owned Waterfront lands.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Government of Canada and Government of Ontario to include Toronto residents and their democratically elected municipal government in all significant decisions impacting Toronto, including decisions about the uses and future of the Toronto waterfront. 2. City Council opposes any unilateral expropriation of City land by the Government of Canada or Government of Ontario.
MM39.60adopted
No ICE in Toronto - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie
Toronto should be a place where everyone feels welcome and safe. This summer, our city is going to welcome thousands of visitors from across the globe to participate in the FIFA World Cup, which should be a time to celebrate everything that brings us together. As a city that is rightly proud of our diversity, I know that residents will also be sharing their love for the many countries that remain in the hearts of our communities here and form a sense of identity and pride for hundreds of thousands of Torontonians. Residents and visitors should be able to enjoy our city without fear. Unfortunately, the actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has cast doubt on the ability of many to visit or live in the United States and beyond safely. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has demonstrated through their actions in Minnesota and across the U.S. that they bring fear and disorder, not safety and security. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is known to operate beyond American borders, including at times within Canada. Any presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Toronto is liable to create fear during a time when we want to welcome the world and ensure that everyone feels safe. City Council should be clear that we are committed to upholding and defending our constitutional rights by making a clear statement; No ICE in Toronto.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council express its opposition to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement involvement in Toronto, including during the FIFA World Cup 2026 games. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to instruct City Staff to avoid actions supporting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, particularly during the 2026 World Cup. 3. City Council request the Federal Minister of Public Safety and Minister of Foreign Affairs to reject any U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deployment in Toronto. 4. City Council request the Ontario Solicitor General to oppose any U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement involvement in Toronto, particularly during the FIFA 2026 World Cup. 5. City Council forward its decision to the Toronto Police Service Board.
Staff recommendation as filed
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that: 1. City Council express its opposition to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement involvement in Toronto, including during the FIFA World Cup 2026 games. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to instruct City Staff to avoid actions supporting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, particularly during the 2026 World Cup. 3. City Council request the Federal Minister of Public Safety and Minister of Foreign Affairs to reject any U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deployment in Toronto. 4. City Council request the Ontario Solicitor General to oppose any U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement involvement in Toronto, particularly during the FIFA 2026 World Cup. 5. City Council forward its decision to the Toronto Police Service Board.
MM39.61adopted
The Chinatown Centre mall is an important part of Toronto's cultural landscape, serving people across Toronto and attracting large numbers of tourists and local residents to visit. Chinese-Canadian property owners and architects, such as Louis Yip and Michael HK Wong introduced some of the earliest mixed-use high-rise development in the city, such as Chinatown Centre and Dragon City Mall. The Chinatown retail character that exists is a rich layering of signage in Chinese and English languages as well as, small businesses, cultural spaces and street vendors. As part of the Chinatown Planning Framework, recognizing a vision for the future of Chinatown to continue to be a meeting place for many nations, a refuge for all, and home for Chinese-Canadian identity could be enabled through the City's support for this motion.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with General Manager, Transportation Services and any relevant divisions, community stakeholders and the local Councillor, to explore improvements to the 222 Spadina Chinatown Centre mall plaza, including historical statue, building frontage, and additional seating, litter receptacles, public artwork and other planting additions.
Staff recommendation as filed
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with General Manager, Transportation Services and any relevant divisions, community stakeholders and the local Councillor, to explore improvements to the 222 Spadina Chinatown Centre mall plaza, including historical statue, building frontage, and additional seating, litter receptacles, public artwork and other planting additions.
MM39.62withdrawn
On or about September 2024 anti-Israel demonstrators arrived at the intersection of Bathurst Street and Sheppard Avenue. They were mostly on the northeast corner. This is a predominantly Jewish neighbourhood. There are no government buildings, no consulates, no embassies and no city squares. Since that time, these demonstrators have used noise amplification systems to harass, demonize and provoke the Jewish community holding a vigil on the west side of Bathurst Street. On occasion, the anti-Israel protestors wander through the local neighbourhood and harassing local residents. They have called for the destruction of Israel, globalizing the Intifada, and making hateful and derogatory remarks about Jews. By November 2025, those praying and singing for the release of the Israeli hostages held by the terror group Hamas had departed, and yet the anti-Israel demonstrators continue to arrive every Sunday afternoon. They have damaged the local business climate and have put an unreasonable burden on police resources. Dozens of local residents have signed victim impact statements based on the hateful chants and harassment by the demonstrators. This would not be accepted in any other minority neighbourhood. Ours is a city seeking moral clarity. The city is a crossroads. In 2024, there were 443 hate crime occurrences reported to Toronto Police Service. This was a 19 percent increase over the 372 occurrences reported in 2023 and an 80 percent increase over reported occurrences in 2022. The most frequently targeted communities were the Jewish, 2SLGBTQ+, Black, and Muslim communities. Assaults against LGBTQ+ rose by 42 percent in 2024. Letting this mayhem and lawlessness endure at Bathurst and Sheppard means the "rule of law" has broken down, and the Charter rights of local residents and businesses are not upheld. This trend of hate crimes and the mayhem at Bathurst and Sheppard is a dangerous precedent for the entire city. We need to restore Toronto's reputation as one of respect, safety and tolerance and our diverse populations.
