Scarborough Community Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 13 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
SC18.1amended
Golden Mile Secondary Plan - Final Report
The Golden Mile Secondary Plan ("GMSP") Study was initiated by City Planning staff in May 2016, and generally consisted of the lands located along Eglinton Avenue East, between Victoria Park Avenue and Birchmount Road. In April 2019, City Council expanded the study area boundary from 97 to 113 hectares to include additional lands east of Victoria Park Avenue within Wards 20 and 21, as well as approximately 4.3 hectares of land on the west side of Victoria Park Avenue within Ward 16 (Attachment 1: Golden Mile Secondary Plan Study Area Boundary). The Golden Mile has been influenced by agricultural, industrial and commercial eras of development. The area became known as the "Golden Mile of Industry" during the post-World War II era with the construction of large-scale manufacturing buildings along Eglinton Avenue East, between Pharmacy Avenue and Birchmount Road. Large-scale commercial construction generally occurred during the 1990's, replacing many of the former industrial buildings that fronted onto Eglinton Avenue East. This report recommends that City Council adopt the Golden Mile Secondary Plan (the "Secondary Plan") and associated amendments in Official Plan Amendment ("OPA") No. 499. The Secondary Plan establishes a comprehensive planning framework for future development in the Secondary Plan Area (the "Plan Area") that sets out the long-term vision for a complete, liveable, connected, responsive, and prosperous mixed-use community. The Secondary Plan directs anticipated growth to appropriate locations, identifies public realm and built form directions, and identifies and plans for community services and facilities necessary to meet the existing and future needs of the Plan Area. OPA No. 499 identifies a number of structuring elements through the re-designation of certain lands as Parks, and the identification of new public streets and widened/reconfigured existing public streets. These improvements are necessary structuring elements of the Plan Area and will facilitate the creation of a complete community and allow for an appropriate level of intensification within the Plan Area. The Secondary Plan facilitates the transformation of the Golden Mile, while maintaining its role as an important economic driver within the east end of Toronto and is envisioned as both a destination and a place for residents, workers, and visitors to live, work, shop, and play. The Secondary Plan advances a vision for a new mixed-use community that has the potential to accommodate approximately 24,000 residential units, 43,000 residents and 19,000 jobs over the next 20+ years, in a mix of tall, mid and low-rise buildings ranging in height from 4 to 35 storeys (Attachment 5: Draft Official Plan Amendment No. 499, Golden Mile Secondary Plan). The Secondary Plan provides an overarching framework for land use, development capacity, a new street network and a parks and open space system, within which more detailed planning can be undertaken to distribute density on sites and blocks based on the core structuring elements. Given the overall size of the Secondary Plan area (approximately 113 hectares), this approach is appropriate to respond to specific conditions of multiple character areas and districts, including the need to acknowledge existing uses and required phasing of development. The Secondary Plan provides flexibility regarding the location and timing of dedication of public streets and built form. The provision of clear and specific policy direction at the macro level, coupled with flexibility in implementation at the context plan level, will allow development to proceed in a predictable and consistent manner while ensuring area specific conditions can be addressed. The Secondary Plan is accompanied by Urban Design Guidelines for the Plan Area, which provide more detailed guidance to assist in the review of development applications and public realm improvements, and the implementation of the Secondary Plan. OPA No. 499, including the Secondary Plan, has regard to matters of provincial interest under Section 2 of the Planning Act, is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) ("PPS (2020)"), and conforms to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) ("Growth Plan (2019)"). OPA No. 499, including the Secondary Plan, is consistent with the general intent and purpose of, and conforms to, the City's Official Plan.
