transit
Presto's successor fare system is quietly in play
The TTC issued a Request for Information for a next-generation automated fare collection system to eventually replace Presto. Over 70 vendors downloaded the documents and roughly two dozen responded officially. The board directed staff to complete the evaluation, including vendor interviews, and continue market engagement to inform future fare system decisions.
- The TTC is actively sounding the market for a successor to the Presto fare system, with over 70 vendors interested and roughly two dozen formal responses.
amendedToronto Transit Commission Board · Wed, Jul 22Watch
Who did what
- Councillor Jamaal Myers (Ward 23) movedPut forward the motion directing staff to complete the RFI evaluation and continue market engagement
- A citizen commissioner questioned staffAsked staff how many organizations responded to the RFI
From the floor
“We had over 70 entities who downloaded the documents and kind of expressed some interest. At the end of the day, we've had a couple dozen who have actually responded officially.”City staff
“Translink is going through a process right now too, so it's not a quiet market, and yet we still got quite a significant response from that market.”City staff
Also in this item
• The TTC is actively sounding the market for a successor to the Presto fare system, with over 70 vendors interested and roughly two dozen formal responses.
The journey
What happens next
No open comment window stated; this is an early market-sounding stage. Future fare system procurement decisions will return to the board, residents can watch for and depute on those.
Decision
The board unanimously (7-0) directed staff to complete evaluation of the RFI submissions, including vendor interviews, and undertake additional market engagement to assess market capabilities and value for money in support of future fare collection system decisions.
Watch it happen
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
ContainedA future council could redirect or halt this; what is being decided here is to continue evaluating RFI responses and engage vendors, a bounded and reversible step. The eventual fare system replacement would be Stakes 2-3, but that decision is not being made here, this is the study/market-sounding stage, so the substance decided today is contained.Touches a narrow groupFares are a broadly-felt subject, but nothing changes on any rider's week now, this is an internal RFI evaluation with no fare, technology, or service change taking effect. Present effect is indirect at most, so it lands at 1, not 2. The subject's importance shows up when an actual fare system decision is made.
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.
Child Care Expansion in High-Inequity Neighbourhoods; Update on Workforce and Funding Barriers
Children's Services reported progress toward federal child care expansion targets in priority wards, including 60 new licensed home child care spaces. The sector's main advocate, Amy O'Neal of the Toronto Community for Better Child Care, requested stable multi-year funding, provincial wage advocacy, and proactive city partnerships to identify buildings for expansion, citing Ontario's shortage of nearly 10,000 early childhood educators and unrealistic timelines as barriers to growth.
adoptedEconomic and Community Development Committee · Tue, Jul 14Watchprovincial decision
Who did what
- Councillor Paul Ainslie (Ward 24) questioned staffAsked about Children's Services involvement in for-profit child care within development applications in priority neighborhoods; requested briefing on historical city matching-fund policy no longer in place.
From the floor
“We need stable, predictable funding. Over the past five years, funding has changed from year to year with new funding envelopes, different reporting requirements, and separate reconciliations. While every investment is appreciated, managing short-term funding streams has become an administrative burden, especially for smaller nonprofit operators like myself.”Speaker not identified
“Ontario is currently short nearly 10,000 registered early childhood educators. We urge the city to continue advocating to the province for a pay equity compliant provincial wage grid. Without competitive wages, we cannot recruit and retain the educators we need to expand the system.”Speaker not identified
“We ask that the city partner with nonprofit operators to identify buildings and land that could become childcare centers, particularly in Scarborough and Etobicoke, and help fast-track approvals to delay project.”Speaker not identified
“I'm trying to understand how children's services would be involved in an application like this if we need affordable child care in the community.”A councillor
Also in this item
• Ontario faces a shortage of nearly 10,000 registered early childhood educators, directly constraining Toronto's ability to meet federal child care expansion targets despite meeting space creation targets.
• The sector reports that short-term, year-to-year funding with changing reporting requirements has become an administrative burden, particularly for smaller nonprofit operators, making it difficult to plan and retain staff.
• A Scarborough development application in a neighbourhood improvement area offered child care space but proposed for-profit daycare; Children's Services confirmed it would be involved only after planning review, raising questions about city leverage on affordability.
The journey
What happens next
Residents in high-inequity neighbourhoods can advocate at council for stable multi-year child care funding and provincial wage grid advocacy; no imminent vote window evident from the record.
Watch it happen
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
Big deal at city hallThis is a multi-year expansion effort with federal and provincial funding at stake and direct bearing on who controls child care provision in high-inequity neighbourhoods. The city's willingness to invest city funding and partner with nonprofits versus developers is a budgetary and policy decision that departs from past practice and affects a class of residents (low-income families with young children). Hard to reverse without reputational and fiscal cost.Felt nowParents in high-inequity wards seeking licensed child care directly experience affordability and availability barriers; the 60 new licensed home child care spaces and school-age program funding announced affect families immediately. Workforce shortage is a lived constraint on the system's actual capacity this year and going forward.