Member Motion MM39.62 was withdrawn at City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that: 1. City Council condemn any and all hateful chants and the playing of hateful recorded music at protests and rallies in the City of Toronto. 2. City Council express its support of the correspondence (see Attachment A) dated December 30, 2025, by the Solicitor General of Ontario to the Chief of Toronto Police Service and the Chair of the Toronto Police Service Board. 3. City Council support Toronto Police Service Board Item 6 motion adopted by the Board on January 13, 2026 (see Attachment B). 4. City Council express its support of correspondence dated March 9, 2026 from the Toronto Police Association, the Toronto Professional Firefighters Association and Toronto Civic Employees' Union - Local 416 (see Attachment C) to Prime Minister Carney and Premier Ford, advocating for a sustainable funding model which supports police and other front line emergency workers who have been impacted by endless protests across Toronto since October 2023. 5. City Council support the objectives of correspondence (see Attachment D) from the former interim Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission to the Chief of Police dated November 26, 2024, regarding hateful graffiti appearing on Toronto Transit Commission vehicles and other property. 6. City Council request the Toronto Police Service Board to review its responsibilities and progress under the Hate Sponsored Rallies Policy adopted by Council on May 14 and 15, 2019, and report back to City Council by July 2026. 7. City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to ensure sufficient resources are available to respond noise amplification complaints. 8. City Council request the City Solicitor to report to Council by July 2026 with an update on item 2023.MM12.28, Hate Speech and Other Hate Activities, adopted by City Council on November 8 and 9, 2023, and what legal tools are available to take action against hateful protests in the public domain. 9. City Council request the City Manager to action item 2024.CC24.2 Policy Framework - City Response to Demonstrations, adopted by City Council on December 17 and 18, 2024, and report on City of Toronto protests and rallies policy to City Council by July 2026. 10. City Council request the City Manager to review the City of Toronto Hate Sponsored Rallies (see Attachment E) policy adopted by Council on May 14 and 15, 2019, and provide progress reports to City Council of measures taken under this policy by July, 2026. 11. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board and the City Manager to provide to City Council by July 2026 remarks, feedback, steps taken and any response and feedback from other governments based on item 2025.MM35.35 adopted by Council on December 16 and 17, 2025, which requested the creation of a combined "Federal, Provincial and Municipal Law enforcement Task force to Combat Antisemitism and other Acts of Hate and Terror." 12. City Council forward this item to the Toronto Police Services Board, the Office of the Solicitor General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Public Safety of Canada.
MM39.63adopted
A true Renaissance man, Dr. Joseph Leventhal was a devoted family man, trusted friend, gifted physician, community stalwart, talented and award-winning artist, World War II veteran, storyteller, and proud centenarian. Dr. Joe was born on Grange Avenue between the Ward and Kensington Market - historic gateways for new immigrants - and grew up during the Depression. In classic immigrant fashion, Toronto's Jewish community gradually migrated north along Bathurst Street, transforming it into the vibrant heart of Jewish life in Toronto. This northward movement reflects more than a century of migration, institution-building, and community continuity. It was in the Eglinton-Lawrence neighbourhood and beyond where Dr. Joe raised his family and dedicated himself to the community. His artistic talent was recognized at a young age and after attending Harbord Collegiate, he received a scholarship to study at the Ontario College of Art (now Ontario College of Art & Design University) under the tutelage of Group of Seven member Arthur Lismer. Serving in the Royal Canadian Air Force during World War II, Dr. Joe was a bomber navigator chasing Nazi submarines up the St. Lawrence River. He was also stationed in Trenton, Quebec, Halifax, and Iceland, and was awarded multiple medals for his distinguished service. With Royal Canadian Air Force support, Dr. Joe studied medicine at the University of Toronto and became a beloved family physician known for his compassion, unwavering care, and humour. He built a busy practice, made house calls, served as Parish Doctor for the local Catholic church, and was the attending physician at the Royal Canadian Air Force base in Downsview. He proudly lined his office walls with pictures of many of the 3,000 babies he delivered throughout his outstanding career. Dr. Joe also volunteered in geriatric medicine at Baycrest and served on staff at Northwestern, Humber Memorial, and Branson hospitals. He was the founding member of the Ontario Family Practice Association and a founding member of Temple Sinai, where he remained an active congregant for many years. Dr. Joe was deeply engaged in community life, committed to making Toronto more inclusive, supportive, and connected. As the son of immigrants who fled persecution in search of a better life, he never forgot his roots, devoting much of his career to serving marginalized communities and providing compassionate care to many of the city's most vulnerable residents. Dr. Joe made the decision to locate his practice in an underserved neighbourhood, often offering free medical care in the years before universal health coverage. In February 2023, Dr. Joe passed at the age of 102 after a life extraordinarily well lived. A pillar of our community, he leaves a legacy of distinguished service and dedication. A property naming application was submitted to Strategic Partnerships including 23 letters of support and a consent form. The proposal to name the parkette in his honour has garnered very strong support through a petition of over 850 signatures and counting, a local mail drop, newsletters, social media outreach, and endorsements from local synagogues, Jewish schools, neighbours, and members of the community he served. To date, not a single concern or any opposition have been expressed to my office. Naming the park in Dr. Joe's honour celebrates his remarkable legacy, ensures his decades of service are remembered for generations, and inspires others to carry forward his lifelong commitment to community service and care.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. Despite the provisions of the City of Toronto Naming Policy, City Council approve the naming of the new park at 2788 Bathurst Street as Dr. Joe Leventhal Park. 2. City Council request the General Manager of Parks and Recreation, in addition to the design and installation of facility and wayfinding signage, to report to the May 26, 2026 meeting of North York Community Council with a plan to locate an appropriate space within Dr. Joe Leventhal Park and designate it with a plaque as "Dr. Joe's Healing Garden".