Scarborough Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council adopt Official Plan Amendment No. 499 substantially in accordance with Attachment No. 1 to the Supplementary Report (September 29, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District. 2. City Council authorize that development may proceed by site-specific zoning by-law amendments that conform to the Golden Mile Secondary Plan, and request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward a Zoning By-law Amendment, as may be necessary, for the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area to comply with Official Plan Amendment No. 499 when the Amendment is in full force and effect. 3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study for the Golden Mile area, which will include options for potential modifications to Bartley Avenue/O'Connor Drive and consider comments received from area landowners. 4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to study transit priority transit measures or higher order transit measures on Victoria Park Avenue and Warden Avenue. 5. City Council adopt the Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines substantially in accordance with Attachment No. 2 to the Supplementary Report (September 29, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to make any minor, technical or stylistic amendments/modifications as required to align with the Golden Mile Secondary Plan. 6. City Council direct staff to use the Golden Mile Secondary Plan and Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines in the evaluation of all current and new development proposals within its boundaries. 7. City Council receive the Infrastructure Identification Assessment in Attachment No. 7 of this report, and direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate agencies, boards, and divisions, to develop a Financial Strategy and Impact Analysis to support a coordinated approach to managing and promoting growth in the Secondary Plan that is integrated with long term infrastructure and financial planning and that considers the matters identified in the Infrastructure Identification Assessment for the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including the costs, potential funding and financing options and the financial impacts. 8. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to Official Plan Amendment No. 499 as may be required. 9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council adopt Official Plan Amendment No. 499 substantially in accordance with Attachment No. 5 to the report dated June 25, 2020, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District. 2. City Council authorize that development may proceed by site-specific zoning by-law amendments that conform to the Golden Mile Secondary Plan, and request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward a Zoning By-law Amendment, as may be necessary, for the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area to comply with Official Plan Amendment No. 499 when the Amendment is in full force and effect. 3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study for the Golden Mile area, which will include options for potential modifications to Bartley Avenue/O'Connor Drive. 4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to study transit priority transit measures or higher order transit measures on Victoria Park Avenue and Warden Avenue. 5. City Council adopt the Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines substantially in accordance with Attachment No. 6 to the report dated June 25, 2020, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and authorize the Director, Urban Design, make any minor, technical or stylistic amendments/modifications as required to align with the Golden Mile Secondary Plan. 6. City Council direct staff to use the Golden Mile Secondary Plan and Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines in the evaluation of all current and new development proposals within its boundaries. 7. City Council receive the Infrastructure Identification Assessment in Attachment No. 7 of this report, and direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate agencies, boards, and divisions, to develop a Financial Strategy and Impact Analysis to support a coordinated approach to managing and promoting growth in the Secondary Plan that is integrated with long term infrastructure and financial planning and that considers the matters identified in the Infrastructure Identification Assessment for the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including the costs, potential funding and financing options and the financial impacts. 8. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to Official Plan Amendment No. 499 as may be required. 9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.
SC18.2amended
1910 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the zoning by-law amendment application located at 1910 Eglinton Avenue East. The application proposes mixed use redevelopment of the approximately 0.35 hectare site to accommodate a 35-storey residential tower and associated 6-storey podium, comprising of 371 rental apartment dwelling units (62%: 1-bedroom; 32.6%: 2-bedrooms; 5.4%: 3-bedrooms). The total gross floor area proposed is 28,833 square metres, including 27,912 square metres of residential uses and 921 square metres of ground floor retail space. The resulting combined density of the proposed development on a gross basis is an FSI of 8.14 times the lot area, with a proposed building coverage of 0.53 times the lot area. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Directed staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands subject to the rezoning application at 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Directed staff to provide notice for a community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 300 metres of the site and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Directed that staff process these applications concurrently with, and within the context of, Official Plan Amendment 499 as may be further revised prior to final approval.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands subject to the rezoning application at 1910 Eglinton Avenue East, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Staff will provide notice for a community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Staff process these applications concurrently with, and within the context of, Official Plan Amendment 499 as may be further revised prior to final approval.
SC18.3amended
The site is subject to an Official Plan Amendment Application for the entire site. The applicant has filed a zoning by-law amendment application for the lands municipally known as 2206 Eglinton Avenue East. The applicant has also submitted a draft Plan of Subdivision Application on the entire site, for the lands municipally known as 2200-2206 Eglinton Avenue East, 1020-1030 Birchmount Road and 75 Thermos Road. The zoning by-law application (Block 2) proposes development of the 0.75 hectare Block 2 corner portion of the larger approximately 6.4 hectare site with two residential towers of 39- and 46-storeys, connected by a consolidated podium element of 3- to 4-storeys. The total gross floor area proposed is 65,699 square metres, including 64,861 square metres of residential uses, 612 square metres of ground floor retail space, and 226 square metres of childcare space. The resulting combined density of the proposed development represents an FSI of approximately 1 times the overall site area and 8.7 times the area of proposed Block 2 specifically. Together, the proposed development includes 976 residential units (60%: 1-bedroom; 30%: 2-bedrooms; 10%: 3-bedrooms). Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor. The draft plan of subdivision (see Attachment 7: Simplified Draft Plan of Subdivision) proposes: Block 1 containing the existing 7-storey office building and 4-storey above-ground parking structure to be retained; Block 2 subject to the current rezoning application discussed in this report as the first phase of site redevelopment; Blocks 3 and 9 proposed as public parks/open spaces; Blocks 4 and 8 proposed as private north-south streets (segments A and B); Block 6 proposed as an east-west public street indicated as 'Golden Mile Boulevard' (as per the recent Golden Mile Transportation Master Plan but otherwise referred to as 'New East-West Link 2' in draft Official Plan Amendment 499 - Golden Mile Secondary Plan); Blocks 5, 7 and 10 for future development; and Block 11, being a 1.89 metre-wide road widening conveyance along Birchmount Road.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Directed staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands subject to the rezoning application at 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Directed that notice for a community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 300 metres of the site and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Directed staff to process these applications concurrently with, and within the context of, Official Plan Amendment 499 as may be further revised prior to final approval.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands subject to the rezoning application at 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Staff will provide notice for a community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Staff process these applications concurrently with, and within the context of, Official Plan Amendment 499 as may be further revised prior to final approval.