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.
Childcare inequity in Scarborough and other high-need areas persists; staff say capital plan is fully committed and provincial policy limits municipal action
The committee received a status update on 18 Ombudsman recommendations for social assistance overpayment handling, with 11 completed and 7 advancing to completion by end-2026. Councillors pressed staff on why geographic childcare gaps remain unresolved despite acknowledged high-need areas like Scarborough; staff disclosed the 10-year capital plan is fully committed with no unallocated funds, and that provincial policy constrains municipal levers beyond consultation, engagement, and service navigation supports.
adoptedEconomic and Community Development Committee · Tue, Jul 14Watchprovincial decision
Who did what
- Councillor Lily Cheng (Ward 18) questioned staffAsked when high-need area data was last refreshed and noted that 5 of 6 Scarborough wards are flagged as high-inequity; questioned whether change has occurred and how long the city has known about these gaps.
From the floor
“how does the strategy look to make progress in growth in areas like Scarborough and that have been identified as as inequitable?”A councillor
“the province as you are aware sets the legislative policy and funding framework so a lot of control um with this respect is with the province however the levers that are within our control which include uh consultation and engagement uh town halls as we did um uh in your ward uh and building capacity and professional development uh are within our control”City staff
“We have a 10-year capital plan that is fully committed Um and so we do not have any um unallocated funds”City staff
“Is is there a specific plan to to heighten or uh grow that solution for home childcare in areas like my ward or other wards that have that disparity?”A councillor
“there isn't per se uh strategy uh for home childcare However we do embed it into our local system planning”City staff
Also in this item
• City's 10-year childcare capital plan is fully committed with no unallocated internal funds available; expansion depends entirely on federal-provincial Canada-wide renewal negotiations
• Scarborough remains flagged as high-inequity on childcare access across 5 of 6 wards, with no change evident in latest data refresh (released with 2025 service plan); staff acknowledged not knowing when prior data was last updated
• Staff acknowledged home childcare could address inequity gaps but stated no targeted strategy exists for high-need areas, only that home childcare is embedded in routine local system planning
The journey
What happens next
Residents in high-inequity wards can depute at future childcare or budget hearings; advocacy to provincial/federal representatives on childcare funding may be more actionable than municipal.
Decision
Received the status update; no motion or recommendation to council is evident from the transcript.
Watch it happen
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
ContainedThe city confirms a multi-ward childcare access problem and acknowledges the equity gap, but describes it as a resource constraint (fully committed capital plan) and a provincial jurisdiction issue (funding and policy). The decision itself is contained: the city will continue planning and advocacy, not redirect existing commitments or pursue new municipal levers. This is a genuine problem statement without a commensurate institutional decision.Felt nowChildcare access affects families with young children weekly, and the transcript identifies Scarborough residents specifically as experiencing disproportionate access gaps. The problem is named, mapped, and present; however, no new action lands on anyone this week, staff commit to future studies and town halls. The effect is real and direct for Scarborough families, but nothing changes next week.
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.
City has almost no power on ticket gouging; Ontario and federal government control the issue
Staff reported back on a July request to address hidden fees and price gouging on event tickets. The finding: Toronto lacks regulatory authority. Ontario and the federal government control ticket sales and competition law; the city can only ban street-level ticket resale under its sidewalk by-law. The item clarifies what the city cannot do rather than proposing new protections.
adoptedEconomic and Community Development Committee · Tue, Jul 14Watchprovincial decision
From the floor
“live performance, um these are good uses and we need to make sure that they can exist in compliance with our licensing and I would say that being in communities that some of us live in is a really great scale to be able to connect to come out and it's a really important way to support working musicians in the city”Speaker not identified
Also in this item
• Toronto has almost no regulatory tool for ticket gouging or hidden booking fees; the issue sits entirely with Ontario and federal government
The journey
What happens next
Residents can petition the Ontario government or federal government on ticket regulation; this committee found no municipal lever. No further deputation window at this meeting.
Decision
Referred back to staff with no new city action; acknowledged Ontario and federal jurisdiction over ticket sales and booking fees
Watch it happen
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
RoutineThis is a report clarifying what the city cannot do, not a decision to change policy or jurisdiction. No institutional change flows from the finding. The clarification is useful but substantive; the city makes no new commitment.Touches a narrow groupEvent ticket prices affect people who buy tickets, but this item does not change anyone's week: it confirms the city has no power to act. The salience is in the subject (tickets matter to some residents) but the effect is zero (nothing changes). Residents who feel gouged remain unprotected by Toronto.
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.