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. Despite the provisions of the City of Toronto Naming Policy, City Council approve the naming of the new park at 2788 Bathurst Street as Dr. Joe Leventhal Park. 2. City Council request the General Manager of Parks and Recreation, in addition to the design and installation of facility and wayfinding signage, to report to the May 26, 2026 meeting of North York Community Council with a plan to locate an appropriate space within Dr. Joe Leventhal Park and designate it with a plaque as "Dr. Joe's Healing Garden".
MM39.64adopted
Toronto is home to a vibrant and diverse Black community that faces unique socio-economic and cultural challenges. From the 2021 Census, 10 percent of Torontonians identify as Black. In our city, Black maternal health is often overlooked due to limited data on maternal health outcomes, systemic anti-Black racism, and a lack of targeted public initiatives. Research shows that Black pregnant people experience higher rates of stillbirths, and poor maternal and infant outcomes, such as preterm birth, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, hypertension, and congenital heart disease, compared to white individuals. For example, a study from McGill University found that 8.9 percent of Black women gave birth to preterm babies between 2004 and 2006, compared to 5.9 percent of white women. This data stresses the need for targeted interventions and support to address disparities. Even with a universal healthcare system, Black women face health disparities due to systemic anti-Black racism and social inequalities. A 2023 study revealed that many Black women in Toronto feel dismissed, ignored, and neglected by healthcare providers. To improve Black maternal health, the healthcare system and other frontline providers must train service providers on anti-Black racism, specific to the care of Black childbearing women, and increase the number of Black service providers in perinatal settings. Building on the momentum of its inaugural year, the Black Maternal Health Collective Canada will bring together healthcare leaders, policymakers, community advocates, families and allies to advance equitable maternal health outcomes for Black communities. This year's theme, "From Awareness to Accountability: The Role of Families, Allies & Systems in Black Maternal Health," calls for collective action across institutions and communities to address longstanding disparities in maternal health experienced by Black women and families in Canada. Toronto Black Maternal Health Week, April 11 to 17, 2026, takes place during Black Maternal Health and Reproductive Justice Month, a time dedicated to raising awareness of the systemic challenges affecting Black women's reproductive health and advocating for solutions. This commitment is in line with the City of Toronto's broader work to deepen cultural and systemic change and deliver better outcomes for Black Torontonians, such as the development of a renewed 10-year Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism . With this proclamation, we commit to collaborating and advocating with partners for improvements to Black maternal health equity. The City of Toronto also commits to providing equitable and welcoming spaces for Black parents and families in Toronto through existing City programs and services, including raising awareness on this important issue.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council formally declare April 11 to 17, 2026, as Black Maternal Health Week in the City of Toronto.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that: 1. City Council formally declare April 11 to 17, 2026, as Black Maternal Health Week in the City of Toronto.
MM39.65amended
On June 27, 2024, City Council approved a development proposal for two residential buildings at 59 and 55-storeys, with 1,374 dwelling units at 55-75 Brownlow Avenue ( Agenda Item History - 2024.TE14.7 ). The proposal includes an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 571 square metres. The development will occur in two phases with the park located adjacent to the second phase. The Owner will be conveying the entire 571 square metre parkland dedication prior to the first above grade permit for the first phase, which is earlier than required for the parkland dedication related to the second phase of the development. Because of this, the Owner has requested to be permitted to use the parkland area for construction staging and access, at nominal consideration, for the entirety of the staging length following conveyance of the on-site parkland dedication to the City. This motion will authorize the use of the on-site parkland dedication for construction staging, at nominal consideration, for the entirety of the staging length following the conveyance of the lands to the City. This motion is urgent as the project is currently under construction and this matter requires imminent resolution.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to negotiate and execute any agreements necessary with 55-57 Brownlow Inc. to use the on-site parkland dedication lands at 55-75 Brownlow Avenue for the stockpiling of any soils or materials, and for construction staging and construction access for nominal consideration, following the conveyance of the on-site parkland dedication lands to the City for a term of up to 5 years, commencing on approximately May 1, 2026 , on terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the on-site parkland dedication be permitted to be used for the stockpiling of any soils or materials, or as an interim construction staging area for the development and construction access for nominal consideration, for the entirety of the staging length following the conveyance of the on-site parkland dedication, subject to agreements with the City outlining the insurance requirements, extent of area and use permitted, tree removal and replacement (if any), duration, and restoration plan and costs (including any necessary environmental remediation), to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
MM39.66adopted
At its meeting of July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, Toronto City Council adopted Item 2022.TE34.11 approving draft zoning by-laws for 40 Raglan Avenue subject to certain conditions to be fulfilled. In the time since the City Council meeting, staff has discovered that recommendation 5.a.iv. contained an incorrect calculation of the required specified mid-block connection. This was a technical error and the recommendation should be replaced. The staff report contained sufficient information and material to enable the public and Council to correctly understand the zoning proposal that was considered. Further, On July 19, 20, 21, and 22, City Council ( Agenda Item History - 2022.TE34.11 ) approved an on-site parkland dedication with a minimum size of 174 square metres at 40 Raglan Avenue. The parkland conveyance was tied to prior to the first above grade building permit, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation. The parkland approved at 40 Raglan Avenue will mirror the adjacent parkland dedication at 32 Raglan Avenue. Initial conversations between the developers and Parks Development explored the idea of the Owner of 32 Raglan Avenue building out Base Park Improvements on both parkland dedications, with the Owner of 40 Raglan building out the Above Base Park Improvements for both parkland dedications. Due to recent legislative changes related to the payment timing of Development Charges, the Owner of 40 Raglan Avenue has since communicated that there is no longer any interest to design and construct the Above Base Park Improvements. Despite this, conveyance timing of the parkland requires adjustment to reflect what was agreed to in earlier negotiations in order to facilitate the development. This motion will authorize the adjustment of parkland conveyance from "prior to first above grade permit" to "prior to one (1) year following the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit". This motion is urgent as the development is imminently moving towards construction. Requires Re-Opening: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 2022.TE34.11 (July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, City Council meeting) only as it pertains to Part 5 and 11.