SC18.4adopted
3051-3079 Pharmacy Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the application located at 3051-3079 Pharmacy Avenue. The proposal seeks to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the development of the subject lands with 85 residential units, comprising of back-to-back and standard townhouse units. The proposed residential units will range in configuration and size from approximately 100 to 152 square metres and are deployed in 5 blocks of three to four storeys in height. The site will be accessed from a single vehicular access point taken from Huntingdale Boulevard. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Directed staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 3051 to 3079 Pharmacy Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Directed staff to provide notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 3051 to 3079 Pharmacy Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Staff will provide notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
SC18.5adopted
Refusal of a Clothing Drop Box Location Permit Application Located at 1967 Lawrence Avenue East
The purpose of this report is to report on the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards in the matter of an application for a Clothing Drop Box Location Permit at 1967 Lawrence Avenue East.
Scarborough Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council deny the application for the proposed Clothing Drop Box Location Permit at 1967 Lawrence Avenue East.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director of Business Licensing and Regulatory Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that: 1. City Council deny the application for the proposed Clothing Drop Box Location Permit at 1967 Lawrence Avenue East.
SC18.6adopted
Parking Amendments - Kingston Road, between Wood Glen Road and Midland Avenue
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Kingston Road, City Council approval of this report is required. The purpose of this report is to rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the east side of Kingston Road, between Cliffside Drive and Midland Avenue. Removing the maximum one-hour parking regulation will address the business owners' concerns and allow for statutory maximum three-hour on-street parking for their customers. During this investigation staff also noted several discrepancies in the existing parking regulations for Kingston Road, between Wood Glen Road and Birchmount Road. The proposed amendments in Recommendations 2 through 4 will correct these discrepancies.
Scarborough Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the east side of Kingston Road, between Cliffside Drive and Midland Avenue. 2. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 39.5 metres east of Eastwood Avenue and Birchcliff Avenue. 3. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the south side of Kingston Road, between Birchcliff Avenue and a point 70 metres east. 4. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the south side of Kingston Road, between a point 61 metres east of Wood Glen Road and Haig Avenue.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services recommends that: 1. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the east side of Kingston Road, between Cliffside Drive and Midland Avenue. 2. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 39.5 metres east of Eastwood Avenue and Birchcliff Avenue. 3. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the south side of Kingston Road, between Birchcliff Avenue and a point 70 metres east. 4. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times on the south side of Kingston Road, between a point 61 metres east of Wood Glen Road and Haig Avenue.
SC18.7amended
Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) Review - Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. In response to a request from Councillor Paul Ainslie and a neighbourhood petition, Transportation Services staff reviewed the need for traffic calming, specifically the installation of speed humps on Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive. Our assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been satisfied. Therefore, traffic calming should not be installed on the subject section of Keeler Boulevard.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Waived the petition and polling requirements under the City's Traffic Calming Policy and authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) on Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive. 2. Directed the City Solicitor to prepare a by-law to alter the roadway for the installation of speed humps on Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive, generally as shown on the Location Map attached as Attachment 1 to this report entitled "Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) Review - Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive". 3. Reduced the speed limit from 40 km/h to 30 km/h on Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive, in conjunction with the installation of speed humps.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services recommends that: 1. Scarborough Community Council not authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) on Keeler Boulevard, between Neilson Road and David Drive.
SC18.8amended
All-Way Stop Control Review - Deep Dene Drive and Camor Court
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report recommends that Scarborough Community Council not authorize the installation of all-way stop control at the intersection of Deep Dene Drive and Camor Court as the existing conditions do not meet the warrant for the installation of such a traffic control device. Currently, this intersection has a stop control facing the eastbound approach on Camor Court at Deep Dene Drive.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Authorized all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Deep Dene Drive and Camor Court.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services recommends that: 1. Scarborough Community Council not authorize all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Deep Dene Drive and Camor Court.