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2022.TE34.11 by deleting Part 5.a.iv. 5. City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (the "Section 37 Agreement") as follows: a. the community benefits to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows: Part to be deleted: iv. the owner shall provide, at its own expense, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, a mid-block connection 7.1 metres wide and 5.3 metres in vertical height, with a minimum area of 640 square metres, comprised of a driveway and pedestrian walkway, connecting Raglan Avenue and the north-south public lane to the west of the site, as a surface easement for vehicle and pedestrian use by members of the general public; such easements shall be conveyed to the City prior to site plan approval, and with the configuration and design to be determined to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in the context of site plan approval; and and adopt instead the following new Part 5.a.iv: iv. the owner shall provide, at its own expense, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, a mid-block connection 7.1 metres wide and 5.3 metres in vertical height, with a minimum area of 250 square metres, comprised of a driveway and pedestrian walkway, connecting Raglan Avenue and the north-south public lane to the west of the site, as a surface easement for vehicle and pedestrian use by members of the general public; such easements shall be conveyed to the City prior to site plan approval, and with the configuration and design to be determined to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review in the context of site plan approval; 2. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2022.TE34.11 by deleting in Part 11 the words "prior to the first above grade building permit" and replacing them with the words "prior to one (1) year following the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit", so that Part 11 now reads as follows: 11. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to one (1) year following the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 174 square metres located in the south portion of the site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2022.TE34.11 by deleting Part 5.a.iv. 5. City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (the "Section 37 Agreement") as follows: a. the community benefits to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows: Part to be deleted: iv. the owner shall provide, at its own expense, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, a mid-block connection 7.1 metres wide and 5.3 metres in vertical height, with a minimum area of 640 square metres, comprised of a driveway and pedestrian walkway, connecting Raglan Avenue and the north-south public lane to the west of the site, as a surface easement for vehicle and pedestrian use by members of the general public; such easements shall be conveyed to the City prior to site plan approval, and with the configuration and design to be determined to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in the context of site plan approval; and and adopt instead the following new Part 5.a.iv: iv. the owner shall provide, at its own expense, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, a mid-block connection 7.1 metres wide and 5.3 metres in vertical height, with a minimum area of 250 square metres, comprised of a driveway and pedestrian walkway, connecting Raglan Avenue and the north-south public lane to the west of the site, as a surface easement for vehicle and pedestrian use by members of the general public; such easements shall be conveyed to the City prior to site plan approval, and with the configuration and design to be determined to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review in the context of site plan approval; 2. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2022.TE34.11 by deleting in Part 11 the words "prior to the first above grade building permit" and replacing them with the words "prior to one (1) year following the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit", so that Part 11 now reads as follows: 11. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to one (1) year following the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 174 square metres located in the south portion of the site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
MM39.67adopted
As the municipal Agency charged with managing the City of Toronto's civic theatres, TO Live is one of Canada's largest multi-arts organizations, operating three iconic venues: Meridian Hall, the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts and Meridian Arts Centre. In addition, TO Live presents a full range of performing arts, theatrical and concert events at these venues in both downtown and uptown Toronto. With these two hubs of creativity and content creation, TO Live has a unique place in the local cultural ecosystem to present local and international artists, connect audiences to a diverse array of cultural content reflective of the multicultural nature of the city, and provide accessible cultural space to a variety of partners in Toronto's cultural sector. Across its three sites, TO Live presents over 1,000 performances a year, attracting well over 500,000 people. Reporting to City Council, TO Live is overseen by a Board of Directors composed of 13 members including: the Mayor or a Council member appointed by the Mayor as the Mayor's designate; 2 Council members; and 10 public members. The Chair is drawn from the pool of public members. The TO Live Board of Directors provides oversight over the +$45 million annual operating budget for TO Live and its complement of more than 250 staff. The TO Live board has been without a Chair since the resignation of Lori DeGraw in November of 2025. This motion recommends the appointment of Brian Astl as Chair of the Board. Brian has served as a member of the TO Live board since March of 2024. Reason for Urgency: This matter is urgent because the TO Live board has been without a Chair since November 2025.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council appoint Brian Astl as Chair of the TO Live board of Directors, at pleasure of Council, for the remainder of his term ending February 10, 2028, and until a successor is appointed.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that: 1. City Council appoint Brian Astl as Chair of the TO Live board of Directors, at pleasure of Council, for the remainder of his term ending February 10, 2028, and until a successor is appointed.
MM39.68adopted
Martingrove Baseball Inc. is a grassroots all-volunteer community-based organization featuring all levels of co-ed baseball and girls' softball since 1958. This seasonal permit holder provides opportunity for Etobicoke residents to participate in baseball/softball. The changes being proposed at Jim Horton diamond at Martingrove Gardens Park include moving the infield back 10 to 20 feet and angling it a few degrees to avoid the trees that currently impact left field. The fencing will be upgraded to more suitable fencing for the level of play on this diamond. The proposed changes have been reviewed and approved in principle by Parks staff. The City, through Parks and Recreation's Capital Rehabilitation Program, already has the following work to be completed at this site: replacing players benches, bleachers and removing of the current backstop. In 2025, City Council approved the naming of the baseball diamond after the late Jim Horton, a long-time coach and executive member of Martingrove Baseball. Material and installation costs will be covered through the contribution for an in-kind value of up to $125,000.00. The Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy requires City Council approval for donations being received by the City of Toronto with a value over $50,000.00. This motion seeks the authority to accept the donation, and to enter into the necessary agreements. This motion is urgent because the improvements need to be completed prior to the start of their baseball season this spring.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to accept the in-kind donation of up to $0.125 million from Martingrove Baseball Inc., to support capital improvements to the Jim Horton baseball diamond infrastructure at Martingrove Gardens Park, in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy and provided an acceptable agreement can be negotiated. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to negotiate and execute an agreement with Martingrove Baseball Inc. to facilitate capital improvements at the Jim Horton Baseball Diamond at Martingrove Gardens Park, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and in accordance with City policies applicable to capital projects, including compliance with the City's Fair Wage policy and other procurement policies, as well as the City's Labour Trades Contractual Obligations in the Construction Industry, if applicable.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to accept the in-kind donation of up to $0.125 million from Martingrove Baseball Inc., to support capital improvements to the Jim Horton baseball diamond infrastructure at Martingrove Gardens Park, in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy and provided an acceptable agreement can be negotiated. 2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to negotiate and execute an agreement with Martingrove Baseball Inc. to facilitate capital improvements at the Jim Horton Baseball Diamond at Martingrove Gardens Park, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and in accordance with City policies applicable to capital projects, including compliance with the City's Fair Wage policy and other procurement policies, as well as the City's Labour Trades Contractual Obligations in the Construction Industry, if applicable.
MM39.69adopted
This motion seeks to fund the beautification of waterfront parks in Ward 14. This motion proposes to direct funding from Parks and Recreation's approved 10-year Capital Budget and Plan for the purchase of additional waste receptacle enclosures for the beautification of Biidaasige Park and Leslie Lookout. Biidaasige Park, which was opened last summer and the new Biidaasige park Phase 2 which will open this summer are exceptional new city parks on the Waterfront, built into the Michael van Valkenburg's design for the Portland Flood Protection Project. They were built by Waterfront Toronto on Toronto Port Lands Company lands and in consultation with the city. Prior to the park opening last summer, and in response to request from City Council ( 2025.EX22.3 ), Parks and Recreation, in consultation with Solid Waste Management, purchased waste receptacle enclosures to hold the Blue and Grey large toters used in our parks in order to complement the setting of the new park. However, there were not enough receptacles available to distribute them evenly throughout the park. Leslie Lookout is one of five Claude Cormier designed parks on Toronto's waterfront. Claude Cormier was a one of Canada's foremost and internationally recognized landscape architects and park designers. This motion would allow for additional attractive waste receptacle enclosures s for the large toters that Solid Waste uses in the park. Reason for Urgency: Following the City's successful Port Lands Open House this month, there is clear and significant resident interest in additional waste receptacles in waterfront parks in Ward 14. With the upcoming opening of Biidaasige Park Phase 2, planning for waste management capacity is required ahead of the summer season to address anticipated demand, respond to community concerns, and maintain public confidence in municipal services.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the use of up to $160,000.00 from the Biidaasige Park Account (CPR126-58) for the purpose of the procurement and installation of waste receptacle enclosures at Biidaasige Park (Phases 1 and 2) and Leslie Lookout Park. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to procure and install waste receptacle enclosures consistent with those currently in use at Biidaasige Park, and to complete installation across Biidaasige Park (Phases 1 and 2) and Leslie Lookout Park. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to provide ongoing waste collection services for the additional waste receptacle enclosures installed at Biidaasige Park and Leslie Lookout Park.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the use of up to $160,000.00 from the Biidaasige Park Account (CPR126-58) for the purpose of the procurement and installation of waste receptacle enclosures at Biidaasige Park (Phases 1 and 2) and Leslie Lookout Park. 2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to procure and install waste receptacle enclosures consistent with those currently in use at Biidaasige Park, and to complete installation across Biidaasige Park (Phases 1 and 2) and Leslie Lookout Park. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to provide ongoing waste collection services for the additional waste receptacle enclosures installed at Biidaasige Park and Leslie Lookout Park.