SC18.9adopted
Speed Limit Regulation Housekeeping on Durnford Road
Durnford Road, between Rylander Boulevard and Sheppard Avenue East, is classified as a collector road. This highway is on the frontage of residential properties and Rouge Valley Public School. There is no TTC service on this route. Although the regulatory speed limit on Durnford Road is 50 km/h, the posted speed limit is 40 km/h. It appears the signs have been in place for some time without a by-law in place to support the posted 40 km/h speed limit. In order for the 40 km/h speed limit to be enforceable, an amendment to the by-law is required. My office has consulted with staff from Transportation Services regarding the recommended speed limit regulation change and staff do not hold objection to the recommendation.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Reduced the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Durnford Road, between Rylander Boulevard and Sheppard Avenue East.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor McKelvie recommends that: 1. Scarborough Community Council reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Durnford Road, between Rylander Boulevard and Sheppard Avenue East.
SC18.10adopted
All-Way Stop Control on Beechgrove Drive and Fergalea Avenue
In response to concerns brought forward by members of the community, I am bringing forward a motion to Scarborough Community Council to authorize the installation of an all-way stop control at Beechgrove Drive and Fergalea Avenue. Multiple families residing on Beechgrove Drive between Lawrence Avenue East and Kingston Road are vocal that we need immediate attention towards traffic calming measures along this 900 meters of roadway. As an interim response, my office has worked with residents to request multiple watch-your-speed signs and vision zero slow-down signs this season. While providing temporary traffic calming, this has not adequately addressed traffic concerns in this area. The installation of an all-way stop control aligns with the fundamental message of the Vision Zero Road Safety plan. Fatalities and serious injuries on our roads are preventable, and we must strive to reduce traffic-related deaths and injuries to zero. My office has consulted with staff from Transportation Services regarding the selection of the recommended location and staff do not hold objection to the recommendation.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Authorized all-way stop control at the intersection of Beechgrove Drive and Fergalea Avenue.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor McKelvie recommends that: 1. Scarborough Community Council authorize all-way stop control at the intersection of Beechgrove Drive and Fergalea Avenue.
SC18.11adopted
All-Way Stop Control on East Avenue
In response to concerns brought forward by members of the community, I am bringing forward a motion to Scarborough Community Council to authorize the installation of two all-way stop controls, on East Avenue at Golders Green Avenue and East Avenue at Broadbridge Drive, respectively. East Avenue is a collector road with sidewalk on the west side and partial sidewalk on the east side. The speed limit is 50 km/hr with a reduction to 40 km/hr in a school zone. The road connects two collector roads: Island Road and Lawrence Ave East. Currently, there are no-all-way-stop controls on East Avenue between Lawrence Ave East and Kirkdene Drive. These intersections are located 1.7 kilometers apart. The West Rouge Community Association, which represents approximately 3,400 households, is concerned about excessive speed on East Avenue. Speed and traffic volumes are especially a concern during peak travel times at Rouge Hill GO Station. Commuters traveling to the higher order transit station often use East Avenue as an alternative route to Port Union Road, a minor arterial road that is scheduled for widening in 2021/22. These traffic conditions have made turns between East Avenue and local roads increasingly difficult. In September 2019, my office requested a transportation Study from Transportation Services on East Avenue via SC8.18, Request for Transportation Study for Traffic Management on East Ave in Ward 25. My office has consulted with staff from Transportation Services regarding the selection of the recommended locations and staff do not hold objection to the recommendation.
Scarborough Community Council: 1. Authorized all-way stop control at the intersection of East Avenue and Golders Green Avenue. 2. Authorized all-way stop control at the intersection of East Avenue and Broadbridge Drive.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor McKelvie recommends that: 1. Scarborough Community Council authorize all-way stop control at the intersection of East Avenue and Golders Green Avenue. 2. Scarborough Community Council Authorize all-way stop control at the intersection of East Avenue and Broadbridge Drive.
SC18.12adopted
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 57 Pegasus Trail
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Pegasus Trail. The application indicates the reason for removal is to address concerns over the declining health of the tree, damage to cars caused by falling debris, and damage to the driveway. The subject tree is a white pine (Pinus strobus), measuring 46 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
Scarborough Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Pegasus Trail.
Staff recommendation as filed
The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Pegasus Trail.
SC18.13adopted
Introduction and consideration of Bills for enactment of By-laws.
General Bills Scarborough Community Council enacted By-laws 890-2020 to 894-2020. Confirmatory Bill Scarborough Community Council passed a Confirmatory Bill as By-law 895-2020.