MM39.70adopted
In May 2023, City Council authorized the City of Toronto to enter into a Construction Management Agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation and to transfer up to $4.722 million for the construction of the St. James Town Open Space and Public Realm project (Agenda Item History - 2023.GG4.22). The $4.722 million includes $4.615 million of Section 37 funding secured by Parks and Recreation and $107,000 identified in Transportation Services' Capital Budget. The project costs are being proportionately shared between Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the City. The St. James Town Open Space project was tendered for construction by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in 2025, and the resulting lowest bid was higher than the construction funding allocated by the City and Toronto Community Housing Corporation. The lowest bidder has slightly reduced their bid in response to a review of the bid against the final cost estimate. However, the lowest bid is still over the project budget. The options are to cancel the procurement and value-engineer the project, with the risk that costs continue to escalate and construction is delayed, or to proceed with the lowest bid and seek additional funding. The report seeks authority to transfer additional funds for construction of Parks and Recreation's share of the project to Toronto Community Housing Corporation. The funds are to cover the differential between the original approved amount and the tendered lowest bid amount. Toronto Community Housing Corporation has allocated funds in the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for State of Good Repair for this project, which also includes Toronto Community Housing Corporation's costs associated with garage rehabilitation. Toronto Community Housing Corporation's financial contribution to this project is included in the confidential attachment. The construction will be managed by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in coordination with the City and is anticipated to start later in 2026 and last until approximately 2028, pending approval of this additional funding. The project is located within land owned by Toronto Community Housing Corporation and comprises a large open space, a shared walking/cycling corridor (formerly referred to as Ontario Street South) and the public realm surrounding the Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings located at 275 Bleecker Street and 200 Wellesley Street East. The open space will become a City park under a lease agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation. The lease will commence once construction of the park is complete. The future park is designed to increase the amount and quality of green space in the St. James Town neighbourhood and will include a playground, water play, a large open lawn and a stage. Reason for Urgency: This motion is urgent because the contractor award for the project will be presented for approval at the April 28, 2026, Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors meeting, by which time the City's portion of the project funding must be approved by City Council.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (March 16, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation: 1. City Council increase Parks and Recreation's 2026 Approved Capital Budget for the St. James Town Open Space Construction project, in the amount of $2.6 million fully funded from the Section 42 reserve funds received from 308 Jarvis Street (Internal Order: XR2213-4201671) which has been received and deemed eligible for use. 2. City Council authorize the City of Toronto to transfer up to $2.6 million in funding to Toronto Community Housing Corporation on the condition that Toronto Community Housing Corporation must enter into an acceptable Construction Management Agreement, and that within the Agreement there is included a condition that Toronto Community Housing Corporation should be contractually obligated to enter into a lease with the City before the City advances any funding for the project. 3. City Council direct that the information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential as it contains financial information that belongs to the City of Toronto and has monetary value. 4. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 following the completion of the project, at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (March 16, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation: 1. City Council increase Parks and Recreation's 2026 Approved Capital Budget for the St. James Town Open Space Construction project, in the amount of $2.6 million fully funded from the Section 42 reserve funds received from 308 Jarvis Street (Internal Order: XR2213-4201671) which has been received and deemed eligible for use. 2. City Council authorize the City of Toronto to transfer up to $2.6 million in funding to Toronto Community Housing Corporation on the condition that Toronto Community Housing Corporation must enter into an acceptable Construction Management Agreement, and that within the Agreement there is included a condition that Toronto Community Housing Corporation should be contractually obligated to enter into a lease with the City before the City advances any funding for the project. 3. City Council direct that the information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential as it contains financial information that belongs to the City of Toronto and has monetary value. 4. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 following the completion of the project, at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
MM39.71adopted
Through the 2026 Operating Budget process, investments were identified to address emerging priorities including strengthening local capacity, supports for vulnerable residents, and advancing community-led solutions in a neighbourhood experiencing ongoing social and economic pressures. City Council has an opportunity to direct funding toward organizations that provide essential supports, social connection, and culturally responsive programming. These investments will help stabilize services, expand access for residents, and ensure that community partners can continue meeting urgent and evolving needs. This application contains community focused measures including: - Allocating $0.020 million to Weston Area Emergency Support to provide the food relief provisions with a particular focus on supporting the Weston Mount Dennis community. - Allocating $0.025 million to the St. Fidelis Golden Age Club to provide seniors with programs and services that enhance well‑being through social connection, active living, and meaningful community engagement. - Allocating $0.030 million to the Canadian Somali Association is a not-for-profit organization offering youth and seniors programming in York South-Weston, These investments collectively reinforce the City's commitment to supporting neighbourhood level priorities, strengthening community resilience, and ensuring that local organizations have the resources needed to respond effectively to emerging issues in York South-Weston. This motion is urgent to ensure timely reallocation of 2026 budget funds to community organizations addressing immediate needs in York South-Weston. Any delay risks disrupting essential support and program delays for vulnerable residents.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the reallocation of $0.075 million, as provided in the 2026 Operating Budget to support the Weston Community Association, as follows: a. $0.020 million to Weston Area Emergency Support; b. $0.025 million to the St. Fidelis Golden Age Club; and c. $0.030 million to the Canadian Somali Association. 2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, to negotiate and enter into the necessary agreements to disburse the funds allocated to the organizations referenced in Recommendation 1 above on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Social Development, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the reallocation of $0.075 million, as provided in the 2026 Operating Budget to support the Weston Community Association, as follows: a. $0.020 million to Weston Area Emergency Support; b. $0.025 million to the St. Fidelis Golden Age Club; and c. $0.030 million to the Canadian Somali Association. 2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, to negotiate and enter into the necessary agreements to disburse the funds allocated to the organizations referenced in Recommendation 1 above on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Social Development, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
MM39.72adopted
Parks and Recreation staff applied for a grant from the National Bank Play Your Court Program to obtain funding to contribute to the cost of improvements at the Malvern Park tennis courts. Initially it was thought that this funding would fall under the City's Donation Policy and Item 2025.MM30.8 was moved to authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to accept a $100,000 donation from Tennis Canada for refurbishment of the tennis courts at Malvern Park. Subsequent to the adoption of the motion, Tennis Canada advised that the grant is conditional upon the City providing certain benefits such as National Bank and Tennis Canada branded signage on nets and entrance of courts, a grand opening event, and access to the Malvern tennis courts up to two days per calendar year at no charge to host programming or an event. Upon review, it was determined that the contribution was incorrectly categorized as a donation due to the conditions associated with the grant. The parties to the agreement have also been updated to accurately reflect the program name, and the funders and administrators of the program. The financial contribution to the City remains $100,000, the same as the original motion. National Bank Play Your Court Program aims to revitalize over 100 community tennis courts across Canada by 2030. Municipalities own the largest inventory of outdoor court infrastructure across the country. There is a growing demand for tennis at the community level and a need to update outdoor community tennis courts. In 2025 and 2026, the City of Toronto is improving tennis courts across the City, including improvements to lighting, fencing and court surfaces through its Back on Track program. This grant would provide additional funding to enhance the tennis courts at Malvern Park, creating a high-quality public tennis facility with colour-coated courts for the Malvern community. This motion is urgent as the contribution agreement needs to be negotiated and executed prior to the City completing the capital improvements at the Malvern Park tennis courts. Requires Re-opening: Member Motion Item 2025.MM30.8 (May 21 and 22, 2025, City Council meeting) only as it pertains to Part 1.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM30.8 by deleting Part 1. Part to be deleted: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to accept a cash donation of up to $0.100 million from Tennis Canada's Play Your Court program, which is funded in part by National Bank Financial, for the purposes of improving tennis courts at Malvern Park in 2025, and to negotiate and execute a donation agreement, in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor. and adopt instead the following new Part 1: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to negotiate and execute a contribution agreement with the National Bank of Canada and/or the Canadian Tennis Association (operating as "Tennis Canada"), under the National Bank Play Your Court Program, to secure a grant of $100,000, applied for by the City, funded by the National Bank of Canada, and administered by Tennis Canada for the purposes of improving tennis courts at Malvern Park, municipally known as 36 Sewells Road, Toronto, including program requirements such as branded signage on the court nets and entrances, a grand opening event, and up to two days of annual no‑charge access for Tennis Canada to host programming or events for a term of ten (10) years, provided that the terms and conditions are acceptable to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the agreement is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM30.8 by deleting Part 1. Part to be deleted: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to accept a cash donation of up to $0.100 million from Tennis Canada's Play Your Court program, which is funded in part by National Bank Financial, for the purposes of improving tennis courts at Malvern Park in 2025, and to negotiate and execute a donation agreement, in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor. and adopt instead the following new Part 1: 1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to negotiate and execute a contribution agreement with the National Bank of Canada and/or the Canadian Tennis Association (operating as "Tennis Canada"), under the National Bank Play Your Court Program, to secure a grant of $100,000, applied for by the City, funded by the National Bank of Canada, and administered by Tennis Canada for the purposes of improving tennis courts at Malvern Park, municipally known as 36 Sewells Road, Toronto, including program requirements such as branded signage on the court nets and entrances, a grand opening event, and up to two days of annual no‑charge access for Tennis Canada to host programming or events for a term of ten (10) years, provided that the terms and conditions are acceptable to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the agreement is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
MM39.73adopted
Across Toronto near schools, it is particularly important to implement measures to ensure the safety of all road users, including students, families, and other vulnerable populations. The City continues to make strong progress through safety measures such as School Safety Zone signage, "Watch Your Speed" alerts, pavement markings, and, until recently, Automated Speed Enforcement cameras. Traditionally, pavement markings have included large format "SCHOOL" stenciling on a single lane of roads near school, even in circumstances where the road is multi-lane. I was proud to pilot an enhanced pavement marking approach on Kingston Road east of Midland Avenue, where "SCHOOL" stencils were applied across all lanes of the roadway. This simple improvement significantly increases visibility for all drivers and has been well received by the community. Expanding this approach city-wide would strengthen School Safety Zones and support safer streets for students, children and families. Following the success of the pilot, we have an opportunity to take a stronger leadership role in advancing low-cost, high-impact safety measures together with Staff's support. This motion seeks Council approval to authorize Transportation Services to adapt the enhanced road marking approach with respect to "SCHOOL" stencils across multi-lane roadways within School Safety Zones on a go-forward basis. Reason for Urgency: This matter is considered urgent given our understanding that Staff are currently renewing contracts under which this initiative would be implemented.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to build into the next contract(s) for School Safety Zone pavement markings an enhancement such that the "SCHOOL" marking is painted on all lanes of multi-lane roadways and retrofit all applicable existing School Safety Zones accordingly within a reasonable timeframe.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Parthi Kandavel, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe, recommends that: 1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to build into the next contract(s) for School Safety Zone pavement markings an enhancement such that the "SCHOOL" marking is painted on all lanes of multi-lane roadways and retrofit all applicable existing School Safety Zones accordingly within a reasonable timeframe.
MM39.74adopted
Two Loons Brewing, located at 122 Brock Avenue, has advised that in order to obtain a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence, a resolution from the local Municipal Council is required. Reason for Urgency: This Motion is urgent to allow the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to process the application without further delay and unnecessary hardship to the applicant
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Two Loons Brewing, 122 Brock Avenue for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that: 1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Two Loons Brewing., 122 Brock Avenue for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass.
MM39.75adopted
Across Toronto, a growing number of approved development sites are sitting idle as the condominium market stalls, with many remaining vacant for years on end. Vacant properties diminish the vibrancy of our main streets, reduce the sense of safety in neighbourhoods, and provide no economic benefit to the city. Interim uses including community-oriented activations such as public courts, markets, and pop-up programming, offer a practical and effective solution. Where they have been implemented, they have demonstrated significant benefits by animating main streets, improving safety, and supporting economic activity. However, a critical policy gap penalizes these interim uses. When a vacant development site is activated through a new interim use, the Province's Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, may reclassify the property from its prior residential or industrial classification to a commercial one. This reclassification then triggers a substantially higher municipal tax rate. In Toronto-St. Paul's, the activation of public racket courts on a development site at Yonge and Rosehill, through a partnership between the developer and Fairgrounds, was a major success. However, Municipal Property Assessment Corporation recently reclassified the subject site commercial, triggering an unsustainable property tax increase that puts the courts at risk of closure. There are also many other vacant or underutilized sites across the city where property owners are considering interim uses but, because of the financial risks of Municipal Property Assessment Corporation reclassification, opt not to proceed. There is existing Council direction through Item 2025.MM28.36 to address vacant storefronts, and to report on the feasibility of a tax reduction program for property owners that host pop-ups. This motion builds on this direction, and requests staff to identify solutions to promote the uptake of developers using their lands for interim uses including by analyzing the feasibility of policy tools including Community Improvements Plans as a solution. This motion also requests urgent action to address the immediate classification issue facing the Yonge and Rosehill site, given the longer timeline and resources required to operationalize programmatic solutions. Accordingly, this motion directs staff to identify a short-term solution, focusing on advocacy to Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and the Province, to allow this location to continue operating while a longer-term fix is developed.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report back to City Council no later than May 2026 on available short-term options to preserve the continued operation of the public recreational facility currently operating on the vacant development site at Yonge and Rosehill. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to request the Province of Ontario and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation to address classification issues with development sites in transition, and to immediately review of the commercial reclassification of the property at 1965-1975 Rosehill. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report back to the Economic Development Committee no later than the first quarter of 2027 with policy options to support interim, community-oriented uses on vacant development sites in the City of Toronto, including: a. a review of the City of Vaughan's Community Improvement Plan, including its eligibility criteria, financial structure and impacts, and implementation experience, and an assessment of whether Vaughan's approach can be adapted for Toronto; b. an analysis of whether the existing Economic Development and Growth in Employment Community Improvement Plan is an appropriate vehicle for interim use incentives, and if not, the rationale for a new Community Improvement Plan program stream; and c. proposed eligibility criteria, financial impacts, and program governance for a new interim use Community Improvement Plan program stream if staff deem necessary, and an implementation plan and timeline for launch. 4. City Council request that the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture consult with representatives of the development industry, Business Improvement Areas, community organizations active in interim use programming, and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, as appropriate.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report back to City Council no later than May 2026 on available short-term options to preserve the continued operation of the public recreational facility currently operating on the vacant development site at Yonge and Rosehill. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to request the Province of Ontario and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation to address classification issues with development sites in transition, and to immediately review of the commercial reclassification of the property at 1965-1975 Rosehill. 3. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report back to the Economic Development Committee no later than the first quarter of 2027 with policy options to support interim, community-oriented uses on vacant development sites in the City of Toronto, including: a. a review of the City of Vaughan's Community Improvement Plan, including its eligibility criteria, financial structure and impacts, and implementation experience, and an assessment of whether Vaughan's approach can be adapted for Toronto; b. an analysis of whether the existing Economic Development and Growth in Employment Community Improvement Plan is an appropriate vehicle for interim use incentives, and if not, the rationale for a new Community Improvement Plan program stream; and c. proposed eligibility criteria, financial impacts, and program governance for a new interim use Community Improvement Plan program stream if staff deem necessary, and an implementation plan and timeline for launch. 4. City Council request that the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture consult with representatives of the development industry, Business Improvement Areas, community organizations active in interim use programming, and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, as appropriate.
MM39.76adopted
Through 2025.IE25.6, City Council introduced a series of traffic pattern changes throughout Cedarvale and Forest Hill designed to combat severe congestion on neighborhood streets caused by the dysfunctional operation of the Eglinton Avenue West and Allen Road expressway intersection. The goal was to determine whether severe congestion on neighborhood streets could be reduced without causing undue delay or inconvenience to residents. While many of the new restrictions have effectively encouraged commuters to stay on arterial roads, the new turn restrictions at Strathearn and Bathurst and Burton and Bathurst are not serving their intended purpose. While many streets throughout Cedarvale deal with congestion, the left-turn restriction at Strathearn and Bathurst and the westbound through prohibition at Burton and Bathurst have pushed cars onto neighboring streets ill-equipped to deal with heavy traffic. As a collector road, Strathearn is better suited to accommodate additional vehicles and serves as a key access point to Cedarvale Park. This motion asks that City Council reopen 2025.IE25.6 to remove the provisions at Strathearn and Bathurst and Burton and Bathurst. Reason for Urgency: Safety concerns due to heavy traffic on residential streets without sidewalks.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.IE25.6 by deleting Parts 1.n. and 1.o. Parts to be deleted: The implementation of turn prohibitions and compulsory turns at the following locations: 1.n. Strathearn Road and Bathurst Street, prohibit northbound left-turns from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays (bicycles excepted); and 1.o. Bathurst Street and Burton Road prohibit westbound through movements from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays (bicycles excepted) at Bathurst Street, from the easterly leg of Burton Road to the westerly leg of Strathearn Road.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.IE25.6 by deleting Parts 1.n. and 1.o. Parts to be deleted: The implementation of turn prohibitions and compulsory turns at the following locations: 1.n. Strathearn Road and Bathurst Street, prohibit northbound left-turns from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays (bicycles excepted); and 1.o. Bathurst Street and Burton Road prohibit westbound through movements from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays (bicycles excepted) at Bathurst Street, from the easterly leg of Burton Road to the westerly leg of Strathearn Road.